Re: [Vo]:Quantum Drive SpaceX Launch

In reply to Robin's message of Sat, 01 Apr 2023 12:58:03 +1100: Hi, [snip] >In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Fri, 31 Mar 2023 10:22:49 -0400: >Hi, >[snip] >>https://www.universetoday.com/160516/the-first-all-electrical-thruster-the-ivo-quantum-drive-is-headed-to-space/ > > BTW I suspect

Re: [Vo]:Quantum Drive SpaceX Launch

In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Fri, 31 Mar 2023 10:22:49 -0400: Hi, [snip] >https://www.universetoday.com/160516/the-first-all-electrical-thruster-the-ivo-quantum-drive-is-headed-to-space/ Phosphorous-32 has a power to weight ratio of 2.9E6 W/kg. Compare this to the measly 340 W/kg of

Re: [Vo]:Quantum Drive SpaceX Launch

In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Fri, 31 Mar 2023 10:22:49 -0400: Hi, [snip] >https://www.universetoday.com/160516/the-first-all-electrical-thruster-the-ivo-quantum-drive-is-headed-to-space/ Combined with

Re: [Vo]:quantum effects coming out of a cavitating cleaner

I'd like to try this myself, but I can find no other reference to the phenomenon other than yours. By cavitating cleaner do you mean an ordinary ultrasonic cleaner, or is it something different? How much power is needed? What size and thickness of foil are used, etc.? If the surface of the

Re: [Vo]:quantum effects coming out of a cavitating cleaner

Sorry, the project name is ULTR On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 5:37 PM Axil Axil wrote: > Bob Greenyer of MFMP has moderated the experiments that you are interested > in under the project name "ULTRA". There is a lot of info on Bob's site on > this stuff. > > Bob's site is as follows: > >

Re: [Vo]:quantum effects coming out of a cavitating cleaner

Bob Greenyer of MFMP has moderated the experiments that you are interested in under the project name "ULTRA". There is a lot of info on Bob's site on this stuff. Bob's site is as follows: https://remoteview.substack.com/archive?sort=new also see

Re: [Vo]:quantum effects coming out of a cavitating cleaner

With reference to the post that I contributed to this blog a few days ago regarding how multiple dimensions could underpin unobservable processes during cavitation, I now continue as follows: Beginning a few days ago, an opportunity afforded itself whereby an scanning electron microscope (SEM)

Re: [Vo]:Quantum Non-locality

ET signals just get ignored because uncomfortable for people to accept; so they form a mindset based on false physics paradigm Tesla detected alien signals >>In 1901, while Tesla was conducting experiments tapping into the earth's >>geomagnetic pulse for sending electronic messages, his

Re: [Vo]:Quantum Non-locality

In Sabine's most recent video on the search for ET, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nwOcc-buSsg she concludes by saying that the reason we have not detected ET is that we have not developed the right technology to pick up their communication. If there is anyway to send information faster than the

Re: [Vo]:Quantum Non-locality

i.e. the modern version of Ptolemaic epicycles On Sunday, 14 June 2020, 01:31:32 BST, ROGER ANDERTON wrote: >>I wonder what they mean by "information" when they say in the introduction >>that the "information speed" never exceeds the speed light.<< I think its bluff. Go back to

Re: [Vo]:Quantum Non-locality

>>I wonder what they mean by "information" when they say in the introduction >>that the "information speed" never exceeds the speed light.<< I think its bluff. Go back to Einstein 1905 when he started all this relativity madness, he never said anything about there being "information speed".

