On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Rob Dingemans manonbrid...@aim.com wrote:
Hi,
An appropriate anagram of cold fusion would be ;-) :
Coils Found
There's also:
Foci Old Sun
Cloud Of Sin
Cud Of Lions
Flu Is On Doc
And a few hundred more in english.
Dave:
Your interaction with Cude on the DC power issue has been most illuminating in
two ways:
1- since Cude has admitted that the estimate of output power was probably
reasonable, that only leaves in question the input power. If this forum can
help to eliminate possible, and
For those who don't get it, see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:The_Nightwatch_by_Rembrandt.jpg
OK, I guess it was not clear to me what you were pointing out. It had the
sound of sarcasm...my bad.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: DJ Cravens djcrav...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Jun 4, 2013 12:33 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:A Couple Hundred Bucks Maybe...
Hello folks,
I'm scanning just a little of the cold fusion discussion the last two weeks
-- I'm glad Joshua Cude is married and has to balance a life against his
brisk practice to pinpointing and summarizing evidence that cold fusion
claims are erroneous -- I believe him when he says, like me, he
One of the 10 most famous paintings in the world. Peter Greenaway
actually made two versions of the movie about this painting
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0446750/
and
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1303889
and the life of Rembrandt. The latter explaining in detail how full
of meaning the
DJ Cravens djcrav...@hotmail.com wrote:
Peltiers give you direct heat electrical but you are lucky to get 5% in
the real world on those and that would mean a COP of 20 for a self
sustaining thing.
I believe that is 5% with high heat, such as the exhaust pipe of a truck.
Jed- do you
MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
you admit that you haven’t read most of his postings so you haven’t a
clue. He is a liar. His goal is to debunk. That should be obvious.
On 5/31:
“Man, this place is crawling with ignoramuses.”
** **
on 6/1:
“It's funny
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013 09:28:12 -0700
MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
Vorl:
You haven't a clue either...
When it comes to LENR, there is overwhelming evidence
Then why haven't MIT and GE noticed the overwhelming evidence and
taken out patents so they can add a trillion or so
I agree, the contribution by Cude has long since lost its value. His
issues have been discussed and answered several times. He is never
going to accept the basic claims, so why bother. Nevertheless, his
response is answered and the the answer creates a response, with no
end in sight.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
If you do not like to read this sort of thing just block his messages.
What is the big deal?
***When lurkers come on over to Vortex, they might read one thread but the
vast majority don't read all the threads. On one
Vorl Bek vorl@antichef.com wrote:
When it comes to LENR, there is overwhelming evidence
Then why haven't MIT and GE noticed the overwhelming evidence and
taken out patents so they can add a trillion or so to their bottom
lines?
Because they are unaware of the results. They have
Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
***When lurkers come on over to Vortex, they might read one thread but the
vast majority don't read all the threads. On one thread I proved that
Joshua Cude was off by more than 4500 orders of magnitude. He goes
silent. Then on another thread he
What he said. I whacked, unread, those forty odd, and here I am reading
and deleting, one-by-one, forty or so responses. Enough of this.
Ol' Bab
On 6/4/2013 12:15 PM, Robert Ellefson wrote:
... at what point does this incessant (IMO) kind posting behavior considered
a nuisance and
Vorl Bek vorl@antichef.com wrote:
As I said the other day, if this test was of competing coffee
makers, and they chose brand A as the best one, I would probably
accept their recommendation rather than demanding more tests . . .
Measuring the difference between 300 Watts and 900 Watts is
Sarcasm has no place in science. To me it is just telling a lie and laughing
about it.
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:A Couple Hundred Bucks Maybe...
From: dlrober...@aol.com
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 13:02:11 -0400
OK, I guess it was not clear to me what you were pointing out. It
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013 14:29:27 -0400
Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
The fact that these measurements have enormous
implications has no bearing on...how believable they are.
Of course it does. Do you think GE will be beating down Rossi's
doors because of this one test?
; but
Hello group,
Daniele Passerini of 22passi blog is posting photos and slides from
yesterday's meeting at the EU parliament on LENR, from an anonymous
source, along with other misc. information. As of writing only photos
from McKubre's and Violante's presentation are available, but apparently
Vorl Bek vorl@antichef.com wrote:
Of course it does. Do you think GE will be beating down Rossi's
doors because of this one test?
No, as I said, they know nothing about this.
