From Jed:
Mizuno informed me that the Japanese government agency NEDO has issued a
Request
for Proposal (RFP) for projects in cold fusion. The date is 2015, title
Energy / Environment
New Technology Program
http://www.nedo.go.jp/content/100754489.pdf
Item D4 on p. 13 here
The mechanism for LENR or whatever is a reasonable description of energy
producing system at 1380 C may well be different than what happens at lower
temperatures. The main question IMHO is how mass is being converted to thermal
phonic energy—what are the conditions that allow this transition?
The Bertozzi’s experiment just shows that a 20 MeV electron is relativistic
no matter how that electron was produced.
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Was Bertozzi’s experiment in a plasma—2 particle interaction-- or within a
many bodied solid or liquid
What causes the warp?
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Roarty, Francis X
francis.x.roa...@lmco.com wrote:
Axil, the math is fine but IMHO we need to consider equivalent
acceleration where the region of space the hydrogen is passing thru is a
warp and the entire atom undergoes Lorentzian
Axil, the math is fine but IMHO we need to consider equivalent acceleration
where the region of space the hydrogen is passing thru is a warp and the entire
atom undergoes Lorentzian contraction becoming relativistic NOT JUST THE
ELECTRON. You and I are not expending energy to move at
I think Mizuno meant that is no one left in Japan who is capable of
applying for this grant, or interested in applying for it.
The document (http://www.nedo.go.jp/content/100754489.pdf) is entirely in
Japanese, but if you look at the pages below 15, you will see the
application form. You will
Was Bertozzi’s experiment in a plasma—2 particle interaction-- or within a many
bodied solid or liquid coherent system? The options for reactions may be
significantly different.
Bob Cook
From: Axil Axil
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 12:19 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: [Vo]:Piantelli theory of
Quantum mechanical entanglement can combine different types of atoms and
photons can entangle atoms and atoms can entangle photons. This is how
multiple atoms can become one atom and the energy released from that fusion
can be converted to heat.
See for example
Jed I like your reaction
The conclusion to me is that government is not good at entrepreneurship,
innovation or other things not fully understood as the result is part of
the task to be delegated.
Government by definition cannot delegate. I think Steven's example proves
it.
That is why risk taking
The warp is caused by suppression geometry of the cavity walls or defects in
the lattice, it is a quantum effect of the surrounding geometry that the atoms
happen to be randomly migrating through, they may react to the decrease in
vacuum density but they did nothing themselves to supply the
OK Jed it was not very well stated.
Yes, there are good people all over the place.
My point was that in new organizations it is easier to get the culture to
stay. If you have clear messages from the top and enthusiasm then it can
work.
I think - without having any connection worth mentioning -
Hi Steven,
I'm sympathetic to your feelings about new, inexperienced managers barging
in and arrogating to themselves important decisions without the benefit of
consulting the people who are in the best position to know what the
implications will be.
But going beyond that, let me propose that
Hi Steven,
Yes I agree with that NASA did something I would say in spite of being a
government organization. Driving forces JFK and W von Braun. Not the
organization .
I will not comment on the political stuff as I do not want to come across
as I like any politician (looking on them as a function
I wrote:
But going beyond that, let me propose that each government is dysfunctional
in its unique way, and the primary challenge faced by the US government
seems to be that it is overly bureaucratic.
I do not want to overstate this. I do not mean that other governments are
not also too
Hello again Lennart,
I wanted to comment on:
Example of good result in the government is not enough to convince me that
government can handle change and improvements
I would say the same criticism applies towards a number of private corporations
as well. Jed has been very good at
On the subject of governments, technology and infrastructure, here is an
interesting video from the MTA showing equipment from the 1930s and 1950s
still in use in the New York subway system. This shows why large
organizations cannot change quickly. They have to keep the trains moving.
The electron(s) associated with the H- cannot enter the nucleus unless
their energy is greater that 20 MeV due to the uncertainty principle.
An electron in a H- orbital cannot be that energetic since it would shed
that energy through the production of an x-ray photon as the H- seeks a
state of
See please:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/07/the-hottest-e-cat-catches-bad-lenr.html
we have to wait for the answer, but the question is interesting.
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Hi Lennart:
Government by definition cannot delegate. I think Steven's example proves it.
Actually, I would disagree with that opinion even though my previous post would
seem to suggest otherwise. I really don't blame government, nor do I think
government is incompetent or incapable of
Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com wrote:
Yes I agree with that NASA did something I would say in spite of being a
government organization. Driving forces JFK and W von Braun. Not the
organization .
That is not a bit true. Most of the NASA people were top notch. The movie
Apollo 13 is an
From Jed:
I did not know Grace Hopper but no one contributed more to software than she
did. She was an admiral in the Navy.
Back around 1980 when I still had a few visible fledgling feathers I got to see
Grace Hopper at a talk she gave in Madison on one of her numerous speaking
21 matches
Mail list logo