Re: [Vo]:Quantum Non-locality

On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 6:27 PM Jürg Wyttenbach wrote: > I recently had and still have some discussion on researchgate about > superluminal signal transmission by scalar waves. It is well known and even > classically allowed that the group/phase speed can be greater than the > speed of light. >

Re: [Vo]:Quantum Non-locality

In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sat, 13 Jun 2020 00:27:41 +0200: Hi, [snip] >https://www.researchgate.net/post/Did_I_actually_measure_a_superluminous_signal_thus_disproving_the_relativity_theory Tesla assumed that the signal went around the Earth. If one instead assumes a light speed

Re: [Vo]:Quantum Non-locality

I recently had and still have some discussion on researchgate about superluminal signal transmission by scalar waves. It is well known and even classically allowed that the group/phase speed can be greater than the speed of light. This has been experimentally proven to be higher than at least

Re: [Vo]:Quantum Non-locality

Typically mathematical issues that arise never seem to be regarded as evidence that there is something seriously wrong with a theory. I think this attitude exists for a few reasons. First mathematical models have been tremendously successful at describing patterns in nature. Second, the structure

Re: [Vo]:Quantum Non-locality

By "domain" I mean something more like a world-view. The mechanical philosophers of the 17th century gave modern physics the world-view that matter is to be analysed as something that is inactive, inanimate or dead. They also insisted that physics must explain how things come about using only

Re: [Vo]:Quantum Non-locality

Freeman Dyson explains why he is comfortable without unification: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pcicI_GJGcM Harry On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 3:30 PM ROGER ANDERTON wrote: > >>it might be preferable to accept them as each true within their > respective domains<< > > When "they" talk of those

Re: [Vo]:Quantum Non-locality

On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 3:30 PM ROGER ANDERTON wrote: > >>it might be preferable to accept them as each true within their > respective domains<< > > When "they" talk of those "domains" - there is a lot of handwaving; > general relativity is often said to breakdown at the singularity, and >

Re: [Vo]:Quantum Non-locality

>>it might be preferable to accept them as each true within their respective >>domains<< When "they" talk of those "domains" - there is a lot of handwaving; general relativity is often said to breakdown at the singularity, and quantum mechanics supposedly fails to be able to deal with

Re: [Vo]:Quantum Non-locality

On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 4:30 PM ROGER ANDERTON wrote: > >>Thoughts?<< > > there are problems combining relativity (especially general relativity) > with quantum physics, so when people try to talk from things combining them > then they are not on solid ground. > > I only mentioned SR because it

Re: [Vo]:Quantum Non-locality

>>Thoughts?<< there are problems combining relativity (especially general relativity) with quantum physics, so when people try to talk from things combining them then they are not on solid ground. >From my point-of-view relativity has been mistranslated and misunderstood so >false claims are

Re: [Vo]:quantum thermodynamics and the Second Law--

proven experiment that demonstrates the conversion between these two quantities. Dave -Original Message- From: bobcook39923 <bobcook39...@hotmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Sat, May 20, 2017 5:25 pm Subject: RE: [Vo]:quantum thermodynamics and the Second L

RE: [Vo]:quantum thermodynamics and the Second Law--

research…” “Regards, Marco” <<<<<<<< Those devices Marco refers to are nuclear magnetic resonance machines I believe. I did my own research on them in 1961. Bob Cook From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com<mailto:bobcook39...@hotmail.com> Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2017 2:26 PM

RE: [Vo]:quantum thermodynamics and the Second Law--

reflecting Planck’s constant, h. ( I am not sure I understand your comment regarding classical physics.) Bob Cook From: David Roberson<mailto:dlrober...@aol.com> Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2017 11:29 AM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com> Subject: Re: [Vo]:quantum th

Re: [Vo]:quantum thermodynamics and the origin of the neutrino-

. From: David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> Sent: Saturday, May 20, 2017 2:29 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:quantum thermodynamics and the Second Law-- Of course, in classical physics linear momentum and angular momentum are orthogonal to each other and can not be exchanged

Re: [Vo]:quantum thermodynamics and the Second Law--

20, 2017 11:16 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:quantum thermodynamics and the Second Law-- This is interesting thinking. The idea that angular momentum, linear momentum, and energy are "conserved" is a hypothesis created and supported (as I understand it) by observation, not by derivation ba

