The Cold is similiar to inertia. It discourages acceleration. Cold
fusion involves absorption of the cold thereby allowing molecules to accelerate
and heat things up.
Harry - only 1/3 joking
From: Wm. Scott Smith scott...@hotmail.com
To: prot...@frii.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu,
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:54:36 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
They cannot supply electricity for their own use only because they are not
designed to run at a tiny fraction of regular output, say 0.1%. I believe
that is about all they need to keep themselves going. (The energy
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:54:31 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Wind is a function of solar radiation and
that has not changed, so I doubt overall wind or the patterns of wind have
changed, or can change.
That isn't quite true. The world's heat engine runs on the temperature
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Thu, 28 Apr 2011 15:54:31 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
PV also produces roughly 30% of nameplate because the sun shines with peak
intensity around 8 hours per day. However, unlike wind power, PV produces
peak electricity at exactly the moment when demand peaks during
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Thu, 28 Apr 2011 19:27:40 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Now, considering the amount of hydrogen required, why not supply a H2
pressurized cartridge with the powder magic mixture? If you do the
math, I think you will see that no new hydrogen will be required for
the
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:19:10 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
provided gratis by the constant motion of gas[ZPE]
...but AFAIK gas motion is not primarily ZPE driven. It's just the thermal
energy of the molecules. So the implication would seem to be that as the energy
was
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:19:10 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
That's why I was trying to find a form of the time dilation formula[Gamma]
already solving for force
You might try reverse engineering Einstein's full equation to get the momentum,
then you can calculate
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Thu, 28 Apr 2011 13:49:28 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
The E-cat certainly appears to include nuclear reactions but I don't know if
it was ever established that the amount of ash produced was proportional to
energy output.
It does appear to be at least
In reply to OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson's message of Thu, 28 Apr 2011
12:04:40 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
I suspect that is one of the reasons
why I think he might make a decent president.
I agree. I actually always rather liked Powell, but I felt that he caved in to
pressure a little too easily (which
http://freeenergytruth.blogspot.com/2011/04/97-e-cats-in-operation-right-now.html
Harry,
Joking or not I begin to see where Jones was going when he said the nuclear
reaction may be an unavoidable consequence of ZPE / book balancing and
perhaps where most of the radiation is going - the hot Fusion being a
product of the absolute difference in energy between a deeply
Robin,
I agree thermal is the primary source of motion at our scale but ZPE is the
inexhaustible source at any scale. Gas and Casimir geometry just happen to
have properties we can use to exploit this inexhaustible source. The
relativistic interpretation of Casimir effect means that the most
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Esa Ruoho esaru...@gmail.com wrote:
http://freeenergytruth.blogspot.com/2011/04/97-e-cats-in-operation-right-now.html
97 E-Cats In Operation Right Now Accross 4
Countrieshttp://freeenergytruth.blogspot.com/2011/04/97-e-cats-in-operation-right-now.html
Robin ,
I made the mistake of starting from the bottom of the email replies -
your position that the ash is roughly proportional would have balanced Scott
Smith's position that there is far too much ash for heat extracted - I made
some assumption in my previous reply that were based on
The single most important
development in recent history and in a time of crisis, but it's
not worthy of mention.
Why should the media mention it? It hasn't been replicated, as far
as we know, by independent testing labs; nobody even knows how
it works or if it works reliably.
Right now, it is
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 4:41 PM, peatbog peat...@teksavvy.com wrote:
The single most important
development in recent history and in a time of crisis, but it's
not worthy of mention.
Why should the media mention it? It hasn't been replicated, as far
as we know, by independent testing
On 04/28/2011 03:37 PM, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/04/28/utilities-tva-storms-idUSN2718319320110428
All 3 Browns Ferry sites lost outside power and switched to diesel power.
They're using DIESEL POWER to run them?
Jeez, all these years and they STILL haven't
peatbog peat...@teksavvy.com wrote:
Why should the media mention it?
I agree the mainstream media is not likely to mention a thing like this.
They cannot distinguish it from a perpetual motion machine claim.
It hasn't been replicated, as far as we know, by independent testing labs;
Your typical locomotive engine is around 1 MW.
It might be wise to skip the generation of electricity in the first
wave of Rossi e-cat sales. Focus on the KISS principal. Simply focus
on the economic advantages of cheap heat! Rossi-powered 1 MW furnaces
might do very well if the goal is to show
Cold fusion has been replicated thousands of times in hundreds of labs, and
***conclusively verified*** by people such as Levi and Kullander.
You are too ethusiastic.
