RE: [Vo]:Re: Is the proton friable?

The only finger your God uses is his middle finger! That is clearly obvious in this troubled world. From: Bob Cook [mailto:frobertc...@hotmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 10:23 AM To: vortex-l Subject: [Vo]:Re: Is the proton friable? Axil-- I doubt that the final snow flake

Re: [Vo]:Re: Is the proton friable?

http://www.its.caltech.edu/~atomic/snowcrystals/faqs/faqs.htm Snowflakes have 6 arms. Kenneth Libbrecht a physicist at Caltech writes about snow crystal formation on his website : The story

[Vo]:Re: Is the proton friable?

Axil-- I doubt that the final snow flake is determined by the “seed” which starts the snow flake (an accumulation of water crystals) growing. I would imagine that the subsequent accumulation of dust particles etc also influence the final shape as it grows. In other words it’s a random growth

[Vo]:Re: Is the proton friable?

Russ- You may be right about the bag model of a nucleus. However, there are some models that suggest some order to nuclei, including the stability of alpha particle groups within nuclei as suggested by Rossi, based on Norman Cook’s theory, and the apparent existence of electrons and

Re: [Vo]:Re: I.H. press release responding to Rossi

The attorney of the defendants: http://www.jonesday.com/crjpace/

Re: [Vo]:Re: I.H. press release responding to Rossi

Hey, Jones, you're a JD. Any relation? :-) On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Alan Fletcher wrote: > Seems Darden/IH et al have retained Jones Day to > represent them. >

Re: [Vo]:Re: I.H. press release responding to Rossi

Seems Darden/IH et al have retained Jones Day to represent them. < http://freeenergyscams.com/now-we-know-the-defendants-law-firm-in-the-rossi-v-d arden-e-cat-lawsuit/ > This apparently gives them 60 days to reply in detail. Presumably it'll cost them an arm and a

Re: [Vo]:Re: Comparison of energy inputs to Earth climate

Presumably these five men were shielded by 10,000 feet of air while they stood directly under the detonation of 2Kiloton atomic bomb. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BlE1BdOAfVc Harry On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 3:41 PM, H LV wrote: > Bob, > > Unless the beam of gamma rays

Re: [Vo]:Re: Comparison of energy inputs to Earth climate

Bob, Unless the beam of gamma rays are emitted at high enough altitude most of the beam energy will be reabsorbed by the atmosphere. harry On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Bob Cook wrote: > Harry- > > No I do not think sending energy to space is equivalent to

[Vo]:Re: Comparison of energy inputs to Earth climate

Harry- No I do not think sending energy to space is equivalent to increasing the reflectivity of the earth. Its using kinetic energy released as heat or work or other useful form (existing already on Earth) to transfer heat stored in the atmosphere and oceans (more than is used by the

[Vo]:Re: LIVE ON YOUTUBE: Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project: *GlowStick* 5.3 - Ready to power climb

It could also be that an increased magnetic field in the null reactor actually causes an exothermic reaction without any muons with a trace hydrogen present. How permeable is the Alumina for H? If hydrogen is being depleted in the null reactor with time, there may be a concentration gradient

[Vo]:Re: [Vo]:Saudi Arabia to Diversify

That's why I asked. Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone - Reply message - From: mix...@bigpond.com To: Subject: [Vo]:Saudi Arabia to Diversify Date: Fri, Apr 15, 2016 6:34 PM In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 15 Apr 2016 17:55:31 -0400: Hi,

[Vo]:Re: Next Big Future - goes out on a limb

Axil-- Your wrote: “One prediction is the production of intense RF because the reaction is magnetic and RF is a result of Active NMR elements. “ I agree with this assessment. I think you are correct on this part of the theory of LENR. Bob Cook From: Axil Axil Sent: Thursday, April 14,

Re: [Vo]:Re: Next Big Future - goes out on a limb

Bob, I like that you pointed that out. I have no clue it is so, nor did I observe the Pepsi plant. The reality is that we have too many unknown and speculations becomes very 'wide'. We need to wait and judge until we are better informed. It ought be a quick answer. Both parties should benefit from

