On 2011-04-05 20:51, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
Rossi continues to answer and/or avoid answering questions.
I find this of interest too:
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=473
[...] The walls of the reactor are made of stainless steel, copper
free. Yes, I have understood why scaling
Thank you very much for signalling this- it si a proof that he is doing
healthy logical professional DEVELOPMENT. Very interesting and very
different from scientific research- has a lot more dimensions, including
human ones. (I was engaged in thsi type of activity for 25 years in nthe
chenmical
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 6:22 AM, SHIRAKAWA Akira
shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
I wonder what could it be. It sounds like we will
find out soon, anyway.
My guess is Lockheed-Martin. I've heard rumblings of something coming
from Marietta; but, I always thought it was EEStor.
T
From Terry
I wonder what could it be. It sounds like we will
find out soon, anyway.
My guess is Lockheed-Martin. I've heard rumblings of something coming
from Marietta; but, I always thought it was EEStor.
Wallmart! ...where they treat you like family!
Just kidding. (I wish!)
William :
My understanding is that the reactor volume in the original E-CAT was
around 1 liter or 1000cc and that the new smaller module has a volume of
about 1/20th of a liter or 50cc. Is this correct?
Also, what is the standard power rating of this smaller module? Is it
officially 2.5 kW?
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
William :
My understanding is that the reactor volume in the original E-CAT was around
1 liter or 1000cc and that the new smaller module has a volume of about
1/20th of a liter or 50cc. Is this correct?
Also, what is the
Rossi continues to answer and/or avoid answering questions.
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=360cpage=14#comments
Andrea Rossi
April 5th, 2011 at 5:24 AM
Dear Mr Antonio Di Stefano:
Thank you for your suggestions. The minimum size is a module of 2.5 kW of
power, so far.
Warm
I have asked him because I dislike the planned method of scale up. I hope he
has already tested step-wise combinations of, say 3, 12, 25 E-cats working
together. As with the airplanes- the start period is critical- heat peaks or
inhibition, oscillations (I think) An E-lion must have a more
In reply to Alan J Fletcher's message of Tue, 05 Apr 2011 11:51:18 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Dear Mr. Gluck:
I prefer to use small modules for economy scale and safety issues. To combine
even thousands of modules in series and parallels is easy, and zero risk time
thousands is always zero. Why risk?
I think the problem is heat management and control; it seems that there very
frequent heat peaks at the start- and local overheating can destroy the
active sites. In the same time the triggering of the reaction needs uniform
heat.
One problem to be solved is that of design- a good commercial
10 matches
Mail list logo
