for that.
A bit like Scrooge, I guess it's never too late.
KRM
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 at 7:11 PM
From: "Jed Rothwell"
To: "Vortex"
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Many years later...
Don't fret about it. We have thick skin in this business. Welcome back!
On Mon, Feb 22, 2
Vortexians,
Having worked in the automotive industry for a long time, I've encountered
various things that can be of use to the amateur scientist. A lot of them are
not applicable here, but one that came back to mind the other day I thought I
should put out there, and maybe you guys can offer
Hello again, Vortexians.
It's been a long time, perhaps 10 years or so since I've been here. I can't
recall exactly, but that was another life. You'd be surprised how much can
change in that time, and how much you look back on with regret and sorrow.
I'll start off by saying, if there are
--- On Sat, 1/28/12, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
By the way, I'm disappointed by all the Mary Yugo bashing. I
did not find MY's skepticism to be severe or particularly
extreme, compared to plenty I've seen.
Well, as a semi-interested outsider who'd love a cheap
--- On Sat, 1/28/12, Mark Iverson-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
As the one who 'rode her ass' a number of times, I have said
that her (his)
technical criticisms were WELCOME... but to lay off the
focus on the
personalities.
Good idea. Discussing the science and analysis of the
There is no dark side of the moon, really. Matter of fact it's all dark.
V,
Whatever side of the aisle you fall on with regards to Rossi, you got to admit,
given his slap-it-together plumbing style, a Lenard ray tube built from a booze
bottle, kitchen foil, and hardware store crap is right up their alley.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0FYVBsGCUVg
Gotta admit,
--- On Wed, 11/23/11, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
Most interesting! Garnet is desirable because it
inherently transmits light differently in one direction than
in another: It has a different index of refraction — the
bending of light as it enters the material — depending on
On 11/13/2011 1:15 PM, Vorl Bek wrote:
I have had it with Mary Yugo.
I think Mary Yugo is a good addition to this list.
Mary Yugo's skepticism is better than excusing Rossi's odd
behaviour on the grounds that he must be an eccentric genius.
I have no idea if Rossi is a scammer or if he
--- On Sat, 9/24/11, Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
Jouni,
I am not certain I follow quite what you're suggesting. Are you suggesting
that, possibly, the absolute frame of reference may have differing velocities
based on the velocity of the local object? I.E, some planet,
--- On Sat, 9/24/11, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
Yeah. Bien sur. The whole issue isn't that some
religious law might be broken; it's that you can get
contradictions if we allow stuff like this to go on without
careful controls on it, and short cuts, improbability
physics,
--- On Sat, 9/24/11, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
In the CERN OPERA results, neutrinos arrived about
2.48x10^-5 the travel time sooner than expected. For a
168,000 ly trip the expected photon arrival delay time Dt
should be
Dt = (2.48x10^-5)*(168,000 yr) = 1521
days =
--- On Sat, 9/24/11, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
From: Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com
I believe I alluded to something like this earlier.
In reading back over previous emails, yes, you're right.
In a universe which adheres in general to the SR model, you
can, none the
--- On Fri, 9/23/11, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
This measurement conflicts with early arrival time data for
neutrinos from supernova. The New Scientist article quotes
Marc Sher of the College of William and Mary in
Williamsburg, Virginia, It's not reasonable. ... If
--- On Thu, 5/12/11, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson svj.orionwo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Yeah, well... that's what I would have done. But who
listens to me! ;-)
Hey, at least you get replies!
I do the math showing that Rossi's (erroneous, due to mysterious typo?) claim
of 58g Nickel 30,000
--- On Mon, 5/9/11, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
He then claims that 58 g of Ni provides the equivalent
energy of
30,000 tons of oil with the strangest calculation that
begins with 10
MeV of energy per reaction. This is converted to mass
equivalent,
multiplied by Avogadro's
V,
Double checked my math after thinking about it. Unless I am missing something,
that is the way it is.
No one has anything to say on this?
