Hi Stephen,
Yeah, I'll probably fiddle around some more with this, just because it
seems like the pre-ring is going the wrong way and I'd like to
understand why.
That's good. While the scope precludes you from doing any interesting
shock wave experiments ( way too slow ) you can certainly do
Hi Stephen,
Well, by Dobbs, you've done an experiment. Congrats.
Now for the fun part!
I'm looking at the last scope shot,
http://www.physicsinsights.org/images/img_0748-a1.png
Amplify the receive channel (2) by 10, so you're at
100 mV rather than 1 V/div. Now let's talk about
that negative
Hi Stephen,
it looks like it has something to
do with the signal itself, almost like the pre-ringing of a perfect
low-pass filter
Given that your cutoff frequency is 60MHz, the leading edge
of the signals you are seeing probably bear little relationship
to the actual state of the signal. I say
Hi Frank,
That first link was most interesting, thanks kindly.
I will need to study a bit more about what is meant by the Zemach
radius and the magnetic radius. I do think that the whole
concept of a billiard ball particle falls apart on close inspection,
rather like the old Bohr model. Yet, we
You're welcome, Frank.
I am aware that the value of the proton radius is questionable, for example
http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/physics/Proton.html
the two values listed are 0.805 ± 0.011 and 0.862 ± 0.012 femtometers.
So there is some wiggle room for theory, but 1.4 seems like too big
a
Hi Frank,
You should try moving to my universe, it's twice as large and
we won't be bumping into each other as much *grin*
But seriously, why do our calculations differ? If my derivation
is wrong, can you show me why? Let's at least nail that
down before we tackle the entire universe...
K.
of) distributed model had
too many hands for me to comment on *grin*.
K.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 24, 2006 3:57 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]: 1.568 x 10 -25 Farads
Keith Nagel writes
C = 3.135*10^-25 F
and we
Hi Frank + Fred,
I usually use the formula for the
capacity of a sphere in free space
and the Compton radius, as so.
C=4*pi*epsilon0*r
with r=2.8179*10^-15 M
and epsilon0 = 8.854*10^-12 F/M
C = 3.135*10^-25 F
and we seem to differ by a factor of two.
BTW, this is pretty well known, are
you
Good for you, Stephen! I think this is the first experiment
you've done on Vo.
What you need to do to make the presented experiment
statistically signficant is use about 50 plants each for boiled and uwaved
H2O. Also, get your wife to mix the containers of water, so you don't
know which is
Hey Steve,
Nope, no decoder ring...sorry.
If you conduct the experiment as I described, you'll know
for a _fact_ whether microwaved water is better or worse
than boiled water for plant growth.
Is it madness to know a fact? I suppose so, by today's standards.
Certainly you can incite some real
Well, there are two options.
A) Complain.
or
B) Debug Bills mail script, as follows.
:0
* ! ^Subject: (Re:(\[[1-9]+\])? )?\[Vo\]:
{
:0 w
CURRENT_SUBJ=| formail -zx Subject:
:0 fhw
| formail -ISubject: [Vo]: $CURRENT_SUBJ
}
Hi Jones,
This is the mail script Bill posted to this forum several
months ago when he implemented the new policy. Clearly,
it has a bug. He installed it on his server, so someone
needs to find the bug and correct it, then send him the
revised version for him to install.
Could I do this?
Hi Robin,
I was confused by this also. I don't think english is Andres
first language, so his paper is a little obtuse at points.
What he's saying, after a more careful read on my part, is that
he assumes The Energy of a wave is transported at its phase velocity.
is what Roger is claiming. I
You know, Jones, it would be fun to pursue this line of
reasoning to its logical conclusion. As so.
The car is a miserable form of transport. Firstly, it
runs on fossil fuels. Rather, we should have the
vehicle run on waste vegetable matter. Preferrably
the vehicle should have an on-board
Walter writes:
I don't propose turning science over to magicians, much less priests.
Yet that is where we are at now.
There is only one science that I know of. It is learning through experience
and mistake. There is no other. When I wrote earlier of doing the
Ohsawa carbon arc experiment, I
Walter writes:
We assume the impartiality of the experts. They don't lie; they're
scientists! We believe them because theoretically at least we could get
the same training and come to the same conclusions. That's what makes
science different from theology.
