On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 11:00 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 1:54 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
To put it in simple terms, the presence of the spectator nucleus provides
the
4He, something to push off against, like a swimmer pushing off against
the end
, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.comwrote:
If a bunch of low energy photons is equivalent to the energy of 1 high
energy gamma photon, why can't a particular nuclear reaction sometimes
produce a mountain of infrared photons instead one gamma photon? According
to conservation of energy
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
It seems a bit more logical to suggest that the lack of gammas can be
better
explained by the lack of the kind of nuclear reaction that produces gammas.
The most prevalent nuclear reaction in the Universe, reversible
If a bunch of low energy photons is equivalent to the energy of 1 high
energy gamma photon, why can't a particular nuclear reaction sometimes
produce a mountain of infrared photons instead one gamma photon? According
to conservation of energy this is possible, so why is it considered
impossible?
The Lightning Field -- Walter De Maria
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umwWKPcPlNU
http://www.diaart.org/sites/page/56/1375
Harry
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Jack Harbach-O'Sullivan
alset9te...@hotmail.com wrote:
More than iron, more than lead, more than gold I need. . .
ELECTRICITY.
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 4:13 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Tue, 26 Mar 2013 00:31:22 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
However, might the hbar arise because you overlooked the motion of the
proton in conserving angular momentum? The electron is not orbiting a
fixed
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a limit to stability, once stability reaches that limit, there is
no way to go but toward instability.
Is this something like buckling?
Failure without breaking
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wrdO8hPJGyg
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a limit to stability, once stability reaches that limit, there
is no way to go but toward instability.
Is this something like buckling
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
There is a limit to stability, once stability reaches that limit, there is
no way to go but toward instability.
Is this something like buckling?
Failure without breaking
The buckling occurs under compressive load and its
Robin,
Sorry I did some googling and I learned there are ways you can derive some
quantum conditions from classical physics. What remains to be seen is if
all features of quantum mechanics can be derived classically, but it
appears from reading the essay below, that more and more features are
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.nonlinearstudies.at/quantummechanics.php
Emergent Quantum Mechanics
One is here reminded of Feynman’s famous discussion of the double slit,
and his introductory remark: We choose to examine a phenomenon
://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yCWpGfuyAjU
Harry
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 11:46 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.comwrote:
http://www.nonlinearstudies.at/quantummechanics.php
Emergent Quantum Mechanics
One is here reminded
These cracks could prevent electrons and protons forming standard atoms of
hydrogen and instead channel them together so they form much
smaller structures such as a deflated hydrogen atom.
Harry
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:41 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Luke destabilizing a proton with an electron
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DOFgFAcGHQc
well actually he does it with two electrons ;-)
Harry
size (wave) beyond a point
location.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Mar 27, 2013 12:05 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: only a perfect LENR theory should attack other
theories
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 2:20
upon this
behavior. ;-)
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Mar 27, 2013 12:38 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Low Energy Neutrons and Local Temperature
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:29 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 2:11 PM, David L Babcock ol...@rochester.rr.com wrote:
Regarding the charging, if you shift the source band up-spectrum to light
frequencies, then all that's needed is a photocell and a small IC for
voltage boost. Probably get more charge too, even if the phone is
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 2:20 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Harry,
I have not given much thought about free electrons. The example that we
were discussing was of an electron trapped in orbit around a nucleus which
then would have the positive charge of the nucleus to keep it
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 6:29 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
One question that I keep asking is how quickly does a quantum mechanical
effect take place?How long does a neutron have to be near to a steady
nucleus before it is sucked in?
As we all things quantum mechanical it
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 1:47 AM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Sun, 24 Mar 2013 13:13:10 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Classical EM theory says a charge undergoing acceleration should radiate
energy.
A charge with angular momentum is experiencing an acceleration (in the
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=791#comments
Andrea Rossi
March 24th, 2013 at 10:53 PM
DEAR GEORGEHANTS:
YOUR COMMENT IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE OPENS THE GATE FOR THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION:
THE TESTS OF THE THIRD INDIPENDENT PARTY HAVE BEEN COMPLETED YESTERDAY.
I DID NOT ATTEND,
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 9:45 AM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
The antenna and the receiver circuit are designed to pick up a wide
range of frequencies — from 500 megahertz to 10 gigahertz — and
convert
Sometimes, I think Rossi is like the beggar in this Hanukkah story of
Bone Button Borscht.
You can listen to the story here.
http://www.cbc.ca/video/news/audioplayer.html?clipid=2178798097
It starts at the 5:30 mark.
Harry
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 3:37 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
He takes risks. No report within 1 month, he will lose even his core fans.
The report will be inconclusive and/or written by
unknown professors even worse.
