In reply to Robin van Spaandonk's message of Fri, 29 Apr 2011 01:03:44 -0700
[snip] ...but AFAIK gas motion is not primarily ZPE driven. It's just the
thermal
energy of the molecules. So the implication would seem to be that as the
energy
was extracted, the gas would get colder, until it reached
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:19:10 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
provided gratis by the constant motion of gas[ZPE]
...but AFAIK gas motion is not primarily ZPE driven. It's just the thermal
energy of the molecules. So the implication would seem to be that as the energy
was
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:19:10 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
That's why I was trying to find a form of the time dilation formula[Gamma]
already solving for force
You might try reverse engineering Einstein's full equation to get the momentum,
then you can calculate
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:49:28 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
The E-cat certainly appears to include nuclear reactions but I don't know if
it was ever established that the amount of ash produced was proportional to
energy output.
It does appear to be at least
Robin,
I agree thermal is the primary source of motion at our scale but ZPE is the
inexhaustible source at any scale. Gas and Casimir geometry just happen to
have properties we can use to exploit this inexhaustible source. The
relativistic interpretation of Casimir effect means that the most
, April 29, 2011 4:09 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Magnetostriction and Cavitation ll
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:49:28 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
The E-cat certainly appears to include nuclear reactions but I don't know if
it was ever
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Fri, 29 Apr 2011 09:37:20 -0400:
Hi Fran,
[snip]
Robin ,
I made the mistake of starting from the bottom of the email replies -
your position that the ash is roughly proportional would have balanced Scott
Smith's position that there is far too
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
The bottom line IMO is that we will just have to wait till more definitive
and independent info becomes available.
Robin,
Exactamundo. This is precisely why I think that yesterday's announcement of
NASA throwing its hat into the Ni-H ring is
Jones,
I agree with most of what you are saying even that we still dispute
the need to makeup chemical energy released by catalytic disassociation. ZPE
is absolutely based on a negative potential but once you provide a method to
rectify this energy (Heisenberg trap) it operates on the
Fran - I did not make it clear that in a ZPE-only interpretation, a
nuclear reaction may not be needed, however - it is unclear if it can be
completely avoided.
This brings up the lochon which is not a hydrino - although Andrew M. was
a participant on the HSG for a long time. This has turned up
Fran,
I've been following you ideas for awhile but I don't see how they can apply to Rossi if you believe
the Ni--- Cu claims which were supposedly verified by the Swedes.
At one time I was going to try a MAHG replication but it turned out that Naudin made obvious errors
in his power
[mailto:prot...@frii.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2011 11:45 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Roarty, Francis X
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Magnetostriction and Cavitation ll
Fran,
I've been following you ideas for awhile but I don't see how they can apply to
Rossi if you believe
the Ni--- Cu claims
I don't know if this is relevant ... includes keywords
rossi, nickel, hydrogen and casimir
http://froarty.scienceblog.com/32183/gas-property-of-constant-motion-disassociates-h2-in-opposition-to-changes-in-casimir-force/
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 1:30 PM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
I don't know if this is relevant ... includes keywords rossi, nickel,
hydrogen and casimir
http://froarty.scienceblog.com/32183/gas-property-of-constant-motion-disassociates-h2-in-opposition-to-changes-in-casimir-force/
Uh,
Wouldn't you need a time varying magnetic field for this to work?
Harry
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, April 21, 2011 9:44:28 AM
Subject: [Vo]:Magnetostriction and Cavitation ll
This is a long post putting together several threads of evidence that
From: Harry
*
* Wouldn't you need a time varying magnetic field for this to work?
Yes. Power from PLCs would normally be PWM.
This should work fine with DC heating tape, no?
Jones Beene wrote:
The Griggs pump needs massive water flow.
No, it does not. I observed tests with various flow rates. It does not
need a higher flow rate than a conventional boiler.
- Jed
From: Jones Beene
From:Harry
Ø
ØWouldn't you need a time varying magnetic field for this to work?
Yes. Power from PLCs would normally be PWM.
This should work fine with DC heating tape, no?
I wouldn't know.
So the input power figures we hear about are time averaged?
Harry
18 matches
Mail list logo
