Re: [Vo]:Carl Page discusses cold fusion

[Peter Gluck]

Carl Page EDGE answer published on Jan 2 this year
shttp://
egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/01/jan-2-2016-lenr-message-and-info-second.htmlee

peter

On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Jed Rothwell  wrote:

> See:
>
> "Low Energy Nuclear Reactions Work And Could Supplant Fossil Fuels"
>
> https://www.edge.org/response-detail/26753
>
> This is a positive article.
>
> I gather this person is the brother of Larry Page, the founder of Google.
> So I suppose he is influential.
>
> - Jed
>
>


-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:Carl Page discusses cold fusion

[Che]

On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Jed Rothwell 
wrote:

> See:
>
> "Low Energy Nuclear Reactions Work And Could Supplant Fossil Fuels"
>
> https://www.edge.org/response-detail/26753
>
> This is a positive article.
>
> I gather this person is the brother of Larry Page, the founder of Google.
> So I suppose he is influential.
>
> - Jed
>
>

The unstated -- but ever-present -- premise of such hopes for a brave new,
cheap/abundant, 'clean' fuel source, is a fervently-hoped-for salvation of
this decadent, dead-end Capitalist order from itself.

Us marxists never kid ourselves about this (not-so-well) hidden agenda --
or the most-likely real outcome of such pious pipe dreaming.

RE: [Vo]:Reason why there are no dead grad students...

[bobcook39923]

Another interesting  item from 2 years ago regarding NUCLEAR SPIN coupling in a 
small group of coherent atoms can be found here:

http://phys.org/news/2014-08-evidence-symmetry-atoms.html

I have long considered that the synchronization of electronic spin states with 
the nuclear states  is necessary for LENR reactions, since it could provide for 
large potential energy in nuclei  to be given up to the phonic kinetic energy 
of lattice  electrons, all without any appreciable high energy EM radiation or 
energetic particles, a hallmark of LENR.  

In common NMR machines the radio frequency induce nuclear spin energy state 
changes.  It may only be a matter of managing phonic energy state of a 
nano-particle to match the nuclear resonant state to achieve  the coupling 
suggested above.   Sonic energy  or thermal energy input may work to raise the 
electronic spin/angular momentum to be in tune with the nuclear spin.  An 
ambient magnetic H field would change both the nuclear and electron spin states 
to some degree such that a synchronization occurs, thereby providing a handy 
control mechanism for LENR+ energy production.

Bob Cook


From: MarkI-ZeroPoint
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2016 11:22 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Jones Beene; 'Roarty, Francis X'; 'Terry Blanton'; fznidar...@aol.com
Subject: [Vo]:Reason why there are no dead grad students...

Vorts,

Haven’t had time to do much sci-surfing in 2016, but as is quite common in my 
life, when I get a nagging feeling to do it, I come across stuff that could be 
very significant… 

Happened to go to physorg.com today when eating lunch at work and came across 
this article:

    “Laser pulses help scientists tease apart complex electron interactions”
 http://phys.org/news/2016-12-laser-pulses-scientists-complex-electron.html

Title doesn’t really sound all that breakthrough, but for some reason I clicked 
on it and came across what could be the mechanism of action in LENR reactions 
which gently sheds the energy to the lattice instead of ejecting high-energy 
particles, i.e., the ‘expected’ mechanism.  To quote the article:

“But they also discovered another, unexpected signal-which they say represents 
a distinct form of extremely efficient energy loss at a particular energy level 
and timescale between the other two.

"We see a very strong and peculiar interaction between the excited electrons 
and the lattice where the electrons are losing most of their energy very 
rapidly in a coherent, non-random way," Rameau said. At this special energy 
level, he explained, the electrons appear to be interacting with lattice atoms 
all vibrating at a particular frequency-like a tuning fork emitting a single 
note. When all of the electrons that have the energy required for this unique 
interaction have given up most of their energy, they start to cool down more 
slowly by hitting atoms more randomly without striking the "resonant" 
frequency, he said.

"We know now that this interaction doesn't just switch on when the material 
becomes a superconductor; it's actually always there,"
Although electron-based and not nucleus-based, it still makes me wonder if this 
is one step in a multi-step process of energy transfer… nucleus to electrons to 
lattice.

It is in a very narrow energy range, and is obviously some kind of resonance 
(coherent) condition… which also explains why it’s so hard to reproduce.  
Wonder if the narrow energy kink is anywhere close to FrankZ’s 1.094Mhz-meter?

