PeterH,
as far I remember the Liaw et al paper is published in the Proceedings of
ICCF-2. I have donated my CF library to my friend the journalist Haiko
Lietz who lives in Germany, I hope you know him personally. I think the
above Proceedings are at him and he can send you a copy.
As regarding
- Original Nachricht
Von: Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Datum: 28.11.2011 09:15
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Elevated-temperature excess heat production in a Pd D
system in 1991
PeterH,
as far I remember the Liaw et al paper is published in the
Alternatively you could ask the main author- he is still active/young:
http://www.hnei.hawaii.edu/template2.asp?userID=bliaw
He has continued the work, after Pd with Ni but this was also abandoned.
PeterG
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:34 AM, peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
- Original
I think, this says all.
This guy is a professional electrochemist and without doubt he has 1000fold
more possibilities than I.
If he gave up, he has doubts himself.
If there is a serious chance for success others should try it, who have a
laboratory.
Patents dont hinder scientific research and
Corrosion is something I always suspected that would lead Rossi to the use
of a bit of copper with nickel Rossi, given that such alloys are more
resilient to electrochemical processes.
2011/11/28 Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com
I spoke with Liaw at ICCF-2 Como 1991. The system had very great
Just after I read that Larsen thinks LENR reactions can occur inside
Lithium Ion batteries I read this:
http://www.rex.com.au/MediaRelease/Files/295_MR2025%20-%20Mobile%20Phone%20Self%20Combustion.pdf
Battery was reported as glowing Red hot.
AG
More photos of the phone:
http://www.australianfrequentflyer.com.au/community/travel-news/iphone-self-combusts-regional-express-34736.html#post522180
Sure made a mess of the phone. Maybe send the phone to Larsen to look
for transmutation products?
AG
On 11/28/2011 8:15 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
AG
pictures are not visible to not registered members of this site
2011/11/28 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
More photos of the phone: http://www.**australianfrequentflyer.com.**
au/community/travel-news/**iphone-self-combusts-regional-**
Try this:
https://picasaweb.google.com/100758632386227249211/November282011?authuser=0feat=directlink
AG
On 11/28/2011 8:23 PM, Andrea Selva wrote:
AG
pictures are not visible to not registered members of this site
2011/11/28 Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
not so sure.
Lithium batteries, (except the LiFePO4, that are an interesting product)
are known to burn or explose if badly build or badly treated (chargeed or
discharger roughly).
this is hy normally (except in some chinese fraudes copy) there are safety
Mosfet that limit discharge deepness and
But nobody was hurt by radiation. So no nuclear reactions.
Lets assume, the battery was charged and contained an energy of 7 Wh.
Lets assume, this is released in 2 minutes.
This means 210 Watt, and the peak power is probably higher.
As soon as the batteri is no longer air tight, the lithium
Try this:
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/cfakepathlattice-energy-llc-len-rs-in-liion-battery-firesjuly-16-2010
AG
On 11/28/2011 9:16 PM, peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
This is why I dont have my handy in my pocket ;-)
What has this to do with LENR?
LENR are not well understood. it seems they happens, but the by product are
not sure, and the theories are not proved.
It is as presumptuous as to say that any kind of fusion produce neutron,
gamma, and so-on,
as presumptuous as to pretend that any current circulating produce heating
, or any
- Original Nachricht
Von: peter.heck...@arcor.de
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Datum: 28.11.2011 11:46
Betreff: Aw: [Vo]:Larsen, LENR in Lithium batteries and burn out IPhone
But nobody was hurt by radiation. So no nuclear reactions.
Lets assume, the battery was charged and
- Original Nachricht
Von: Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Datum: 28.11.2011 12:08
Betreff: Re: Aw: [Vo]:Larsen, LENR in Lithium batteries and burn out IPhone
Try this:
That output was seen by everybody in the room when the reactor fired up.
Rossi tried to damp it by increasing the water flow to max but when the
outlet temp reached 40 deg C, he shut down the reactor and then
restarted it. That is what happened if you believe Levi and the others
that were
From David:
Article about trip of andrea rossi to massachusetts from boston globe
http://bostonglobe.com/business/2011/11/28/cold-fusion-project-looks-for-hom
e-massachusetts/w7FgGyI9Zx432chxuD5BEL/story.html
Looks like you have to sign up and pay money to view the article.
Regards,
Steven
On 28 November 2011 15:39, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
orionwo...@charter.net wrote:
From David:
Article about trip of andrea rossi to massachusetts from boston globe
http://bostonglobe.com/business/2011/11/28/cold-fusion-project-looks-for-hom
- Original Nachricht
Von: Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
An: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Datum: 28.11.2011 12:52
Betreff: Re: [Vo]:Larsen, LENR in Lithium batteries and burn out IPhone
That output was seen by everybody in the room when the reactor fired up.