Again let me urge you to look at history. Look after Marshall proved that
Helicobacter pylor people ignored him,
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013 15:46:16 -0400
Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Vorl Bek vorl@antichef.com wrote:
Of course it does. Do you think GE will be beating down Rossi's
doors because of this one test?
No, as I said, they know nothing about this.
I doubt GE got to where it
I stopped reading his 40 posts at about the #10 mark, and skipped responses to
them too.
I don't think I missed anything significant.
I DID think that his poolboy/taxi-driver comment was very funny. There MAY be a
human being under all the robo posts after all.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
The Wikipedia article was nonsense from start to finish, when I last
checked it a few years ago.
***And by doing nothing about dishonest debunkers, Vortex will become the
same.
So... some Vorts want to see him
Vorl Bek vorl@antichef.com wrote:
No, as I said, they know nothing about this.
I doubt GE got to where it is without an efficient intelligence
service that keeps them up-to-date on anything that could
increase, or threaten, their bottom line.
I have been in contact with people at GE.
From: Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2013 12:12:14 PM
Daniele Passerini of 22passi blog is posting photos and slides from
yesterday's meeting at the EU parliament on LENR, from an anonymous
source, along with other misc. information. As of writing only
I meant to say: EPRI is the only major organization that knows anything
about McKubre's work and they also said it is real.
They do not fund the research because of academic and corporate politics.
- Jed
Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
I would have expected a summary of Rossi's CLAIMED results, pointing out
that they have not been fully verified.
That would only happen if one of Levi's group showed up. Researchers never
talk about results from other groups. It would be irresponsible for
I wrote:
Researchers never talk about results from other groups. It would be
irresponsible for them to do so.
I mean at a formal, official presentation of this nature. It would fine for
McKubre to talk about Rossi at an ICCF conference or some other less formal
venue.
At the 2004 DOE
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013 16:15:23 -0400
Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Please stop the nonsense. You said that right here:
That is true. The risk for Levi is negligible and he can always claim
ignorance. Levi has very steady job at university and his pay roll is
determined solely by
Materials in which heat flows perpendicular to an electric current could
lead to better devices for cooling electronics.
http://physics.aps.org/articles/v6/63
Harry
Vorl Bek vorl@antichef.com wrote:
So If Levi is making few dozens of kiloeuros extra money with Rossi with
very little efforts, his involvement is more than justified. . . .
Did you mean that, or not? Do you think Levi is conspiring to defraud
people, or not?
Again, I did not say
Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
The Wikipedia article was nonsense from start to finish, when I last
checked it a few years ago.
***And by doing nothing about dishonest debunkers, Vortex will become the
same.
I do not see the similarity. At Wikipedia, when they disagree with
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013 16:48:10 -0400
Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
You are right! You did not say that. Jouni Valkonen did. I somehow got the
messages mixed up. My apologies.
No problem.
Josh,
I promised not to keep responding to you in an effort to keep your posts from
flooding the bandwidth with non sense. You just need to make one consideration
about input power. If you are sharp enough and can follow what I have written
then you will put 2 and 2 together to understand
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:52 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:58 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.comwrote:
But I think you misunderstood. I was not referring to new science
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:12 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The tactic of the obstructionist is to avoid dealing with the case
The avoidance here is from the true believers who insist that any
alternative
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 2:24 PM, David L Babcock ol...@rochester.rr.com wrote:
What he said. I whacked, unread, those forty odd, and here I am reading and
deleting, one-by-one, forty or so responses. Enough of this.
JC is considerate to post all his responses at one time making them
easier to
LinkedIn
Daniel Rocha requested to add you as a connection on LinkedIn:
--
michael,
I'd like to include you in my network to share updates and stay in touch.
- Daniel
Accept invitation from Daniel Rocha
*…whereas they refuse to explain the thermodynamics of a power density 100
times that of uranium in a fission reactor without melting,…*
The fission reactor is extremely inefficient in its use of nuclear fuel.
The limiting factor in the nuclear fuel utilization is the zirconium
cladding that
Take a look at the posting times of JC's latest posts in the Ethics
string and compare with the length of the posts:
7:44
7:45
7:46
7:48
7:50
7:52
7:54
7:55
7:57
7:58
7:59
8:08
Hmmm. Interesting, eh? Now, I'm not saying he is a bot; but, can even
Jed do this in real time with his Dragon?