You can't even get this kind of energy by fusing up the chain all the way from
hydrogen to nickel-56 as happens in massive stars, as far as I know,
--- On Fri, 4/1/11, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm. A quick search reveals discussions about this back on Mar. 11, so it
doesn't look like April Fools shenanigans.
http://tucsoncitizen.com/wryheat/2011/03/11/a-nuclear-explosion-on-mars/
And paper here:
--- On Sat, 3/12/11, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
snip
Vortex-L's resident curmudgeon awakens... WHO DISTURBS MY SLUMBER?
But seriously... what are you thinking? Things were relatively peaceful until
you began posting this stuff. Maybe you missed Bill
V,
This is one of the most sobering things I have seen in a long time.
God only knows what the effect of it all will be in the end. 10,000+ dead in a
virtual blink of the eye. Radiation. Mass destruction. Lives destroyed or
forever altered.
My wife has a friend who is Japanese. We aren't sure
--- On Sun, 3/13/11, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
Kyle, OFF-TOPIC Sunday Sermon I have posted this particular OFF
TOPIC commentary in vortex-l because I have perceived the fact that
there are individuals on this list that have shown interest in what's
--- On Sun, 3/13/11, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Subject: [Vo]:Reactor #3 just blew up, and another tsunami coming
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Sunday, March 13, 2011, 9:26 PM
Reactor #3 just exploded.
Also there are aftershocks and
--- On Sat, 1/29/11, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:The Big Picture
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Saturday, January 29, 2011, 4:57 PM
This is an unknown nuclear reaction for crying out loud! A NUCLEAR
REACTION. It is not a
--- On Tue, 1/18/11, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
... a true character ... but I'm not so sure the Dime Box
was fictitious ?
The romantic in me likes to think it was real. Maybe not in this plane of
reality, whatever it is, but *somewhere*.
I liked R.C.
We talked quite a bit
--- On Tue, 7/20/10, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
If it was an interstellar communication and it happened to
impinge on earth, it would have stayed pointed in our
direction for a long time. Ditto for a deliberate signal to
attract our attention and announce the existence of
--- On Sat, 7/17/10, mix...@bigpond.com mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
At a distance of 1 light year, a dish with a radius of 100
m would pick up grand
total of 3E-22 W from a 10 MW transmitter on Earth. I don't
think there are any
10 MW transmitters, and even if there were, a signal that
small
--- On Sat, 7/17/10, mix...@bigpond.com mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
To put this in perspective, in order to pick up 1
micro-Watt in total from our
10 MW transmitter, the dish would have to have a radius of
6 million km.
BTW the *closest* star to Sol is 4 ly away, not one.
1uW is a lot of
--- On Sun, 7/18/10, mix...@bigpond.com mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
I seem to recall that measurements on some supernova
indicated that the neutrino
burst and the x-rays arrived at the same time. IOW
neutrinos don't travel faster
than light. (Only tachyons do that ;^)
On the one hand...
In my
--- On Mon, 7/19/10, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmmm . . . What about up-links to geosynchronous TV and telcom
satellites. Or, if a civilization expands beyond one planet (but not
interstellar), what about interplanetary communications?
I don't have any data on hand about
V,
From http://www.faqs.org/faqs/astronomy/faq/part6/section-12.html
I did some calculations (assumes I did the arithmetic right) for a dish with an
aperture of 10,000 meters. Such a structure could be conceivably constructed in
space, using either one massive construct, or arrays of smaller
--- On Fri, 7/16/10, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Jed, and all:
Another I'd add to the list is, we assume they would use radio waves or optical
(laser) communication (ala COSETI). Some other medium may exist, which we
either cannot use effectively at the moment (neutrinos) or
--- On Thu, 5/27/10, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Unspeakable . . .
I can't bring myself to read this.
See:
Witness: Mallove asked for help before he died
I read it, unfortunately.
This is awful. I cannot imagine the mindset of a person who would not do as
he asked.
--- On Fri, 5/21/10, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
Sorry for the long delay in replying, it was a... rough week.
I used that same substance, different mixture. More sugar,
I think, and I used it for smoke bombs, it burned slowly
with copious white smoke, basically harmless.
--- On Wed, 5/19/10, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
All good points, Kyle. The only individual I can think of
that is trying to
reverse this trend is Dean Kamen, inventor of Segway.
