Thanks, Lou. In Larsen's slide 8, he wonders: Just before 'going nuclear',
does 'patch' become an evanescent HTSC? Now these fractal HTSC links you
have provided discuss behaviors that occur on scales vastly larger than
nanoscale, but smaller than bulk materials.
In either case, we might have a
The Shukla-Eliasson (SE) force is one of the main actors in cold fusion.
The other is charge screening which is the triggering process .
Also high electric charge concentration produces degenerate electrons.
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1209.0914
Clustering of Ions at Atomic-Dimensions in Quantum
I agree Eric; but, I use wikipedia a little differently from most. I
use it as a reference source, rarely quoting wiki together because the
truth is volatile there; but, the reference base at the bottom of the
articles is a treasure trove.
T
From: Axil Axil
Doesn't LeClair's cavatation patent take the Quantum
Potential Corporation out of the fusion from cavitation business?
LeClair's IP is a joke. Below is the important prior art in sonofusion, all
of them building on the original Flynn patent from
Terry, Eric
You ever open a Sampler box of Godiva or other fine chocolates and find
that are a few that you do not like as well as the rest...
Most are close to heaven, of course ...
Wiki is like that. You pass over the one or two that you do not favor (i.e.
cherry-filled) and savor the rest.
- proposes that high temp superconductivity may develop in surface
plasmons when very high (10^11 V/m) E-field gradients develop at the
interface between collectively oscillating electrons and collectively
oscillating protons.
snip
They are getting closer. Next they must dump the neutrons
Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
I appreciate the sentiment. But I'll place myself on record for thinking
that Wikipedia is incredible. It is one of the handiest things to come
about in the last ten or so years.
The Model T Ford was also incredible. It was wonderful breakthrough
Wow! Our former Vort, Ross Tessian, has quite a bit of IP there! For
new comers, Ross used to post here and one day said, I'm going to go
off and start a company, and he did.
How long ago, Jones? Y2K?
T
Last I heard, Ross was no longer at Impulse Devices, although another report
says he returned after an absence.
They have a decent web presence, but since no one can yet make a living from
LENR alone - they are into many other things like sonochemistry (to pay the
bills).
At 10:04 PM 9/9/2012, Jouni Valkonen wrote:
On 10 September 2012 02:52, Jed Rothwell
mailto:jedrothw...@gmail.comjedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
You do not need to satisfy people. You need to
report the replicated, peer-reviewed facts of
the matter. Science is not a popularity contest.
That
Aren't LeClair's claims completely unsubstantiated?
Ron
--On Wednesday, September 12, 2012 1:20 AM -0400 Axil Axil
janap...@gmail.com wrote:
Doesn't LeClair's cavatation patent take the Quantum Potential
Corporation out of the fusion from cavitation business?
Cheers: Axil
On Tue, Sep
Courtesy of LENR Forum - Follow links at -
http://www.lenrforum.eu/viewtopic.php?t=569p=2283
U.S. Patent No. US 8,227,020 July 24, 2012
ABSTRACT:
Techniques to form dislocation cores along an interface of a multilayer thin
film structure are described. The loading and/or deloading of
refer-a-pedia
wiki-ference
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree Eric; but, I use wikipedia a little differently from most. I
use it as a reference source, rarely quoting wiki together because the
truth is volatile there; but, the reference base at
Perhaps all the very controversial subjects from the current wikipedia
should be removed and placed in a distinct wikipedia dedicated to very
controversial subjects.
harry
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
As I said, Wikipedia is good for some things
Hi,
Just to inform you: it is election day in the Netherlands. Polls show
that either the PvdA (moderate socialist party) or VVD (liberals) will
get out as the biggest.
Leader of the PvdA is Diederik Samsom, who was a nuclear physicist and
was an active member of Greenpeace. See
BTW: I was looking for the right words. PvdA would be called a
social-democratic party (labour). Disregard socialist.
On 09/12/2012 01:21 PM, Andre Blum wrote:
Hi,
Just to inform you: it is election day in the Netherlands. Polls show
that either the PvdA (moderate socialist party) or VVD
Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps all the very controversial subjects from the current wikipedia
should be removed and placed in a distinct wikipedia dedicated to very
controversial subjects.
I do not think that will happen. The Wikipedia management would not agree.
