NASA failed to mention the surprising activity that seems to show up in this
Russian video, in slo-mo.
The video could have been altered - with the addition of a fast moving
object that seems to impact with the object to make it explode.
Since the original story of a missile shoot-down
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-octPHs9gcs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-octPHs9gcsfeature=player_embedded#t=0s
feature=player_embedded#t=0s
NASA failed to mention the surprising activity that seems to show up in this
Russian video, in slo-mo.
The video could have been altered - with
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 1:19 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
What is your cite, Terry?
It could have been the same.
What is so unusual about this video? The meteor exploded, which sent
fragments in all directions, including straight ahead as the video
shows. As for shooting down an object slowing from 17000 mph in the
atmosphere, where is the common sense?
Ed
On Feb 17, 2013, at 7:17 AM, Jones Beene
I believe he's referring to the appearance of a glowing object approaching
from _behind_ the main mass that correlates in time and direction to the
ejection of fragments with its disappearance into the main mass. Yes,
we're talking delta-velocities that are outside of plausible explanation by
Commenting on the content of the Nasa patent as follows:
‘The material system may comprise a metal hydride.
The electrically-conductive material may be in a form selected from the
group consisting of particles and whiskers.’
Clearly the theory that this revelation implies is apparent. Nasa even
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Commenting on the content of the Nasa patent as follows:
‘The material system may comprise a metal hydride.
The electrically-conductive material may be in a form selected from the
group consisting of particles and
Resend with this addition: NASA says meteor was nuclear-like in its
intensity. Maybe they know something.
http://cosmiclog.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/02/15/16969092-nuclear-like-in-its-i
ntensity-russian-meteor-blast-is-the-largest-since-1908?lite
Ed,
Near the end of the video at 26-27 seconds -
Note the blury object on the left just below the meteor's tail, which
appears to catch up to the meteor.
Harry
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
What is so unusual about this video? The meteor exploded, which sent
fragments in all directions,
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 3:16 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe he's referring to the appearance of a glowing object approaching
from _behind_ the main mass that correlates in time and direction to the
ejection of fragments with its disappearance into the main mass. Yes,
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Resend with this addition: NASA says meteor was nuclear-like in its
intensity. Maybe they know something.
http://cosmiclog.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/02/15/16969092-nuclear-like-in-its-i
Notice that several independent contrails formed before the explosion
as separate pieces moved through the atmosphere at slightly different
speeds and locations in space. The object appearing to come from
behind could be a piece of the meteor that had come off earlier and
appeared to
Please apply some common sense. The object was too small to detect
and was totally unexpected. Even if it was detected with enough time
to launch a missile, why do this?
Ed
On Feb 17, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 3:16 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com
Erratum: Ignoring the out-gong fragments should be Taking into account
the out-going fragments
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:16 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe he's referring to the appearance of a glowing object approaching
from _behind_ the main mass that correlates in time
Hello group,
Defkalion GT chief technical officer John Hadjichristos occasionally
writes comments and answers questions on Peter Gluck's blog EGO OUT [1].
I think this one posted today might be worth of some attention:
A comparable nuclear blast
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=paCUhiUxxIw
Seems the spectators found it thrilling.
harry
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Resend with this addition: NASA says meteor was nuclear-like in its
intensity. Maybe they know
I don't think it was intercepted, but I am not convinced by the
argument that it was technically impossible.
Harry
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Please apply some common sense. The object was too small to detect and was
totally unexpected. Even if
I agree, no theory will cause a Western government to provide funds
for LENR research for the reasons John states in the article. However,
a useful theory would allow the active conditions to be described and
created. This ability would allow the effect to be replicated at will.
This
Like Tunguska, it was an alien sacrifice:
http://macedoniaonline.eu/content/view/6868/56
This speculation would be fun if some people were not serious.
On Feb 17, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
Like Tunguska, it was an alien sacrifice:
http://macedoniaonline.eu/content/view/6868/56
This is a currently operational ground-based Russian
ABMhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vBto1aVOQwE
.
