On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
The ion diffusion speed in an electrolyte is only some centimeters
per minute at best, while the speed in a Calutron is probably some
100 to some 1000 kilometres per second.
Therefore the mass inertia of the nucleus
Mattia Rizzi wrote:
The point 2 is CRITICAL when the measuremnt is done with point 1,
because without using a demister you made a mesuremnt error that
*over-extimate* the real energy produced.
Over-estimate by how much? 470 kW? I doubt it. The exact power level
does not matter. An hour
Someone pointed out to me that when Lewan made the video, the valve leading
to the condensate bucket was closed. It must have been open before that,
because there was condensate in the bucket. Based on how toy steam engines
work, I suppose that pipe had a great deal of water and condensate in it
Jed, how can you made such measurements without even a water trap?
Why you can't realize that? It's a 2 million trade. The expert didn't add
even a simple water trap. It's amazing!
-Messaggio originale-
From: Jed Rothwell
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 2:45 PM
To:
Mattia Rizzi wrote:
Jed, how can you made such measurements without even a water trap?
That was a water trap. You can see it trapped water and condensate.
Presumably when steam began coming out, they closed it. That's how
people operate steam engines, as I mentioned.
Why you can't
That was a water trap. You can see it trapped water and condensate.
This isn't a water trap. A water trap is a U shaped tube. It physically
force water to go down.
See it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trap_%28plumbing%29
What they made is a small hole inside the tube, like a T. Not U-shaped
I think the thing that is missing from this discussion is that,
assuming Domenico Fioravanti is really working for The Customer (who
is seeming like a missing player from the Matrix series, similar to
The Engineer, The Architect, etc), Col. Fioravanti has been present
for a while. He is
Defkalion responds to a reader re: the possibility of DGT's Hyperions replacing
the Fukishima reactors:
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4t=431p=3617#p3617
___
Could the steam temperature be safely raised to 600 degrees C
It seems you are conflating two processes when only one will suffice. And one
of them is absurd from the start.
Why pump the liquid at all? Why use a magnetic field with pumping, when a
simpler route exists? Calutrons were a gigantic waste of money in the Manhattan
project and were only used
As someone reminded on me on facebook all bodies radiate and the
radiation spectrum depends on the temperature of body as per the
blackbody model. However, I guess what I really had in mind was some
sort of nanoengineered material ( metamaterial) which would glow in
the visible sprectrum at cooler
Cold star
http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/Cold_star
Location:
The Dream Lord's dream world
Appearances:
DW: Amy's Choice
A cold star was a celestial object that existed in a dream shared by
Rory Williams, Amy Pond, and the Eleventh Doctor, created by psychic
pollen that had become lodged in the
On 2011-11-03 22:21, OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson wrote:
www.msnbc.msn.com reports on Rossi's Oct 28 demo. Hagelstein is
quoted. All in all, seems to be a fairly positive report. No blatant
misinformation or stupid misrepresentations that I could spot.
Am 04.11.2011 06:59, schrieb Peter Gluck:
Very well written paper. Bravissimo, Haiko!
If you understand german read my comment:
http://www.heise.de/tp/foren/S-Einfache-Erklaerung/forum-214972/msg-21021826/read/changeview-c/
Peter
Peter
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:02 AM, Haiko Lietz
Daily Mail wrote:
»Several high-profile demonstrations of 'cold fusion' have been proven
to be hoaxes in the past»
I would gladly see any examples of »high-profile» or even low profile
cold fusion demonstrations that ended up been a hoax. It is
unbelievable how little fact based information
Have you ever met a journalist? They are a lower form of life.
--
I write a little. I erase a lot. - Chopin
--- On Fri, 11/4/11, Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Daily Mail
At 09:57 AM 11/4/2011, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
On 2011-11-03 22:21, OrionWorks
- Steven V Johnson wrote:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2057611/Italian-scientist-claims-achieved-cold-fusion--problem-physicists-think-impossible.html
Here's an article on the same test, on Daily
Robinson also covered this back in April. He's not a specialized
science reporter.
Italian scientist claims he has achieved 'cold fusion' - the only
problem is that most physicists think it is impossible
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.dewrote:
Am 04.11.2011 06:59, schrieb Peter Gluck:
Very well written paper. Bravissimo, Haiko!
If you understand german read my comment:
Am 04.11.2011 19:19, schrieb Jed Rothwell:
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:16 PM, Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de
mailto:peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
Am 04.11.2011 06:59, schrieb Peter Gluck:
Very well written paper. Bravissimo, Haiko!
If you understand german read my comment:
Dave,
I think you have an underlying misconception. It isn't thermal
energy that is being exploited, catalytic energy is related to Casimir geometry
which in the case of nanotubes only occurs at openings and defects in the
nanotube as recently discovered by Peng Chen at Cornell
Am 04.11.2011 14:56, schrieb Jed Rothwell:
Someone pointed out to me that when Lewan made the video, the valve
leading to the condensate bucket was closed. It must have been open
before that, because there was condensate in the bucket. Based on how
toy steam engines work, I suppose that pipe
Peter
I was born in Temeswar many years ago, this town was then
penta-national and tetra-linguistic; I have learned German from childhood.
Later I have forgotten Serbian but have learned
English, Russian French Italian- all very useful when you are
a researcher.
