/bigots.
-mark
-Original Message-
From: Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson [mailto:orionwo...@charter.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 10:18 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:doubling speed every 2 years for decades more, Intel silicon
photonics now revolutionizing data
Steven:
Societies without some form of moral code, a shared sense of right and wrong,
usually don’t last long…
Hi Mark,
Agreed. But in the meantime, they can do a lot of damage and cause much pain
and suffering before they implode. The real irony is that most believe they are
truly
for decades more, Intel silicon
photonics now revolutionizing data centers, Michael Kassner: Rich Murray
2015.01.26
People are conflating advances in hardware with advances in software. Software
has been stuck in the dark ages for decades and as a result has metastasized to
fill whatever capacity
[mailto:orionwo...@charter.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 10:18 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:doubling speed every 2 years for decades more, Intel
silicon photonics now revolutionizing data centers, Michael Kassner: Rich
Murray 2015.01.26
Steven:
Societies without some
-l
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:doubling speed every 2 years for decades more, Intel
silicon photonics now revolutionizing data centers, Michael Kassner: Rich
Murray 2015.01.26
People are conflating advances in hardware with advances in software.
Software has been stuck in the dark ages for decades
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
For many day-to-day operations the responsiveness of systems like MS
Windows has actually decreased.
That is because they keep adding bells and whistles. It is feature-itus run
amok. When I installed recent versions of Windows I went through and turned
! -mark
From: Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson [mailto:orionwo...@charter.net]
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 4:04 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:doubling speed every 2 years for decades more, Intel silicon
photonics now revolutionizing data centers, Michael Kassner: Rich
John Berry berry.joh...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW AFAIK Moores Law isn't that speeds increase but that transistor
densities increase.
Correct. It was originally a simple statement about two-dimensional
geometry. It happens that speed followed roughly the same curve for a long
time, although in
HI Mark,
I suspect no religion can escape having an embarrassing moment or two. That's
becuz humans run them all, not any prescribed deity. I didn't mean to single
out Christianity anymore than any other religion. IMHO, if we humans could just
accept the fact that we all occasionally f#$k
Programming could surely be improved a great deal, since some languages
were designed to be bad to give programmers lots of work.
And x86 architecture is baroque from an assembly language perspective.
But while I am on the topic, let me go slightly off topic, there is a lot
that I think is rather
Yes, the advances in neural machine learning are real but in substance they
have been around for decades and are now emerging having been submerged in
the noise. For instance, read Jürgen Schmidhuber's timeline of deep
learning http://people.idsia.ch/~juergen/firstdeeplearner.html going
back to
I believe that a good explanation for doubling speed is provided by Kurzweil’s
suggestion that he calls The Law of Accelerating Returns
(http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns), basically meaning
that whatever is invented/evolved in a system is fed back into the system and
every 2 years for decades more, Intel silicon
photonics now revolutionizing data centers, Michael Kassner: Rich Murray
2015.01.26
From Lewan,
I believe that a good explanation for doubling speed is provided by Kurzweil’s
suggestion that he calls The Law of Accelerating Returns
(http
From Lewan,
I believe that a good explanation for doubling speed is provided by Kurzweil’s
suggestion that he calls The Law of Accelerating Returns
(http://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns), basically
meaning that whatever is invented/evolved in a system is fed back
What James says is true about the radius of connection. However, two
things have been driving that radius smaller - smaller gate size and chip
stacking. We all recognize that making the transistors and the gates
smaller decreases this radius, but what is not widely recognized is chip
stacking
BTW AFAIK Moores Law isn't that speeds increase but that transistor
densities increase.
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 1:33 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
What James says is true about the radius of connection. However, two
things have been driving that radius smaller - smaller gate
yes, moore law talk of size of transistor, but that is linked to speed,
complexity, RAM size...
there are many different moore laws and when they interact with dimensions
in real world it created big problems.
for exemple disk and RAM memory capacity grow faster than the I/O to talk
to the disk.
I suppose there will evolve a molecular scale device of about 1,000 atoms,
interacting by light speed signals, with local memory modules directly
adjacent in six directions -- what would be the cycle time for this?
Since 1660 the growth of all science has been exponential -- that's the
actual
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 6:00 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
They will have the power of today's Watson computer, which is to say, they
will be able to play Jeopardy or diagnose disease far better than any
person. I expect they will also recognize faces and do voice input better
Well said !
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2015 7:00 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:doubling speed every 2 years for decades more, Intel silicon
photonics now revolutionizing data centers, Michael Kassner: Rich Murray
2015.01.26
All boolean functions (meaning all programs) can be parallelized to only 2
gate delays. The problem is your computer ends up with more gates than
there are elementary particles in the universe.
A good deal of real computation consists of, in essence, decompressing a
compressed form of the the
It is my contention that the Ni/H reactor is a proof of principle for the
quantum computer. In the Ni/H reactor energy is shared instantaneously
between all the plasmonic components of the reactor because there exists a
condition of global BEC maintained throughout the reactor.
On Mon, Jan 26,
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Architectures that attempt to hide this problem with lots of processors
accessing local stores in parallel are drunks looking for their keys under
the lamp post.
I disagree. The purpose of a computer is solve problems. To process data.
Not to crunch
The Nanor is an example of a quantum based solid state LENR photonic device
that operated in a state of quantum entanglement. A quantum computer could
well be based on the Nanor.
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 11:35 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
It is my contention that the Ni/H reactor is a
This is nonsense.
In microcomputer architecture there is something known as the radius of
control, which is bounded by the distance that can be traversed by a signal
from a processing unit to memory and back. That feedback time is, even in
some hypothetical all-optical computer, limited by the
The mechanism that underpins the quantum computer is entanglement and the
speed of entanglement is instantaneous. Computing components will be
connected through long rang entanglement so data will be shared
instantaniously.
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 9:15 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
doubling speed every 2 years for decades more, Intel silicon photonics now
revolutionizing data centers, Michael Kassner: Rich Murray 2015.01.26
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2015/01/doubling-speed-every-2-years-for.html
[ See also:
exponential information technology 1890-2014 10exp17 more MIPS
27 matches
Mail list logo