We assume the impartiality of the
Hi Steve,
from the story you quote:
President Bush's administration goal is to replace 75 percent of
the United States' Middle East oil imports with alternative fuels by 2025.
So what does that mean to you? Anyone else here care to comment?
K.
Yeah, that was very funny, thanks.
It sounded like Alex Doonsebury selected this college, and after a steady diet
of ideal current sources and gedanken wankin' has just been tasked with
making a real measurement. Ouch.
I remember taking a biology course as an undergrad; we had to
dissect
The real joke here is that both Alex and the professor
are talking from textbooks and not from actual experience.
No test equipment manufacturer sells an ideal current source.
What you can actually build or buy, are constant current
sources. Real constant current or contant voltage
source can be
Hi Stephen,
You write:
There are two black boxes, each with two terminals on it. One contains
an ideal 1 amp current source in parallel with a 1 ohm resistor; the
other contains an ideal 1 volt voltage source in series with a 1 ohm
resistor. How do you tell which is which?
OK, that at least
Hi Stephen,
First of all, Alex is still in school. She's not going to have a lot of
real world experience -- cut her some slack!
Ahhh, I've been following the strip. She has several patents,
founded a startup, and is being courted by several foreign
companies for product development work.
Couldn't resist trying the new google search feature
with our old friend, CF.
http://www.google.com/trends?q=%22cold+fusion%22
Better bail faster Jed, the boat is sinking. (grin)
OTOH, hot fusion gets so few hits that the trending
software doesn't want to produce a graph. Perhaps
google is
Interesting idea; I like the closed loop nature of the
system although carrying around the extra O2 would
be a problem, yes?
Oh yeah, this is how you do a document link to USPTO.
You can't just copy the URL, it will expire as Frank
suggests.
HTML version
The path of action is open to all, Phillip.
You can choose to read the papers available, and work the field.
If you feel for some reason unable to do this, you can contribute
monetarily to one of the many projects ongoing in the field.
The best person to answer your question is yourself.
Because
Hi Michel,
Actually, Fred has some difficulties that make it hard for
him to do experiments ( much like the space shuttle, he
runs on LOX ). Back in the day, several of us did implement
some of Freds ideas, most notably Frank Stenger. Frank
did the TV experiment for Fred, although you might not
Hi Jones,
you write:
Everyone here seems to
have a narrow field of specific interest and mine is not
anti-gravity per-se, EXCEPT to the extent that it portends
overunity or new sources of energy.
A plethora of mouths, and no ears. A hallmark of our age,
don't you think?
Anyway... Keith, you
Hi Ham,
Yes, I did like the app, and had a few thoughts about it.
K.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 2:28 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EEStor Patent(was: Simple comparison electric car versus
gasoline)
car versus
gasoline)
Hi K, do you think it can work? (you seem to have a reply-to problem just
like Fred BTW)
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Keith Nagel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 8:55 PM
Subject: RE: EEStor Patent(was: Simple comparison
I'll see your 13.4 cents, and raise you to 22 cents ( this
includes the delivery costs, BTW ).
Also, for Phil Winestone, I can appreciate your comments
about counting the PV's that can fit on the head of a pin
but given the insane cost I am now paying for electricity,
you might plug through those
Revtek writes:
This is what must happen:
1. The economy must be kept roaring.
Dow index /
Jan 2000 - 11,500
Jan 2006 - 10,780
aggregate US economic growth, -6%
Roaring, Rev? How about whimpering like a pimpslapped bitch.
No point in addressing the rest. Please reconnect to
The cat is my controller. Damn you, Internets! You've blown my cover!
Hey Jones, post the logs. I'd like to see what a CIA laptop
looks like after it's been 0wned by a script kiddie.
K.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006
Hi Ed,
I think you need to look at it from the university position.
There have been some high profile cases of fraud in the
sciences, perhaps the most press being devoted to the
South Korean cloning scientist but I could name several
more if you like. Academia is no different than the corporate
Hey Jones,
I also noticed this story on the blog, and I'm glad you mentioned it.
It's a great example of how lies are generated and propagated by
Mr. Bush and his associates. Here is the actual quote from the SOTUA.