BTW, the research also used a setup which I’ve been ranting about for years… 
the electron stroboscope.

"By varying the time between the 'pump' and 'probe' laser pulses we can build 
up a stroboscopic record of what happens - a movie of what this material looks 
like from rest through the violent interaction to how it settles back down,"
Merry Christmas to All,
-mark iverson

[Vo]:Carl Page discusses cold fusion

[Jed Rothwell]

See:

"Low Energy Nuclear Reactions Work And Could Supplant Fossil Fuels"

https://www.edge.org/response-detail/26753

This is a positive article.

I gather this person is the brother of Larry Page, the founder of Google.
So I suppose he is influential.

- Jed

Re: [Vo]:Carl Page discusses cold fusion

[Peter Gluck]

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/01/jan-2-2016-lenr-message-and-info-second.html
(corrected)

On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 6:57 PM, Peter Gluck  wrote:

> Carl Page EDGE answer published on Jan 2 this year
> shttp://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/01/jan-2-2016-lenr-
> message-and-info-second.htmlee
>
> peter
>
> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Jed Rothwell 
> wrote:
>
>> See:
>>
>> "Low Energy Nuclear Reactions Work And Could Supplant Fossil Fuels"
>>
>> https://www.edge.org/response-detail/26753
>>
>> This is a positive article.
>>
>> I gather this person is the brother of Larry Page, the founder of Google.
>> So I suppose he is influential.
>>
>> - Jed
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Peter Gluck
> Cluj, Romania
> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
>



-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]: Merry Christmas and a happy New Year!

[Peter Gluck]

Deaar Adrian,

amazingly beautiful.- great Thank you!

Merry Christmas and surprisingly good new Year 2017!

Peter

,



On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:44 PM, a.ashfield  wrote:

> Merry Christmas.  Thanks to all for this interesting blog.
> Amira Willighagen's rendition of Caccini's Ave Maria (11 yrs old)
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7V1X2GW1b3U
>
> Amira Willighagen - "Ave Maria" Gounod Duet (Reykjavík, Iceland) -
> Christmas Concert 2015
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tEImCJWI_ak=4=RDcnjF1vre9sg
>
>


-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:Carl Page discusses cold fusion

[Jed Rothwell]

Che  wrote:

The unstated -- but ever-present -- premise of such hopes for a brave new,
> cheap/abundant, 'clean' fuel source, is a fervently-hoped-for salvation of
> this decadent, dead-end Capitalist order from itself.
>

It is unstated because few people see it that way anymore. Capitalism may
be in crisis, but most people are unaware of that.



> Us marxists never kid ourselves about this (not-so-well) hidden agenda --
> or the most-likely real outcome of such pious pipe dreaming.
>

Still, things are a lot better than they used to be. Life is easier for
everyone. Since 1960, extreme poverty worldwide has been reduced from 55%
to 10%. It has declined in both percent and in absolute numbers. See:

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/declining-global-poverty-share-1820-2015

As Thomas Jefferson wrote in 1818:

Indeed, we need look back half a century, to times which many now living
remember well, and see the wonderful advances in the sciences and arts
which have been made within that period. Some of these have rendered the
elements themselves subservient to the purposes of man, have harnessed them
to the yoke of his labors, and effected the great blessings of moderating
his own, of accomplishing what was beyond his feeble force, and extending
the comforts of life to a much enlarged circle, to those who had before
known its necessaries only. That these are not the vain dreams of sanguine
hope, we have before our eyes real and living examples.


So much for your "pipe dream" pipe dreams.

- Jed

Re: [Vo]:Carl Page discusses cold fusion

[Jed Rothwell]

I wrote:


> Since 1960, extreme poverty worldwide has been reduced from 55% to 10%.
>

I meant 1950. It was 55% to 72%, depending on the definition. See the graph
I linked to:

https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/declining-global-poverty-share-1820-2015

The World Bank, the UN and various other sources agree with this.

See also:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FACK2knC08E

Re: [Vo]:Re: Reason why there are no dead grad students...

[Jones Beene]

Speaking of high transition temperature in palladium hydride ... in the 
context of LENR, check out the summary of this patent where the inventor 
claims to have witnessed HTSC near ambient: "Samples have been produced 
having critical temperatures of 51.6K ... 100K, and 272.5K."


https://www.google.com/patents/US7033568

Yet, that claim creates an interesting situation. Since thermal gain of 
LENR would quell the HTSC effect - is there any way to use both to 
benefit assuming the lattice must not exceed 272K, for instance?