Even Hanno Essén said (on Italian's Skeptics Society (CICAP) magazine (Query))
that the test performed on March 29 was a
Mattia Rizzi mattia.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
Cold fusion has been replicated thousands of times in hundreds of labs,
and conclusively verified by people such as Levi and *Kullander*.
You are too ethusiastic.
Even Hanno Essén said (on Italian's Skeptics Society (CICAP) magazine
Cold fusion
has been replicated thousands of times in hundreds of labs
Straighten me out here, but I thought that the replications were
one-off things that could not be reliably repeated, or the
supposed OU from them was so small that it could be written off as
error.
What was
Terry Blanton wrote:
Your typical locomotive engine is around 1 MW.
If that were so, it would require 3 or 4 MW of raw heat. However,
various on-line references indicate that modern locomotives are usually
more powerful than this, ranging from 1.8 to 6 MW. See, for example:
Any chemical process for producing 25 kWh from any fuel in a 50 cm3 container
can be ruled out. The only alternative explanation is that there is some kind
of a nuclear process that gives rise to the measured energy production. That
sounds conclusive to me.
It's conclusive that you cannot get
From: Jed Rothwell
Mattia Rizzi mattia.ri...@gmail.com wrote:
Cold fusion has been replicated thousands of times in hundreds of labs, and
***conclusively verified*** by people such as Levi and Kullander.
You are too enthusiastic.
Even Hanno Essén said (on Italian's Skeptics Society
peatbog peat...@teksavvy.com wrote:
Cold fusion
has been replicated thousands of times in hundreds of labs
Straighten me out here, but I thought that the replications were
one-off things that could not be reliably repeated, or the supposed OU from
them was so small that it could be
Mattia Rizzi wrote:
It's conclusive that you cannot get 25 kWh from a 50cm3.
You can get that much power density from an electric heater element in a
water heater, or from a chemical source, or from fission.
- Jed
Are you reading me or not, jed?
It's quite simple, jed.
The statement Any chemical process for producing 25 kWh from any fuel in a 50
cm3 container can be ruled out. is TRUE, but that is not the point!
The point is: Are we sure that the E-Cat has produced 25 kWh of heat?
NO!
Why? Because the
Mattia Rizzi wrote:
It's conclusive that you cannot get 25 kWh from a 50cm3.
Oops! I read that as 25 kW (power). I meant yes, you can get that kind
of power from an electric heater and other sources
We agree. You claim there was no 25 kWh. That's incorrect. They did
check the water flow.
I meant to say we agree this is beyond the limits of chemistry, but
there is NO chance the flow rate changed by a factor of 133 and no one
noticed.
- Jed
Jones Beene wrote:
I find it closer to delusional than conclusive. These two Swedes are
acting more like cheer-leaders than top scientists. Kullander is
'emeritus' and could be approaching senility . . .
In my opinion, such ad hominem comments are inappropriate for this
forum. There is
You do not say anything about the numbers. Insulting the people
without talking about the numbers is worthless, and makes you look
like a troll and an imbecile. Is there something wrong with the
numbers they mentioned? Can you show math saying it IS possible to do
with chemical energy?
From: Jed Rothwell
Jones Beene wrote:
I find it closer to delusional than conclusive. These two Swedes are acting
more like cheer-leaders than top scientists. Kullander is 'emeritus' and
could be approaching senility . . .
JR: In my opinion, such ad hominem comments are inappropriate
Jones Beene wrote:
Their statement is either senile or idiotic, take your pick. Copper
migration is well known, and no lucid physicist misses this point.
Kullander misses it. Is he senile or stupid?
I do not think that this much copper can migrate through stainless
steel, so I doubt that
Another example of the close correlation between control factors and
performance can be seen on page 18 here:
http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/McKubreMCHcoldfusiona.pdf
(Where it says, Electrodes made from the same lot of materials (Pd)
produce consistent levels of excess heat.)
These are
It is a mistake to assume that government does the right thing in every
instance. The concept “The government must have done that” cannot be assumed
in every case. Could the blind disbelief in the possibility that cold fusion
could be valid be so rampant throughout the science community within
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:50:37 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
. . . 0.11 gram hydrogen and 6 grams of nickel (assuming that we use one
proton for each nickel atom) are about sufficient to produce 24 MWh through
nuclear processes assuming that 8 MeV per reaction can be
Citation
It is blatantly obvious that there is an ongoing deliberate and
orchestrated attempt to stop the public becoming aware of Rossi's E-Cat, which
when you set it against the backdrop of the recent Fukoshima nuclear disaster,
makes the media silence all the more stark...
