In 2002, the GWE (Genesis World Energy) group was in the News, claiming to
have 400 scientists and engineers employed, and having developed a fabulous
new kind of free energy device... which was demonstrated as a nice looking
prototype, and a fully working unit for home power. Deliveries were
Hi,
On 10-5-2011 22:33, Jones Beene wrote:
So Defkalion, it can be argued - could have improved on the basic pump and
dump scam in many ways, but there may be no proof of that until it is too
late, since this is all taking place in Europe. But with OPEC oil now four
times higher than when the
Jones Beene wrote:
So Defkalion, it can be argued - could have improved on the basic pump and
dump scam in many ways, but there may be no proof of that until it is too
late . . .
It can be argued in what sense? Are you or are you not accusing people
of criminal activities? Do you have any
I am no expert on this, but doesn’t the first amendment protect Jones Beene
from any possible legal harm?
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Jones Beene wrote:
So Defkalion, it can be argued - could have improved on the basic pump
and
dump scam in
Defences to claims of defamation include:
- *Statements made in a good faith and reasonable belief that they were
true * are generally treated the same as true statements; however, the
court may inquire into the reasonableness of the belief. The degree of care
expected will vary with
From Jones:
...
Let me make it clear that there is no proof that they are planning a better
GWE scam, and there is no proof that they are legitimate either. The intent
of this post goes to the old Chinese(?) proverb fool me once, shame on you,
fool me twice shame on me
This is just my
On 05/10/2011 06:24 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
If it comes down to it, I think Fair comment on a matter of public
interest is Jones best defence.
I'm not a lawyer, but in general it's very difficult to actually condemn
someone on defamation charges.
Accusing someone of defamation, and
Axil Axil wrote:
I am no expert on this, but doesn’t the first amendment protect Jones
Beene from any possible legal harm?
Not if it is libel. That is not protected speech.
So far I doubt anyone would say it is libel, but I think it would be
wise for Beene to state clearly that he is not
As much as I detest Trump's general attitude (and hair style), he is allowed to
speak his mind, and occasionally there is something to it. Did you call the
authorities on the Donald because he doesn't like unions and you do? You may
not agree with him, but he has a right not to like minorities,
Mauro Lacy wrote:
I'm not a lawyer, but in general it's very difficult to actually
condemn someone on defamation charges.
Accusing someone of defamation, and prosecuting him on those grounds,
is a different matter.
I am not worried that anyone is going to prosecute Beene. Hundreds of
people
When it comes down to a legal battle, it's not who is right or who is
wrong, it' who has the most money. If some rich SoB wants to come
after you for slander or libel, you have to defend yourself. If he
has a murder of lawyers at his disposal, he can break you, lose, and
drag out the appeals
On 05/10/2011 06:50 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Axil Axil wrote:
I am no expert on this, but doesn’t the first amendment protect Jones
Beene from any possible legal harm?
Not if it is libel. That is not protected speech.
So far I doubt anyone would say it is libel, but I think it
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell
The issue here is not legal, but ethical.
YES, YES, YES - and I think that given the history of scams in the
alternative energy field, it is Rothwell's conduct which is unethical and
without justification !
There is no doubt, that if the
On 11-05-10 05:13 PM, Jones Beene wrote:
*From:*Axil Axil
I am no expert on this, but doesn’t the first amendment protect Jones
Beene from any possible legal harm?
Of course it does.
Jones, am I correct in my impression that you are, in fact, a lawyer?
Just wondering
Of course,
14 matches
Mail list logo