Re: [Vo]:quantum thermodynamics and the Second Law--

This is interesting thinking. The idea that angular momentum, linear momentum, and energy are "conserved" is a hypothesis created and supported (as I understand it) by observation, not by derivation based upon a fundamental principle. While it would be a violation of the hypothesis, trading

Re: [Vo]:Quantum Spin Liquids and Kagome Space-Time Structures Ron Kita

Posting again. -- Original message--From: H UcarDate: Wed, Mar 16, 2016 22:17To: vortex-l@eskimo.com;Cc: Subject:Re: [Vo]:Quantum Spin Liquids and Kagome Space-Time Structures Ron Kita Inordered spins state point out to possibilty of magnetic moment of particles have extra degrees

Re: [Vo]:Quantum Spin Liquids and Kagome Space-Time Structures Ron Kita

Inordered spins state point out to possibilty of magnetic moment of particles have extra degrees of freedom which remain intact despite cooling.

Re: [Vo]:Quantum Spin Liquids and Kagome Space-Time Structures

The ability to control spin of photons is at the heart if the LENR mechanism. The concentration and focusing of the spin of many photons produces monopole flux tubes that interfere with the strong force which is a monopole based interaction between quarks which are really monopoles themselves.

Re: [Vo]:quantum knots accomplished!

In reply to Eric Walker's message of Wed, 20 Jan 2016 19:39:11 -0600: Hi, [snip] >On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:03 PM, wrote: > >No. Mills proposes a pseudo charge that is different for different sized >> orbitspheres, but is constant for any given size. IOW it only changes when

Re: [Vo]:quantum knots accomplished!

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 7:03 PM, wrote: No. Mills proposes a pseudo charge that is different for different sized > orbitspheres, but is constant for any given size. IOW it only changes when > the > orbitsphere changes in size. However he also states that radiation can > occur

Re: [Vo]:quantum knots accomplished!

In reply to Eric Walker's message of Wed, 20 Jan 2016 11:13:52 -0600: Hi, [snip] >On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:14 AM, David Roberson wrote: > >The bottom line is that it is easy to produce a non radiating structure of >> any degree of complexity as long as the currents flowing

Re: [Vo]:quantum knots accomplished!

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:14 AM, David Roberson wrote: The bottom line is that it is easy to produce a non radiating structure of > any degree of complexity as long as the currents flowing within that > structure are constant. An orbitsphere such as Mills appears to refer

Re: [Vo]:quantum knots accomplished!

Subject: Re: [Vo]:quantum knots accomplished! On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 10:14 AM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote: The bottom line is that it is easy to produce a non radiating structure of any degree of complexity as long as the currents flowing within that structure are constan

Re: [Vo]:quantum knots accomplished!

On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:39 AM, David Roberson wrote: An sphere can be constructed from a large number of individual toroids. As > I have mentioned many times before, this toroid type of structure would not > radiate provided the current is constant at every point within

Re: [Vo]:quantum knots accomplished!

example. Dave -Original Message- From: Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Wed, Jan 20, 2016 10:27 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:quantum knots accomplished! On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:39 AM, David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrot

Re: [Vo]:quantum knots accomplished!

In reply to Axil Axil's message of Tue, 19 Jan 2016 21:19:47 -0500: Hi, [snip] >The paper said that the knots have been produce in many contexts. But the >case here is based on a superfluid, Mills does bot recognize the existence >of this state of matter. Or am I incorrect on that? Yes. I think

Re: [Vo]:quantum knots accomplished!

In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Tue, 19 Jan 2016 20:24:26 +: Hi, [snip] >http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2016/01/160118134930.htm Quote: "The field segregates into an infinite number of linked rings, each with its own field direction." This sounds like a description of the

Re: [Vo]:quantum knots accomplished!

It sounds like the topologically opposite shape of the hydrino...the whispering gallery wave. The SPP might well take on the knotted topology on of bose condensate. On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 4:12 PM, wrote: > In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Tue, 19 Jan 2016

Re: [Vo]:quantum knots accomplished!

