RE: [Vo]:Rossi vs I.H.

>From Jed: >> Alain Sepeda wrote: >> what seems unavoidable is that IH was unable to replicate. > I have not heard that they tried to replicate. Oh! This is interesting news to me. I did not know that. > Perhaps they did, but I have no information on that. The only thing > I

Re: [Vo]:Dear Johannes

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 6:08 PM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson < orionwo...@charter.net> wrote: > Woah! I didn't expect to see so much commentary on this particular > thread. I had to re-subscribe a while longer. > > > > Harry, the link you supplied on Feynman's Lost Lecture on Motions

[Vo]:interview with LENRHUN.HU, multiplicative vs. additive excess heat, Storm's strategy

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-25-2016-interview-with-lenrhunhu.html I enjoyed composing this issue peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

[Vo]:Rossi vs I.H.

S V Johnson. IH have obviously attempted to make E-Cats. How else would they check the IP they have received from Rossi? It is recorded that they made the Hot Cats used in the Lugano tests. Cherokee may not have a spotless record as you think. I gave the link of them being charged over

Re: [Vo]:Rossi vs I.H.

Jed, "That is not a straw man. Anyone can compute that. As I said, it is like having 26 times more heating capacity than normal for that square footage, turned on full blast with no thermostat. Obviously that will make the room too hot to survive." This started because you objected to me

Re: [Vo]:New force couples electron to neutron

Thanks Russ, a great find. A new boson must carry a new force since bosons are force carriers. But I wonder if this force could be something that comes out of the dirac equations that has not been seen before experimentally, Maybe this new particle is carrying the monopole charge? The

Re: [Vo]:New force couples electron to neutron

Maybe I'm missing something here, but all this strong, weak and 5th force nonsense... Couldn't it simply be that the electric field from a single subatomic particle isn't a perfect inverse square law field on the micro-scale especially at a single point in time, but has perturbations. maybe an

Re: [Vo]:New force couples electron to neutron

The whole idea of a particle like a boson holding things together seems to make little sense, unless particle is a bad name and it is like Carver Mead's idea that an electron can be infinitely long.

Re: [Vo]:New force couples electron to neutron

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anomalous_magnetic_dipole_moment both the muon and the tau have dipole monments that don't add up in the standard model. This is what the dark force is all about... The search for dark photons and the g-2 anomaly

Re: [Vo]:New force couples electron to neutron

I should have said: And that only as a group and or over time or at a distance does the fields become a smooth inverse square with no irregularities, perturbations or features. On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 12:56 PM, John Berry wrote: > Maybe I'm missing something here, but

Re: [Vo]:New force couples electron to neutron

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spin%E2%80%93charge_separation The electron may be forming from the two more fundamental electron parts that show symmetry breaking at this 140 degree angle. This pre election might be a twister that contains all the fundamental parts of the electron and positron all

Re: [Vo]:Crescent Dunes Solar Energy Project

Oops, Default Oops, Fire http://www.investors.com/politics/commentary/ivanpah-solar-plant-catches-fire-but-taxpayers-get-burned/ Oops On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote: > I wrote: > > >> The taxpayers will get their money back eventually. The

Re: [Vo]:Rossi vs I.H.

Alain Sepeda wrote: what seems unavoidable is that IH was unable to replicate. > I have not heard that they tried to replicate. Perhaps they did, but I have no information on that. The only thing I know is that they analyzed Rossi's data and they say there is no heat in

RE: [Vo]:Some questions about H(1) ultra dense hydrogen.

From: Stephen Cooke * If the two nuclei are separated by 2.3 pm I suppose the are rotating about their center of mass… Would those nuclei generate Bremsstrahlung radiation… Not the b-word, as usually defined; but if the pair, or the cluster, became destabilized, the result could be

Re: [Vo]:Rossi vs I.H.

a.ashfield wrote: ""[Vo]:1 MW of heat in a 6,500 sq. ft. facility without industrial > ventilation would be fatal"" > > Why did you set up that straw man in the first place? > That is not a straw man. Anyone can compute that. As I said, it is like having 26 times more

[Vo]:do not open "So Exciting"

It looks like its from out Peter G. but its not. Frank

[Vo]:New force couples electron to neutron

Here’s a lead on one of the great mysteries, just how is an electron coupled to a neutron as clearly neutrons spit out electrons when they decay. http://www.nature.com/news/has-a-hungarian-physics-lab-found-a-fifth-force-of-nature-1.19957 Of course if ordinary neutrons hold on to ordinary

RE: [Vo]:New force couples electron to neutron

Wow. This could definitely have implications for LENR. Surprised there is not more mention of it in the science news. SLAC has concluded that the particle could carry an extremely short-range force that acts over distances only several times the width of an atomic nucleus. This could be