a violation of energy conservation? No. Electric
potential energy is decreasing somewhere,
I'll let you find where :)
...
...We want
to know, lol! :-)
Oops I have found in the meantime that my initial explanation was wrong, so
it's just as well I kept it to myself ;-)
Electric
Michel Jullian wrote:
a violation of energy conservation? No. Electric potential
energy is decreasing somewhere, I'll let you find where :)
...
...We want to know, lol! :-)
Oops I have found in the meantime that my initial explanation was
wrong, so it's just as well I kept it to myself
Vorts,
FYI,
Some of you might enjoy reading the following short clip recently posted out at
zpenergy.com.
See:
http://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?name=Newsfile=articlesid=2206
http://tinyurl.com/3bkvey
Perhaps Mark can share with us a little more about the details, that is without
Michel Jullian wrote:
a violation of energy conservation? No. Electric
potential energy is decreasing somewhere,
I'll let you find where :)
...
...We want
to know, lol! :-)
Oops I have found in the meantime that my initial
explanation was wrong, so it's just
as well I kept it to
- Original Message -
From: Stephen A. Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]: Energy *Violations* using *standard* physics
Michel Jullian wrote:
a violation of energy conservation? No. Electric potential
On Thursday 25 January 2007 09:30, OrionWorks wrote:
Vorts,
FYI,
Some of you might enjoy reading the following short clip recently posted
out at zpenergy.com.
See:
http://www.zpenergy.com/modules.php?name=Newsfile=articlesid=2206
http://tinyurl.com/3bkvey
Perhaps Mark can share with
Has anyone ever tried one of these wrist exercising
gizmos?
Long ebay url:
http://cgi.ebay.com/Power-Gyroscope-Wrist-Exercise-Strengthener-Ball_W0QQitemZ230018345529QQihZ013QQcategoryZ28067QQcmdZViewItem#ebayphotohosting
Direct Images:
http://images.virtualvillage.com/004400-001/001m.jpg
On 1/25/07, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the other hand, electrons are more complex that
just magnetic dipole moment.
You might find this model of interest:
http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/2787/2214/1600/app%206-7.jpg
Terry
Vo,
The prototype seems to be real. However, it does not seem to be a simple
device to mass produce, as it depends on special ferrofluids and what may
prove to be Hg, as a second liquid used separately in this system. If it is
Hg, the toxicity and difficulty of obtaining sufficient quantities
In reply to Mark Goldes's message of Thu, 25 Jan 2007 12:53:19 -0800:
Hi,
Vo,
The prototype seems to be real. However, it does not seem to be a simple
device to mass produce, as it depends on special ferrofluids and what may
prove to be Hg, as a second liquid used separately in this system. If
On Thursday 25 January 2007 15:53, Mark Goldes wrote:
Vo,
The prototype seems to be real. However, it does not seem to be a simple
device to mass produce, as it depends on special ferrofluids and what may
prove to be Hg, as a second liquid used separately in this system. If it is
Hg, the
On 1/25/07, Mark Goldes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robin,
The Wang generator is not at all like the Steorn work. As far as I know,
there is no liquid in the Steorn inventiions. Wang uses two. The first is a
complex ferrofluid and the second might be Hg.
However, Wang and Steorn *do* seem to use
Terry Blanton writes with an air of mystery:
I have requested that certain resources seek the truth.
You can't handle the truth!
- Jed
On 1/25/07, Jed Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can't handle the truth!
Son, we live in a world that has walls. And those walls have to be
guarded . . .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wall
Paul, if I understand correctly your long comments below (BTW could we be as
concise as possible, and stick to the convention of new stuff on top whenever
possible?), you believe that potential energy in general (not just magnetic,
but also gravitational, electric too I suppose...) is just a
In reply to Mark Goldes's message of Thu, 25 Jan 2007 13:59:49 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
Robin,
The Wang generator is not at all like the Steorn work. As far as I know,
there is no liquid in the Steorn inventiions. Wang uses two. The first is a
complex ferrofluid and the second might be Hg.
The
Michel Jullian wrote:
---
Paul, if I understand correctly your long comments
below (BTW could we be as concise as
possible, and stick to the convention of new stuff on
top whenever possible?),
---
Sorry, I was merely replying to your comment.
Michel Jullian wrote:
---
you believe that
I did read your reply, I did think for a while, but I still disagree ;-)
You insist on some _internal_ energy being spent while the object falls. Where
would it come from when the object is an elementary particle such as an
electron, would it lose mass or something? :-)
Michel
P.S. Again,
18 matches
Mail list logo