[Vo]:Re: Next Big Future - goes out on a limb

Axil-- I avoided noting this. You are too out spoken. Bob Cook PS: I have thought the Pepsi brewing plant next door to the customer was the real target for the steam, it being sold by the customer at a markup. BC From: Axil Axil Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2016 8:50 PM To: vortex-l

[Vo]:RE: [Vo]:RE: Ólafsson - Laser not strictly needed

OK, Frank this could be intriguing or coincidental – please remind us again – your magic number of 1,094,000 meters second would ostensibly be a near fit to 1064 nm, if that was the wavelength of light which Holmlid uses and you wanted to reduce some parameter to an integer. Maybe he is

Re: [Vo]:RE: Ólafsson - Laser not strictly needed

All of this gives me confidence that it is the coherent photons at the correct frequency which work and I think the reason they work is that hematite is the dielectric and SPP are known to form when photons interact with a dielectric in a resonant way. It is all about SPP and resonance.

[Vo]:RE: Ólafsson - Laser not strictly needed

Hi Ecco, I had not seen this thread, but a few of the details are a bit different from his presentation at the SRI colloquium. For instance he has moved to a different frequency laser. I have my notes here but there should be a video of that speech online, since they were filming it.

Re: [Vo]:Re: Next Big Future - goes out on a limb

Bob Cook wrote: What I remember Rossi said was that he would release the report when his > legal advisors said it was ok. > He said all kinds of things. That is an excuse. Before he said that, in January, February and March, he said he *would* publish the report. The

[Vo]:Re: MFMP GS5.3 - a replication

Eric-- My experience is that the devil is in the details and the demise of the devil is the job of the instruments and they are not cheap. I think the MFMP understands that and my hope is that they guess the ones that will get the devil out. That being said I hope that they have two or three

[Vo]:Re: Next Big Future - goes out on a limb

Dave-- Why do people run marathons and win sometimes at great physical expense? Bob Cook From: David Roberson Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 8:34 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Next Big Future - goes out on a limb I will be disappointed if the ERV report is not released

[Vo]:Re: Next Big Future - goes out on a limb

Eric-- Per my recent comment, (I had not read yours) I agree with your comment about many unknowns and lack of straightforward relationships. Anharmicity is not a straightforward happening. Bob Cook From: Eric Walker Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 8:31 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject:

[Vo]:Re: Next Big Future - goes out on a limb

Eric and Dave-- I have thought that there may be other controlling parameters, such as pressure affecting volatility of Li and potentially other fuel constituents, or magnetic field which enhances with INCREASING temperature by the resultant establishment of SSP’s. I think there are many

Re: [Vo]:Re: Next Big Future - goes out on a limb

, 2016 10:10 pm Subject: [Vo]:Re: Next Big Future - goes out on a limb Jed-- What I remember Rossi said was that he would release the report when his legal advisors said it was ok. His legal advisors may have other issues associated with the release than mere legalities. And there may be som

[Vo]:Re: Next Big Future - goes out on a limb

Jed-- What I remember Rossi said was that he would release the report when his legal advisors said it was ok. His legal advisors may have other issues associated with the release than mere legalities. And there may be some legalities as well as contractual issues to consider over an above

RE: [Vo]:Re: More from Goat-guyRe:

Adrian-- I believe you! Bob Cook > To: vortex-l@eskimo.com > From: a.ashfi...@verizon.net > Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: More from Goat-guyRe: > Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 13:38:43 -0400 > > Bob, > "I do not think what you have said fits this definition very well. I bet &g

Re: [Vo]:Re: More from Goat-guyRe:

Bob, "I do not think what you have said fits this definition very well. I bet your pay is 0 lbs sterling, maybe a shilling. :0)" Keep in mind I used that analogy because I was replying to Jones who was getting hot and bothered about foreign engineers and licenses. But there do seem to be