BTW, have you noticed how silent is the ShutdownRossi site
Subtle But Challenging:The Universe according to Planck
21 Mar 2013
http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/object/index.cfm?fobjectid=51551
ESA's Planck satellite has delivered its first all-sky image of the
Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), bringing with it new challenges
about our understanding of
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 3:45 AM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Mon, 25 Mar 2013 02:33:23 -0400:
This abstract seems to support your theory as long as the electron's
displacement is small relative to its size.
if it is possible to
deconstruct the charge movement into individual loops that are continuous.
If this can be done, then the far field will balance out and you will only
have a near field magnetic effect.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 7:56 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Sat, 23 Mar 2013 17:59:19 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
The standard model, I assume, is predicated on the conviction that QM
is correct and also necessary.
It is felt necessary because it explains the
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 6:04 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Sat, 23 Mar 2013 04:04:55 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
The weak force doesn't actually present a barrier. It presents a chance that
something will occur. Electrons and protons don't normally combine into
Nokia developing phone that recharges itself without mains electricity
Prototype harvests radiowaves from TV, radio and other mobiles
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/jun/10/nokia-mobile-phone
quote ...Nokia claims it is able to scavenge relatively large
amounts of power — around a
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 9:00 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Harry,
An electron would not spiral into the nucleus if it is a continuous charge
instead of a point source. Think of it as a steady DC current which
generates a magnetic field that does not radiate energy like an
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 7:35 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Sat, 23 Mar 2013 06:52:31 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
-Original Message-
From: Harry Veeder
According to Robin reduced-mass neutrons can form spontaneously, but
rarely, when an electron is captured
-Original Message-
From: Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Mar 24, 2013 10:28 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: CMNS: only a perfect LENR theory should attack other
theories
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 9:00 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Harry
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 10:50 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Sun, 24 Mar 2013 20:36:40 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
It's actually classically forbidden. 1 baseball + a second baseball does not
make 3 baseballs.
I don't understand your analogy.
Aren't we talking
The planet Saturn comes to mind!
The proton is the planet and the electrons are the rings.
Harry
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Dave,
I did not know that. So, for example, a uniformly charged circular
ring spinning like a wheel will not radiate
are
consistently stable.
harry
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
The planet Saturn comes to mind!
The proton is the planet and the electrons are the rings.
Harry
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Dave,
I did
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 4:14 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:40:15 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 5:10 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Sun, 17 Mar 2013 22:56:07 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
On Sun,
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Harry Veeder
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/WL/WLTheory.shtml
Harry - let's count the number of miracles required for this to happen:
quote
Allan Widom and Lewis Larsen propose
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
You notice this is from the GRASP lab. What next, the STAB lab? These people
are not even hiding their intention to take over the world! They remind me a
James Bond movie villains, flouting their villainy.
- Jed
I
On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Harry Veeder
According to Robin reduced-mass neutrons can form spontaneously, but
rarely, when an electron is captured by a nucleus. Would it be possible to
exchange the seven miracles
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Arnaud Kodeck arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be wrote:
Eric,
Says that slow neutron is produced and absorbed by atoms in a LENR device.
In the order of 6.24E11 neutron captures per second for 1W, as you said,
some atoms which have received an absorbed neutron will
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:22 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The key mechanism of the WL theory is defined in a way to make it very
hard or impossible to verify.
As I said, I cannot judge the situation, but if that is the case, it is not
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:02 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Son of cold fusion:
Forbes.com returns attention to low-energy nuclear reactions
Spirited interest from two NASA scientists leads to new information about
an old controversy.
So far the microwave background is still best explained by standard
cosomology. That doesn't mean big bang cosmology is right (since a
flat universe obviously counts against it). The claim to fame of big
bang cosomology is still the cosmic microwave background. No other
cosmology predicted it.
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2007/jun/18/the-hunt-for-unparticles-is-on
What are unparticles? Here is the explanation.
The first paper published on unparticles:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-ph/0703260v3.pdf
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2007/jun/18/the-hunt-for-unparticles-is-on
What are unparticles? Here is the explanation.
quote All particles exist in a state with a certain energy, momentum
and mass. In most of
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 5:10 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Sun, 17 Mar 2013 22:56:07 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:50 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
BTW there is no potential barrier here. The proton and the electron carry
opposite
IVY-MIKE, the first hydrogen bomb test, nov. 1, 1952.
Includes an animation showing how a Nagasaki style fission bomb
initiates the fusion explosion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7vyKDcSTaE
Harry
The tree of modern physics branches beautifully, but it is all dead to me.
Harry
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 9:50 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Einstein was able to derives the mass-energy equivalency E=mc
Does physics have to be about bones and dead trees?
Is there any point in re-vital-izing physics? I give up...perhaps
physics should remain as it is... a science of the dead.