Breakthroughs on this and other new technologies will help us reach
another
)
Keith Nagel wrote:
Talk about gross factual errors! Jed, this list is _not_ a science
based discussion list.
There is a WORLD of difference between suspending disbelief and
ignoring facts. I am always ready to consider ideas and phenomena,
but that is not the same as pretending that Benjamin Spock
Hey All,
Horace writes:
That was not my gedanken. It was Keith's.
Woah, that's news to me. I do real experiments,
not gedanken ones (grin). A Horace hiatus indeed.
Einstein throwing rocks at Poincare who turns
them into energy? That's Steves department.
K.
The answer is simple, Ed.
Entertainment is more important than information.
You can quote me on that.
K.
-Original Message-
From: Edmund Storms [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 1:43 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: ZPE, Naked Women and UFOs
I can't
Hi Nick,
That'd be called barkhausen noise; a magnetic effect
even your dog can pronounce. The wooshing is
caused by the unpinning of domain walls, if
you look carefully at the signal with a scope
you can see the individual avalanches of domain motion.
Try it with various samples of transformer
many Keith girls. veg
http://profiles.yahoo.com/horselover_fats
We need more F's in FE!
I find the Wiegand Wires (WW) interesting. I'll study the references
more.
Do you think the WW impulses tap the ZPF?
-Original Message-
From: Keith Nagel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One can synchronize
Hi Mike,
I'm glad you took some measurements, but I'm confused
by your results. If you see no drop off from 1
to 5 miles inland, how do you know the results are
coming from the ocean? Another source listed
on the EPA site is burning biomass. I recall you've
had quite a bit of that in the past
Hey Mike,
So presumably as you go inland, the levels drop off.
How fast do they do so? And what numbers did you measure?
To be clear, most sources ( including the EPA ) back
your claim. Here for example, the evil socialists of Sweden (grin) say...
Methyl chloride (CAS No. 74-87-3) is released
Hey Mike,
I had a similar experience to you when I got a rad counter. I was
pretty surprised to find fireplaces had 3-5X background
level of radiation, prolly exceeding NRC regs. It was
explained to me that trees concentrate airborne radioactive
particles from rain, and being heavy they tend to
Alexandra Kerry; comments at the DNC:
We were standing on a dock waiting for a boat to take
us on a summer trip. Vanessa, the scientist, had packed
all her animals including her favorite hamster. Our over-zealous
golden retriever got tangled in his leash and knocked the hamster
cage off the dock.
Hello John,
I posted about this back in March, but to recap:
The US applications are just that, applications. They are not patents.
You're looking in the right spot, but they haven't published yet
so no publication number and no love for you. When they publish,
you will be able to read them.
Hi Richard,
You write:
Once had a friend say he could hear music from the fillings in his teeth.
Always got a laugh. We tried an experiment . He sat in another room while
we had an AM radio playing popular music. He couldn't hear the radio
from his location but he could tell us what melody was
Hi George,
You write:
- Interestingly, in the so called
- spin orbit coupled materials with gyromagnetic ratios closer
- to 1 the electron orbital magnetic contribution is in fact quite large
- but still smaller than the electron direct contribution.
The big three Fe Ni Co all have gyromagnetic
Yes, that is a good book on PKD.
BTW Jones, you never answered Stephens question. Yes, that
was supposed to be Eric Clapton. The name used in the story
is the thinly disguised Eric Lampton. Also note that it
was well known at the time that 'Clapton is God'
Hi Stephen,
But the original issue was an assertion that the B field
lines around a straight, current-carrying wire actually form a spiral
pattern rather than circles. That seems pretty fundamental -- I don't
see how it could result from magnetic charge being present!
Yes, that's Franks
Hi Frank.
You write:
=
107:10. Moab the pot of my hope.
Over Edom I will stretch out my shoe:
the aliens are become my friends.
=
Clearly God is promoting the medical use
of marijuana, along with a helpful hint
about how
Hi Stephen,
I hardly think the fact that the divergence of B field not
being equal to zero will bring down modern physics and
electromagnetics...
