No need to do 17,000 mph to get into weightlessness,
a well designed speed bump will do it for you (parabolic trajectory) at 30 mph
more or less.
Personally I prefer electro-dynamic braking better than treadmills built into
the highway to save gas and maintenance costs, Harry.
Fred
Q1. Doesn't the ramp just steal pennies from our petrol tanks?
A1. The ramp is designed to be situated in parts of the roadway where
vehicles are having to slow down anyway, for example on downhill
gradients, when approaching traffic lights or roundabouts as well as
being used to replace
I'm not so sure that it was faked. If true, this airship was flying several
hundred to a thousand feet above the ground. Taking the sun angle and
direction from cars and building shadows, the shadow of the airship should
be at least 1000 to 2000 feet away.
I saw a couple of candidates for the
--- Christopher Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
unsubscribe - Please
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail
beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com
As before, you must send a null message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the subject header saying unsubscribe.
sigh
On 11/24/06, Christopher Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
unsubscribe - Please
Do you Yahoo!?
It's definitely faked. Zoom in and look at the outline of the blimp.
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Nick Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2006 1:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: [OT] Google Maps Easter Eggs
I'm not so sure that it was faked. If
Michel Jullian wrote:
Q1. Doesn't the ramp just steal pennies from our petrol tanks?
A1. The ramp is designed to be situated in parts of the roadway where
vehicles are having to slow down anyway, for example on downhill
gradients, when approaching traffic lights or roundabouts as well as
Interesting if accurate:
http://www.upi.com/Energy/view.php?StoryID=20061107-070924-5161r
And the CO2phobes begin to scream in 5...4...3...2
If indeed workable, we can begin 2 things almost immediately, if played
right:
1. Rapidly shut down U.S. reliance on foreign oil imports, ideally
While we're on the subject of ridiculous ways to extract
energy from moving machinery, why not a robotic-coal-fired train with carloads
of super-magnets going around in a circle inside a toroid tunnel?
Over-Unity Roll-Around possible with computerized hydraulic-gravity-enhanced
downgrade?
Kits
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Fink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2006 11:11 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Vo]: weight and charge
I didn't follow all of this thread, but an interesting thought occurred to
me that may have been considered and rejected
Hi Frank,
You should try moving to my universe, it's twice as large and
we won't be bumping into each other as much *grin*
But seriously, why do our calculations differ? If my derivation
is wrong, can you show me why? Let's at least nail that
down before we tackle the entire universe...
K.
Think about it.
The energy generated is not meant to power vehicles.
It is meant to power the traffic systems that driver's
utilise.
The energy costs of operating a vehicle are not just
the cost of filling the gas tank or recharging
a fuel cell or battery.
These costs are born by municipal
Great idea...but I think extracting energy from landing aircraft
would be slightly less ridiculous.
Harry
Frederick Sparber wrote:
While we're on the subject of ridiculous ways to extract
energy from moving machinery, why not a robotic-coal-fired train with
carloads
of super-magnets going
If you wish, but not with speed bumps please ;-)
Michel
- Original Message -
From: Harry Veeder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2006 8:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Re: The Toroid Railroad Generator
Great idea...but I think extracting energy from
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2006 11:49 AM
Subject: [Vo]: FW: [Vo]: weight and charge
Rather than use hydraulic shocks on vehicles that convert energy into
waste
heat, why not use electro magnetic shocks
On Saturday 25 November 2006 10:26, Kyle R. Mcallister wrote:
Interesting if accurate:
http://www.upi.com/Energy/view.php?StoryID=20061107-070924-5161r
And the CO2phobes begin to scream in 5...4...3...2
If indeed workable, we can begin 2 things almost immediately, if played
right:
1.
On Saturday 25 November 2006 18:19, Kyle R. Mcallister wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jeff Fink [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Saturday, November 25, 2006 11:49 AM
Subject: [Vo]: FW: [Vo]: weight and charge
Rather than use hydraulic shocks on vehicles that
17 matches
Mail list logo