Here in
Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
It is a mistake to assume that government does the right thing in every
instance.
WHO assumes that?!? Do you also assume that Microsoft programs never fail?
And that Wall Street has your best interests at heart?
Could the blind disbelief in the
See this interesting discussion on a sceptic page in Sweden:
http://www.e-catalyzer.se/viewtopic.php?f=2t=4#p11
--
GMX DSL Doppel-Flat ab 19,99 Euro/mtl.! Jetzt mit
gratis Handy-Flat! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:25:01 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
I meant to say we agree this is beyond the limits of chemistry, but
there is NO chance the flow rate changed by a factor of 133 and no one
noticed.
- Jed
Actually that depends on whether the flow rate was
In reply to OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson's message of Fri, 29 Apr 2011
09:17:11 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
(Water parks - turn them into
establishments that are open all year!), roads sidewalks,
Please don't advocate stupid wastes of energy. Current known World Nickel
reserves (140 million tons) are
haha...
hmmm ...actually the disaster at the Fukushima plant could have been prevented
if one reactor
was left running to temporarily power the all the plant's saftey backups.
Harry
- Original Message
From: Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri,
Hello group,
In a recent interview in italian by Radio24, Francesco Celani mentioned
that it is Yoshiaki Arata who first introduced in 2008 a few very
important innovations in LENR research in order to increase Pd-D
reactivity in a dry reactor cell (not using electrolysis).
(for the record,
I wrote:
Even if you do not check the rate there is chance a variation in the the
flow rate could produce an error large enough to make 30 W look like 4,000
W.
Oops. That should be ~300 W, not 30 W. It says: The electric heater was
switched on at 10:25, and the meter reading was 1.5 amperes
mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Actually that depends on whether the flow rate was measured with the device
attached or not.
Sure. I have seen that often enough with pond pumps.
The thing is, I suppose any scientist would know that. As I said before,
I am assuming these people are not stupid. But
Angela Kemmler wrote:
Here in Germany, almost nobody cares about Rossi and his claims. I don’t
wonder: there is no published article in any scientific journal and the test
results are not very consistent (see my new thread about the 12.4 kW claims).
There were about a dozen bloggers
Angela Kemmler wrote:
See this interesting discussion on a sceptic page in Sweden:
http://www.e-catalyzer.se/viewtopic.php?f=2t=4#p11
It is a little hard for me to tell which section you are pointing to,
but the part about the pump is incorrect. The flow rate was confirmed by
leaving the
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:58 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Please don't advocate stupid wastes of energy. Current known World Nickel
reserves (140 million tons) are only going to last us 100 years *at our
current
rate of use*. If we start wasting energy on stupid things like heating roads
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Harry Veeder hlvee...@yahoo.com wrote:
haha...
hmmm ...actually the disaster at the Fukushima plant could have been prevented
if one reactor
was left running to temporarily power the all the plant's saftey backups.
Harry
Yeah, well, that takes a plan,
The message below that from Ekstrom says:
As the real water throughput was something around 0.6 * 12.1 = 7.3
l/hr, or 121 ml/min. . . .
That is incorrect. The real water throughput was 292 ml/min, according
to the weight scale and the water collected in the liter cylinder.
These people
Terry Blanton wrote:
You keep ignoring the fact that with an ECat propulsion system, we can
fetch water from comets and nickel from asteroids and get all the
stuff we need.
Actually, that is a valid point. When someone asked me about supplies of
deuterium, I pointed out there is plenty in
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:41:47 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 5:58 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Please don't advocate stupid wastes of energy. Current known World Nickel
reserves (140 million tons) are only going to last us 100 years *at our
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 6:47 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually, that is a valid point.
Of course it is! I'm not always joking.
Well, did you see Princess Beatrice's hat?
ROFLMAO!
T
attachment: Beatrice.jpg
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell
Rossi was asked in January 2011 which type of pump was
used, but could not or was not willing to tell the pump model. His
response was clear. He said Levi brought the pump and the rest of the
stuff, and he does not know a thing about it. That's
mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
However I don't think roads will ever be heated anyway, because I expect
lifter based air transport to take off in a big way, so roads may become
largely redundant.
I am hoping most roads will be put underground, and most commuting will
be shortened or eliminated
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 29 Apr 2011 15:35:55 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
The Cat-E secret must be considered as* Born secret* and *born classified*.