Rydberg hydrogen matter is superconductive and also demonstrates the meissner effect. We also know that SPPs will always form on the surface of a long nano-strings and might well provide this superconductive nature to the rydberg matter. Knotted vortex circulation of photons trapped in a photonic

Re: [Vo]:quantum knots accomplished!

For one thing electrons cannot form a bose condensate since they are fermions. So we can exclude electrons from the knot. Photons are what circulated around a whispering gallery wave track which forms a closed ring as a component of the torid. On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:51 PM,

Re: [Vo]:quantum knots accomplished!

Fermions cannot form a bose condensate. Only photons can. On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 8:04 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:51 PM, wrote: > > How is this the topological opposite? I think you just want to be defiant. >> ;) > > > I've

Re: [Vo]:quantum knots accomplished!

In reply to Axil Axil's message of Tue, 19 Jan 2016 17:49:21 -0500: Hi Axil, [snip] >It sounds like the topologically opposite shape of the hydrino...the >whispering gallery wave. The SPP might well take on the knotted topology on >of bose condensate. How is this the topological opposite? I think

Re: [Vo]:quantum knots accomplished!

In reply to Eric Walker's message of Tue, 19 Jan 2016 19:04:55 -0600: Hi, [snip] >On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:51 PM, wrote: > >How is this the topological opposite? I think you just want to be defiant. >> ;) > > >I've heard that Mills posits "orbitspheres," which are spherical

Re: [Vo]:quantum knots accomplished!

In reply to Axil Axil's message of Tue, 19 Jan 2016 20:05:22 -0500: Hi, [snip] >For one thing electrons cannot form a bose condensate since they are >fermions. So we can exclude electrons from the knot. Photons are what >circulated around a whispering gallery wave track which forms a closed ring

Re: [Vo]:quantum knots accomplished!

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:07 PM, Axil Axil wrote: Fermions cannot form a bose condensate. Only photons can. > Indeed. Eric

Re: [Vo]:quantum knots accomplished!

On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:51 PM, wrote: How is this the topological opposite? I think you just want to be defiant. > ;) I've heard that Mills posits "orbitspheres," which are spherical shells of current, whereas what's shown in the article is a toroid. Eric

Re: [Vo]:quantum knots accomplished!

The paper said that the knots have been produce in many contexts. But the case here is based on a superfluid, Mills does bot recognize the existence of this state of matter. Or am I incorrect on that? On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 9:09 PM, wrote: > In reply to Axil Axil's message

Re: [Vo]:quantum knots accomplished!

<eric.wal...@gmail.com> To: vortex-l <vortex-l@eskimo.com> Sent: Tue, Jan 19, 2016 8:05 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:quantum knots accomplished! On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:51 PM, <mix...@bigpond.com> wrote: How is this the topological opposite? I think you just want to be defiant. ;) I'v

Re: [Vo]:quantum tunneling

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1407.2930v1.pdf Delayed-choice gedanken experiments and their realizations If one chooses to believe that the atom really did take a particular path or paths then one has to accept that a future measurement is affecting the atom's past, said Truscott. The atoms did not

Re: [Vo]:Quantum entanglement produces time.

Also see http://www.nature.com/news/theoretical-physics-the-origins-of-space-and-time-1.13613 Theoretical physics: The origins of space and time On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 1:10 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:

Re: [Vo]:Quantum Chromodymanics in an external magnetic field

To simulate your imagination, if pions can be created externally by strong magnetic fields, then among the types of nuclear reactions that this meson can make possible are as follows. Since a Pion can convert protons to neutrons and neutrons to protons. A proton can enter a nucleus after it has

Re: [Vo]:Quantum Vortices - Using Nonlinear Optics to Gain Insight into Superconductors, Liquid Helium, and Bose-Einstein Condensates

