11:54:43 -0800
Subject: Re: [Vo]:E-Cat production in the US has begun
From: maryyu...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Steven Johnson svj.orionwo...@gmail.com
wrote:
From MY
If Rossi is producing nuclear fusion reactors in the US, how
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Robert Lynn
robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Without appropriate certification you cannot get equipment insured.
Rossi claims he has CE certification.
T
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Rossi claims he has CE certification.
From JNoP:
Andrea Rossi October 23rd, 2011 at 8:08 AM Dear Dario: The CE for the
business to business has been done. For household applications not
yet. Warm Regards, A.R .
Of
Exactly. Besides which others have claimed to have checked and found no
records of his having CE compliance.
On top of which it is obvious to any engineer that looks that his design
and construction would not comply with even the European Pressure Equipment
Directive, (Oct 6th test was a
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Robert Lynn
robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Exactly. Besides which others have claimed to have checked and found no
records of his having CE compliance.
Yeah, that was me. But, you need to know under which company it is
registered. I tried all the
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 8:40 AM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Robert Lynn
robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Exactly. Besides which others have claimed to have checked and found no
records of his having CE compliance.
Yeah, that was me.
Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Without appropriate certification you cannot get equipment insured.
Installing uncertified equipment anywhere exposes the company
manufacturing, marketing, installing or owning the equipment up to all
sorts of potentially devastating legal
The problem of insurance et certification is a key fact.
for me it is a way for the incumbent business to block the spread of that
technology to the public, and privatize the benefits to the usual big
players.
as you see many comments, this is in process. the LENR is not event proved,
and
1.
Fyodor
December 9th, 2011 at 11:08 AM
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=516cpage=15#comment-142909
Mr. Rossi
Has production begun yet in your US facilities? Or are they still
starting up?
Thank you for taking time to answer my question
2.
Andrea Rossi
On a cautionary note: Rossi's terse response strikes me as a matter of
personal interpretation. With Rossi, personal interpretation can mean a lot
of different scenarios. I find myself asking, how is Rossi choosing to
exploit the word begun in this particular case.
Maybe it actually does means
Your interpretation of begun should be constrained by the context of the
original question in which begun is contrasted with starting up.
However, your interpretation of begun was not so constrained. I suggest
you restate your argument with that in mind.
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 8:03 AM,
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 4:43 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.comwrote:
Mr. Rossi
Has production begun yet in your US facilities? Or are they still
starting up?
Does Rossi have production facilities in the US? If so where? And how do
we know? Has anyone ever been invited
If his customer is the military, perhaps he doesn't need authorization...
2011/12/10 Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 4:43 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
Mr. Rossi
Has production begun yet in your US facilities? Or are they still
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.comwrote:
If his customer is the military, perhaps he doesn't need authorization...
The military may not need authorization to use a device but he needs
authorizations galore for a manufacturing plant/factory. For example,
James Bowery wrote:
Your interpretation of begun should be constrained by the context of the
original question in which begun is contrasted with starting up.
However, your interpretation of begun was not so constrained. I suggest
you restate your argument with that in mind.
I
Why should it be in a populated area?
2011/12/10 Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 10:08 AM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.comwrote:
If his customer is the military, perhaps he doesn't need authorization...
The military may not need authorization to use a device but
From MY
If Rossi is producing nuclear fusion reactors in the US, how was this
authorized without an opportunity for public comment?
Strikes me as an odd comment from MY, the staunch skeptic.
Damned if you do. Damned if you don't.
Svj - orionworks.com
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.comwrote:
Why should it be in a populated area?
Far as I know, all of Massachusetts is a populated area. And you can't
make nuclear devices in the US without all sorts of permits.
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 11:42 AM, Steven Johnson
svj.orionwo...@gmail.comwrote:
From MY
If Rossi is producing nuclear fusion reactors in the US, how was this
authorized without an opportunity for public comment?
Strikes me as an odd comment from MY, the staunch skeptic.
Damned if you do.
Why do you assume that is in Massachusetts?
2011/12/10 Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.comwrote:
Why should it be in a populated area?
Far as I know, all of Massachusetts is a populated area. And you can't
make nuclear
of controlled substances, how could it be illegal (currently)? I
contend that the action cannot be prohibited without being acknowledged.
I'd love to get comments from anyone with a legal background.
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2011 11:54:43 -0800
Subject: Re: [Vo]:E-Cat production in the US has begun
From: maryyu
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.comwrote:
Why do you assume that is in Massachusetts?
Because Rossi said that was where he was planning to produce E-cats in the
US. I don't think it matters. I don't think he can make nuclear fusion
reactors in the US without
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Robert Leguillon
robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote:
If there is no measurable radiation, no possession or disposal of
controlled substances, how could it be illegal (currently)?
You forget: Rossi claims gamma radiation during operation which, he says,
is
From Robert Leguillon wrote:
I contend that the action cannot be prohibited without being acknowledged.
Spot on.
Thats what is so amusing about it.
Svj -orionworks.com
... or,
they'll just make up some double-talk and do what they want anyway.
-mark
-Original Message-
From: Steven Johnson [mailto:svj.orionwo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2011 12:55 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:E-Cat production in the US has begun
From Robert Leguillon
On Sat, 2011-12-10 at 11:53 -0800, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 11:40 AM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Why should it be in a populated area?
Far as I know, all of Massachusetts is a populated area. And you
can't make nuclear devices in the US without
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 5:31 PM, Craig Haynie cchayniepub...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think it would be considered a nuclear device.
Calling it a nuclear device would be the utmost irony!
Sorry, you cannot being that nuclear device into the US.
Uh, no, there is no such thing as a cold fusion
27 matches
Mail list logo