Segway is also not
practical but it's still an impressive product that has
--- On Wed, 5/19/10, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fMQEiRWoiJw
Is it practical? No. Was it fun? Oh yes.
Better page: http://www.sparkbangbuzz.com/flame-amp/flameamp.htm
I know Nyle's pages are better than mine, that's why I linked to
--- On Wed, 5/19/10, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Just for fun...
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Wednesday, May 19, 2010, 10:22 AM
In the (non-ecclesiastical) category
of 'nothing new under the sun'
Here is an article that
V,
With some spare time over the weekend, and little to do (a rarity), I decided
to make a crystal-less crystal radio. Inspired by Nyle Steiner's work (google
him, he is a god among amateur scientists), I conducted a couple hour's worth
of experimenting with using flames as a detection method
Frank,
I'm late in replying, as I usually am, what with how my life generally is...
Don't give up. I may not say much these days, but I read your messages. Keep at
your work.
--Kyle
--- On Sun, 2/21/10, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:TEST
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Sunday, February 21, 2010, 10:34 AM
Another test. I have not been able to post
messages.
- Jed
Came through OK here, Jed.
I've
Test...
--- On Sat, 2/20/10, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
From: Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Census Community Survay..what is the remedy if I fail to
produce?
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
First, I'm pretty sure that it's a misdemeanor at worst,
and there isn't
--- On Tue, 1/26/10, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
HARIMA, JAPAN—Saying that there was no more knowledge to
acquire about
the physical nature of the universe, the International
Union of Pure
and Applied Physics announced Monday that it had concluded
the
scientific study of
--- On Fri, 1/22/10, Rick Monteverde r...@highsurf.com wrote:
Of course there are a few right here in our own
neighborhood that are decent
candidates for deep bio activity. And aside from that one
where we are to
attempt no landing..., we wouldn't have to fight off
those annoying blue
V,
It is more a sad one, I think, so far.
Up here where I live, a lesbian woman was assaulted two girls and a group of
four men, apparently simply because the woman was a lesbian. Among other
things, she was stabbed in the eye, and will most likely (if she has not
already) lose that eye. I
--- On Sat, 12/5/09, Alexander Hollins alexander.holl...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Alexander Hollins alexander.holl...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:OT: Scientists grow pork meat in a laboratory (Follow-up)
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Saturday, December 5, 2009, 8:24 AM
Its a comedy bit by
See comments below...
--- On Fri, 12/4/09, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:OT: Scientists grow pork meat in a laboratory
(Follow-up)
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com, vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Friday, December 4, 2009, 3:02
--- On Fri, 12/4/09, Alexander Hollins alexander.holl...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Alexander Hollins alexander.holl...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:OT: Scientists grow pork meat in a laboratory (Follow-up)
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Friday, December 4, 2009, 9:53 PM
* Happens to be. He
V,
If you can watch this with a straight face, well, I'm rather impressed:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0bKq3x74UE
I don't know if Koji Kondo would be amused or horrified. But, if that made your
ears bleed, then THIS is freaking cool, and straight from the man himself:
--- On Fri, 12/4/09, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
From: Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:OT: Scientists grow pork meat in a laboratory
(Follow-up)
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Friday, December 4, 2009, 10:55 PM
It wasn't; I was mostly thinking in
V,
I'll try this again. In my previous post in the other thread, I made a few
points relating to some things being argued, but as is usual, there was no
response to what I said whatsoever, save one private message effectively
calling me a racist for posting a link to the (I thought) humorous
--- On Fri, 10/30/09, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jed and all,
There's more than a few unanswered questions about this whatsit.
1. Previous models have produced modest thrust. What is modest thrust? The
best we have seen to date is an apparatus of indeterminate weight very
--- On Tue, 10/13/09, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
A pair of otherwise distinguished physicists have
suggested that
the hypothesized Higgs boson, which physicists hope to
produce with the
collider, might be so abhorrent to nature that its creation
would ripple
backward through
--- On Wed, 9/23/09, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Late reply... sorry. Had to repair a family member's car. Unbelievably simple
problem, a real bear to track down.
