There is a discrepancy on the HV power indeed.
At some moment in the video Mats remarked that he measured 1100 Watt input
power of the HV unit.
There was no instant response to that remark. The wall dispay indicated
around 200-250 Watt HV input power to the reactor.
Despite the fact that it was
Beside that question, one participant ajb on lenr-forum make a quick
optimistic computation,
based on the safe assumption that Defkalion is fooling nobody...
(I hear the moderate and hard skeptics moan already).
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Teslaalset robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.comwrote:
HV units should have a higher efficiency than observed.
The ones I have researched are 50% efficient at best.
released by the core.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.com
To: Vortex List vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Jul 29, 2013 5:50 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:DGT Really Has Something Big
Beside that question, one participant ajb on lenr-forum make a quick
optimistic
The demonstration we just witnessed by DGT should modify the minds of many
sitting upon the fence. But, I recall the story about being able to lead a
horse to water, but not being able to make it drink. This might be the
situation regarding LENR. Many of the skeptics are just not capable of
From: David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 4:02:52 PM
I reviewed the DGT demonstration and had a chance to give it a bit of
serious thought. One observation that I focused upon was the reading
of the output temperature during the hydrogen cycle. It is obvious
that
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 4:02 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
It is obvious that this reading remained stuck at 100 C during a lot of
time as the power output was being ramped up. I expected this to occur.
At first I thought the demonstration was completely copacetic from the
Why don't people just go look at the electric company's meter?
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 4:33 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 4:02 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.comwrote:
It is obvious that this reading remained stuck at 100 C during a lot of
time as
On 07/28/2013 05:08 PM, Alan Fletcher wrote:
There may well be a pressure (and temperature) drop down the output
tube to outlet --- but from steam tables and a guess at the tube size
and length I'd be surprised if it is more than about 0.5 bar -- so the
COP is most likely at the 10+ level.
On Sun, Jul 28, 2013 at 3:53 PM, Craig cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
I read that Defkalion answered Mats Lewan's objection to the HV power.
There is apparently a 20% duty cycle; so Mats calculated input power
should have been divided by 5.
I can't remember where I read this, however.
I reviewed the DGT demonstration and had a chance to give it a bit of serious
thought. One observation that I focused upon was the reading of the output
temperature during the hydrogen cycle. It is obvious that this reading
remained stuck at 100 C during a lot of time as the power output was
Can anyone come up with a way to prove that the water is not being totally
vaporized under the conditions that were demonstrated? So far I come up
empty. My best estimate is that the true power output is over 20 kilowatts
of heat which is significant. My only concern is the speed of vapor
12 matches
Mail list logo