I think there is a prime application for this scenario, aside from 
arctic hand warmers...but I will save it for another time... It appears 
that the patent above went nowhere for Paolo




Jones Beene wrote:


Hi Mark,

Your quotes from the citation brings to mind the mystery connection to 
HTSC (high temperature superconductivity).


Since the early days there was thought to be some kind of vague and 
undefined connection between LENR and HTSC. This is due primarily to 
the fact that palladium hydride is superconductive but palladium 
isn't. The quote you mentioned adds an explanation in the form of 
lattice vibrations. The problem is the transition temperature.


BTW - for those who are not aware of the history of this - Brian Ahern 
(who was a USAF researcher at the time, specializing in SC) 
independently discovered Pd-H superconductivity many years ago - only 
to find that it had already been reported by someone else (and 
patented). It is still ignored as a factor for gain in "cold fusion" 
due to the aforementioned problem of transition temperature. This is 
probably one of the details that got Brian hooked on LENR - even 
before P and he also discovered that an alloy of nickel and 
palladium performs much better than palladium alone for excess heat.


For the heck of it, I did a quicky search to see if "nickel hydride" 
has ever been reported with SC properties. This begs to be part of the 
LENR-CANR library even if the rationale between LENR and HTSC is foggy.


As it turns out - W-L also picked up on the cross-connection and found 
the same citation I found:


*Superconductivity in the palladium-hydrogen and 
palladium-nickel-hydrogen systems**

**Authors* - First published: 16 June 1972 by
T. Skoskiewicz

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pssa.2210110253/abstract

The paper is a poor scan, I am trying to find a digital version. This 
is almost 45 years old ! Why is it seldom mentioned?


This is a fine blog article from EM Smith on the situation (which I 
had read but forgot), It is worth a reread.


https://chiefio.wordpress.com/2015/05/24/widom-larsen-superconducting-hydrides-and-directed-speculation/


 MarkI-ZeroPoint wrote:


Vorts,

Haven’t had time to do much sci-surfing in 2016, but as is quite 
common in my life, when I get a nagging feeling to do it, I come 
across stuff that could be very significant…


Happened to go to physorg.com today when eating lunch at work and 
came across this article:


“Laser pulses help scientists tease apart complex electron 
interactions”


http://phys.org/news/2016-12-laser-pulses-scientists-complex-electron.html

Title doesn’t really sound all that breakthrough, but for some reason 
I clicked on it and came across what could be the mechanism of action 
in LENR reactions which gently sheds the energy to the lattice 
instead of ejecting high-energy particles, i.e., the ‘expected’ 
mechanism.  To quote the article:


“But they also discovered another, unexpected signal-which they say 
represents a distinct form of _extremely efficientenergy loss 
at a particular energy level and 
timescale_ between the other two.


"We see a very strong and peculiar interaction between the excited 
electrons and the lattice where the _electrons are losing most of 
their energy very rapidly in a coherent, non-random way_," Rameau 
said. At this special energy level, he explained, _the electrons 
appear to be interacting with lattice atoms all vibrating at a 
particular frequency-like a tuning fork emitting a single note_. When 
all of the electrons that have the energy required for this unique 
interaction have given up most of their energy, they start to cool 
down more slowly by hitting atoms more randomly without striking the 
"resonant" frequency, he said.


"We know now that this interaction doesn't just switch on when the 
material becomes a superconductor; it's actually always there,"


Although electron-based and not nucleus-based, it still makes me 
wonder if this is one step in a multi-step process of energy 
transfer… nucleus to electrons to lattice.


It is in a very narrow energy range, and is obviously some kind of 
resonance (coherent) condition… which also explains why it’s so hard 
to reproduce.  Wonder if the narrow energy kink is anywhere close to 
_FrankZ_’s 1.094Mhz-meter?


BTW, the research also used a setup which I’ve been ranting about for 
years… the electron stroboscope.

[Vo]:Just LENR info

[Peter Gluck]

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/12/dec-22-2016-lenr-just-info.html

-Peter

Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:Re: Reason why there are no dead grad students...

[Frank Znidarsic]

 "The Constants of the Motion Tend Toward the Electromagnetic in a Bose 
Condensate that is stimulated at a Dimensional Frequency of 1.094,000 
hertz-meters".



-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene 
To: Vortex List 
Sent: Thu, Dec 22, 2016 2:12 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Reason why there are no dead grad students...