Harry
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
The tree of modern physics branches
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Does physics have to be about bones and dead trees?
Is there any point in re-vital-izing physics? I give up...perhaps
physics should remain
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Does physics have to be about bones and dead trees?
Is there any point
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Does physics have to be about bones and dead trees?
Is there any point
Does the explanation make sense to you?
harry
Emperor penguin body surfaces cool below air temperature
http://royalsociety.org/news/2013/cool-penguins/
Harry
. Feel the shoulders of the jacket. They will be colder
than the sides. Same thing. your outer shell becomes colder than the
surrounding air.
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 10:22 AM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Does the explanation make sense to you?
harry
Emperor penguin body
If it is so straightforward, then it should be possible to build a
thermal model of perguin with a heater covered in some insulation
which replicates the surface temperatures of a living peguin.
Harry
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
here is the paper
16, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
here is the paper
http://www.ipev.fr/pages/bio%20lettersl
the back and sides of the peguin are cooler too.
Harry
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Alexander Hollins
alexander.holl...@gmail.com wrote:
wear a well insulated
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Alexander Hollins
alexander.holl...@gmail.com wrote:
Because up is colder.
Then only the the tops of their shoulders and the tops of their head
should be colder.
Harry
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
So why
Never mind. The paper says the temperature of the ice was -45C which
was also well below the air temperature of -20C. All directions are
colder from a radiative standpoint, so that explains it.
Sorry, to drag you into my confusion.
Harry
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder
Sorry guys,
I read the paper, and it said the ice temperature was also far below
the air temperature.
So that explains why on balance their coats can be colder all over and
not just on the tops of their shoulders and heads.
Nothing to see here.
harry
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 5:09 PM, Jones
LENR .might come to mean Low Energy Nuclear Rhythms
harry
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Friends,
I am pleased and honored to inform you that I have
just published:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:53 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Einstein was able to derives the mass-energy equivalency E=mc^2
(without special relativity!) by imagining a thought experiment
described by Max Born here:
http://web.ncf.ca/eo200/derivation.html
For easier viewing
http://coldfusionnow.org/store/stickers/
Harry
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
And realistic too: The heat is on? I remember
what you have asked yesterday.
But it will be on, and will be great and good.
Peter
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 6:32 PM, DJ
This CFL story could create as much buzz as the Rossi demo from january 2011.
harry
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 1:24 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Tiny Nuclear Reactions Inside Compact Fluorescent Bulbs?
Einstein was able to derives the mass-energy equivalency E=mc^2
(without special relativity!) by imagining a thought experiment
described by Max Born here:
http://web.ncf.ca/eo200/derivation.html
Einstein concludes heat energy E must increase inertial mass by the
amount m = E/c^2, or else the
From
http://www.e-catworld.com/2013/02/aldo-proia-of-prometeon-responds-to-inquiry/
A Post by Robert Greenyer 2013-02-27:
As annoying as it is, we can only report on our own findings and
those we can gain sanction to release from others.
What I can say is that you should expect the unexpected
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Astronomers refined the star's age down to about 14.5 billion years (which
is still older than the universe), from the original data showing 16 billion
years old. In either event it is way older then the Milky Way - yet
why doesn't anyone ask about the origin of energy?
Harry
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Harry Veeder
Astronomers refined the star's age down to about 14.5 billion years
(which
is still older than the universe), from the original data showing 16
billion
years old. In either
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
are not known with a great deal of imprecision
double negative
Harry
Mathematically and historically the concept of inertia (mass)
preceeded the concept of energy.
Energy is a secondary concept because it is built on the primary
concept of inertia. It would seem most theoretical physicists are
ignorant about the conceptual history of their own subject.
The answer
Andrea Rossi interviewed on a special video installment of 'Tom and
Doug' radio show.
recorded feb. 27, 2013. Rossi seems tired during the interview.
The whole video is 25 minutes. The Rossi interview is in the first
half and it is followed by a song about the ECat, LENR and the
Petroleum
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
I'm mentioning this bit of cosmology as on topic simply because it shows
how tenuous is expert consensus on the most important things in our
Universe. We as an advanced society are far from having a complete knowledge
of
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 8:34 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
In other words, it is not just the commodity value in 4 years that matters.
In this situation the oil companies would be like companies manufacturing
vacuum tubes in 1952, after transistors were announced. Even though
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Even with best intentions, there is an unintentional homicide charge that
can be used at the discretion of the Stat, depending on culpability. This is
often called Involuntary or Reckless Manslaughter. Feynman did take
Even if he never made the claim explicitly, he wants people to infer
he has such device.
Unfortunately or fortunately (depending on your point view) the law
doesn`t protect people
from such mind games.