The only reason we stopped is because the Chinese do it so
cheaply. This is also why the U.S. stopped manufacturing
--- On Sun, 9/6/09, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
One problem with their story is that the home system of the
aliens was
identified as Zeta Reticuli, a binary star system. It
is believed
that binary systems likely would not contain planets, much
less those
which could sustain
--- On Mon, 8/31/09, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
Unfortunately, this experiment would be a pain in the neck
to perform,
and if I can judge by the silence, both Horace and Kyle
have given up on
this particular time sink.
No.
Things are just... things are hard. Life.
As for
V, and Stephen and Horace in particular...
Okay. The following experiment was performed.
Took my two trusty bearings from the working BB motor. Left the U bolts
attached to the outer races. Fine.
Took a length of 5/8 smooth steel shaft, cut two pieces 2 long from that. One
piece was clamped
--- On Wed, 9/2/09, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
Good? No? Indifferent?
Good? Great, really.
Thanks, appreciate that.
The experiment, I mean. The result I'm not so happy
with -- trouble is
it didn't produce the result I expected! Arrgh,
experiment wins again!
Now,
--- On Fri, 8/21/09, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
Subject: [Vo]:Roswell Confession
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Friday, August 21, 2009, 8:58 AM
http://ufocon.blogspot.com/2009/08/scientist-admits-to-study-of-roswell.html
Sunday, August
V,
Hey kids, what time is it?
Howdy Doody time!
No, actually, it's ball-bearing motor time again. The old motor was
disassembled and remade into a more nimble form. The spacing between the
bearings was halved, thus reducing resistance. Also, the wobbly allthread shaft
was replaced with a
V,
Behold:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMO8Pyi3UpY
--Kyle
Postscript: Maybe if the water was D2O?
--- On Sat, 8/22/09, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
I would recommend holding off on the graphite until you get
a chance to take some measurements first. The graphite
messed up my motor to some degree as far as measurements are
concerned.
Alright, will hold off on that then.
V, and Horace of course,
Got out the original ball bearing motor which works, and connected a high
current transformer of indeterminate turns ratio (made it myself years ago, do
not remember). Technical details of the transformer are below:
Core: several spools worth of iron rebar tie wire
--- On Fri, 8/14/09, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
Well, Kyle, the ball bearing motor may just have some
anomalies left up its sleeves. Looks like the back emf
possibly doesn't increase with rpms, at least in some range.
How strange is that?
Do you want me to rig that
--- On Sat, 8/8/09, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
This is a bit of a surprise. I would have thought
with that much current it would have had at least some sign
of working. I guess there is probably more inherent
friction.
It could be. Didn't feel like there was any more
Or lack thereof.
Tests using various cage-to-race tightnesses showed no motoring effect
whatsoever, even with enough current applied to cause heavy automotive jumper
cables to become uncomfortably hot. Identical shaft and flywheel setup was used
as in the ball bearing motor which works
Horace,
Just for the hell of it, I am making a new bearing motor out of automotive
bearings, the old conical roller type used in the front wheels of
rear-wheel-drive cars. It's almost done, but I unfortunately ran out of 5/16
nuts tonight, so cannot continue until tomorrow evening.
Two
--- On Sat, 8/1/09, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
state of mind.
If you're going to use English to communicate with others,
please use
the words to mean what we all agree that they mean.
snip
time is not a state of mind.
snip
A country mile is not an hour.
snip
And
--- On Thu, 7/30/09, Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
Some of the youtube experiment videos show motors that seem
to run well with low current. I would not have expected the
contact to be so poor. Maybe it *is* indeed poor and
that is key to getting enough torque. The fact
--- On Fri, 7/10/09, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Jed,
New York state is never to be outdone in the stupidity department. You should
read the inspection manual for here; it is a three-ring circus.
1. If a car has a 1mm hole in a rear taillight lens, it fails. Because, you
know,
V,
This is a catch-all message for a couple different things in different threads.