Speaking of high transition temperature in palladium hydride ...  in the 
context of LENR, check out the summary of this patent where  the inventor 
claims to have witnessed HTSC near ambient: "Samples  have been produced 
having critical temperatures of 51.6K ... 100K,  and 272.5K."

https://www.google.com/patents/US7033568

Yet, that claim creates an interesting situation. Since thermal  gain of 
LENR would quell the HTSC effect - is there any way to use  both to benefit 
assuming the lattice must not exceed 272K, for  instance?

I think there is a prime application for this scenario, aside  from arctic 
hand warmers...but I will save it for another time...  It appears that the 
patent above went nowhere for Paolo








Jones Beene wrote:



Hi Mark,
  
Your quotes from the citation brings to mind the mysteryconnection to 
HTSC (high temperature superconductivity). 
  
  
Since the early days there was thought to be some kind of vagueand 
undefined connection between LENR and HTSC. This is dueprimarily to the 
fact that palladium hydride is superconductivebut palladium isn't. The 
quote you mentioned adds an explanationin the form of lattice 
vibrations. The problem is the transitiontemperature.
  
  
BTW - for those who are not aware of the history of this -Brian Ahern 
(who was a USAF researcher at the time, specializingin SC) 
independently discovered Pd-H superconductivity manyyears ago - only to 
find that it had already been reported bysomeone else (and patented). 
It is still ignored as a factor forgain in "cold fusion" due to the 
aforementioned problem oftransition temperature. This is probably one 
of the details thatgot Brian hooked on LENR - even before P and he 
alsodiscovered that an alloy of nickel and palladium performs much  
  better than palladium alone for excess heat.
  
  
For the heck of it, I did a quicky search to see if "nickelhydride" has 
ever been reported with SC properties. This begs tobe part of the 
LENR-CANR library even if the rationale betweenLENR and HTSC is foggy. 
  
  
As it turns out - W-L also picked up on the cross-connectionand found 
the same citation I found:
  Superconductivity in the palladium-hydrogen and
palladium-nickel-hydrogen systems
  Authors -  First published: 16 June 1972 by 
  T. Skoskiewicz  
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pssa.2210110253/abstract
  
The paper is a poor scan, I am trying to find a digitalversion. This is 
almost 45 years old ! Why is it seldommentioned?
  
This is a fine blog article from EM Smith on the situation(which I had 
read but forgot), It is worth a reread.
  
  
https://chiefio.wordpress.com/2015/05/24/widom-larsen-superconducting-hydrides-and-directed-speculation/
  

  
  
 MarkI-ZeroPoint wrote:
  
  

  
Vorts,
  
 
  
Haven’t had time to do much sci-surfingin 2016, but as is quite 
common in my life, when I get anagging feeling to do it, I come 
across stuff that could bevery significant… 
  
 
  
Happened to go to physorg.com today wheneating lunch at work and 
came across this article:
  
 
  
“Laser pulses help scientists teaseapart complex electron 
interactions”
  

http://phys.org/news/2016-12-laser-pulses-scientists-complex-electron.html
  
 
  
Title doesn’t really sound all thatbreakthrough, but for some 
reason I clicked on it and cameacross what could be the mechanism 
of action in LENRreactions which gently sheds the energy to the 
latticeinstead of ejecting high-energy particles, i.e., the 
   ‘expected’ mechanism.  To quote the article:
  
 
  
“But  they also discovered another, unexpected signal-which they
  say represents a distinct form of extremely efficient energy loss at 
a particularenergy level and timescale between the other two.
  
 
  
"We  see a very strong and peculiar interaction between the 
 excited electrons and the lattice where the electronsare 
losing most of their energy very rapidly in a

Re: [Vo]:Re: Reason why there are no dead grad students...

[Axil Axil]

Hi Jones,

there is a new science in development that postulates that the universe
emerges from entanglement. I wrote a number of posts about this idea. This
thread fits into this subject.

Coherence is fundamental


Throughout the vacuum, electromagnetic fluctuations are produced at a
constant average rate under the purview of the uncertainty principle. The
name that tags these fluctuations is virtual particle production. These
fluctuations in the fabric of spacetime is called “quantum spin liquid”.
The string theory science name for the pure vacuum without mass floating
around in it is *de Sitter space. *This space produces only dark energy and
is there General relativity works best.

In this space, all the virtual particles are maximally entangled and the
surface of space can describe what is going on inside since everything is
connected to everything else by entanglement.