Both terms which refer to a policy of information being classified from the
moment of its inception, usually regardless of where it was being
Jones Beene wrote:
used, but could not or was not willing to tell the pump model. His
response was clear. He said Levi brought the pump and the rest of the
stuff, and he does not know a thing about it. That's what he said on his blog,
and what he told me. *I find that reassuring.*
Do you
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Fri, 29 Apr 2011 15:35:55 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
If U233 and PU-239 can be produced by the Cat-E, the secret of the Cat-E
must be protected by the national espionage act and held as closely as any
other atomic secret. Any violation of that secret must be punished
Jones Beene wrote:
and Levi's has not presented his notes about the beginning and ending weight -
which could have been simply human error - but yet it is nevertheless
reassuring that so little firm evidence can be presented in support of
extraordinary claims?
Anything might be human
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 6:58 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, did you see Princess Beatrice's hat?
Mercury can't possibly do that, even with Johnny Depp as the Mad
Hatter. It takes lysergic acid diethylamide. Thank you Albert
Hofmann.
T
From Robin:
(Water parks - turn them into
establishments that are open all year!), roads sidewalks,
Please don't advocate stupid wastes of energy. Current known
World Nickel reserves (140 million tons) are only going to last us 100
years *at our current rate of use*. If we start wasting
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:00:42 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
I am hoping most roads will be put underground, and most commuting will
be shortened or eliminated with telecommunications and satellite offices
close to home.
I think putting roads underground is far too
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell
and Levi has not presented his notes about the beginning and ending weight -
which could have been simply human error - but yet it is nevertheless
reassuring that so little firm evidence can be presented in support of
extraordinary claims?
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 7:24 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
I think putting roads underground is far too expensive, so I doubt that will
happen either (except perhaps here and there in large cities).
As a former employee of Parsons Brinckerhoff, I agree, in the short
term. However, there's
In reply to OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson's message of Fri, 29 Apr 2011
18:16:51 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
From Robin:
(Water parks - turn them into
establishments that are open all year!), roads sidewalks,
Please don't advocate stupid wastes of energy. Current known
World Nickel reserves (140
The US List of restricted items that are restricted for export, or even
disclosing the details of manufacture includes Raney Nickel and similar
substances. Fran I have long speculated that weak radioactive elements can be
made to decay much faster with substance containing many Casimir
-Original Message-
From: Terry Blanton
I think putting roads underground is far too expensive, so I doubt that
will happen either (except perhaps here and there in large cities).
As a former employee of Parsons Brinckerhoff, I agree, in the short
term. However, there's the Big Dig.
In reply to mix...@bigpond.com's message of Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:00:21 +1000:
Hi,
[snip]
$12/lb). That would likely mean a considerable increase in economically
winnable
reserves, and I have no idea by how much. Note that if we could extract all the
Nickel from the top 1 km of the land then we
From: Wm. Scott Smith
* While we are on the subject, one could get the sort of heat they are
talking about by accelerating the decay of isotopes that are not even very
radioactive, normally. For example Thorium is many times less radioactive
than U235 or Plutonium.
Yes indeed. And were
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
JR: Anything might be human error. But noting changes on a weight scale
is easy. I do not think human error is likely in this instance.
Given a well known corollary to Murphy's Law that the probability of an
error is inversely proportional to the
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:05:00 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Why would not some form of subsurface robotic tunneling for roads - in the
future history of cheap LANR power, be almost as cheap?
..because the same robots could still build a surface road cheaper (and much
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Why would not some form of subsurface robotic tunneling for roads - in the
future history of cheap LANR power, be almost as cheap?
Now we have all these silly ventilation requirements: CFMs, CO
detectors, filtration,
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:20:45 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Yes indeed. And were you aware that there are only four elements in the
periodic table which are heavier (in a.m.u.) than the next element above
them in the table?
Which 4? Looking at average isotope mass, I can't
- Original Message
From: mix...@bigpond.com mix...@bigpond.com
However I don't think roads will ever be heated anyway, because I expect
lifter based air transport to take off in a big way, so roads may become
largely redundant.
(lifters are less energy efficient than fixed wing
In reply to mix...@bigpond.com's message of Sat, 30 Apr 2011 10:49:03 +1000:
Hi,
[snip]
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:20:45 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Yes indeed. And were you aware that there are only four elements in the
periodic table which are heavier (in a.m.u.) than the
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
If he were still using copper, why would he say it is stainless steel?
Duh! Of course he would lie about it. He does not want replication but does
like to be in the Media Spotlight, so he tries to act like he is being
forthright, on occasion.
Again,
Jones If an inventor had TelluriumWho?
From: jone...@pacbell.net
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Restricted Munitions List Raney Nickel, Guess Why!