Harry
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:55 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Clearly John
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:58 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Even with best intentions, there is an unintentional homicide charge
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 12:16 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Well that is Feynman's version. It is in conflict with neutral eyewitness
testimony.
RF had every incentive to spin it that way - even when he wasn't joking g
but there is no doubt that CalTech settled for a large cash
I should probably keep my mouth shut...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34ag4nkSh7Q
Harry
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:12 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Lattice Energy looks at the possibility that the unexpected Hg-isotopic
distribution in long running compact fluorescent light bulbs (and
similar systems) may be due to current induced LENRs:
Lattice Energy LLC-Are LENRs
Lunarcy!
trailer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r0ULU21THe4
about the film
http://filmswelike.com/films/lunarcy/
With wry humor and affection, Simon Ennis’ Lunarcy! follows a
disparate group of dreamers and schemers who share one thing in
common; they’ve all devoted their lives to the Moon.
NRL Scientists Produce Densest Artificial Ionospheric Plasma Clouds Using HAARP
http://www.nrl.navy.mil/media/news-releases/2013/nrl-scientists-produce-densest-artificial-ionospheric-plasma-clouds-using-haarp
Harry
James you need to find people who will listen.
Look at the Basic Income Earth Network if you haven't already heard of
the organization.
http://www.basicincome.org/bien/
How to fund a basic income is a serious topic in places where the
movement is more advanced such as Europe, Brazil
and Nambia
Dear Peter, I think you choosing between the western style
inequality of the 1960's with
Soviet style equality. However, western style inequality of today
is wicked.
harry
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 11:56 AM, Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear James,
I will not discuss here about
Research Hints at Graphene’s Photovoltaic Potential
Newly observed properties mean graphene could be a highly efficient
converter of light to electric power.
http://www.technologyreview.com/news/511751/research-hints-at-graphenes-photovoltaic-potential/
Although the work only hints at possible
America has the best health care in the world, according to the
Republican media machine...so this must be irrelevant...right?
Harry
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:13 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
He should
In the end you can buy the best health care in the world if you are a
wealthy Canadian, American, Brit etc...
Harry
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Chris Zell chrisz...@wetmtv.com wrote:
I have some friends in Canada who talk about their experience with health
care there. It is not as bad as
A video of a man hit by lightning twice...wow!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Qr39-pbSqA
but analysis reveals the video is fake. :-(
Harry
It will be most interesting if they find through further measurements
the proton radius depends on whether muons or electrons are used in
the measurement.
harry
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 7:46 PM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
This might tie in to what Jones has been saying in a
BTW, is this actually a challenge for QED theory, or does it mean that
a closer study of QED theory predicts the new result, i.e. the proton
radius will vary with the presence of muons or electrons?
harry
On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
It will be most
The calculation of odds doesn't reveal relatedness. It is a deduction
based on theory of how they might related.
Harry
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I would point out:
1. The event did occur.
2. A causal connection between the two objects
The calculations here relfect of view that they are relatable only in
ways which respect to the laws of physics.
Harry
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
The calculation of odds doesn't reveal relatedness. It is a deduction
based on theory of how
Unless the russian meteor was tracked for a period of time before it
entered earth's atmosphere, extropolating the orbit of the Russian
meteor into the past seems like guess work to me.
harry
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Alexander Hollins
alexander.holl...@gmail.com wrote:
if it were in
As a practical matter, whenever a large body passes near the earth
should should we regard it as warning sign that the earth
will temporarily be at an elevated risk of being hit by a smaller
body? People who study near-earth objects should be able to answer
this question which is different from
http://www.thegwpf.org/wind-farms-monuments-failed-civilisation-top-environmentalist-claims/
In a letter to Torridge District Council, his local planning
authority, Professor Lovelock wrote: “I am an environmentalist and
founder member of the Greens but I bow my head in shame at the thought
that
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Mark Goldes mgol...@chavaenergy.com wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/23/star-shaped-gravity-waves-physicists-france_n_2744664.html?ir=Science
quote:
It is generally accepted that the shape of the waves depends on the
container shape, said researcher
-
From: Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Feb 24, 2013 11:48 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:star shaped gravity waves
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 1:59 AM, Mark Goldes mgol...@chavaenergy.com
wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/02/23/star-shaped
So is it your thesis that the russian meteor was a fragment blown off
the larger meteor?
Harry
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:29 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Terry, if you want to invoke scifi space based kinetic energy weapons with
precise targeting, try The Moon is a Harsh Mistress
of what I've written renders me speechless.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
So is it your thesis that the russian meteor was a fragment blown off
the larger meteor?
Harry
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 2:29 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote
Curiosity serves as his robotic caddy.
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you think Obama played a round of golf while visiting Mars?
201 - 300 of 2957 matches
Mail list logo