This space forms a quantum spin liquids. This space may be considered
"quantum disordered" ground states of spin systems, in which zero point
fluctuations are so strong that they prevent conventional magnetic long
range order.

More interestingly, the vacuum as a quantum spin liquid is a prototypical
example of ground state with massive many-body entanglement, of a degree
sufficient to render these states distinct phases of matter.

The vacuum is completely entangled at long range as identical patterns of
virtual particle emerge throughout the vacuum, with each pattern strongly
entangling other identical patterns.

Just by chance, patterns of virtual particles come into existence at wide
spread locations in the vacuum and become connected.

Quantum entanglement, a phenomenon in which virtual particles as
fluctuations in the electromagnetic field, shed their separate identities
and assume a shared existence, their properties becoming strongly
correlated with one another. The virtual particles act identically no
matter how far away they are separated. Normally physicists think of these
correlations as spanning space, linking far-flung locations in a phenomenon
that Albert Einstein famously described as “spooky action at a distance.”

Even harder to accept, there is a growing body of research investigating
how these correlations can span time as well. What happens now can be
correlated with what happens later, in ways that elude a simple mechanistic
explanation. In effect, you can have spooky action at a delay.

These correlations seriously mess with our intuitions about time and space.
Not only can two events be correlated, linking the earlier one to the later
one, but two events can become correlated such that it becomes impossible
to say which is earlier and which is later. Each of these events is the
cause of the other, as if each were the first to occur.

But perhaps most important, researchers are working towards a new way to
unify quantum theory with Einstein’s general theory of relativity, which
describes the structure of spacetime. The world we experience in daily
life, in which events occur in an order determined by their locations in
space and time, is just a subset of the possibilities that quantum physics
allows.

Some physicists take this as evidence for a profoundly nonintuitive
worldview, in which quantum correlations are more fundamental than
spacetime, and space-time itself is somehow built up from correlations
among events, in what might be called quantum relationalism. The argument
updates Gottfried Leibniz and Ernst Mach’s idea that spacetime might not be
a God-given backdrop to the world, but instead might derive from the
material contents of the universe.

In this view quantum entanglement is more fundamental than spacetime
because quantum entanglement generates spacetime. Quantum entanglement is
not sensitive to the constraints of spacetime, that is, quantum
entanglement connects events without regard to walls of matter, distance or
the past and future.

The key to control spacetime and the forces that operate in spacetime is
the control of entanglement and coherence. This is what LENR engineering is
all about.

On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 11:05 AM, Jones Beene  wrote:

> Hi Mark,
>
> Your quotes from the citation brings to mind the mystery connection to
> HTSC (high temperature superconductivity).
>
> Since the early days there was thought to be some kind of vague and
> undefined connection between LENR and HTSC. This is due primarily to the
> fact that palladium hydride is superconductive but palladium isn't. The
> quote you mentioned adds an explanation in the form of lattice vibrations.
> The problem is the transition temperature.
>
> BTW - for those who are not aware of the history of this - Brian Ahern
> (who was a USAF researcher at the time, specializing in SC) independently
> discovered Pd-H superconductivity many years ago - only to find that it had
> already been reported by someone else (and patented). It is still ignored
> as a factor for gain in "cold fusion" due to the 

[Vo]:Re: Reason why there are no dead grad students...

[Jones Beene]

Hi Mark,

Your quotes from the citation brings to mind the mystery connection to 
HTSC (high temperature superconductivity).


Since the early days there was thought to be some kind of vague and 
undefined connection between LENR and HTSC. This is due primarily to the 
fact that palladium hydride is superconductive but palladium isn't. The 
quote you mentioned adds an explanation in the form of lattice 
vibrations. The problem is the transition temperature.


BTW - for those who are not aware of the history of this - Brian Ahern 
(who was a USAF researcher at the time, specializing in SC) 
independently discovered Pd-H superconductivity many years ago - only to 
find that it had already been reported by someone else (and patented). 
It is still ignored as a factor for gain in "cold fusion" due to the 
aforementioned problem of transition temperature. This is probably one 
of the details that got Brian hooked on LENR - even before P and he 
also discovered that an alloy of nickel and palladium performs much 
better than palladium alone for excess heat.


For the heck of it, I did a quicky search to see if "nickel hydride" has 
ever been reported with SC properties. This begs to be part of the 
LENR-CANR library even if the rationale between LENR and HTSC is foggy.


