The question is, how did they measure the energy input?
This is not documented.
This colonel engineer confuses kg and g.
He measures a hydrogen consumtion of 1.7000 kg and dont write down all
significant digits.
Then he subtracts this from a value that means gramm. but is mistakenly
labeled as
crisply summarizes a lot of the critical evaluation by Cude, Heffner,
and Murray... elementary over estimation of excess heat by Rossi in
all his demos... thanks to Mary Yugo and the original source 123star
--
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?tab=nm#inbox/133dbc70ac37ba45
123star
November 23,
I do not doubt that Rossi's device works, but I have a lot of doubts
over his power output because his demos are so useless. He is
claiming 100kW/kg output levels, while Miley appears to be closer to
10kW/kg levels (IIRC 30g 200W). But given the 8:1 steam to water
ratio enthalpy ratio it is
Robert Lynn robert.gulliver.l...@gmail.com wrote:
I do not doubt that Rossi's device works, but I have a lot of doubts
over his power output because his demos are so useless. He is
claiming 100kW/kg output levels, while Miley appears to be closer to
10kW/kg levels (IIRC 30g 200W). But given
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
The question is, how did they measure the energy input?
This is not documented.
Were you being sarcastic? I'll assume you weren't.
To answer your first question, it is not documented but it seems quite
obvious.
The
Berke Durak berke.du...@gmail.com wrote:
The power was entirely supplied by a diesel generator. The diesel
generator had a fuel level meter or an electricity meter built-in . . .
They used the built in meters in the generator (genset).
He uses decimal point and decimal , alternating in
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Berke Durak berke.du...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd be happier when you guys come up with real arguments and not silly I
don't
like his handwriting! arguments.
Sure. The argument against the October 28 test is that the customer
is anonymous and who Fioravanti
Am 26.11.2011 19:49, schrieb Jed Rothwell:
I have heard they wrote the document in Italian and then translated
it. People often make mistakes like this.
In the document by Brattain you can see he made a correction on the
second page and then crossed it out, where it says 5.4 x 10^-7 Watts:
Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
There are several other words crossed out. By the logic of the skeptics
here, this proves that transistors do not exist.
No.
I know the difference between a notepad and an undersigned document.
That was not a notepad. It was the experiment log. It
Berke, they do not have anything else to come up with in their effort to
discredit Rossi and his system. It is sad to see them resort to this level of
criticism.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Berke Durak berke.du...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, Nov 26, 2011
Berke Durak berke.du...@gmail.com wrote:
This colonel engineer confuses kg and g.
False. The correct sentence would be :
This coloned engineer CONFUSED kg and g.
That is, he made a mistake in the report. You can't claim with
a straight face that he doesn't know a gram from a
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I am sure they will continue to assert that Fioravanti does not know the
difference between grams and kilograms for as long as this dispute lasts,
until Rossi is either accepted by the mass media, or forgotten.
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 1:01 PM, Berke Durak berke.du...@gmail.com wrote:
That's part of the same fuck-up.
Then he subtracts this from a value that means gramm. but is mistakenly
labeled as kg.
That's part of the same fuck-up.
In the 15 or some odd years, I have never seen anyone use this
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
And, on behalf of Vortex-l, I apologize to Mary Yugo and any other
ladies who might be participating or lurking.
Well, cough-cough ... before yugo overboard g don't forget that screen
names are essentially genderless.
For years on the hydrino
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
For years on the hydrino group - a well-known scientist and University
Professor - Dr. John Connet used the screen name Nora Barron, for whatever
reason.
Yes, I was following the group at that time. And I do remember
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
In the 15 or some odd years, I have never seen anyone use this word
on this forum. If English is not your first language, you might
understand that this in inappropriate for this forum. I invite you
to seek a more
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Berke Durak berke.du...@gmail.com wrote:
PS. How about a ban on ad hominem attacks and unsusbtantiated
accusations or insinuations of scam or incompetence?
The possibility of Rossi's E-cat being a scam has been widely discussed all
over the internet and is a
On Nov 26, 2011, at 19:52, Berke Durak berke.du...@gmail.com wrote:
.
Actually, some women will find your statement offensive - are ladies
precious flowers unable to speak up for themselves and that should be
protected from vulgar language?
Absolutely. And American ladies never, ever use
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 9:25 PM, Charles Hope
lookslikeiwasri...@gmail.com wrote:
Absolutely. And American ladies never, ever use foul language. We maintain
them as creatures of proper breeding and pleasant temperament. You really
must try one some time. They're the envy of all the world.
I didn't originate this. I reprint it with minor changes from ecatnews.com.
quote starts here *---
A curious note about the “famous” guaranteed COP of 6.
Energy required to heat 1 kg of water from 20 to 100 °C (80 degrees
difference)= 4.181 kJ * 80 = 335 kJ
Latent heat of vaporisation of
20 matches
Mail list logo