1. John Berry: did finish the HV supply to charge the tube/capacitor. But due
to the current consumption of the tube in 'keep alive' mode and the desire to
have everything isolated from ground, I am going to
V,
Today, went out and got a nice power supply for a Marinov bearing motor. 1200
ampere jump starter box.
Two high quality RBI ball bearings, 5/8 shaft size, were purchased. Mated them
to a shaft with an aluminum flywheel on the end, used a couple U bolts to hold
the bearings to a wooden
V,
Built a quick and dirty one tonight. Does work, not well, but it does at least
take far longer than it should to spin down. The bearings were basically cheap
crap from Valu Hardware. Need to get something better.
Power source was a moderately charged 12V Autocraft lawnmower battery,
--- On Wed, 6/24/09, William Beaty bi...@eskimo.com wrote:
From: William Beaty bi...@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hiddink capacitor links
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Wednesday, June 24, 2009, 3:28 PM
On Wed, 24 Jun 2009, John Berry
wrote:
If something interests you, then test it.
--- On Wed, 6/24/09, Michel Jullian michelj...@gmail.com wrote:
Or it could be that in both cases the capacitance remains
constant
(defined by the dielectric material, area and thickness),
and the
decrease in frequency is due to the increase in resistance
of the
resistor + plasma series
V and John,
1.2kVDC and 4kV, eh? No problem.
Did find: old microwave oven. Transformer still works, lower wattage oven so
safer output. 120VAC to 2kVAC transformer. Plan to send this to a 2 stage
multiplier, as I have about a hundred 6kV diodes on hand and nice capacitors
rated for this
--- On Tue, 6/23/09, Michel Jullian michelj...@gmail.com wrote:
Kyle, nice work as always. Couldn't the plate (the support
of the net
charge) be simply the inside surface of the glass tube, and
the plasma
be just the conducting wire leading to that plate? In
this case,
suppressing the
V,
Hmm. Very little to say, re: my plasma capacitor relaxation oscillator. I'll do
a few more quick tests and let you know what I find.
John, now that we've established, despite the static, that one can make a cap
with one plate a plasma, what specifically would you like me to do with it
John, and all interested,
In an experiment to determine whether or not a lit fluorescent tube can act as
a capacitor when surrounded with a conductive material, I did the following
experiment.
A relaxation oscillator was constructed; +V of about 110VDC from a 'bandolier'
of 9V batteries put
--- On Tue, 6/16/09, John Berry aethe...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, though Gray has air and hence no inner tube between
the plasma and the metal terminal.
What is he using as plasma? Corona?
The outside of the envelope is metal
foil.
That should work however everything indicates that the
V, and John Berry in particular,
Figured I should make a more aptly titled thread for this, as Enough Already
doesn't make much sense in light of what we're talking about. :)
Made a mistake in my last post, UV blacklights DO have a phosphor, one that
prefers the blue end of the spectrum. Not
--- On Tue, 6/16/09, John Berry aethe...@gmail.com wrote:
From: John Berry aethe...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Enough Already
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2009, 6:43 PM
Hopefully though it is the end of this
whole affair as it is about finding a resolution.
It is
--- On Tue, 6/16/09, John Berry aethe...@gmail.com wrote:
From: John Berry aethe...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Enough Already
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Tuesday, June 16, 2009, 8:41 PM
Too bad about the helium ;)The
charecteristic we want is for the plasma to be very exact
about when
--- On Sun, 6/14/09, Mike Carrell mi...@medleas.com wrote:
Kyle sees snapshots of Jed as a cruel and arrogant person
-- in fact he drives a cheap car.
Prius is not cheap. $1000 Buick is cheap.
What Kyle does not see is
Jed's acute and passionate awareness of the millions in
developing
--- On Mon, 6/15/09, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com wrote:
From: Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Jed's temporary ban...
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Monday, June 15, 2009, 8:22 AM
Interesting page. Here are some comments (yes,
they're just theory, I
don't
--- On Mon, 6/15/09, John Berry aethe...@gmail.com wrote:
Personally my interest is in the aether and I have much
evidence for a model I have developed which explains most
everything and roughly how to do almost anything, but I can
not imagine trying to wade into that subject here.