As it turns out - W-L also picked up on the cross-connection and found 
the same citation I found:


*Superconductivity in the palladium-hydrogen and 
palladium-nickel-hydrogen systems**

**Authors* - First published: 16 June 1972 by
T. Skoskiewicz

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pssa.2210110253/abstract

The paper is a poor scan, I am trying to find a digital version. This is 
almost 45 years old ! Why is it seldom mentioned?


This is a fine blog article from EM Smith on the situation (which I had 
read but forgot), It is worth a reread.


https://chiefio.wordpress.com/2015/05/24/widom-larsen-superconducting-hydrides-and-directed-speculation/


 MarkI-ZeroPoint wrote:


Vorts,

Haven’t had time to do much sci-surfing in 2016, but as is quite 
common in my life, when I get a nagging feeling to do it, I come 
across stuff that could be very significant…


Happened to go to physorg.com today when eating lunch at work and came 
across this article:


“Laser pulses help scientists tease apart complex electron 
interactions”


http://phys.org/news/2016-12-laser-pulses-scientists-complex-electron.html

Title doesn’t really sound all that breakthrough, but for some reason 
I clicked on it and came across what could be the mechanism of action 
in LENR reactions which gently sheds the energy to the lattice instead 
of ejecting high-energy particles, i.e., the ‘expected’ mechanism.  To 
quote the article:


“But they also discovered another, unexpected signal-which they say 
represents a distinct form of _extremely efficientenergy loss 
at a particular energy level and 
timescale_ between the other two.


"We see a very strong and peculiar interaction between the excited 
electrons and the lattice where the _electrons are losing most of 
their energy very rapidly in a coherent, non-random way_," Rameau 
said. At this special energy level, he explained, _the electrons 
appear to be interacting with lattice atoms all vibrating at a 
particular frequency-like a tuning fork emitting a single note_. When 
all of the electrons that have the energy required for this unique 
interaction have given up most of their energy, they start to cool 
down more slowly by hitting atoms more randomly without striking the 
"resonant" frequency, he said.


"We know now that this interaction doesn't just switch on when the 
material becomes a superconductor; it's actually always there,"


Although electron-based and not nucleus-based, it still makes me 
wonder if this is one step in a multi-step process of energy transfer… 
nucleus to electrons to lattice.


It is in a very narrow energy range, and is obviously some kind of 
resonance (coherent) condition… which also explains why it’s so hard 
to reproduce.  Wonder if the narrow energy kink is anywhere close to 
_FrankZ_’s 1.094Mhz-meter?


BTW, the research also used a setup which I’ve been ranting about for 
years… the electron stroboscope.


"By varying the time between the 'pump' and 'probe' laser pulses we 
can build up a stroboscopic record of what happens - a movie of what 
this material looks like from rest through the violent interaction to 
how it settles back down,"


Merry Christmas to All,

-mark iverson

Re: [Vo]: Merry Christmas and a happy New Year!

[a.ashfield]

There are several child prodigies at singing that one can see thanks to 
YouTube.  The most recent is Laura Bretan on America's Got Talent

https://youtu.be/xCoxGV7j71c?t=1  (@2:50)   (see all 4 great performances)

Patricia Janeckova first caught my ear in 2012 .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOy6M_X2MO8=False
Then all grown up at 18.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ErN8JDGjrHQ=RDybPQKhrQaJ4=8
So much for the critics who claim starting so early ruins your voice.


On 12/22/2016 9:56 AM, Frank Znidarsic wrote:

She is great.  Thanks I need that.

Frank Znidarsic


-Original Message-
From: Peter Gluck 
To: VORTEX 
Sent: Thu, Dec 22, 2016 9:51 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Merry Christmas and a happy New Year!

thank you a lot...
dear Adrian do you like opera?
I do not know if you have read (and listened)

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2011/03/explaining-opera-music-of-all-noises.html

the problem is that some audios are outdated.

As regarding religioud music, do you know the Romanian
COLINDE  DE CRACIUN- you can discover some really good
by simple search on You Tube.

warm greetings,
Peter

On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:38 PM, a.ashfield > wrote:


Dear Peter,
Thank you for your kind words.   I find Amira's voice so beautiful
it moved me to tears.
She became famous on Holland's Got Talent, that she won.  Watch
her performance here.
https://youtu.be/qDqTBlKU4CE
Adrian


On 12/22/2016 4:37 AM, Peter Gluck wrote:

Deaar Adrian,

amazingly beautiful.- great Thank you!