As you correctly point out, all it means is that magnetic
charge is present. Now I understand that the particle
physics community has had great
Hi Steve,
One of my clients holds a few patents in brain imaging technology,
and he often asserts I've looked for that little homunculus far
and wide, but could not find him. I suspect something similar with
the artificial version of consiousness, it's not something that
can be easily put in a
Private industry takes on global warming...one swiss ski resort
at a time.
http://www.terradaily.com/2005/050510203249.4l577zv0.html
Swiss ski resort swaddles glacier to stop melting
ANDERMATT, Switzerland (AFP) May 10, 2005
A Swiss ski resort Tuesday wrapped up an entire glacier to stop it
Hi Ed.
You write:
I suspect that when a person loses his pension, his job, and his house,
and food costs rise out of sight because of high energy costs, he will
be so pissed that gay rights, abortion, and other religious issues will
become much less important.
And you would be entirely wrong.
OK, time for some Shelley, as my beat friend Bob Dombrowski likes
to opine, Ozymandias, you've done better than most...
K.
Ozymandias
--
I met a traveler from an antique land
Who said: Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
Stand in the desert. Near them, on the sand,
Half sunk, a
The internet gets drunk sometimes and forgets things, RC...
Youds patents are in various specific countries, seemingly none in the US.
NZ511385 Sonified vortex machine for communition and treatment of solids
GB2354232 Cyclone apparatus for treating sewage
GB2337514 Crystalline structure
Hey Jones,
A flop is a floating point operation, I don't know how you/they
get from one flop to the action of a neuron. It's probably
closer to 100 flops/neuron, maybe much more. I'm guessing the
first hack for xbox+ will be simulating nuclear bombs, expect
a rush order from Iran shortly (
Good point, Ron.
Each of those neurons are acting in parallel, all functioning
simultaneously. Trying to simulate this with a single threaded
machine is just not practical. Another sort of architecture
is required, like maybe using carbon rather than silicon *grin*
Sort of like nanotechnology.
Needless to say, the aptly named Jones has eschewed my cautionary
advice and eaten a whole handful of those delicious chocolate
espresso beans. Fasten your safety belts, Vo, your collective
inboxes are in for a lumpy ride.
BTW, regarding my earlier post, we already have a massively
paralleled
Robin,
Some quick sniffing around produced this site,
http://www.proton21.com.ua/articles_en.html
If you can find anything relating actual experimental
proceduces, rather than results and sample analysis,
please note it.
I've never used copper as an electrode, as it tends
to disintegrate with
Hi Frank,
You should be aware that back in the mid 90's, _many_ people
were encouraged by Greg to build and test these devices. I
was not one of them, preferring my own insanity to others,
but some are still on Vo. These devices started with Emil
Hartman as far as I can tell, and they do work as
Hi All,
I'm sort of curious what you all think about the national ID
card bill that President Bush signed into law last wednesday.
You will all be required to prove citizenship the next time
you renew your drivers licences, rather than the usual mail-in
update. A federal database will store all
Frank writes:
I don't think one has to go as far as having a circle of
ramps. If the steel ball could transit a straight line of
100 SMOTS, say, that would be pretty convincing.
What's the difference between 2 and 100? Nothing, IMHO.
The challenge is curving the line back on itself. I have
no
I hadn't really thought of that...a funny image, that.
All the same, it seems clear from experiment that
multiple ramps can be joined in a line. Perhaps as
you say, after many such ramps the ball will peter
out, hooking somewhere between the exit and entrance.
It would seem like frictional losses
I'm just curious how he (they) are getting that weird
discharge shape in the copper electrode. I've never seen
anything like that before. I'm referring to that thing
on page 7. Was that a rod that was blasted back? Or
did it grow out of the electrode? The former seems reasonable
to me, the latter
Hi Terry,
Yes, this patent US5929732 has been around the block a few times. I even think
the
inventor is someone who can be found on the internet, on some of the
more colorful lists ( like this one *grin* ). If I'm not mistaken,
this is him.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As you say, it's easy
Hi Mitchell,
A few thoughts about what I can find on the site.
You don't mention current, but presumably it's in the .1 to 10 ma
range? With the high voltages you use, I also assume that you're not
using a salt of any kind, this to explain the rather localized
electrolysis you note on the
For our resident concrete head,
http://www.physorg.com/news3985.html
wow! not sure what you'd build with that stuff,
but it sure can flex.
K.