I've had
--- On Mon, 6/15/09, Edmund Storms stor...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Kyle, in the absence of Jed, I feel it's my duty to educate
about cold fusion. If you want to know what has been learned
up to 2007, I suggest you read my book The Science of Low
Energy Nuclear Reaction. If you want to learn
--- On Mon, 6/15/09, Chris Zell chrisrz...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Chris Zell chrisrz...@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:On Topic
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Monday, June 15, 2009, 7:15 PM
OK, I'm interested in the
anomalies you mentioned, particularly the conditioning of
space.
The whole
Vortex,
I have apologized to Jed. I don't know if he will accept it, but nevertheless,
I post it here as well, to make a public statement of it.
Jed and I do not agree on many things. But unfortunately, I took advantage of
that, and lashed out in anger. I feel anger first, when I perceive a
--- On Sat, 6/13/09, OrionWorks svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
Really? That's your impression of Jed?
Yes.
I would suggest you might want to consider looking in the
mirror when
you say that.
I wish for people to be free to choose their own paths. Read what he has
written, and I have
--- On Sun, 6/14/09, OrionWorks svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
I wish to express a public apology to Kyle MCallister. My
previous
comment was impulsive, and it shows so. Let me rephrase my
prior
thoughts into something less impulsive, and hopefully more
thoughtful.
I appreciate
--- On Sun, 6/14/09, OrionWorks svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
From: OrionWorks svj.orionwo...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Public apology to Kyle Mcallister, and a rephrasing of my
original comment
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Sunday, June 14, 2009, 6:15 PM
Kyle,
Thanks for taking
--- On Sat, 6/13/09, Mark Iverson zeropo...@charter.net wrote:
From: Mark Iverson zeropo...@charter.net
Subject: [Vo]:Jed's temporary ban...
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Date: Saturday, June 13, 2009, 1:23 AM
Hey Jed, time to go take a vacation
and get some RR... Go climb a mountain with your
V,
Been away from the computer for a while, but now that I'm back, I need to
clarify something.
The video I posted a link to pertaining to the fishing line being used to run
the Mylow motor is NOT my video. It was posted by someone calling
himself TinselKoala...which while an
--- On Wed, 5/27/09, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Credit to TinselKoala.
Which is an anagram for Nikola Tesla. Whatcha you
wanna bet it is
Alsetalokin of Whipmag fame? ;-)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PIvZJ9xGutI
Same person. Voices are a clear match. This guy's been
--- On Wed, 5/20/09, OrionWorks svj.orionwo...@gmail.com wrote:
I hope I was able to answer Kyle's concerns. Sounds like
Buffalo, NY,
has a few issues of it's own as well! ;-)
I am very glad to hear that all is well with you and yours. It is a terror
beyond imagining when one feels that
Steven,
I hope everything goes well, and safely, for you and
yours. I've dealt with similar things before, albeit
with a machine in my hands that would be far more
effective than any modern donut-monster. Thankfully, I
never had to use it.
One thing I am not entirely clear on, why did the cop
V,
Have had and done with this. I don't know if it is
possible or not. Maybe. But whatever the case, this
thing is getting very stupid, very fast.
Mylow, posting to Youtube.com as magnetmotor1 took
everything down today, posted a reply to a comment by
TinselKoala on this video:
--- Harry Veeder hvee...@ncf.ca wrote:
-
Mylow (and his twin brother) demonstrate the motor
with six bar magnets:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_KQ8tldXnY
Watching this with my wife now.
Something about the video seems odd. I cannot put my
finger on it,
--- Jeff Fink rev...@ptd.net wrote:
Kyle,
Pardon my ignorant, irrational excursion into green
shock technology. What
you are saying here makes perfect practical sense,
even though the PS
article played it up so nicely.
I am a retired designer of large scale power
generating
--- Harry Veeder hvee...@ncf.ca wrote:
Kyle,
I have a construction suggestion. If you haven't
already thought of
this, try using double sided tape to position the
rotor magnets instead
of glue.
Have to remember that for future. On Saturday, I spent
a while hot gluing them down to the
1 - 100 of 197 matches
Mail list logo