Merry Christmas and surprisingly good new Year 2017!

Peter

,



On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:44 PM, a.ashfield
> wrote:

Merry Christmas.  Thanks to all for this interesting blog.
Amira Willighagen's rendition of Caccini's Ave Maria (11
yrs old)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7V1X2GW1b3U


Amira Willighagen - "Ave Maria" Gounod Duet (Reykjavík,
Iceland) - Christmas Concert 2015

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tEImCJWI_ak=4=RDcnjF1vre9sg






-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck

Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com






--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:Re: Reason why there are no dead grad students...

[Jones Beene]

This is good stuff, Axil.

I wish that I understood how it all fits together at the hardware level.

There is probably an intuitive connection between coherent quantum spin 
in the context of LENR and "de Sitter Space" "Dirac's reciprocal space" 
"Reimann Space" the EPO field and multiple dimensions- all of which will 
eventually open up understanding of LENR... but getting the 
verbalization of that stuff into a design for the hands-on engineer who 
can build a working device - is not quite here yet.


Hopefully we are getting closer ... without dead grad students.

 Axil Axil wrote:

Hi Jones,

there is a new science in development that postulates that the 
universe emerges from entanglement. I wrote a number of posts about 
this idea. This thread fits into this subject.



  Coherence is fundamental


Throughout the vacuum, electromagnetic fluctuations are produced at a 
constant average rate under the purview of the uncertainty principle. 
The name that tags these fluctuations is virtual particle production. 
These fluctuations in the fabric of spacetime is called “quantum spin 
liquid”. The string theory science name for the pure vacuum without 
mass floating around in it is *de Sitter space. *This space produces 
only dark energy and is there General relativity works best.

*
*
In this space, all the virtual particles are maximally entangled and 
the surface of space can describe what is going on inside since 
everything is connected to everything else by entanglement.

*
*This space forms a quantum spin liquids. This space may be considered 
"quantum disordered" ground states of spin systems, in which zero 
point fluctuations are so strong that they prevent conventional 
magnetic long range order.


More interestingly, the vacuum as a quantum spin liquid is a 
prototypical example of ground state with massive many-body 
entanglement, of a degree sufficient to render these states distinct 
phases of matter.


The vacuum is completely entangled at long range as identical patterns 
of virtual particle emerge throughout the vacuum, with each pattern 
strongly entangling other identical patterns.


Just by chance, patterns of virtual particles come into existence at 
wide spread locations in the vacuum and become connected.


Quantum entanglement, a phenomenon in which virtual particles as 
fluctuations in the electromagnetic field, shed their separate 
identities and assume a shared existence, their properties becoming 
strongly correlated with one another. The virtual particles act 
identically no matter how far away they are separated. Normally 
physicists think of these correlations as spanning space, linking 
far-flung locations in a phenomenon that Albert Einstein famously 
described as “spooky action at a distance.”


Even harder to accept, there is a growing body of research 
investigating how these correlations can span time as well. What 
happens now can be correlated with what happens later, in ways that 
elude a simple mechanistic explanation. In effect, you can have spooky 
action at a delay.


These correlations seriously mess with our intuitions about time and 
space. Not only can two events be correlated, linking the earlier one 
to the later one, but two events can become correlated such that it 
becomes impossible to say which is earlier and which is later. Each of 
these events is the cause of the other, as if each were the first to 
occur.


But perhaps most important, researchers are working towards a new way 
to unify quantum theory with Einstein’s general theory of relativity, 
which describes the structure of spacetime. The world we experience in 
daily life, in which events occur in an order determined by their 
locations in space and time, is just a subset of the possibilities 
that quantum physics allows.


Some physicists take this as evidence for a profoundly nonintuitive 
worldview, in which quantum correlations are more fundamental than 
spacetime, and space-time itself is somehow built up from correlations 
among events, in what might be called quantum relationalism. The 
argument updates Gottfried Leibniz and Ernst Mach’s idea that 
spacetime might not be a God-given backdrop to the world, but instead 
might derive from the material contents of the universe.


In this view quantum entanglement is more fundamental than spacetime 
because quantum entanglement generates spacetime. Quantum entanglement 
is not sensitive to the constraints of spacetime, that is, quantum 
entanglement connects events without regard to walls of matter, 
distance or the past and future.


The key to control spacetime and the forces that operate in spacetime 
is the control of entanglement and coherence. This is what LENR 
engineering is all about.