Re: [Vo]:Re: More from Goat-guy

Because the situation is so complex, any violation of common sense is unhelpful to understand what has and is happening. To understand the situation, making political points using spin and an appeal to emotion must be identified and called out. A law suite is a complex situation where untruths

[Vo]:Re: More from Goat-guyRe:

"Shill can also be used pejoratively to describe a critic who appears either all-too-eager to heap glowing praise upon mediocre offerings, or who acts as an apologist for glaring flaws. In this sense, such a critic would be an indirect shill for the industry at large, because said critic's

[Vo]:Re: More from Goat-guy

Axil-- Are you saying this: “Who ever came up with this criticism of the ERV is full of hate and has lost any credibility IMHO,”? If so, I agree with you on this issue, but I am surprised at these words coming from you. Bob Cook From: Axil Axil Sent: Monday, April 11, 2016 9:15 AM To:

[Vo]:Re: Next Big Future - goes out on a limb

Dave-- I would agree with that assessment. All Rossi had to do in the contract was to produce 100 C steam or hotter. Some insulation and a slight pressure above atmospheric would achieve that. Assuming the control system did not take to much power and the system was self sustaining with no

[Vo]:Re: I.H. press release responding to Rossi

It could be that Rossi has received some US Government order associated with the new patents he has been working on or one or more of the patents listed in Exhibit B of the Agreement between IH, Rossi and others, making them secret. That is the reason the complaint was filed in the Federal

RE: [Vo]:Re: I.H. press release responding to Rossi

am not sure about ‘quarks’, the latter is of course of the most importance. From: Bob Cook [mailto:frobertc...@hotmail.com] Sent: Saturday, April 9, 2016 11:46 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: [Vo]:Re: I.H. press release responding to Rossi Russ-- Your comment about Rossi avoiding

[Vo]:Re: I.H. press release responding to Rossi

Russ-- Your comment about Rossi avoiding the courts, if he were off base on his complaints, was the first thought that entered my mind when I read the complaint. He clearly is on the right side of the truth and was smart enough to plan for contingencies in his potential negative interactions

[Vo]:Re: I.H. press release responding to Rossi

Jones-- If the customer only wanted heat for 8 hours a day and it was being produced at a cop of 50, 8 or maybe even 24 Mw hrs of energy could readily have been produced per day. The agreement seems to say that it need only indicate a cop of 4 as I recall. It may be that the intermittent

[Vo]:Re: I.H. press release responding to Rossi

—but does not indicate explicitly how government patents are handled, nor, what treaties have in them to control government patents held secretly. Bob Cook From: Roarty, Francis X Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2016 4:16 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Re: I.H. press release

RE: [Vo]:Re: I.H. press release responding to Rossi

...@thornros.com] Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 6:46 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Re: I.H. press release responding to Rossi As there is no trade agreement between the US and China transfer of IP from the US to China is really hard to understand that IH have transferred the IP. I

Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Re: I.H. press release responding to Rossi

t; > Fran > > *From:* Bob Cook [mailto:frobertc...@hotmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, April 08, 2016 4:42 PM > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Subject:* EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Re: I.H. press release responding to Rossi > > > > I do not consider it would be good faith to claim OWNERS

[Vo]:Re: Press Release - Cold Fusion (LENR) Verified - Inventor SuesIndustrial Heat, LLC.

It is my understanding that the test in Rossi's facility in Ferrara, Italy was the 24 hr test that IH first witnesses to form the basis for buying the 1 Mw unit. Rossi subsequently shipped to NC. It consisted of 100 10 kw reactors. The successful 24 hr test earned Rossi $10 to add to the

RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Re: I.H. press release responding to Rossi

and world trade will demand everyone has equal access to this tech. IH letting the tech slip away would be bad for them but possibly very good for the world. Fran From: Bob Cook [mailto:frobertc...@hotmail.com] Sent: Friday, April 08, 2016 4:42 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Re: I.H

