A much wider set of principles can be found in patent applications by
George Samual Levy.
In particular his published provisional filing 61567455 which can be
obtained at http://portal.uspto.gov/pair/PublicPair is intreaging,
My personal interest goes to the solid state versions of his claimed
There is a denial by Rossi from Rossi's Journal of Nuclear Physics on
February 15, 2013
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=785cpage=2#comment-626114:
Andrea Rossi
February 15th, 2013 at 3:00 AM
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=785cpage=2#comment-626114
Dear Todd Burkett:
I
The almost intractable problem for explaining LENR to physicists, or even
undergrads in physics - is that there is no gamma - presenting a major
obstacle to our understanding if there is to be real fusion. Almost all of
the other problems in Ni-D, the Mizuno reaction, including lack of
Jones,
Isn't the problem with this scenario that the ground state H/D atom must
GIVE UP energy to enter the DDL state. What you propose is that the H/D
atoms could absorb the gamma emission from the transmutation and
fractionate the photons to DDL energy chunks. For this to occur, the
coupled
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
It’s more complicated than that. Everyone borrows to a greater or to a
less extent.
Mills borrowed at little, Rossi borrowed a lot. Yet in the end – success
may require both borrowers - and probably one or two more.
As Steve Jobs said, Good artists
It should be mentioned that this version, which envisions gamma radiation
being fractionalized to DDL instead of all the way down to phonon vibration,
could be at least partially falsifiable.
Here's how it could be done.
QSI makes nanoparticles of NiO which are close to the proper size for
From: Bob Higgins
Isn't the problem with this scenario that the ground state H/D atom must GIVE
UP energy to enter the DDL state.
That would be true under Mills theory, but one big objection to Mills concept
is that if it were true - as a logical matter, there would be nothing
*Dear Jones,*
*I have been trying to move you to the “Superabsorption” concept for the
last year or two. I am pleased that you are getting nearer to appreciate
Superabsorption of gamma radiation.*
*Superabsorption is the reciprocal concept to Superradiance. *
*You were kind enough to clue
The reason why a quantum dot idea won't work is the fact that electrons
conform to the Pauli exclusion principle.
The quantum dot can be thought of as a single atom with thousands of
ascending electron orbital energy levels. As these levels absorb gamma
radiation, it get increasingly harder for
Axil,
Of all the wild possibilities that we consider on vortex – most of which are
eventually rejected as impossible, gamma fractionalization still appears to me
to be the least likely major holdover theory (from the cold fusion era) to be a
physical reality in the NiH era. This is despite
Rossi saw 512KeV gamma from positrons in his early reactors. He put this
fact into his 2010 patent in reference to nickel to copper transmutation.
On January the 14th 2011, Rossi and Focardi gave the first public
demonstration of the low temperature E-Cat to a personally invited group. A
short
In reply to H Veeder's message of Sun, 28 Sep 2014 19:18:08 -0400:
Hi Harry,
The link has two drawings on the same page. The top drawing, which is the
one I found, doesn't challenge FP research.
The bottom drawing is my modified version and it is intended to show that
the fusion process can be
In reply to Bob Higgins's message of Mon, 29 Sep 2014 11:42:39 -0600:
Hi,
[snip]
Jones,
Isn't the problem with this scenario that the ground state H/D atom must
GIVE UP energy to enter the DDL state. What you propose is that the H/D
atoms could absorb the gamma emission from the transmutation
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 2:54 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
If it happened nobody would notice.
Yes. I think it would be indistinguishable from an elastic collision (if
the two situations are different).
Eric
14 matches
Mail list logo