For my best German friend please
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2011/11/04/article-2057611-0EAB31D40578-330_468x286.jpg
Key: Rossi says he has produced a pattern of triple track atoms, pictured,
which is at the heart of the cold fusion theory
That's a
Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
Rossi is overworked and unable to explain the simplest facts correctly.
In all seriousness, that is true. It is important aspect of his personality.
I do not think it is because he is overworked. I think he is just not good
at explaining things.
You are correct Fran, I am confused about the hydrino theory. I think I
understand that you imply that the hydrino can not exist outside of the
nanotube structure. If this is true then it would not be possible to extract
energy from the beast. Whatever you borrowed must be returned very
Is that really a fake PhD? I thought it was an honorary doctorate for his
biofuel powerplant. For example, the former president of my country, Lula,
got and has been getting these titles even though he just studied until the
4th grade (that is below junior high). He couldn't study since he had to
Am 04.11.2011 21:46, schrieb Jed Rothwell:
Rossi is also careless and he gets facts wrong. He does not care about
details. He REALLY does not care about details, to an extent that most
of us find pathological.
This explains why the e-cat leaks and fails when really serious
customers and NASA
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
Is that really a fake PhD? I thought it was an honorary doctorate for his
biofuel powerplant.
Ah, that may explain it. Perhaps he has two honorary PhDs, one for the
biofuel, and one from the diploma mill. Perhaps he thought I was talking
about the
Then came CBS:
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-205_162-57318762/cold-fusion-debate-heats-up-after-latest-demo/
viewable in IE9, Chrome no like.
T
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Then came CBS:
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-205_162-57318762/cold-fusion-debate-heats-up-after-latest-demo/
viewable in IE9, Chrome no like.
Chrome works on reload.
T
Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
This explains why the e-cat leaks and fails when really serious customers
and NASA scientists are present.
In all seriousness, I expect it does. It also explains why he ran the
October 6 demonstration without bothering to put an SD card into the
Am 04.11.2011 22:42, schrieb Jed Rothwell:
From Rossi's point of view quibbling about minor details such as the
thermocouple temperature readings is silly. I'm sure he would say go
ahead and ignore that if you like; just look at the physical facts.
If he does it this way, then he cannot
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Energy_Catalyzer
Basically came down to: if it's a scam it's still notable
.
(lenr.qumbu.com -- analyzing the Rossi/Focardi eCat -- Hi,
google!)
Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
I'm sure he would say go ahead and ignore that if you like; just look at
the physical facts.
If he does it this way, then he cannot know the difference between a
random effect, a systematic measurement error or a real physical fact. How
can he
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
They understood perfectly
well that a candle cannot burn for many days
True, but a latke can! Ask my stomach!
T
Since nuclear isomers (i.e., metastable atoms with excited nuclei) can
store energies far exceeding chemical energies, could any LENR results be
due to undetected isomers decaying to nuclear ground state?
Some are extremely long-lived, and some may still be undiscovered.
(e.g., Discovery of a
This one is pretty good too.
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-205_162-57318762/cold-fusion-debate-heats-up-after-latest-demo/
I told someone who is looking for funding that venture capitalists will not
touch this field as long as we have mass media publishing articles with
titles like Cold Fusion
Here is an interesting comment in the Wikipedia discussion from someone who
claims he or she was present at the Oct. 6 test. Does anyone know what
kettle stone means? Deposits from evaporated water?
Keep, Been present at the oct6 testing of the device, I confirm a 100%
certain that the average
From: francis [mailto:froarty...@comcast.net]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2011 9:36 PM
To: 'dlrober...@aol.com'
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Mill's and Lu paper define hydrino as fractional Rydberg
Dave,
You are getting to the heart of it quickly. First there is
definitely energy
That's hilarious.
What is it with these people? I do not understand why they are so anxious
to keep people from finding out about things they oppose. They hate the
idea that people will discuss the issue, or learn something about it. I
don't like creationism, and I hate these people opposed to
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is an interesting comment in the Wikipedia discussion from someone who
claims he or she was present at the Oct. 6 test. Does anyone know what
kettle stone means? Deposits from evaporated water?
Yes, also called
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is an interesting comment in the Wikipedia discussion from someone who
claims he or she was present at the Oct. 6 test. Does anyone know what
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:26 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
It seems you are conflating two processes when only one will suffice. And one
of them is absurd from the start.
Why pump the liquid at all? Why use a magnetic field with pumping, when a
simpler route exists? Calutrons
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is an interesting comment in the Wikipedia discussion from someone who
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, also called boiler scale:
http://www.magnumarchive.com/c/iconographic-encyclopedia-volume-5/Storage-Water-Its-Purification.html
http://www.eutechinst.com/techtips/tech-tips45.htm
I'm sure you can't read all my posts, nor would you want to;
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 10:36 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a reason this is
more of a problem with Rossi's reactor?
No, I think AR's problem with using water is the fact that his heat
source is so very small. With a focused thermal reaction, the
resulting scale will
This is sort of what seems most natural to me. Something is happening on either
side of NI62, and it gets into a cyclic state - once in a while by the magic of
QM it overshoots and you get copper, or undershoots and you get iron. But most
of the time it bounces back and forth. Some oscillatory
47 matches
Mail list logo