 Jones Beenewrote:

Hi Mark,

Your quotes from the citation brings to mind the mystery
connection to HTSC (high temperature superconductivity).

Since the early days there was thought to be some kind of vague
and undefined 

Re: [Vo]: Merry Christmas and a happy New Year!

[a.ashfield]

Dear Peter,
Thank you for your kind words.   I find Amira's voice so beautiful it 
moved me to tears.
She became famous on Holland's Got Talent, that she won.  Watch her 
performance here.

https://youtu.be/qDqTBlKU4CE
Adrian

On 12/22/2016 4:37 AM, Peter Gluck wrote:

Deaar Adrian,

amazingly beautiful.- great Thank you!

Merry Christmas and surprisingly good new Year 2017!

Peter

,



On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:44 PM, a.ashfield > wrote:


Merry Christmas.  Thanks to all for this interesting blog.
Amira Willighagen's rendition of Caccini's Ave Maria (11 yrs old)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7V1X2GW1b3U


Amira Willighagen - "Ave Maria" Gounod Duet (Reykjavík, Iceland) -
Christmas Concert 2015
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tEImCJWI_ak=4=RDcnjF1vre9sg





--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]: Merry Christmas and a happy New Year!

[Peter Gluck]

thank you a lot...
dear Adrian do you like opera?
I do not know if you have read (and listened)

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2011/03/explaining-opera-music-of-all-noises.html

the problem is that some audios are outdated.

As regarding religioud music, do you know the Romanian
COLINDE  DE CRACIUN- you can discover some really good
by simple search on You Tube.

warm greetings,
Peter

On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:38 PM, a.ashfield  wrote:

> Dear Peter,
> Thank you for your kind words.   I find Amira's voice so beautiful it
> moved me to tears.
> She became famous on Holland's Got Talent, that she won.  Watch her
> performance here.
> https://youtu.be/qDqTBlKU4CE
> Adrian
>
>
> On 12/22/2016 4:37 AM, Peter Gluck wrote:
>
> Deaar Adrian,
>
> amazingly beautiful.- great Thank you!
>
> Merry Christmas and surprisingly good new Year 2017!
>
> Peter
>
> ,
>
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:44 PM, a.ashfield 
> wrote:
>
>> Merry Christmas.  Thanks to all for this interesting blog.
>> Amira Willighagen's rendition of Caccini's Ave Maria (11 yrs old)
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7V1X2GW1b3U
>>
>> Amira Willighagen - "Ave Maria" Gounod Duet (Reykjavík, Iceland) -
>> Christmas Concert 2015
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tEImCJWI_ak=4=RDcnjF1vre9sg
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Dr. Peter Gluck
> Cluj, Romania
> http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
>
>
>


-- 
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]: Merry Christmas and a happy New Year!

[Frank Znidarsic]

She is great.  Thanks I need that.


Frank Znidarsic



-Original Message-
From: Peter Gluck 
To: VORTEX 
Sent: Thu, Dec 22, 2016 9:51 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Merry Christmas and a happy New Year!



thank you a lot...
dear Adrian do you like opera?
I do not know if you have read (and listened)


http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2011/03/explaining-opera-music-of-all-noises.html



the problem is that some audios are outdated.


As regarding religioud music, do you know the Romanian
COLINDE  DE CRACIUN- you can discover some really good
by simple search on You Tube.


warm greetings,
Peter



On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:38 PM, a.ashfield  wrote:

  
Dear Peter,
Thank you for your kind words.   I find Amira's voice so beautifulit 
moved me to tears.
She became famous on Holland's Got Talent, that she won.  Watch her
performance here.
https://youtu.be/qDqTBlKU4CE
Adrian



On 12/22/2016 4:37 AM, Peter Gluck  wrote:


  
Deaar Adrian,



amazingly beautiful.- great Thank you!




Merry Christmas and surprisingly good new Year 2017!




Peter





,  

  
  

  

  
  


On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:44 PM,  a.ashfield    
   wrote:
  
MerryChristmas.  Thanks to all for this interesting blog.
Amira Willighagen's rendition of Caccini's Ave Maria (11 yrs
old)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7V1X2GW1b3U

Amira Willighagen - "Ave Maria" Gounod Duet (Reykjavík,
Iceland) - Christmas Concert 2015

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tEImCJWI_ak=4=RDcnjF1vre9sg

  






-- 

Dr.  Peter Gluck  
Cluj, Romania
  
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

  


  







-- 

Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com