Re: [Vo]:Re: I.H. press release responding to Rossi

The Lugano test used Rossi's fuel and it did not produce commercial levels of excess heat. There is more to Rossi's reactor than just the fuel mix. On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Bob Cook wrote: > I do not consider it would be good faith to claim OWNERSHIP OF E-CAT IP

[Vo]:Re: I.H. press release responding to Rossi

RE: [Vo]:I.H. press release responding to RossiI do not consider it would be good faith to claim OWNERSHIP OF E-CAT IP rather than licensee to use it to provide products in the license domain. IH has had advertised substantial involvement with various entities in China. The question in my

Re: [Vo]:Re: Copy of Rossi's civil complaint

So IH had Fulvio Fabiani reporting to them on the 1MW test. He should be an interesting witness: https://animpossibleinvention.com/2015/11/25/rossis-engineer-i-have-seen-things-you-people-wouldnt-believe/ “As a skeptic I started there, and in the beginning Rossi wouldn’t let me see any

[Vo]:Re: Copy of Rossi's civil complaint

If Rossi’s Hot Cat works and produces direct electricity, it may be that that associated IP is not licensed, since it is a separate invention. The key question is did any of the IH team contribute to the Hot Cat direct electricity invention and/or who paid for the ideas. Its not my impression

[Vo]:Re: Copy of Rossi's civil complaint

The suit is filed in the Federal District Court of Southern Florida. The agreement between Rossi and IH etal. indicates that disputes with the agreement will be settled in the State of Florida Courts. I wonder why it is filed in the Federal Court system? It seems pretty clear in the

[Vo]:Re: Lets work out some useful definitions

RE: [Vo]: Lets work out some useful definitionsOne other question about the protons is whether they form Cooper pairs before reacting? Such pairing may contribute to the dense Rydberg matter that Holmlid claims exists. Again intense magnetic fields would potentially lead to such pairing.

RE: [Vo]:Re: has this document been saved to the LENR library?

From: Bob Cook Ø The theory presentation does not address the question of the state of the electrons in the sea of condensed matter. Currently, a good explanation for the location of “missing” electrons is derived from the Lawandy paper. The electrons are internalized into the

[Vo]:Re: has this document been saved to the LENR library?

Bob Higgins-- I think you are correct that there is proposed a condensed matter per the Olafsson presentation. It seems to be a crystal-like item with a sea of electrons not associated with any given positive charge in the condensed item. Its clearly different from the model of a normal

Re: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

Bob Higgins-- I agree with your conclusion regarding rhe absence of significant Zn in AP’S fuel. The laser activation results indicate this clearly IMHO as previously noted. Bob Cook Sent from Windows Mail From: Bob Higgins Sent: ‎Wednesday‎, ‎March‎ ‎30‎, ‎2016 ‎10‎:‎59‎

RE: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

From: Bob Higgins Jones, I agree that there are many tantalizing characteristics of Zn as a possible catalyst material….My point is only that based on other measurements of AP's fuel, it is not plausible that 64Zn can be responsible for for the high ICP-MS reading for 64Ni in his Sochi

Re: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

Jones, I agree that there are many tantalizing characteristics of Zn as a possible catalyst material. My point is only that based on other measurements of AP's fuel, it is not plausible that 64Zn can be responsible for for the high ICP-MS reading for 64Ni in his Sochi reported analyses. This

RE: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

Bob, You seem to be hung up on the impossibility of 7% zinc contamination and OK - you are probably correct on that point, as far as it goes… BUT… consider this. Zinc has a surprisingly low boiling point of 907C and the typical glow-tube reactor does not produce excess heat unless it

Re: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

See below ... On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 9:49 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Bob Higgins > wrote: > > First of all, it is reasonable to presume that any Zn contamination would >> have a natural isotopic ratio. The

Re: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:31 PM, H LV wrote: I wrote: > > > Notice that the amount of 58Ni increased by 1% and the amount of 60Ni > > increased by 0.8%. > > In total this equals the 1.8% decrease in the amount of 64Ni. > > I was refering to slide 14 in this link: > That

