Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
The MIT 2014 LENR Colloquium included in the agenda:
Yiannis Hadjichristos Heat Energy from Hydrogen-Metal Interactions
and the need for new Scientific Alliances
but, I can't find anything on the web about the presentation. Does
anyone have a
From Daniel:
Alright, if Defkalion cannot answer for themselves,
I am not going to do it anymore for free.
I realize I'm probably misinterpreting the intent of your message, but the
implication I'm making is that you may have been a paid shill for Defkalion.
Needless to say, I do not
To continue with the argument that chemical energy from hydrogen can be
thermodynamically overunity without violating Conservation of Energy
principles, and without any nuclear reaction - due to the ubiquity of
interfacial positronium (the Dirac epo field at the interface of 3-space)
there is an
The only way a quantum theory of gravity is going to fly is by using extra
dimensions decaying to gravitons.
The atmosphere around pulsed microwave radar towers is donating protons and
dissolving limestone, I have 50 years of data in Florida pointing to it
around multiple towers. Our weather
Greetings Vortex-L,
There is a Electrogrtavitics Paper: Gravity as a Secondary Electrostatic
Force
by Professor Gupta of Luckow University, India.
He was inspired by his mentor: Nobel Prize Laureate, Professor Abdus Salam
University Trieste...who won the Nobel Prize for discovery of the
If magnetism is the first-order (velocity dependent) effect of moving
electrons in conductor, gravitation is the second-order
(acceleration-dependant) effect of revolving electrons in atoms.
I have wonders why the magnetic field (the spin component of atoms) must
rotate in anti-gravity devices to
Jones--
You stated:
The textbook energy from burning hydrogen in oxygen is 2.85 eV per
molecule
of H2O
Is that energy based on the differential mass of (H2 molecule + O2 molecule)
and 2H2O molecules?
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
To:
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook
The textbook energy from burning hydrogen in oxygen is 2.85 eV per
molecule of H2O
Is that energy based on the differential mass of (H2 molecule + O2
molecule) and 2H2O molecules?
Well yes, it can be stated that way - although it is a chemical
Jones,
I am having a difficult time following your example. The diagram illustrating
the energy balance appears to add up properly to me.
If you take another reaction, such as burning of a liquid hydrocarbon, does
your technique still demonstrate an unbalance? Any time I see a process that
Sheesh, Evgeny Podkletnov twenty years ago was spinning a superconducting disk
at a high RPM. He noted a three percent loss of weight for objects placed above
the disk. His work was pretty well documented as I recall although of course he
lost his job at some Finnish university. This sounds
From: David Roberson
If you take another reaction, such as burning of a liquid hydrocarbon, does
your technique still demonstrate an unbalance?
No- bare protons must be present for positronium to get involved. We are
talking about the need to reach an interface with another spatial
Sheesh, Evgeny Podkletnov twenty years ago was spinning a superconducting disk
at a high RPM. He noted a three percent loss of weight for objects placed above
the disk. His work was pretty well documented as I recall although of course he
lost his job at some Finnish university. This sounds
Uh-oh this was supposed to be attached to an earlier antigravity thread in
answer to Dave Robinson's question. My apologies I will pay closer attention
Steve High
On Apr 13, 2014, at 6:36 PM, Steve High diamondweb...@gmail.com wrote:
Sheesh, Evgeny Podkletnov twenty years ago was spinning a
A question: what would be the net effect of all these extra electrons being
pulled over from the Dirac Sea? Would this not eventually produce some kind of
unholy electrostatic issue. Or worse?
Steve High
On Apr 13, 2014, at 6:40 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
From: David Roberson
From: Steve High
A question: what would be the net effect of all these extra
electrons being pulled over from the Dirac Sea? Would this not
eventually produce some kind of unholy electrostatic issue. Or
worse?
Good question, Steve. The
Perhaps there is a reaction of the type you are describing Jones. I cling to
the classical ideas about COE and might overlook this system.
My reason for asking about the hydrocarbon was that it is contains a great deal
of hydrogen that must be stripped away from the carbon when burned. Once
Thanks for the link Steve. I am interesting in finding out more about this
subject. For folks that suspect that there may be some truth to the stories
about UFOs there must be some means of propulsion that is robust and capable of
being operated by electricity. Perhaps Dr. Podkletnov has
From: David Roberson
My reason for asking about the hydrocarbon was that it is contains a great deal
of hydrogen that must be stripped away from the carbon when burned. Once free,
I would expect it to behave much like a broken apart hydrogen molecule. Do you
understand why free hydrogen
I met Martin Tjmar during one of my lectures.
http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/movies/jhu.wmv
-Original Message-
From: David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Sun, Apr 13, 2014 8:57 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:anti-gravity
Thanks for the link Steve. I
19 matches
Mail list logo