The formation of EMF vortexes are a function of how nanoparticles bend light. Gold nanoparticles of different shapes and sizes, including nanospheres, nanocubes, nanobranches, nanorods, and nanobipyramids, were dispersed into water-glycerol mixtures of varying volume ratios to investigate the

RE: [Vo]: quantum tunneling increases chemical reaction rate at very low temperatures

Moab*2: See the vortex thread, Of Reaction Rate and Resonances... http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg83767.html I think the research referenced in that thread makes a VERY important point: Reaction rates are determined by at least 2 factors: heat and resonances. And the

Re: [Vo]:Quantum teleportation done between distant large objects

That really sounds interesting. I don't suppose you would like to translate that in non-mensa-ese. Roger On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:04 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: A very remarkable achievement -- Quantum teleportation done between distant large objects

Re: [Vo]:Quantum teleportation done between distant large objects

They made entangled particles interact with each other at a distance for a while, sending complex info, rather than a single on off communication like we've done at distance before. On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Roger Bird bachc...@gmail.com wrote: That really sounds interesting. I don't

Re: [Vo]:Quantum teleportation done between distant large objects

Roger, Hopefully, here is my attempt at a concise mini-explanation: They have managed to create a Schroedinger's cat state in a macroscopic system (not as large as a cat, but pretty big) and managed to transfer it over a distance of nearly two feet at room temperature to another macroscopic

Re: [Vo]:Quantum teleportation done between distant large objects

Thank you. That's what I thought. (:-) On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:33 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: Roger, Hopefully, here is my attempt at a concise mini-explanation: They have managed to create a Schroedinger's cat state in a macroscopic system (not as large as a cat, but pretty

Re: [Vo]:Quantum teleportation done between distant large objects

This isn't teleportation, it is transmission of information. In this case, the information transmitted was spin state. On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 10:04 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote: A very remarkable achievement -- Quantum teleportation done between distant large objects

Re: [Vo]:Quantum teleportation done between distant large objects

It is still interesting as all get out and perhaps even miraculous. On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.comwrote: This isn't teleportation, it is transmission of information. In this case, the information transmitted was spin state. On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at

Re: [Vo]:Quantum teleportation done between distant large objects

, indeterminate. In such a way as to say, it got there or it didn't. So far this still sounds like theory. Gibson From: Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2013 11:38 AM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Quantum teleportation done

Re: [Vo]:Quantum teleportation done between distant large objects

Even stranger is entanglement with the past: http://www.livescience.com/19975-spooky-quantum-entanglement.html

Re: [Vo]:Quantum teleportation done between distant large objects

Translate, please. On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote: Even stranger is entanglement with the past: http://www.livescience.com/19975-spooky-quantum-entanglement.html

Re: [Vo]:Quantum teleportation done between distant large objects

and vice versa. Dave -Original Message- From: Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Tue, Jun 11, 2013 6:18 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:Quantum teleportation done between distant large objects Even stranger is entanglement with the past: http

Re: [Vo]:Quantum teleportation done between distant large objects

: Re: [Vo]:Quantum teleportation done between distant large objects Even stranger is entanglement with the past: http://www.livescience.com/19975-spooky-quantum-entanglement.html

Re: [Vo]:Quantum Vacuum --University in Finland

I like that Hawking radiation. Stewart darkmattersalot.com On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Ron Kita chiralex.k...@gmail.com wrote: Greetings Vortex-L, The Quantum Vacuum and realization: http://phys.org/news/2013-02-particles-illuminate-vacuum.html Ron Kita Doylestown PA

Re: [Vo]:Quantum coherence in bacteria

For those interested in how quantum coherence/entanglement may be generated in very hot, noisy, systems which are not at all environmentally isolated, here is another recent reference - Persistent dynamic entanglement from classical motion: How bio-molecular machines can generate non-trivial

RE: [Vo]:Quantum coherence in bacteria

! ! ! YES ! ! ! ~QUANTUM COHERENCE Photosynthesis~Bio-Chemistry-COLD FUSION-link~ This is 'precisely' the correlative parallel between Relativity-leading to-THE PHOTO VOLTAIC EFFECT which is what Einstein 'actually' got his Nobel-Prize for and NOT 4 'Relativity'. . . Not to mention that