How
I have been a lurker for a short while, but I figured if skeptopaths are
allowed here, I should also be accepted.
I think a simple way to deal with skeptopaths is to make a rule that no one may
be here who does not accept the reality of LENR. There are plenty of forums
where disbelievers in
It takes time to formulate a well-structured and informative post. However,
If a mindless randomize word generator technique is used to produce a
series of post , a high rate of verbiage can be spewed out in a relatively
short timeframe.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Terry Blanton
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 6:40 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
It takes time to formulate a well-structured and informative post. However,
If a mindless randomize word generator technique is used to produce a series
of post , a high rate of verbiage can be spewed out in a relatively short
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Roger B rogerbi...@hotmail.com wrote:
I have been a lurker for a short while, but I figured if skeptopaths are
allowed here, I should also be accepted.
I think a simple way to deal with skeptopaths is to make a rule that no one
may be here who does not accept
That is a description, not a rule. If it were a rule, we could enforce it. I
know all about freedom of speech and openness and all that. But I really don't
think that it applies here in a world were everyone can say anything anywhere.
LENR is a FACT. We should be trying to deal with LENR+,
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
It is not clear to me that CF works best in a completely solid
environment. Melting may accelerate the effect, but if the melting
occurs just beneath the surface like magma, pressure will build and
volcanic like
Agreed, Mr. cude doesn't seem to be able to control himself.
Yes, every once in a while we pick up a staunch Skeptic who can't seem
to read Rule 2.
I have no rule against trolls here. And I have little problem with
small-s skepticism. But in part, rule 2 is there to stop the irrational
From one ignoramus to another, that's a very interesting observation!
;-)
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton [mailto:hohlr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 3:27 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:Cude and the Ethics String
Take a look at the posting times of JC's
I'm not arguing for banning Joshua Cude. I'm saying he should be given a
timeout, to return in one day (if he wishes) but then he has an assigned
thread that he will be expected to babysit. The thread would be something
like Joshua Cude Returns. Anyone can log onto that thread and point out
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013, Roger B wrote:
I have been a lurker for a short while, but I figured if skeptopaths are
allowed here, I should also be accepted.
Hm, better read MODERATOR message.Deal harshwy with those that
transgwess the unwritten lawr. But it's not unwritten:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:58 PM, William Beaty bi...@eskimo.com wrote:
The
x-ray laser backscatter CIA satellites are imaging your brain right now, you
know? Their beams are pulsed to cleverly mimic cosmic ray background on a
gm counter, but I know better, I KNOW!
I told you to keep your tin
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
It is like explaining how a rocket works to a muleskinner.
Note, however that the astronomer Milton Humason began his career as a
muleskinner during the construction of the Mt. Wilson observatory. Then he
became the janitor in 1917. Then in 1919 he was
I confess to being an ignoramus. I confess to having only a B.A. in
psychology, a B.A. in philosophy, and an A.S. in electronics technology. I am,
however, a philosophical savant.
I have a question that I have asked several times but have never gotten an
answer. By what means do
MIT? Is that a guess.
I thought he had already been identified as a grad student named Josh
Schroeder, pictured here with fellow students (and fellow posters?) at
Columbia
http://outreach.astro.columbia.edu/aboutus/index.html
-Original Message-
From: MarkI-ZeroPoint
From one
If you are, as you say, a philosophical savant interested in the speed of
light, then I suggest you read ON THE OCCURRENCE OF SOME FAMILIAR PROCESSES
REVERSED IN
TIMEhttp://www.boundaryinstitute.org/bi/articles/ProcRevTime_1960.pdf
.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Roger B
I didn't say that I was a speed reader.
Roger
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 19:41:21 -0500
Subject: Re: [Vo]:I confess
From: jabow...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
If you are, as you say, a philosophical savant interested in the speed of
light, then I suggest you read ON THE OCCURRENCE OF SOME
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:39 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
MIT? Is that a guess.
Columbia will suffice. I dunno; but, I don't think he was doin' this alone.
I do know that beta particles, used in the famous gold foil experiments,
are .75 c in vacuum, but often faster than c in other materials.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Roger B rogerbi...@hotmail.com wrote:
I confess to being an ignoramus. I confess to having only a B.A. in
psychology, a
Vorl sez:
...
Others on this list post far more often than Cude,
but you have nothing to say about them; it seems to
me you just want to shut Cude up because you do not
like what he says.