I do not
For any here puzzled-
Pointing out the obvious:
If, while temperature is rising, some increasing portion of a resistive
conductor becomes superconductive, the overall resistance of the entire
conductor will decrease. If this decrease exceeds an increase which
temperature rise is causing at the
This increase in conductivity is casued by the formation of cooper pairs of
protons through the action of thr Shukla-Eliasson Attractive Force. See my
last post - Friedel oscillations
Cheers: Axil
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:02 PM, David L Babcock ol...@rochester.rr.comwrote:
For any here
Jed,
I am quite neutral on that.
Wheter it is Gerischer or Brian Josephson, or even Laughlin, whom I admire.
Their opinion does not matter substantially.
Those are fringe-opinions, which do not influence mainstream science a lot.
They eventually are heard by people like You and me, but that's it.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps all the very controversial subjects from the current wikipedia
should be removed and placed in a distinct wikipedia dedicated to very
controversial subjects.
I do not
Also if you go to the later slides in the presentation Lou originally
posted, there is some mention of experimental evidence for something like
non-monotonic resistivity - it may be described as wild swings (?) on
the slide). I haven't searched the archive for the reference(s).
Jeff
On Wed, Sep
Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
I think contributors to a controversial subject must self-identify as
either pro or con. That way readers can *immediately* see from the
user name on which side of the controversy each contributor stands.
Exactly. To simplify: Just have signed
Axil,
Your URL reference was clipped.
www.physics.uiowa.edu/.../EPSICPP_2012_Talk_Merlino.ppt
Were you referring to one of the figures in --
Dusty plasmas: Experiments on nonlinear dust acoustic waves,
shocks, and structures
http://www.physics.uiowa.edu/~rmerlino/EPS_ICPP_2012_PPFC_MS.pdf
-- ?
David,
I agree. If the resistance fluctuates under constant potential, transient
superconductivity, or ballistic conduction may be occuring. If the
resistance follows the same deterministic non-monotonic path each time the
voltage is swept, then maybe something like Esaki-diode (differential)
I wrote:
If the subject is controversial, you can [have] two articles, one by
supporters, and one by opponents. Why not?
This is against the rules in Wikipedia. They insist that people reach
a compromise taking into accounts all points of view. They want one and
only one article per topic.
Lou, your link will work.
Try this link to get to the PPT I intended.
http://pesn.com/2012/09/11/9602180_2012_E-Cat_Conference_Report--1_MW_E-Cat_Ready/
(plus other links).
Biggest news/ leak is :
A little secret I'll let you in on is that Rossi does have
self-looped data for the Hot-Cat, but chose not to release that at
this time. Self-looped is effectively
2012/9/12 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Harry Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
I think contributors to a controversial subject must self-identify as
either pro or con. That way readers can *immediately* see from the
user name on which side of the controversy each contributor stands.
If it is true, it is great. If...
Peter
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
http://pesn.com/2012/09/11/**9602180_2012_E-Cat_Conference_**
Report--1_MW_E-Cat_Ready/http://pesn.com/2012/09/11/9602180_2012_E-Cat_Conference_Report--1_MW_E-Cat_Ready/
(plus other
in fact I've heard of wikipedia spitrit in the old time :
it was to express reasonable opinion, all reasonable opinions, with
reference data, show controversies, ...
but on some subject I follow I've see that peer-reviewed but non mainstream
point of view get thrown out by ideological non
http://www.google.com/patents?id=WhIgAgAAEBAJpg=PA1lpg=PA1dq=%22Low+Energy+Nuclear+Reaction%22source=blots=Xuf1yRH2vBsig=142QFcoB_2WmhjeCiLVn9AuUGlUhl=ensa=Xei=qEROUKH4JsjSrQHKmIGoBwved=0CD4Q6AEwBQgoback=.gde_4132340_member_161859049#v=onepageqf=false
Isn't this sort of big deal? Not so much
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 2:56 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I wrote:
If the subject is controversial, you can [have] two articles, one by
supporters, and one by opponents. Why not?
This is against the rules in Wikipedia. They insist that people reach a
compromise taking into
From
PESNhttp://pesn.com/2012/09/11/9602180_2012_E-Cat_Conference_Report--1_MW_E-Cat_Ready/
:
One third of the $1.5 million price is paid up front, and two thirds is
paid after a successful performance test; and if the performance test
doesn't meet the specifications, then the deposit is
Sterling Allen also posted a link to a video
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Bob_Rohner%27s_Noble_Gas_Engine#Plasma_Cycle_is_Not_Air_Driven
A 1-cylinder Papp is assembled from scratch, charged with gas and
operated.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0fd-coQ84XU
The cylinder fires against
On Sep 12, 2012, at 5:05 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
The main problems are that it allows anonymous editing, and it has no respect
for authorities in complicated, specialized subjects. I hope that it is
reformed, or -- if it is not -- that some competing encyclopedia arises.
