- Original Message -
From: Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 8:57 PM
Subject: Re: S. Jones makes claims about 9/11 attack
Jones Beene wrote:
John Coviello wrote:
H.V: Do buildings that suffer structural failure collapse so
John Coviello wrote:
- Original Message - From: Harry Veeder
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sunday, January 29, 2006 8:57 PM
Subject: Re: S. Jones makes claims about 9/11 attack
Jones Beene wrote:
John Coviello wrote:
H.V: Do buildings that suffer structural
-Original Message-
From: Stephen A. Lawrence
The issue of whether the fire was hot enough to _melt_ the steel beams
may be another red herring -- it just had to be hot enough to soften
them enough so that the already damaged supports for one floor broke.
The National Institute
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
On a smaller scale than skyscrapers, where one finds both wood frame
and steel frame buildings of roughly similar size and shape, in a
good hot fire, and all else being equal, a wood-frame building will
typically stand _longer_ than a steel-frame building before
RC Macaulay wrote:
Hi Jones,
Interesting that we have never heard from the original team of
structural engineers that designed and supervised construction of the
Towers.
We certainly have! The chief designer gave a presentation on it shortly
after the collapse. IIRC, he explained
Harry Veeder wrote:
I doubt the Empire State Building would have collapsed if a jet liner
crashed into it.
The Pentagon was built around the same time as the Empire State
Building, using similar materials and techniques. It shattered when
the airplane smashed into it.
I believe experts
I doubt the Empire State Building would have collapsed if a jet liner
crashed into it. If the twin towers were built like clipper ships, the
Empire State building was built like a battle ship.
Harry
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
We certainly have! The chief designer gave a
I still doubt it. ;-)
Harry
Jed Rothwell wrote:
Harry Veeder wrote:
I doubt the Empire State Building would have collapsed if a jet liner
crashed into it.
The Pentagon was built around the same time as the Empire State
Building, using similar materials and techniques. It shattered
. Jones makes claims about 9/11 attack
RC Macaulay writes:
With all debris removed from the WT site, no proof of anything remains.
That's incorrect. Thousands of tons were put aside for the investigation,
and have been preserved. Samples of the damaged steel and other materials
have been
- Original Message -
From: Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2006 10:38 PM
Subject: Re: S. Jones makes claims about 9/11 attack
RC Macaulay writes:
With all debris removed from the WT site, no proof of anything remains.
That's
John Coviello wrote:
Do buildings
that suffer structural failure collapse so quickly and cleanly? If not,
then the events of 9/11 require alternative explanations, IMO.
Yes...if the buildings had been designed to be demolished.
Disposable architecture brought to you by the throw-away
John Coviello wrote:
H.V: Do buildings that suffer structural failure collapse so
quickly and cleanly? If not, then the events of 9/11 require
alternative explanations..
Yes...if the buildings had been designed to be demolished.
Yes, but of course it does not *have to be* part of the
: Re: S. Jones makes claims about 9/11 attack
John Coviello wrote:
H.V: Do buildings that suffer structural failure collapse so quickly and
cleanly? If not, then the events of 9/11 require alternative
explanations..
Yes...if the buildings had been designed to be demolished.
Yes
Jones Beene wrote:
John Coviello wrote:
H.V: Do buildings that suffer structural failure collapse so
quickly and cleanly? If not, then the events of 9/11 require
alternative explanations..
Yes...if the buildings had been designed to be demolished.
You switched me with John Coviello.
Jones Beene wrote:
John Coviello wrote:
H.V: Do buildings that suffer structural failure collapse so
quickly and cleanly? If not, then the events of 9/11 require
alternative explanations..
Yes...if the buildings had been designed to be demolished.
You switched me with John Coviello.
This is not related to cold fusion, but Jones has contributed to the field, so
perhaps it will interest the readers here:
http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,635179751,00.html
QUOTE:
BYU professor's group accuses U.S. officials of lying about 9/11
Last fall, Brigham Young University physics
Group and Zodiac SA of France.
Making big bucks on defense contracts.. I thought the US and France were on
the outs?
Richard
- Original Message -
From: Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, January 28, 2006 2:58 PM
Subject: S. Jones makes claims about 9
RC Macaulay writes:
With all debris removed from the WT site, no proof of anything remains.
That's incorrect. Thousands of tons were put aside for the investigation, and
have been preserved. Samples of the damaged steel and other materials have been
extensively tested by many independent
18 matches
Mail list logo