Re: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

I wrote: > Notice that the amount of 58Ni increased by 1% and the amount of 60Ni > increased by 0.8%. > In total this equals the 1.8% decrease in the amount of 64Ni. I was refering to slide 14 in this link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B5Pc25a4cOM2cHBha0RLbUo5ZVU/view?pref=2=1 Harry

Re: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

Notice that the amount of 58Ni increased by 1% and the amount of 60Ni increased by 0.8%. In total this equals the 1.8% decrease in the amount of 64Ni. Harry On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:49 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Bob Higgins

Re: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Bob Higgins wrote: First of all, it is reasonable to presume that any Zn contamination would > have a natural isotopic ratio. The natural abundance for 64Ni is 0.9%. > So, for the reported 4.4% of m=64 to be 64Zn + natural 64Ni, there

RE: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

Hi Bob, Again, “how the zinc got there” is probably an unsolvable mystery, but contamination can come from unexpected places. It may still amount to serendipity. Recently an acute observer of the details of this situation has mentioned to me off-list that Parkhomov added zinc oxide to his

Re: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

Jones, While all of this Zn speculation is an interesting theory/hypothesis, it stemmed from a completely improbable hypothesis - that the 4.4% of measured 64Ni was due to contamination by Zn in Parkhomov's Sochi analyses. First of all, it is reasonable to presume that any Zn contamination would

RE: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

The recent realization that zinc fits the role as an ideal vapor-phase catalyst for hydrogen densification should be emphasized, so bear with me until the point is fully belabored. J This is about using zinc with nickel as a catalyst in the context of a hot reactor like the Parkhomov Sochi

RE: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

Bob - I’m simply trying to present options at this point. It is impossible to draw any valid conclusions since the data is conflicting. Zinc would be less compelling as a reactant if it were not a Mills catalyst with the lowest Rydberg “hole” in addition to its volatility. Thus it can **do

Re: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

Hi Bob, On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Bob Cook wrote: If I am not wrong, the laser activation indicates Zn is 0.004 mass % vs > the suggested 4%—more than an order of magnitude LOW!—more like 3 orders > Low! I checked the table of mass % and it adds to 100

[Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

RE: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickelJones-- Your argument about Zn volatility has some merit. However, from the data it would appear that the Zn in the “before reaction” laser activation test migrated to the cooler parts of the reactor and were not measured

RE: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

Bob, If a particular test or type of analysis is sampling the surface, but is done in such a way that a natural mechanism can bring mobile elements from deep inside a structure up to the surface, then the more volatile components could appear to have much higher concentration than they should.

Re: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

Quote from Miley on Zinc posted on my web page Zero Point Technologies. http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/wright.html

[Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Bob Cook <frobertc...@hotmail.com> wrote: I do not think there was any report of very much Zn in the fuel. If there was Zn-64 in the samples tested it was not apparen

[Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

Subject: RE: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel From: Bob Cook I doubt that the mass spec readings would have had such a peak at 64 given the low concentration of Zn reported. That’s because the zinc was labeled as nickel. Both the charts on page 14 and 15

Re: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 9:57 PM, Bob Cook wrote: I do not think there was any report of very much Zn in the fuel. If there > was Zn-64 in the samples tested it was not apparent from the report. In > fact as I noted yesterday, Zn was on the order of 01 percent. It was

RE: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

From: Bob Cook I doubt that the mass spec readings would have had such a peak at 64 given the low concentration of Zn reported. That’s because the zinc was labeled as nickel. Both the charts on page 14 and 15 show the enrichment of 64Ni at 4.4% -- but now Parkhomov explains that

[Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

I doubt that the mass spec readings would have had such a peak at 64 given the low concentration of Zn reported. Bob Cook From: Eric Walker Sent: Monday, March 28, 2016 7:24 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel On Mon, Mar 28, 2016

[Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

RE: [Vo]: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickelI do not think there was any report of very much Zn in the fuel. If there was Zn-64 in the samples tested it was not apparent from the report. In fact as I noted yesterday, Zn was on the order of 01 percent. It was not anyway

[Vo]:Re: Obtained stable magnetic bound state of locked counter wise spinning of magnets

And if the magnetic field increases sufficiently, it tends to create a one-dimensional space. The rules for interaction of quantum systems change. All the energy states allowed by a coherent system change drastically. Resonances change along with the changing magnetic field. Electrons and

[Vo]:Re: [usa-tesla] 5 things Einstein got totally wrong

Here's a refutation of the recent gravitation wave measurementsGravity Waves found? 14 Years NOTHING, but "find" it on 100-year Einstein publishing anniversary https://youtu.be/PBpMQ564cWQ Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/ On

[Vo]:Re: [usa-tesla] 5 things Einstein got totally wrong

>>>I have an issue with symmetrical time dilation which seems to defy common >>>sense . I myself became confused on the issue the problem is that there is a contradiction in the maths as I show at- Maths contradiction in Einstein's relativity with its connection to Newton |   | |   | |  

RE: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

The only details that I can surmise from this label is that it probably came from “Ruskhim” which from the web is/was a seller of reagents, chemical, raw materials and lab gear … and that the sales date was 1990. And at least the seller considered it to be 99.90 % nickel. This means

[Vo]:Re: LENR's past helping its radical renewal

Jed-- Your understanding of how radiation is regulated is not entirely correct. NRC has cognizance over certain radioactive materials and, hence, the safety associated with handling those materials. Many radioactive materials are not controlled by NRC. For example, materials activated by

Re: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

Don't know if this will come through, but it is small... Here is the image of the label unwrapped from the jar: ​ On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 2:06 PM, Terry Blanton wrote: > Okay, without the noise: > > http://oi66.tinypic.com/b7bc5k.jpg > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 4:01 PM,

Re: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

Okay, without the noise: http://oi66.tinypic.com/b7bc5k.jpg On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Terry Blanton wrote: > That was confusing. Try this: > > http://tinypic.com/r/b7bc5k/9 > > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Terry Blanton wrote: > >> Here's

Re: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

That was confusing. Try this: http://tinypic.com/r/b7bc5k/9 On Sun, Mar 27, 2016 at 3:59 PM, Terry Blanton wrote: > Here's a piccy of the label: > > http://tinypic.com?ref=b7bc5k; target="_blank">http://i66.tinypic.com/b7bc5k.png; border="0" alt="Image and video > hosting

[Vo]:Re: thanks and an explanation to Prof. Hew Price

Thanks Bob From: Peter Gluck Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 1:22 PM To: VORTEX Subject: Re: [Vo]:thanks and an explanation to Prof. Hew Price Answer: the Fleischmann Pons electrolytic Pd D cell peter On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 10:02 PM, Bob Cook wrote: Peter--

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Re: EM Drive(s)

Dave-- Your right. I got the P's mixed up. Bob -Original Message- From: mix...@bigpond.com Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 1:13 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Re: EM Drive(s) In reply to Bob Cook's message of Sat, 26 Mar 2016 12:20:53 -0700: Hi, [snip

RE: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

to speculate on. - Mark Jurich From: Eric Walker <mailto:eric.wal...@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 1:35 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Jones Beene <jone...@pa

[Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

will chime in with). ... More stuff for you guys/gals to speculate on. - Mark Jurich From: Eric Walker Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 1:35 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Jones Beene <j

Re: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Jones Beene wrote: I think we all agree that more information is needed, and that both 64Zn > and 64Ni are unlikely to be seen in such large percentage – especially > without the author of the paper taking notice. Resolution of this mystery >

Re: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 9:39 AM, Bob Cook wrote: My comment is only addressing the issue of whether Zn-64 was mistaken for > Ni-64 which Jones raised a couple days back. > Your point about the amount of zinc in the ICP-MS analysis on slide 13 was an interesting one. I

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Re: EM Drive(s)