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:20:45 -0700
From:
Wm. Scott Smith
Ø While
we are on the subject, one
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Fri, 29 Apr 2011 17:50:24 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
...where we're going we don't need roads
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4BPxF1mLYFM
:)
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
From: Wm. Scott Smith
Subject: [Vo]:Jones If an inventor had TelluriumWho?
Jones If an inventor had TelluriumWho?
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/54760973/Thermoelectric-Generators---Patent-6620
994
:-)
mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
Why would not some form of subsurface robotic tunneling for roads - in the
future history of cheap LANR power, be almost as cheap?
..because the same robots could still build a surface road cheaper (and
much
faster).
I discussed this in the book. Cost and speed
Need: 3 scouts (one mule, one driver, one narrator)
Two scouts enter (one on all fours if conditions allow) and move
across stage as the skit proceeds. One is the mule and the other is
the driver. A narrator stands just offstage.
Narrator: In the heat of the Mojave Desert, the mule driver pushes
Hook, line and sinker . . .
Ya gotta read Jed's book about the chickens . . .
http://www.lenr-canr.org/BookBlurb.htm
From: Jed Rothwell
JB - I would never have guessed it would get to this on a forum which is
supposed to be focused on finding the truth. Sad.
JR. You are certain it is the truth that Kullander is senile?
That is not what I said. I am certain that he claimed the Rossi reaction was
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Fri, 29 Apr 2011 09:37:20 -0400:
Hi Fran,
[snip]
Robin ,
I made the mistake of starting from the bottom of the email replies -
your position that the ash is roughly proportional would have balanced Scott
Smith's position that there is far too
This would not happen with a camel.
In reply to Jed Rothwell's message of Fri, 29 Apr 2011 21:01:26 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
All your points are interesting, and as I said, I can see underground roads
being of some importance in large cities, and perhaps with time in smaller
cities too, however before they reach the point where the
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
JR. You are certain it is the truth that Kullander is senile?
That is not what I said. I am certain that he claimed the Rossi reaction
was nuclear because an extraordinary amount of copper was found.
Here is what you said:
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:12:49 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
I am certain
that this means that the copper CANNOT be the result of a nuclear process.
..it could be if Rossi enhanced the Ni62/64 isotopes as he claims to have done.
(however I must admit that I find Rossi's claim
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
The bottom line IMO is that we will just have to wait till more definitive
and independent info becomes available.
Robin,
Exactamundo. This is precisely why I think that yesterday's announcement of
NASA throwing its hat into the Ni-H ring is
From Robin,
Good detailed analysis. Thanks for the fiddley bits. Much to ponder there.
...
I always pass judgment on everything, don't you? :)
As do I. I just try to keep'em to myself. Needless to say, I don't always
succeed in that department.
Please don't take offence, none was intended,
Jed sez:
...
... We will have a billion robots sitting around anyway,
or 10 billion if we want. Why not put them to work?
Until they all unionize!
We Wisconsinites can probably supply those robots with some good tips. We're
still working on our own collective bargaining matter. At present we
From: Jed Rothwell
* but if it turns out the copper has natural isotopes and yet it is a
transmutation product . . . that will be a fact, and you will be wrong.
Right . and if frogs grow wings they will not bump their butts on every
leap.
Do you realize how silly you are
Robin wrote:
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:12:49 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
I am certain
that this means that the copper CANNOT be the result of a nuclear process.
..it could be if Rossi enhanced the Ni62/64 isotopes as he claims to have
done.
(however I must
mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
All your points are interesting, and as I said, I can see underground roads
being of some importance in large cities, and perhaps with time in smaller
cities too, however before they reach the point where the concept would be
extended to major continental highways, I
In reply to Harry Veeder's message of Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:50:57 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
hmmm...If the copper results from migration rather than from transmutation the
contents of the reactor would weigh relatively more than you would expect from
transmutation.
Harry
That depends on what you
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Ø but if it turns out the copper has natural isotopes and yet it is a
transmutation product . . . that will be a fact, and you will be wrong.
Right … and if frogs grow wings they will not bump their butts on every
leap.
Do you realize how
mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
I am certain
that this means that the copper CANNOT be the result of a nuclear process.
..it could be if Rossi enhanced the Ni62/64 isotopes as he claims to have
done.
(however I must admit that I find Rossi's claim a bit far fetched.)
I find it far fetched too.
If Zr were present in the catalyst, It would have been found in the ash. It
has not.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Akira Shirakawa
shirakawa.ak...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello group,
In a recent interview in italian by Radio24, Francesco Celani mentioned
that it is Yoshiaki Arata who first
1 - 100 of 109 matches
Mail list logo
