RE: [Vo]:Neutral K mesons violates CPT

at light energy from the laser is turned into matter and antimatter, especially since the color of the light changes the nature of the matter produced. Said in another way, different light makes different matter. On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com>

RE: [Vo]:Neutral K mesons violates CPT

different matter. On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: Could generation of +/- s quark pairs be the trigger for nucleon disintegration. Could each pair with an up quark to form kaons and force the disintegration of the nucleons from whi

Re: [Vo]:Neutral K mesons violates CPT

Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> "*** If I understand correctly there are no sufficiently heavy elements >> available in Holmlids experiment for Kaons to form this way? …" >> >> This i

Re: [Vo]:Neutral K mesons violates CPT

independently. I'm fully with you there Eric. I hope we get that verification someday. > On 28 okt. 2015, at 01:05, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> The alte

Re: [Vo]:Neutral K mesons violates CPT

Well if Kaons are present on the up side we always thought something strange was going on in this process. Although energetically there is enough rest mass in Deuterium to produce a Kaon through some kind of low energy or collective trigger for the nucleons to trigger can it account for the

Re: [Vo]:Neutral K mesons violates CPT

Yup I was also wondering about the different quarks in the Kaons. Was the signature in their data clear? Or was there some other reason they inferred Kaons as well as Pions? Sent from my iPhone > On 26 Oct 2015, at 08:03, Axil Axil wrote: > > K−, negatively charged

Re: [Vo]:Neutral K mesons violates CPT

r is gone? > > We are at a stage in LENR where Niels Bohr was doing his exploration of the > structure of the atom. Holmlid needs to modify his experimental processes to > get as much info out of his experiment as he can. > > > >> On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 7:15 AM, S

Re: [Vo]:Neutral K mesons violates CPT

Could generation of +/- s quark pairs be the trigger for nucleon disintegration. Could each pair with an up quark to form kaons and force the disintegration of the nucleons from which the up quark comes? Each s quark has a rest mass of 100MeV. I'm not sure if there is a meson containing an s

RE: [Vo]:Neutral K mesons violates CPT

in another way, different light makes different matter. On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: Could generation of +/- s quark pairs be the trigger for nucleon disintegration. Could each pair with an up quark to form kaons and force the disinteg

Re: [Vo]:Colloquium at SRI

of produced lepton and neutrinos produced. I'm curious how it can work I suppose we will need to wait to see the of their theory. Sent from my iPad > On 23 okt. 2015, at 16:54, Jones Beene <jone...@pacbell.net> wrote: > > From: Stephen Cooke > > Ø That nucleons may

RE: [Vo]:Colloquium at SRI

Thank a lot Jones Beene for this great and interesting report. If Holmlid process was some how creating dense material that enhanced the Stella type proton proton chain reaction, from deuteron proton reactions onwards that would already be amazing. That nucleons may actually disintegrate is

RE: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

You might be right Axil, These days I certainly tend to think there is some kind of collective disruptive or resonant behaviour that is exciting the nuclei or causing them to act this way. I acknowledge your good arguments and evidence for the formation of SPP's in these devices. It also seems

Re: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

Oct 2015, at 22:18, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > I guess there is a chance that they saw X-ray spectra from Pionic Deuterium > as well as inferring from muons of specific energy. It will be interesting to > see what he says on Thursday, I hope someo

RE: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

say he could well have another explanation. From: eric.wal...@gmail.com Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 08:47:08 -0500 Subject: Re: [Vo]:MMDD Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration To: vortex-l@eskimo.com On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 2:21 AM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote:

RE: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

Oct 2015 08:47:08 -0500 Subject: Re: [Vo]:MMDD Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration To: vortex-l@eskimo.com On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 2:21 AM, Stephen Cooke <stephen_coo...@hotmail.com> wrote: If any was produced we would need to balance this against those the energy required fo

Re: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

This is definitely a crazy train of thought on my part but it's got me wondering: Bearing in mind Holmlids detection of muons and possibility they come from decay of positive or negative pions along with the fact that they are generated in ultra dense deuterium. Is It possible that the nuclei

Re: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

they are inferred – from finding muons, > which can be detected. Hopefully, Ólafsson will address this issue of > detection on Thursday. > > > From: Stephen Cooke > > … Is It possible that the nuclei are sufficiently close that those pions or > virtual ones g

Re: [Vo]:Publishing the Lundin/Lidgren paper

I'm glad it was published. I think it is unlikely that a theorist is going to find the complete theory in one simple step. In the same way it is unlikely that the first simple experiment will create just the right complete conditions for perfect LENR. But each one of these theories and

RE: [Vo]:MMDD .... Muon Mediated Deuteron Disintegration

I really enjoy browsing this site, the discussions are amazing. I recently on LENR Forum had some similar thoughts but since I am more an enthusiast than and far from a serious physicist so they are pretty speculative and I appreciate from the discussions here that there are also all sorts of

<    1   2