Hi Mike,
Try Richard Hull. His group did the first modern studies of this
phenomena to my knowledge, I remember reading about them
in the late Charles Yosts Electric Spacecraft Journal
Issue #9, 1993. Here's a hint of the article from
googling...
DOH! I meant Wordsworth...
***
Five years have past: five summers, with the length
Of five long winters! And again I hear
These waters, rolling from their mountain-springs
With a soft inland murmur. Once again
Do I behold these steep and lofty cliffs,
Hey Frank.
You write:
I couldn't agree more. One has to turn water
into wine...if one wants to be believed. 8-)
OK Frank, you know I can't resist a good challenge *grin*
http://www.blacktable.com/gillin030901.htm
...but I'll need some ketchup too.
K.
Hey Jed,
you write:
I am surprised they managed to sneak this into the archive. I predicted
will soon be yanked out.
It certainly will if you post the cached URL. Here's the link
with some staying power.
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/cond-mat/0505026
With 25 documents already filed, Widom will not
Hey Stephen,
You write:
He has lots of interesting results but if he has anything absolutely
airtight in the way of a public demonstration of something really new I
must have overlooked mention of it.
This ain't academia. You gots to pay to play.
He has a theory which requires throwing out QM
Hey Mark,
you write:
At least one young scientist believes he was more correct than most will
allow.
You ought to let the poor boy out of the basement for some air, he
must have moss growing between his toes at this point.
It would probably help you more than hurt. Just a thought *smile*
K.
Hey Jed,
This kind of thing bothered me before the internet, but now it reads
quite acceptably to me. I've come to appreciate russenglish for the
novel sentence structuring and simplicity of style. That said, your
insertion of the proper unit of current is a critical edit; those
kinds of errors
Google Pykrete and you'll find a wealth of information
about this odd bit of history.
http://www.cabinetmagazine.org/issues/7/floatingisland.php
K.
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 11:52 AM
To: vortex-L@eskimo.com
Subject: Re:
Hey Fred,
Can you get some of the magnets up to the curie point to
demagnetize them? That would make a much better control
than the ceramics. A propane torch might work on a small
NdFeB, ceramics will break unless you use a furnace.
K.
-Original Message-
From: Frederick Sparber
is knocking at this door,
as is/was
CF Cell Electrolysis D2 loading of Pd.
Frederick
[Original Message]
From: Keith Nagel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Vortex vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: 5/3/05 11:08:07 AM
Subject: RE: ICCF-11 papers are depressing
Hey Fred,
Can you get some of the magnets up
Hey RC,
You may have to repost; I'm getting a 403 forbidden error on the link,
even the root domain rejects requests. Can you cut and paste the story?
K.
-Original Message-
From: RC Macaulay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 1:05 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject:
Hey Mark,
you write:
I am not qualified to evaluate the fractional hydrogen experiments, but he
seemed to have carried those forward some distance toward practical
hardware. The patent picture remains cloudy.
It looks from the INPADOC legal data like he's been fighting
it out with the
Hi Fred,
Good introductory article, but I suspect the author was
just googling for data after looking at the freq. ranges
listed for the various detector modalities. Many seem way
too high for commercial devices ( can you find me a commercial hall
effect device that's good to better than 100KHz?
Someone whose name I don't know writes:
There was a government funded study that stopped short of testing
the power of this rocket. Then nothing. Probably working now and
highly classified.
Hey, how about just writing Anthony and asking him about the project?
http://users.rowan.edu/~marchese/
Hi Jed,
Mike's right. Electrolysis is a dead end. It's too
difficult to control, and messy besides. There are
still electroplating plants around, but they have
largely been displaced by higher energy deposition processes.
Same with CF.
Also, with no property rights extended to CF research,
I
Hi All.
If Horace is still out there, I thought he would get a big kick
out of this proposal.
http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2005/4/26/152946/325
It's a non-starter for a couple reasons; but it is somewhat more
feasible than a simple tax.
K.
A guy whose name I still don't know writes:
The web site is a resume. Dr. Marchese is highly qualified as a
researcher and has worked on several government projects. All
of these will have had a classification of confidential or better.
Without a need to know and the required clearances, a
Sure enough, more of those cheaply made lithium
batteries are failing.
http://www.local6.com/news/4434305/detail.html
With picture of injury, that looks mighty painful.
K.