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 4:02 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think it was intercepted, but I am not convinced by the
argument that it was technically impossible.
Harry
Would an electromagnetic pulse from any nuclear explosion at this altitude
cause widespread damage to electronic equipment? I have not seen any reports
of this problem.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Feb 17,
A theory credits lead poisoning as one of the causes of Roman Empire
decline. Romans knew about lead dangers, but that theory is still
fascinating.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decline_of_the_Roman_Empire#Lead_poisoning
mic
2013/2/17 Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com:
I posted this after
*The problem is that we can not agree on what is important or how to solve
the basic problem. The basic problem is the impossibility to cause the
effect at will by anyone who tries. Yes, individuals have had success,
including myself. This success is short lived and rarely replicated by
another
That explosion is way, way too small. It look like to have at most 1kt-2kt.
That meteor exploded with 500x that energy.
It should be something like this:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kvW0N-cFexM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K2fSMJkMK5M
2013/2/17 Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
A
A remastered version:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNx67QjUHxU
2013/2/17 Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
That explosion is way, way too small. It look like to have at most
1kt-2kt. That meteor exploded with 500x that energy.
It should be something like this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZzG881Vii8
I don't think this could be photoshopped frame by frame so well, and so
quickly, but who knows... given the economic realities in Russia, a bunch of
twenty something geeks with nothing better to do, and the promise of YT
monetization ... yeah they could
At least two problems with this speculation:
1) The meteor wasn't brought down -- it was already on its way to collision
with earth.
2) It is highly unlikely that a missile would survive smashing through a meteor
and be able to continue on its course apparently intact.
Cheers,
Lawry
On Feb
Although most of what you say is defensible ... which of these scenarios
makes the most sense:
1) a meteor explodes naturally on contact with the atmosphere, and yet sends
out a highly elongated missile-like projectile with a pointed end, instead
of the expect 'blob' - and which projectile
check the comments below the video...
clearly the fragments are UFO ejection pods. ;-)
Harry
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ZzG881Vii8
I don't think this could be photoshopped frame by frame so well, and so
quickly,
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 6:36 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Would an electromagnetic pulse from any nuclear explosion at this altitude
cause widespread damage to electronic equipment? I have not seen any
reports of this problem.
The nature of the explosion of a meteoroid is
http://www.amusingplanet.com/2008/07/how-to-watch-nuclear-explosion.html
Harry
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 7:08 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
A remastered version:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNx67QjUHxU
2013/2/17 Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
That explosion is way,
On July 19, 1957, five men stood at Ground Zero of an atomic test
that was being conducted at the Nevada Test Site. This was the test of
a 2KT (kiloton) MB-1 nuclear air-to-air rocket launched from an F-89
Scorpion interceptor. The nuclear missile detonated 10,000 ft above
their heads.
A
Yeah, that is what I was trying to say Terry. I pointed out that there was no
electromagnetic pulse damage, so likely no nuclear explosion. :-)
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Feb 17, 2013 8:57 pm
Subject:
Here is an explanation for the amazing projectile form which is seen in
the video exiting the meteor at high speed in the forward vector - at least
this is the best explanation that I can come up with (besides a faked
video).
The initial meteor consists of an agglomeration of two of the better
Here's an interesting article along these lines of discussion.
Trolls win: Rude blog comments dim the allure of science online February
14, 2013
http://phys.org/news/2013-02-trolls-rude-blog-comments-dim.html
The trolls are winning. Pick a story about some aspect of science, any
story, scroll
In addition, you can see the vapor trails and it's clear that at some point
there was two objects. It looks to me more like a piece of the meteor fell
behind after breaking up, but caught up because the main mass slowed
significantly rigght before exploding, which matches standard behavior, it
hit
So ... we all look forward to when your theory allows the effect to be
replicated at will. When will that be? It seems that the closest person
to reach this goal is Hagelstein who says he will send out NANOR samples to
be replicated, or maybe Celani.
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Edmund
38 matches
Mail list logo