I agree Peter. I do not see any hint of strong positive thermal feedback in
the data from the meeting. It would have been better for Rossi to have skipped
revealing this data entirely since it does little to support his claims. My
simulations make me question whether or not there is any
Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
Isn't this sort of big deal? Not so much because of what the patent
covers, but because the USPTO actually granted it? Claim 11, for
example, specifically mentions charged particles and x-rays.
Yes, it is a big deal. I don't know what to make of it. Perhaps the P.O.
Tom Andersen just sent me this new press release on hi-temp 'fractal'
superconductivity -
Room Temperature Superconductivity Found in Graphite Grains
Water-soaked grains of carbon superconduct at room temperature,
claim a team of physicists from Germany
This blog called Shut down Rossi can't find any evidence that safety
certificate was issue by SGS as Rossi claims.
http://shutdownrossi.com/?page_id=1774
I suppose it is possible that the certificate was issued under a
different company name because SGS only confirms that a certificate
was not
From Harry:
This blog called Shut down Rossi can't find any evidence that safety
certificate was issue by SGS as Rossi claims.
http://shutdownrossi.com/?page_id=1774
this is hilarious.
I guess I shouldn't be surprised. How many wannabe rossi related
websites are there now?
Regards
Steven
One likely reason for Rossi holding back on that data is that the
present stipulation of the safety certification requires that the unit
not be self-looped.
:-)
T
Harry Veeder wrote:
This blog called Shut down Rossi can't find any evidence that safety
certificate was issue by SGS as Rossi claims.
This person has it in for Rossi, doesn't he?
Rossi rubs people the wrong way.
Why worry about Rossi? Who has he hurt, other than himself? If he is all
that
This should give Rossi much more confidence to show his invention... if it
was not for his totally confusing writing.
2012/9/12 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Jeff Berkowitz wrote:
Isn't this sort of big deal? Not so much because of what the patent
covers, but because the USPTO actually
As I previously reported here at vortex-l, Bob is claiming no coil is
required. This video demonstrates it. I think it also places in serious
doubt the ring electromagnet
hypothesishttp://pesn.com/2012/08/24/9602167_Noble_Gas_Plasma_or_Aluminum_Ring_Electromagnet/
posited
by Sterling Allen.
I now see the link to Wes's retraction on Sterling Allen's page.
http://pesn.com/2012/08/24/9602167_Noble_Gas_Plasma_or_Aluminum_Ring_Electromagnet/#retraction
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 6:55 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
As I previously reported here at vortex-l, Bob is claiming no
One can also figure out how to operate their microwave at home with the
door open if they are tricky enough but i would advise against it.
On Wednesday, September 12, 2012, James Bowery wrote:
As I previously reported here at vortex-l, Bob is claiming no coil is
required. This video
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:46 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
One can also figure out how to operate their microwave at home with the door
open if they are tricky enough but i would advise against it.
Unless you like cataracts.
T
On 2012-09-12 23:04, Harry Veeder wrote:
I suppose it is possible that the certificate was issued under a
different company name because SGS only confirms that a certificate
was not issued to any of the companies listed by the owner of Shut
down Rossi
I would say it's highly probable that the
After carefully considering the consequences of your theories, I most
certainly would never operate my microwave at home with the door open -- it
would let the gremlins out.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:46 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
One can also figure out how to operate their
Smart man. I get the impression Papp was much brighter than the Rohner
Bros.
On Wednesday, September 12, 2012, James Bowery wrote:
After carefully considering the consequences of your theories, I most
certainly would never operate my microwave at home with the door open -- it
would let the
John is using a coil. Bob is using a metallic casing. But no matter. The
gremlins can sense when their dark lord, Josef Papp, is present, and they
cower in fearful submission heading straight to the Earth's core rather
than toward his pancreas.
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:16 PM, ChemE Stewart
Even so I believe I will wait for Popper ver. 2.0 after SRI figures out the
true nature of the beast.
On Wednesday, September 12, 2012, James Bowery wrote:
John is using a coil. Bob is using a metallic casing. But no matter. The
gremlins can sense when their dark lord, Josef Papp, is
53 matches
Mail list logo
