The radar pulse rate does not effect the penetration into the water. In other
words, the 200 to 1000 Hz rate is applied to the carrier and does not
independently appear anywhere else.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Dear Friends,
It is my privilege to publish this:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/07/a-bright-study-of-nuclear-otherness.html
Please understand that Otherness is the raison d'etre of LENR.
And its huge chance.
Peter
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Marine life on the North Shore of Kauai, HI:
https://www.facebook.com/honulilley/media_set?set=a.10152814052996556.1073742148.574581555type=3pnref=story
Electrons/charged ions will discharge along pointed surfaces, decaying them
(that is why airplane wings have wicks on tips/trailing surfaces to
The radar RF signal is not being rectified by the water into a DC current like
your chart is assuming. The signal is actually reflected from the surface
layers with extremely small penetration. The pulse rate has nothing to do
with the high frequency RF reflection behavior for a typical
Dave, the pulse train is a square wave, with the on amplitude approx 900'
long or longer depending upon duty cycle, bouncing between clouds/planes
and the suface of the ocean
Just one weather radar has an EIRP of 32 billion watts of power, which gets
ducted and scattered by planes and the
Of course if you limit your impact to those transmitters that communicate with
submarines then these very low frequency signals do travel into the deeper
water. But, so far it appears that you have placed all type of radars, etc.
into the same category, which is not reasonable.
From what I
How many dead fish do we have to have and dead birds falling from the sky
to have before you sparkies understand your mistake?
http://darkmattersalot.com/2014/01/12/florida-2/
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 1:48 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
The radar RF signal is not being rectified by
This is primarily meant for fellow Vort, ChemEng (Stewart), but some others
may have an interest.
Stewart, I think I may have a cause for your hypothesis re: a link between
our modern radar systems and the dying of coral reefs.
Seems that proteins in living systems have evolved such that
This is a good article
http://what-when-how.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/tmp1A545_thumb.jpg
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 2:22 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
David,
Of course the low frequency square pulses show up on receivers, that is
how pulsed doppler works!
That was the picture, this is the article
http://what-when-how.com/remote-sensing-from-air-and-space/theory-radar-remote-sensing-part-1/
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 2:24 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a good article
I admit runoff can kill reefs
I admit low pH can kill reefs
I admit walking on reefs can kill reefs
North Shore of Kauai has little of that
Nobody ever considered radiation, which BTW has been shown to be bad for
biology
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 2:00 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
How many counter examples to your hypothesis do you need before you at
least admit there may be more than one cause of dying coral reefs?
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 12:56 PM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
How many dead fish do we have to have and dead birds falling from the sky
to have
No, I have concentrated on pulsed radars, which pulse at 0-1000 Hz,
considered very low frequencies.
Dave you are generalizing and have done no research yourself.
Here is some:
http://darkmattersalot.com/2015/05/19/and-you-thought-the-bp-oil-spill-was-bad/
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 1:55 PM, David
It is up to those that propose problems such as you are doing to prove that the
transmitters are a big problem for society. Some people would also be
concerned about the safety of air transportation without radar or radio
guidance. Are you ready to give up on your cellular radios and other
Last time I argued with you about this you told me you got shocked by an RF
antenna
You proved my point.
I loved radio, but I like Pandora better and that comes through a cable (at
least to my house :))
Stewart
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 2:41 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Not
Not really Stewart. I have worked on radios and theory for many years and I
understand it quite well. You are missing the point about the pulse repetition
rate and its relationship to the radiated signal. The low frequencies are not
radiated by a very band limited high frequency RF
David, all doppler weather, FAA, military radars send pulse trains at
200-1000 Hz. Just google doppler radar, they are ALL pulsed signals. The
carrier frequency (while they are on) determines how well the pulses are
absorbed in things like water. 2.5 - 6 GHz (microwave oven, wifi, weather
Come on now Stewart. If you take the time to analyze the spectrum of a pulsed
radar signal, you will find that all of the energy is contained in a location
surrounding the carrier frequency. Also, how well do you think a dish radar
antenna being feed by a bandwidth limited waveguide is going
OK, this is how the 200-1000 Hz signal is propogated
http://www.nwas.org/committees/avnwinterwx/doppler_weather_radar_overview.htm
A large parabolic dish antenna works well.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 2:29 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
It is up to those that propose problems such
Here are some dead zones and radiation power density
http://darkmattersalot.com/2014/09/03/i-think-uncle-sam-definitely-did-it-in-the-lagoon-with-the-pulsed-microwave-radar/
enjoy!
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 1:55 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Of course if you limit your impact to
David,
Of course the low frequency square pulses show up on receivers, that is how
pulsed doppler works!
http://www.rfcafe.com/references/articles/images/Signal-Analysis-Modern-Radar-R-S-6.jpg
When it is on (every pulse) a weather radar puts out ~1,000,000 WATTS, (32
billion watts EIRP)
Even if we accept the theoretical possibility that collective nuclear reactions
can take place (by an totally unknown physical mechanism) it is absolutely
necessary that the conservation laws should be respected- conservation of
energy, barions, leptons, and of electric charge. It was worked
LENR must involve a positive feedback loop in order to achive over unity.
If magnetic fields are involved, the positive feed back must be magnetic in
nature. Nuclear binding energy is converted to magnetic energy in a gainful
positive feedback loop. Please explain how you beleive this might work.
You are kidding right?
Any signal that shows up is merely being translated in frequency from its
original location down to the baseband. The only signal received is very close
in frequency to the carrier wave. The modulation signal at the low Hertz rate
is visible at the receiver output, but
How does the magnetic field produce heat?
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 5:57 PM, Frank Znidarsic fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
It in the amplitude of the thermal vibrations,.
LENR must involve a positive feedback loop in order to achive over unity.
If magnetic fields are involved, the positive feed
snitthat the conservation laws should be respected/snip
Thanks Perter. The magnetic fields are NOT conserved! That included
electromagnetic, gravito magnetic ,and nuclear spin orbit.
Good, very good comment Peter.
-Original Message-
From: Frank Znidarsic fznidar...@aol.com
To:
Frank--
Regarding conservation laws, are angular momentum and intrinsic spin conserved?
What about spin mass energy? Does that fall into the category of inertial
mass you suggest is not conserved?
Bob
From: Frank Znidarsic
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2015 1:35 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Two things on the universe are not conserved. The magnetic fields and inertial
mass are NOT conserved.
-Original Message-
From: Frank Znidarsic fznidar...@aol.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Jul 7, 2015 4:33 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:a special issue of EGO OUT
Any non-linearity in a medium like salt water will cause baseband currents.
From: David Roberson [mailto:dlrober...@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2015 2:45 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Possible cause for coral reefs dying...
You are kidding right?
Any signal that shows
Yes indeed, they are modulated at that low rate. No one has ever stated
otherwise Stewart. But, this is quite different than a signal at that low
frequency being radiated into the environment.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l
Momentum is conserved.
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Jul 7, 2015 5:13 pm
Subject: [Vo]:Re: a special issue of EGO OUT
Frank--
It in the amplitude of the thermal vibrations,.
LENR must involve a positive feedback loop in order to achive over unity. If
magnetic fields are involved, the positive feed back must be magnetic in
nature. Nuclear binding energy is converted to magnetic energy in a gainful
positive feedback
High frequency radio waves do not propagate under water.
-Original Message-
From: Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. hoyt-stea...@cox.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Jul 7, 2015 5:50 pm
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Possible cause for coral reefs dying...
Any non-linearity in a medium like
Stray electrical currents from electromagnetic induction are an ongoing problem
in saltwater aquariums - diseased fish and marine life.
http://www.reefcentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1982006
In Kauai, the North shore reef fish are turning black and some of the
sharks are going belly up near
JoJo sent me a message to post, so I will post. We will agree to disagree
about the radars/antennas near seawater. I don't disagree electrodes can
stimulate growth, they can also kill it.
http://fishshocker.net/
Stewart
-- Forwarded message --
From: jojoiznar...@gmail.com
Date:
You recall me being shocked by that darned vhf transmitter? Actually it was a
burn, but it proved that I have earned my metal as an experienced RF power
engineer. Most of the guys that I know who have actual experience have been
burned on at least one occasion.
Have you ever been RF
What about low flying aircraft overhead reflecting a strong signal back to
ground?
What about ducting events and high refraction off the atmosphere
during storms?
Salt water is 1000 times better conductor than soil and well grounded.
The radars are pulsing at very LOW frequencies and yes, the
Something more interesting wit rf
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:John_Kanzius_Produces_Hydrogen_from_Salt_Water_Using_Radio_Waves
-Original Message-
From: David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Jul 7, 2015 6:13 pm
Subject: Re:
ChemE and Dave--
Suppose the damage to the reef is to microscopic reef larva or other growth
phase of the reef organism that lives near or on surface. Is there enough
energy impinging the surface at a steep angle, for example a surface of a small
wave or ripple to affect a small egg cell or
I agree it has been covered.
Radar signals are absorbed by the ocean when there are more waves on the
surface of the ocean to absorb carrier waves. A calm ocean is more
reflective.
The reference is on my site.
3-4 waves lapping over a shallow reef are a good spot to absorb and ground
2-6 GHz
Dave,
Then stop talking since you have done no research on correlations of marine
life disease and human disease linked to EM radiation, which is
understandable since you have spent your career generating EM radiation and
you feel compelled to justify
Yep. Those induced currents are at the RF microwave frequency that you are
speaking of Stewart. That is how reflections take place. It also can be used
to explain the attenuation of the main signal as it gets dissipated within the
conductive medium.
This subject has been covered
Manatees are dying of shock around the 17+ microwave radars and earth
stations in Melbourne, fl
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2014-02-01/news/os-manatee-deaths-indian-river-20140201_1_indian-river-lagoon-katie-tripp-dead-manatees
See my maps for EIRP power overhead.
On Tuesday, July 7,
Right, and salt water flowing through a strong pulsing EM field can induce
electrical currents.
On Tuesday, July 7, 2015, Hoyt A. Stearns Jr. hoyt-stea...@cox.net wrote:
Any non-linearity in a medium like salt water will cause baseband currents.
*From:* David Roberson
Of course, this is nothing new. Now show me how the actual pulse repetition
rate is transmitted other than by existing as modulation of the carrier? Can
you integrate this waveform to show that energy is being transmitted at that
200 to 1000 Hz frequency? You can not because none is being
Rectification of the signal can cause small DC currents as you suggest. Any
non linear behavior that treats both the positive and negative RF swings
equally can not result in DC generation but instead causes harmonic generation
of the RF carrier. Do you consider salt water as capable of
Stewart,
I have already suggested that this discussion be terminated due to its
interference with the main issues. But, you clearly need good theoretical
backing for your concepts.
The reflections from a low flying aircraft that you think as large are not
significant at all when you consider
Except low pulsed frequencies
On Tuesday, July 7, 2015, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 1:42 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','zeropo...@charter.net'); wrote:
This is primarily meant for fellow Vort, ChemEng (Stewart), but
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 1:42 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
wrote:
This is primarily meant for fellow Vort, ChemEng (Stewart), but some
others may have an interest…
Stewart, I think I may have a cause for your hypothesis re: a link between
our modern radar systems and the dying
VLF https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_low_frequency radio waves (3–30
kHz https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hertz) can penetrate seawater to a
depth of approximately 20 meters. Hence a submarine at shallow depth can
use these frequencies.
Most of the radars pulse at 200-1000 Hz.
Most of the
Mark,
Thanks for the info, I will pass it on. I read the posts on Vortex
everyday and appreciate the uninhibited creative technical
expulsion that occurs. I am involved in a couple of research efforts
now in addition to my day job as a chemical/environmental engineer
consultant.
One study
Low pulsed frequency is a contradiction in terms.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 7:01 AM, ChemE Stewart cheme...@gmail.com wrote:
Except low pulsed frequencies
On Tuesday, July 7, 2015, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 1:42 AM, MarkI-ZeroPoint zeropo...@charter.net
My bad - I thought your closed form geometry equals a wavelength that matches
our plane and persists in our plane as a physical manifestation like a canoe
stuck in the waterfall whereas all other virtual particles form the ether
medium and just flow thru - their rate of flow establishing the
*entirely new collective nuclear reactions, instantaneous simultaneous
fusion fission transformation, Leonid Urutskoev letter (first part): EGO
OUT blog of Peter Gluck: Rich Murray 2015.07.07*
*http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2015/07/entirely-new-collective-nuclear.html
The CEO of Uber, the ridesharing company, is reported to have expressed a
strong interest in the autonomous vehicles that Tesla is planning to put on
the market. The implication for drivers, including Uber's, is clear.
See:
How does the magnetic field produce heat?
The spin orbit magnetic field (not of electromagnetic origin) can, when
modified, mediate nuclear reactions at a greater range than the Coulombic force.
Frank Z
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l
Thanks for the numbers.
This should be relatively straight forward to test:
Set up two salt water aquariums supporting comparable coral populations.
Run them for a year or so to see they are stable. Then subject one of them
to low frequency EM radiation.
PS: What I mean contraction in terms
Low frequency pulse.
Also, we are not communicating with the marine life and coral reef, the
evidence is mounting that 2 terrawatts of effective isotropic radiated
power (EIRP) in a local area scattered by the overhead atmosphere is mildly
shocking the marine life through electromagnetic
This must be done blind but even then, the experimenter effect ( Marylyn
Schlitz) would override the results ( Experimenter effect
59 matches
Mail list logo
