My earlier post was over reacting to a post by Professor Moddel on
Huffington post(below) that some bloggers (me) were improperly linking their
method to the hydrino. If I interpret the Professors reply correctly he is
making this an all or nothing gambit. There may be different ways to
describe
Which voltage?
2010/3/20, Harry Veeder hlvee...@yahoo.com:
yes.
You are aware that the the voltage keeps rises even after the battery is
disconnected.
harry
- Original Message
From: Michel Jullian michelj...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sat, March 20, 2010 3:59:08
Someone asked me what I mean by independent evaluations of the claims. I
mean that outside experts plan to go into the lab and observe the
experiments, the way Rob Duncan looked at Energetics Technologies. I do not
think they intend to do an independent replication.
Anyway, if they do this, and
On 03/21/2010 09:55 AM, Michel Jullian wrote:
Which voltage?
Volts on the caps attached to the output -- right, Harry?
But the signal generator is still hooked up, and it's coupled to the
output (at least) through the gate capacitance of the FET and the linked
inductors of the transformer,
2010/3/21 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Someone asked me what I mean by independent evaluations of the claims. I
mean that outside experts plan to go into the lab and observe the
experiments, the way Rob Duncan looked at Energetics Technologies.
Such an evaluation is not foolproof, as
A quantitative evaluation- see please the claims in the Focardi Rossi paper-
is foolproof
I think. Heat from radioactive stuff at ths magnitudes is very dangerous, I
think.
Next week we will celebrate the 21st anniversary of our field- and only the
Patterson
system in its day of glory was
Out in the YAHOO DNNY group, one of the participants recently posted the
following plea:
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Hi,
If you have not already read the new note I have placed on the Notes page at
www.godsebook.org, please take a look.
It's
Harry will need to confirm this, but I believe the diagram in question
is only for the input side. The output side, which isn't shown,
consists of a pickup coil, some related circuitry, and the
aforementioned capacitors.
If I'm wrong, then I'm confused (no great surprise there).
On 03/21/2010
See:
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2010-03/acs-fm030810.php
This was also copied to:
http://www.physorg.com/news188377829.html
I find it a little disturbing that they put the word calorimeter in
quotes, in the figure caption. It gives the impression they have never heard
of a
Michel Jullian wrote:
Such an evaluation is not foolproof, as even if the experimental setup is
made fully open to the experts and they find nothing wrong with it (heating
resistor current as advertised etc), there is no way to be sure there isn't
a mundane source of heat such as a some
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell
Ed Storms sometimes reads the messages here [snip] and says that this
issue comes up only because of total ignorance and it should be answered in
the same way as if a person suggested the moon was made of cheese.
You mean it's not cheese ? :)
Hi Peter, nice to see you here!
2010/3/21 Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com:
A quantitative evaluation- see please the claims in the Focardi Rossi paper-
is foolproof
I think. Heat from radioactive stuff at ths magnitudes is very dangerous, I
think.
Not really, there are off the shelf
Michel Jullian wrote:
Not really, there are off the shelf radioisotope heat sources of
this kind of power magnitude which are quite safe even though they are
quite compact (~6 Kg per kW) see:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Purpose_Heat_Source
Off of which shelf? Plutonium-238 costs
Taken at face value, the large claimed gains should easily allow a
self-running device, even if resorting to a TEG to convert the heat to
electricity at 5% efficiency or less.
A self-running device should remove all skepticism and doubt (except for the
possibility of criminal fraud) so why not
Merci beaucoup, Michel...
My interest is in technology and this resurrection or rejuvenation of the
Piantelli system
is the first really interesting event after many years. It is a great
mystery what has happened between 1994 and 2008, it is crucial to know when
(and how) was total
Were you fortunate enough to be abducted on abduction day?
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/03/19/alien-abduction-day/?test=latestnews
Alien Abduction Day Arrives, But Will Little Green Men?
Clamp on your foil hat and cower under your bed, Alien Abduction Day is here!
March 20 is Alien
In this concept drawing I use a toroidal coil with a core like Steorn's
Orbo,but instead of using it to move a rotor I use it to move a linear
oscillator.
http://tinyurl.com/yjytv2o
It works like a stone sitting on a coil spring. Imagine
you can switch gravity off so it expands to its
The capacitor is on the input side.
A pick up coil was added later to see if it is possible to close the loop and
generate OU.
He tried in test 10 but didn't succeed:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c7CsBr7ouPE
harry
- Original Message
From: Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com
To:
Hmmm now I can't view the image without logging into facebook.
That shouldn't happen.
Anyway, my drawing is also about a third of the way down this page:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8892.240
Harry
- Original Message
From: Harry Veeder hlvee...@yahoo.com
To:
03/21/2010 11:56 AM, Michel Jullian
wrote:
Wait a minute, I see
no cap attached to the output on Harry's
diagram
photo
2discussed here (haven't followed the other
discussions), only
one capacitor on the input side, in parallel with the
battery
until
the latter is
_http://article.wn.com/view/2009/12/25/Energy_Alley_Perhaps_Americas_most_im
portant_stretch_of_spac/_
(http://article.wn.com/view/2009/12/25/Energy_Alley_Perhaps_Americas_most_important_stretch_of_spac/)
So the voltage which rises after disconnection of the battery is that
of the single capacitor shown on the diagram, which was initially in
parallel with the battery?
2010/3/22 Harry Veeder hlvee...@yahoo.com:
The capacitor is on the input side.
A pick up coil was added later to see if it is
3 down on the left
_http://movie.teacup.com/search?kw=zpt_
(http://movie.teacup.com/search?kw=zpt)
Frank Znidarsic
On 03/21/2010 07:25 PM, Harry Veeder wrote:
The capacitor is on the input side. A pick up coil was added later to
see if it is possible to close the loop and generate OU.
Interesting. Sorry for my confusion; I didn't watch the videos where he
had no pickup coil (video 4 already had the extra
24 matches
Mail list logo