You're absolutely correct that I don't like what Mr. Cude, or whomever
he/she really is,
Jed sez:
But at what point does this incessant (IMO) kind posting
behavior considered a nuisance and hindrance to on-going
Vortex discussions?
It is not a problem. Just filter the messages out.
Frankly, I do not see why you raise the issue.
As previously stated I already started filtering
From Mr. Murray:
...
I'm glad Joshua Cude is married and has to balance a life against
his brisk practice to pinpointing and summarizing evidence that
cold fusion claims are erroneous
Whoa! You state Joshua is married? Have you been carrying on a private
conversation with him? Did
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013, Roger B wrote:
That is a description, not a rule.
Debunking and pathological skepticism is banned. Perhaps I should add
if you don't identify as True Believer, the owner might remove you at any
time.
But vortex is not a CF list. If someone is a electric-water-vortex
Honestly, a guitar?
http://outreach.astro.columbia.edu/aboutus/photos/joshs.jpg
James,
Somehow the article doesn't grab me. How's that for philosophy. (:-)
Roger
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 19:41:21 -0500
Subject: Re: [Vo]:I confess
From: jabow...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
If you are, as you say, a philosophical savant interested in the speed of
light, then I
A link that hopefully will the Patent Trolls:
http://phys.org/news/2013-06-white-house-high-tech-patents.html
Respectfully,
Ron Kita, Chiralex
A question that hasn't been asked is WHY many pseudoskeptics seem to pursue
rabid vendettas against issues like UFOs, or CF LENR, relentlessly so. I
suspect they do so because they have ironically misplaced the specific
audience they are actually trying to convince. Pseudoskeptics think they are
Actually, Rutherford's gold foil experiment used alpha particles,
generated by Radon radioactive decay.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geiger%E2%80%93Marsden_experiment
According to http://www.epa.gov/radiation/understand/alpha.html and
http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Alpha_decay
I coulda sworn thoron was a beta emitter. my bad.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Joseph S. Barrera III
jbarr...@slac.stanford.edu wrote:
Actually, Rutherford's gold foil experiment used alpha particles,
generated by Radon radioactive decay.
Disappointing, Joe. 5% is just a little on the slow side, relativity speaking.
(:-) I would not call 5% a data point.
Roger
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 19:24:42 -0700
From: jbarr...@slac.stanford.edu
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:I confess
Actually, Rutherford's gold foil
Did you just say this: skeptopaths need to tear everyone else down so that
they can feel superior. Or: skeptopaths are afraid of anything outside of the
box, so they try to get you to come back in. Or: skeptopaths hate anything
that might offer hope. Or: one skeptopath I know has severe
YEAHHH! Finally!
From: Ron Kita [mailto:chiralex.k...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 04, 2013 10:16 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Ending Patent Trolls
A link that hopefully will the Patent Trolls:
http://phys.org/news/2013-06-white-house-high-tech-patents.html
Respectfully,
Ron Kita,
It is interesting that it is seldom the other way round.
Someone who believes in something might want to share with others who are
open minded, but they have little interest in converting so-called
skeptics, they don't seek them out.
Pseudo-skeptics are not just content in stopping people from
Often pseudosceptics have a high opinion of themselves, see themselves as elite. It is interesting that a disproportionately high number of pseudosceptics have an interest in magic.Most however, appear to suffer from Imagination Deficiency Personality IDPFictional miss-identification: Often an IDP
That description gave me quite a start there for a second. I was afraid that
you were talking about me. (:-)
Roger
From: cr...@overunity.co
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Why are pseudoskeptics so relentless in their mission to
debunk?
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 19:59:40 -0700
Often
But, seriously, that was an excellent description. Can you supply a link to it?
Roger
From: cr...@overunity.co
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Why are pseudoskeptics so relentless in their mission to
debunk?
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 19:59:40 -0700
Often pseudosceptics have a high
Are UFO and LENR in the same category?
Giovanni
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 9:24 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
A question that hasn't been asked is WHY many pseudoskeptics seem to
pursue rabid vendettas against issues like UFOs, or CF LENR, relentlessly
A new arxiv paper, perhaps of interest -
Laser-induced synthesis and decay of Tritium under exposure of solid
targets in heavy water
http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.0830
ABSTRACT: The processes of laser-assisted synthesis of Tritium nuclei and
their laser-induced decay in cold plasma in the vicinity
No, LENR and UFOs are not in the same category. LENR has lots of physical
evidence. The so-called physical evidence for UFOs is very weak if not
non-existent.