Hi All.
I may be a cynic; but I am not lazy. At the urgings of some list members
I have begun to post some of the public domain experimental researches of
KPN Consulting. The first posting is an experiment I did for long time
list member Fred Sparber. I will review my own work and see what I
can
or Hal Puthoff (Vortex)
3) Jed Rothwell (Vortex)
4) Terry Blanton (Vortex)
5) Keith Nagel (Vortex)
6) Jean-Louis Naudin (JLN Labs)
7) Stefan Hartman (Overunity.com)
8) Cyril Smith (OU Builders)
9) David Squires (OU Builders)
Now it's just engineering effort, time and money,
Greg
Find local movie
I agree.
Ducting between the poles is a well known phenomena, although
the 20 minute delay is much more common than the 82 hour
one. The ducting is due to the ionosphere and the magnetic poles,
and the effect varies with the solar weather.
I disagree that gravity is the cause. This is a plasma
Hi Jones,
Here's some fresh links for ya.
http://www.aip.org/pnu/2005/split/729-1.html
http://technocrat.net/article.pl?sid=05/04/27/2025254mode=thread
And your link,
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/04/28/science/28fusion.html?
The voltages quoted seem lower than what we
were looking at yesterday,
But Hank,
You're neglecting the key theological issue.
Did Jesus or Satan use the Mac?
/
Some important theological questions are answered if we think of god as a
computer programmer.
Q: Does God control everything that happens in my life?
A: He
:11 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: RE: Computers and Religion
From: Keith Nagel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/04/28 Thu PM 01:42:49 EDT
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: Computers and Religion
But Hank,
You're neglecting the key theological issue.
Did Jesus or Satan use
Hi Michael,
About 50 pounds of iron, and a wall outlet.
You could warm the pyroelectric crystal with your
hands and generate neutrons.
But there is no new physics here, sadly. You are
not missing anything.
K.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Foster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Mr. Bush on Social Security...tonite.
/ Mr Bush sez:
In a reformed Social System, voluntary personal retirement
accounts would offer workers a number of investment options
that are simple and easy to understand.
I know some Americans have reservations about investing
in the stock market, so
Heartburn for Dean Kamen.
http://www.ebikes.ca/Projects/Emanual/Index.html
Watch out Dean, someone might actually get laid riding one
of these boards, me thinks you have some serious competition...
K.
PS: I've seen a grand total of two (2) Segway in NYC. One was
the real McCoy, the other a
Terry writes:
How can anyone doubt the obvious?
No one doubts the obvious. The failure in Iraq however is making
it very hard to do anything about Iran. Let's tune in to todays
press conference with the folks who know...
//
Asked during the briefing are
Thanks Mark,
You must have a subscription. I was disappointed the
articles are blocked. I wish they would adopt the
policy of this publisher and list recent articles.
http://www.iop.org/EJ/
All these journals are accessable for the first month
or so. The New Journal of Physics is a lot like
Hi Akira,
Lithium Tantalate.
http://www.sawseek.com/prody1.html
http://www.almazoptics.com/LiTaO3.html
K.
-Original Message-
From: Akira Kawasaki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 4:48 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: Nature re Putterman cold fusion
Hi All,
Some additional info.
Movies etc.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v434/n7037/suppinfo/nature03575.html
When the slashdot crowd gets through with it, more stuff here.
http://rodan.physics.ucla.edu/pyrofusion/
K.
-Original Message-
From: Keith Nagel [mailto:[EMAIL
Here's another view of the personal computer revolution,
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/04/24/RVGSIC93AT1.DTL
West Coast style for Jones amusement (grin).
//
He romanticizes both the era -- how unlike the cynical, selfish nineties --
Hi Greg,
You write:
What I do know is that you can drop the ball
vertically from the entry position, without magnets
and measure the KE delivered in a fall to a level
reference plane, then replace the ball at the entry
point and allow it to do the climb, drop and fall to
the the same entry plane.
Hi Greg,
I'm working on a simple to build / replicate single
ramp, ball return system and expect to post a video in
the next week or so.
Keep us posted. I expect that last inch will be challenging,
if you're going under the ramp. Say, with tongue firmly in
cheek, might I suggest the moniker
1 - 100 of 249 matches
Mail list logo
