Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

Jed and Steven, I think you guys are on to something. It is the expectation and anticipation that is the climax. Reading Rossi's comments - I have the feeling he is in a constant euphorium. I think that is the reason he is doing what he is doing. The question has been asked here "Why does A.R. put

Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

Here is another comment I posted in response to myself, in a kind of monologue. I wrote: I do not recall seeing any information from Godes describing the actual > calorimetry or performance of any of his existing reactors, or previous > reactors. . . . > > I would ask: If Robert Godes has all

Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote: > When I was a small child I often wished that certain aspects pertaining to > my lucid dreams would make an effort to jump into the realm of my physical > reality. Who wouldn't enjoy being able to fly! Alas, they never obliged.

RE: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

>From Jed: > Dreams do come true, so be careful what you wish for. I dreamed of having > a computer of my own, after seeing one at the Census Bureau at age 8. > When I grew up I did have one. It was the first expensive item I bought > as an adult. That was a very prophetic dream you

Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

In reply to David Roberson's message of Thu, 3 Sep 2015 11:04:18 -0400: Hi, [snip] >In order to operate it uses a mixture of deuterium and tritium fuel.I just >remember reading that the reaction process results in the regeneration of >additional tritium fuel but that the process is barely

Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

Subject: Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response @David Roberson "I recall reading that it is going to be a challenge to generate all of the tritium required to fuel the Tokamak reactor itself. Has this problem been resolved? Is there going to be enough left over to become a pr

Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

@David Roberson "I recall reading that it is going to be a challenge to generate all of the tritium required to fuel the Tokamak reactor itself. Has this problem been resolved? Is there going to be enough left over to become a proliferation issue?" ITER, if it ever gets going, should produce

RE: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

from Jed, ... > I do not recall seeing any information from Godes describing the actual > calorimetry or performance of any of his existing reactors, or previous > reactors. He has always talked about what he hopes to accomplish, not what > he has accomplished. I have asked him in

Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

Here is another message I posted about this, over at CMNS. This is about: http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/BrillouinIE123.pdf I would like to clarify something, from an off-line discussion. I wrote: > Let us also assume Godes can make a 100 W reactor, or perhaps a 1 kW > reactor.

Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

<a.ashfi...@verizon.net> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Tue, Sep 1, 2015 12:09 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response Axil "NRC nuclear inspections cost a lot, The reactor operators must give the NRC about 20 million a year for inspection." F

Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

Axil "NRC nuclear inspections cost a lot, The reactor operators must give the NRC about 20 million a year for inspection." For Tokamaks too? It's Tokamaks that make tritium in bulk. Probably the greatest threat for proliferation there is.

[Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

Here is a new article about Brillouin: http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/BrillouinIE123.pdf My response: Godes' strategy makes no sense to me. It is a terrific waste of his time and his investors' money. I cannot imagine any reason why a person would build a 104 kW reactor at this

Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

> > Jed says: > > 2. There are hundreds of corporations and probably hundreds of thousands > of engineers in the world who can do a better job at this than Godes. If he > would only demonstrate that the effect is real, these corporations and > experts would be lined up ready to do this job far

Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/08/31/rossi-manufacturing-not-licensing-is-focus-for-e-cat/ Without air tight IP protection through patents, selling knowhow cannot be done. Rossi is locking down LENR IP. Unless Godes gets his own IP, he has nothing to sell. Will Rossi go to court to cut the legs

Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

Axil Axil wrote: > “We are an engineering company. We are making equipment that companies > should be able to go out and produce things themselves. We don’t want to > produce things; it’s not what Brillouin is about. . . . > > > Jed, did you not understand the business

Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

It seems to me that what you don;t want to do is design a reactor that produces tritium. Tritium production is a nonstarter in the reactor business. The NRC will shut down any reactor that produces tritium even in the smallest amounts. What is Godes thinking here? On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 2:04 PM,

Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

Mon, Aug 31, 2015 2:25 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response It seems to me that what you don;t want to do is design a reactor that produces tritium. Tritium production is a nonstarter in the reactor business. The NRC will shut down any reactor that produces

Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

e an > issue for regulators. > > Dave > > > -Original Message- > From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com> > To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> > Sent: Mon, Aug 31, 2015 2:25 pm > Subject: Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response > > It se

Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

Axil Axil wrote: No reactor that produces any amount of tritium will ever be sold! > That may not be true. Tritium is used today in exit signs and wristwatches. In other words, government regulations already allow it in small amounts. As long as it can be shown that the

Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

Jed, not to mention that Tokamaks produce tritium by the liter.

Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

FYI Rector shutdown due to radiation leakage. https://tlarremore.wordpress.com/2015/03/17/nuclear-event-reactor-shutdown-salem-nuclear-power-plant-new-jersey/t On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > Axil Axil wrote: > > No reactor

Re: [Vo]:New Article on Brillouin, and my response

NRC nuclear inspections cost a lot, The reactor operators must give the NRC about 20 million a year for inspection. On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 3:50 PM, a.ashfield wrote: > Jed, not to mention that Tokamaks produce tritium by the liter. > >