Re: [Vo]:Quantum coherence in bacteria

Fifteen years ago I visited someone at Daresbury in the UK to talk about coherent vibrations in living organisms. One of the things that he was working on was the light harvesting complexes in bacteria, and he said at the time that he felt that that was where we were most likely to find

RE: [Vo]:Quantum coherence in bacteria

...@thedyers.org.uk] Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 1:36 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Quantum coherence in bacteria Fifteen years ago I visited someone at Daresbury in the UK to talk about coherent vibrations in living organisms. One of the things that he was working on was the light harvesting

RE: [Vo]:Quantum coherence in bacteria

Well vorticians assorted nootropes - imagine this for a near-future breakthrough: gene doping with quantum coherence proteins hybridized by Penrose... ... adds another layer of suspicion that Gilroy got it right in a recent film, possibly without knowing how prescient he was ...

Re: [Vo]:Quantum coherence in bacteria

I am far from convinced that Penrose is correct in identifying the tubulin within microtubules as a location for quantum coherence. A couple of more promising starting points are the water that you find adjacent to charged surfaces such as microtubules or more particularly DNA. And there is

RE: [Vo]:Quantum coherence in bacteria

:) From: zeropo...@charter.net To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: RE: [Vo]:Quantum coherence in bacteria Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 14:36:10 -0800 http://phys.org/news/2013-01-approach-nanoparticle-alloys-focused-electromag netic.html#nwlt Since heat is what causes decoherence

Re: [Vo]:Quantum Energy Converter

In reply to Ron Kita's message of Thu, 25 Oct 2012 13:17:48 -0400: Hi, [snip] Greetings Vortex-L, I don t think that I saw the QEC posted here before: http://zpenergy.com/modules.php?name=Newsfile=articlesid=3430 Respectfully, Ron Kita, Chiralex IOW this is a form of diode, which as I have

Re: [Vo]:Quantum superposition.

In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sat, 30 Jun 2012 20:51:43 -0400: Hi, [snip] In this experiment, Piantelli removes one of his nickel rods from his reactor and places into in a cloud chamber. This operation must have had to take an extended period of time assuming the reactor is cooled down

Re: [Vo]:Quantum superposition.

Mixent states: “First, you need to know which particles you are actually seeing in the cloud chamber.” Axil quotes: http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg49583.html “protons of 6-7 Mev energy have been confirmed (in a cloud chamber)” Mixent states: “IOW the fusion reactions

Re: [Vo]:Quantum superposition.

In reply to Axil Axil's message of Tue, 3 Jul 2012 18:36:55 -0400: Hi, [snip] Mixent states: “IOW the fusion reactions themselves are delayed, not the relaxation. This is to be expected as tunneling of the proton into the nucleus is a statistical process.” Axil states: If the nickel bar is

Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation

On 19 Oct 2011, at 04:48, fznidar...@aol.com wrote: A new understanding of flux pinning is the most important relation in 100 years. The magnet floats on the superconductor. Apply an RF field of 10 mega hertz to a small disk and the magnet drops. That what I saw, so what you say. Now

Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation

On Oct 18, 2011, at 9:55 PM, David Roberson wrote: Hello Frank, You have an impressive understanding of the flux pinning theory. Can you give me an answer to my question? It appears that energy can be put into the floating disk-magnet combination by pushing or pulling against the

Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation

On Oct 18, 2011, at 9:55 PM, David Roberson wrote: Hello Frank, You have an impressive understanding of the flux pinning theory. Can you give me an answer to my question? It appears that energy can be put into the floating disk-magnet combination by pushing or pulling against the

Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation

19, 2011 4:31 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation On Oct 18, 2011, at 9:55 PM, David Roberson wrote: Hello Frank, You have an impressive understanding of the flux pinning theory. Can you give me an answer to my question? It appears that energy can be put into the floating disk

Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation

@eskimo.com Sent: Tue, Oct 18, 2011 7:20 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation All this talk of pinning is just fine, but all of this is nicely predicted by the basic laws of electrical induction and the zero resistivity offered by a superconductor, you would expect repulsion or attraction to occur

RE: [Vo]:quantum levitation

because the supercurrents are not DC. Bob Higgins -Original Message- From: Harry Veeder [mailto:hveeder...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2011 12:27 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation Is it posible the RF signal is warming the superconductor just

Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation

@eskimo.com Sent: Wed, Oct 19, 2011 8:27 am Subject: Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation Is it posible the RF signal is warming the superconductor just above the critical temperature so that it drops? Harry On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:48 PM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote: A new understanding of flux pinning

Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation

thanks for the info -Original Message- From: Higgins Bob-CBH003 bob.higg...@motorolasolutions.com To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Wed, Oct 19, 2011 8:48 am Subject: RE: [Vo]:quantum levitation Note that superconductors have zero resistance only for DC. At all frequencies

Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation

Frank -Original Message- From: fznidarsic fznidar...@aol.com To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Wed, Oct 19, 2011 12:20 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation thanks for the info -Original Message- From: Higgins Bob-CBH003 bob.higg...@motorolasolutions.com To: vortex-l

Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation

On Oct 17, 2011, at 2:19 PM, Esa Ruoho wrote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ws6AAhTw7RA pretty Very cool! Check out this one too: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VyOtIsnG71U Best regards, Horace Heffner http://www.mtaonline.net/~hheffner/

Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:15 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote: From: Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com If the law of inertia is universally true, some sort of centripetal force is required to keep the disc revolving in a circle as it moves above the magnets. I can vaguely grasp how

Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation

All this talk of pinning is just fine, but all of this is nicely predicted by the basic laws of electrical induction and the zero resistivity offered by a superconductor, you would expect repulsion or attraction to occur. Now if this were done in a Vacuum then there would be zero air friction

Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation

This is a marvelous effect. I wonder if it would simplify the problem of mag-lev trains, especially ones that run vertically along a space elevator? Conventional mag-lev trains use magnetic force to lift the train, and gravity to oppose the lift. They require complex controls to keep the train

Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation

John, Do you know where the energy goes that is put into the system of magnet and disk due to the movement I mentioned? I assume it had to become heat energy in one of the two parts of the system. Is it the magnet or the disk? My first thought is that the magnet is the sink. Dave From:

Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation

All this talk of pinning is just fine, but all of this is nicely predicted by the basic laws of electrical induction and the zero resistivity offered by a superconductor, you would expect repulsion or attraction to occur. No it is not. This flux pinning thing is a big deal. The same

Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation

Jones says. Frank Znidarsic -Original Message- From: fznidarsic fznidar...@aol.com To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Tue, Oct 18, 2011 7:20 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation All this talk of pinning is just fine, but all of this is nicely predicted by the basic laws

Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation

-Original Message- From: fznidarsic fznidar...@aol.com To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Tue, Oct 18, 2011 11:49 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation A new understanding of flux pinning is the most important relation in 100 years. The magnet floats on the superconductor

Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation

Astounding! - Jed

Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation

electrical energy directly from a cold fusion reaction.. I have a friend at DARPA. -Original Message- From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Mon, Oct 17, 2011 2:47 pm Subject: Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation Astounding! - Jed

Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation

Am 18.10.2011 00:19, schrieb Esa Ruoho: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ws6AAhTw7RA pretty Wow!

Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation

: Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation Astounding! - Jed

Re: [Vo]:quantum levitation

From: Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com If the law of inertia is universally true, some sort of centripetal force is required to keep the disc revolving in a circle as it moves above the magnets. I can vaguely grasp how the phenomena of locking preserves the tilt of the disc, but how does

  1   2   3   >