In reply to Bob Cook's message of Sat, 26 Mar 2016 12:20:53 -0700: Hi, [snip] >Dave-- > >Puthoff I think made a machine that produced a gravity pulse, which displaced >things at a distance and apparently traveled at a velocity greater than >light—I think it was reported to be 64 times c. I

[Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

RE: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickelJones-- I think as you imply that Ni-64 may be the easiest Ni isotope to react in whatever reaction of Ni takes place. It is used up first, maybe. If this is true, it would seem like a good idea to study what the relative ease

Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Re: EM Drive(s)

its ability to carry momentum per the Puthoff reports. Bob Cook From: David Roberson Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 2:15 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Re: EM Drive(s) It is true that the car will eventually come to a rest in its reference frame once its fuel

RE: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

I think we all agree that more information is needed, and that both 64Zn and 64Ni are unlikely to be seen in such large percentage – especially without the author of the paper taking notice. Resolution of this mystery depends on more information. The fact that the other data is spot-on refutes

[Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

spectrometry (IGIC-RAS). My comment is only addressing the issue of whether Zn-64 was mistaken for Ni-64 which Jones raised a couple days back. The link is here: view Bob Cook From: Eric Walker Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016 11:12 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite

Re: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 10:16 PM, Bob Cook wrote: If you believe slide 13 of the AP report, there was very little Zn in the > fuel to start with and even less after reaction. Ni amounted to 60 weight > % to start and Zn was reported to be .0135 %. There was not much

[Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

If you believe slide 13 of the AP report, there was very little Zn in the fuel to start with and even less after reaction. Ni amounted to 60 weight % to start and Zn was reported to be .0135 %. There was not much Zn-64 in any case. Bob Cook From: Bob Higgins Sent: Friday, March 25, 2016

[Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

I agree with Jones that various "stable" nuclei could be stimulated to decay to a different ground state than their so-called stable state. Electric quadrupole and magnetic dipole resonant stimulation of nuclei with electric or magnetic moments can respond to high intensity radiation which

RE: [Vo]:Re: ECat boxes for sale with Specs - from Roger Green

My impression is that Cook and Acland would do anything reasonable to distance themselves from Green, but would rather do it behind the scenes and not in public. Prediction: Green’s website is so inaccurate and inappropriate in the eyes of US financial regulators -- completely deceptive as

[Vo]:Re: ECat boxes for sale with Specs - from Roger Green

ECat boxes for sale with Specs - from Roger GreenJones-- Most “Cooks” are related. I think Norman and I have the same distant Uncle, Uncle Capt. Jimmie as he was known in the family circles. All three of us were/are fond of Discovery I believe. The same goes for the other Cooks that

[Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

generating an exothermic reaction. From: Roarty, Francis X Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 10:16 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel Bob, that’s an interesting theory.. wasn’t over abundant copper one of the anomalous Rossi claims

RE: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

Bob, that’s an interesting theory.. wasn’t over abundant copper one of the anomalous Rossi claims? Fran From: Bob Cook [mailto:frobertc...@hotmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2016 11:51 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

[Vo]:Re: Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickel

Re: [Vo]:Kamacite and natural fractionation of heavy nickelNi-64 + neutron = Ni-65. Ni-65 (natural decay 2.5 hr to Cu-65 via a beta – emission.) It only takes a regular H to react with a electron to form a slow neutron. Analysis of Cu isotopes (before and after) is warranted relative to

Re: [Vo]:Re: E-Cat progress

Another error in an ongoing comedy. I had intended the link to be this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QDAeJ7eLGGg Harry On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Lennart Thornros wrote: > Jones, is it not true that none of ue here at Vortex has invested in Rossi? > If that is

Re: [Vo]:Re: E-Cat progress

Jones, is it not true that none of ue here at Vortex has invested in Rossi? If that is true then we can hardly be even upset about what he says. In which way do we have the right to point finger at Rossi? Even if some of his doing and saying is incorrect and he has done that to protect his IP or

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >