http://dispatchesfromthefuture.com/2015/10/new_video_reveals_internals_of_orbo_powe.html
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Thu, 29 Oct 2015 18:34:31 -0700:
Hi Jones,
I'm not sure I really have a premise. Basically, I'm just juggling numbers to
see what happens. However in the back of my mind is the relationship between the
fundamental particles of the particle zoo that seems to
Because Hawking radiation may be a part of LENR, the Unruh effect is
something one must know to understand LENR fully.
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 4:53 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
> en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unruh_effect
>
> Particles are relative
>
> Unruh demonstrated theoretically that
In reply to David Roberson's message of Fri, 30 Oct 2015 10:01:08 -0400:
Hi Dave,
There is a small energy difference between ortho & para hydrogen (see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin_isomers_of_hydrogen). I would expect that
difference to increase dramatically as the molecule got smaller.
Axil, OK, I am glad you see this as being “sent” into the temporal axis which
is key to what I am saying because it unbalances COE. Normal random motion
cannot be harnessed to power a Maxwellian demon because the random motion of
gas always cancels in 3d…. In 4d it becomes possible and this is
This also fits reports of life after death lab explosions
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 3:10 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: EXTERNAL: Re: [Vo]:Re: Casimir, ZPE and Holmlid
A comment on the THE FLEISCHMANN SINGULARITY as a clue to
Bob-
I had the same question in mind about the Rydberg matter and DDL H or D that
Jones was implying. My neck is not as long as yours.
That’s nice analysis--
The same drawing-together that you describe for D’s happens with any particle
with none-integral spin as I know. It is called
Robin--
Search for Time Variation of the Fine Structure Constant
John K. Webb, Victor V. Flambaum, Christopher W. Churchill, Michael J.
Drinkwater, and John D. Barrow
Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 884 – Published 1 February 1999
This item suggests that the fine constant varies with time. It may be
That was strange my phone sent that before I finished writing.
If Holmlid's results are not a measurement error then I'm not sure if cosmic
mouns could explain the quantity mesons generated together.
I'm not really fixed on any particular ideas I like reading all of them, and
have plenty more
Robin, the electron orbital could be modified in such a manner as to adjust the
external magnetic field of Protium if that is what nature intends. This is
just speculation and not based upon theory.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: mixent
To: vortex-l
I did mention cosmic muons but I also be remember reading that they have been
mentioned elsewhere in the past i
Sent from my iPhone
> On 29 Oct 2015, at 21:25, Jones Beene wrote:
>
> From: Stephen Cooke
>
> Ø It's a nice process you are describing, but I'm curious how
LAWRENCE KRAUSS has had an extensive and impressive career in theoretical
physics. He received undergraduate degrees in mathematics and physics at
Carleton University in Ottawa, Canada, his PhD in physics from the
Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and he has taught at Yale and Case
Hi Axil
I have a few questions about Rydberg Matter and SPP that maybe you know the
answer to:
1. I understand that Hydrogen is stored in much higher densities in the
catalyst material than can even in its liquid form? How does the density of the
atoms (e.g. Hydrogen) compare to the density of
Could there be Cooper pairs of H's that form a molecule made up of two
such pairs? It would be something like an incipient He-4 nucleus which
appears upon capture of two electrons. The mechanism for the release of
the excess energy without hot EM radiation is a question. It seems the
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2015/10/oct-30-2015-just-lenr-info.html
For today
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Answer to #1
A detailed exposition on the production of Rydberg matter is found in the
following:
*Conditions for forming Rydberg matter: condensation*
*of Rydberg states in the gas phase versus at surfaces *
The science of RM formation seems to be a large sub branch of chemistry. It
is not
There are a few possible ways in which the findings and the techniques used
to make dense deuterium for Holmlid could find a direct and easy
applicability in a glow-tube type of experiment - using the same type of
alumina tube (or mullite) used by Parkhomov.
To be safe, this kind of hybrid
Eric-- I response to your Friday, October 30, 2015 11:44 AM comment:
One would think that as space expands the permittivity or the magnetic
permeability it exhibits could also change assuming something is changing
dimensionally. The idea that space only expands between galaxies and not
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unruh_effect
Particles are relative
Unruh demonstrated theoretically that the notion of vacuum depends on the
path of the observer through spacetime. From the viewpoint of the
accelerating observer, the vacuum of the inertial observer will look like a
state containing many
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 8:36 AM, Bob Cook wrote:
This item suggests that the fine constant varies with time. It may be that
> relativistic conditions and time contraction cause small changes in the
> constant effective for any coherent system.
>
If the fine structure
Answer to #2 to #5
Info on tachyons is found in
The Inside Story: Quasilocal Tachyons and Black Holes
Gary T. Horowitz and Eva Silverstein
http://slac.stanford.edu/cgi-wrap/getdoc/slac-pub-11616.pdf
Tachyons are big in string theory and Horowits is one of the biggest string
guys around.
The
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
Holmlid says that he sees 10 billion kions produced by that condensate.
>
You've said this in different forms several times. I'm curious where this
is stated.
Eric
See
http://tempid.altervista.org/SRI.pdf
Look for the words:
Just published by Leif Holmlid Total rate estimation 10^7-10^10 s-1
On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Eric Walker wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 1:44 PM, Axil Axil wrote:
>
> Holmlid
23 matches
Mail list logo