[LENRs will help people. UFOs are just a distraction from worry about paying
one's bills.]
The so-called physical evidence for
This link below is to my own site where I have assembled some of the major character traits of pseudos. I had plenty of real life experience of these clowns owing to the fact that they were at infestation levels on the Steorn forum before they all got banned for trolling. Mary Yugo,
Lou,
NICE CITATION! Funny how radioactive decay keeps coming up with respect to nano
particles and excited gas atoms. Yes I would posit decay acceleration in arcs
with tungsten electrodes used for atomic welding but granted the electrodes are
probably also acting as a catalyst and the decay may
Might I suggest using a smaller point size and any typeface other than
Comic Sans (it's a typeface that give us type nerds bad dreams).
[mg]
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Roger B rogerbi...@hotmail.com wrote:
But, seriously, that was an excellent description. Can you supply a link
to it?
Anyone sincerely think I'm a pseudoskeptic since December 1996 ?
I'm keenly alert to hear exactly what folks really think...
-- uh, I'm sure I'm not...
both terms are prejudiced: PseudoSkeptic, TrueBeliever... just justifies
closing down collaborative discussions by classifyinging the other
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
Might I suggest using a smaller point size and any typeface other than
Comic Sans (it's a typeface that give us type nerds bad dreams).
I think Comic Sans is a perfect typeface for this list, since it scares
away anyone who has
From: Roger B rogerbi...@hotmail.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2013 6:55:38 PM
James,
Somehow the article doesn't grab me. How's that for philosophy. (:-)
Roger
Is there any chance you could drop the 24-point Comic Sans ? It's like a
car-full of clowns screaming.
Fran,
I think it's hard to determine exactly where nuclear effects occur in arcs
- assuming the experiments are conducted and reported correctly.
As time permits, I am trying to calculate how much energy an electron in a
plasma can borrow from its surrounding current using some neglected
physics
Hi Roger B.,
Everything at the scale of atoms, fermions, bosons, quarks, and vibrating
strings (membranes) of energy are pure vacuums, 4-D space-time coordinate
systems that forever boil, as pairs of oppositely charged, otherwise
exactly equal events appear very briefly at all energies, and
Alan wrote...
Is there any chance you could drop the 24-point Comic Sans?
It's like a car-full of clowns screaming.
LoL... now that's funny!
Now that Bill has tossed the drunkard out the door, perhaps things might be
returning to 'normal' in the Dime Box Saloon???
-m
-Original
I guess I'm a little behind the curve. Joshua got banned anyways.
From the other thread...
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not arguing for banning Joshua Cude. I'm saying he should be given a
timeout, to return in one day (if he wishes) but
uh, what is Comic Sans ?
clueless in Imperial Beach, CA, Rich
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:53 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
Might I suggest using a smaller point size and any typeface other than
Comic Sans (it's
Ed,
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
On Jun 2, 2013, at 12:15 AM, Harry Veeder wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 9:11 AM, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
On May 30, 2013, at 11:39 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 11:00
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmmm. Interesting, eh? Now, I'm not saying he is a bot; but, can even
Jed do this in real time with his Dragon?
He was like a mighty paladin with a broadsword in the middle of the
battlefield, with the enemy soldiers
On Tue, 4 Jun 2013, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote:
A question that hasn't been asked is WHY many pseudoskeptics seem to pursue
rabid vendettas against issues like UFOs, or CF LENR, relentlessly so.
Another method is to query your own Skeptic side. What I find in there is
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:24 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
A question that hasn't been asked is WHY many pseudoskeptics seem to
pursue rabid vendettas against issues like UFOs, or CF LENR, relentlessly
so. .
***It's because they're genuinely
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 7:51 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I have never heard of mechanical work from temperatures below 100 deg C.
I recall reading on this list at one point that a Stirling engine could do
something along these lines. There is this post, which says something
Akira,
Thanks for the heads-up; at least someone is keeping an eye on goings-on in
the LENR world when we're busy chasing trolls out of the saloon...
Did anyone happen to look carefully at the slides from SKINR (U of
Missouri)???
Hubler/Rob Duncan
Look at the COPs and Duration of Excess
101 - 194 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