Rossi
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Giovanni Santostasi
gsantost...@gmail.com wrote:
Rossi has interesting glasses in this picture. Anybody knows what they are?
They are Clic magnetic glasses:
http://www.speert.com/discount-sunglasses-products.cfm?SubCategory=Clic%20Magnetic%20Sunglasses
T
Thanks Jouni,
Excerpt:
Rossi said he would also like to develop small household cold fusion
power generators in Massachusetts.
I'm already planning to come back soon, [Rossi] said, We are hoping
to get something started in a matter of weeks, not months.
* * * *
Looks to me as if Rossi is
This waterspout video seems to support the laminar hypothesis.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hN7ug1zoWWE
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 10:02 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Chapter 5 (page 107) of the 2011 doctoral thesis Numerical Simulation of
Tornado-like
Thank you Terry.
G
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 8:34 AM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Giovanni Santostasi
gsantost...@gmail.com wrote:
Rossi has interesting glasses in this picture. Anybody knows what they
are?
They are Clic magnetic glasses:
orionworks sez:
...
... looking like the personification of God
Almighty himself (circa Old Testament)
Akshully, the more I think of it, I suspect Randi is trying to emulate
the Darwin look.
http://www.lucidcafe.com/library/96feb/darwin.html
Regards
Steven Vincent Johnson
www.OrionWorks.com
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 10:11 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
It has been suggested that it is not possible to obtain the rapid increase
in output power measured for the Rossi ECATs. The reason stated is that
the core would have to have its temperature multiplied by a factor of
Indeed, there is a similar phenomenon over land known as landspouts that
are known to be laminar.
It looks like Natarajan screwed up.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:07 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
This waterspout video seems to support the laminar hypothesis.
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 10:39 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
OK Horace, You have supplied the information that is needed to answer the
questions.
By my reading of the graphs, they contradict your ideas. They show that a
step increase in the power input results in a very gradual
You misread the graph. Ask Horace to help you understand what it shows as he
has the program that answers your question. Direct any further inquires to
him. I am confident he can straighten your problem out.
A graph is worth many words Cude. It is clear that a large instantaneous fixed
On 11-11-28 04:45 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote:
Just after I read that Larsen thinks LENR reactions can occur inside
Lithium Ion batteries I read this:
http://www.rex.com.au/MediaRelease/Files/295_MR2025%20-%20Mobile%20Phone%20Self%20Combustion.pdf
Battery was reported as glowing Red hot.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:59 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
You misread the graph. Ask Horace to help you understand what it shows as
he has the program that answers your question. Direct any further inquires
to him. I am confident he can straighten your problem out.
A graph
Joshua Cude has completed his proof that Rossi's own data from the 1
MW demo shows unavoidably that it is certain that no excess heat was
produced. Q.E.D.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2shva=1#inbox/133e0a55a24df9e5
Joshua Cude
7:20 AM (56 minutes ago)
to vortex-l
On Sat, Nov 26, 2011
I find it strange that anyone would assume that a proof has been generated that
the power output does not show excess heat. I think you should read Mr. Cudes'
mailings as he suggests that the power output
could be anywhere between 70kW and 470kW. I think I recall him suggesting that
if it is
OT :
the LiFePO4 battery don't have that problem.
they can sustain hard charge or discharge, support fire or explosion,
staying as flegmatic like an english man.
they have a slightly lower massic capacity, but not so much after some real
use.
I don't understand why they are not so common... maybe
On 11-11-28 11:21 AM, Rich Murray wrote:
Joshua Cude has completed his proof that Rossi's own data from the 1
MW demo shows unavoidably that it is certain that no excess heat was
produced. Q.E.D.
Jeeze, Rich, if you're going to post things that boil down to We are
the chorus, and we
Maybe you do not understand my position in this question. I am not convinced
that there is a large power increase that you speak of. Horace has produced a
graph and a method that should be able to answer that question. If it is in
fact there, his technique should reveal it. Do you argue
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 8:47 PM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
Of all of this patent goings on, no one has applied for a patent to
produce electrical power directly from a LENR reaction. The don't know
enough. They are just making thermal energy to spin a turbine.
Who is spinning a turbine
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Marcello Vitale mvit...@ucsbalum.netwrote:
“Rossi said he was not ready for a full academic investigation of his
technology because he doesn’t yet have full patent protection,’’ Tamarin
said. “That’s consistent with it not working, but it’s also consistent
So, if I understand you correctly, patent protection doesn't work. So why
do we bother with an expensive patent office and all those millions
(billions?) of patents?
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:46 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
Maybe you do not understand my position in this question. I am not
convinced that there is a large power increase that you speak of.
Neither am I. But according to Rossi's claims in his report, there has to
be one. He
BTW, Defkalion scheduled the announcement for Wednesday.
2011/11/28 Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com
So, if I understand you correctly, patent protection doesn't work. So why
do we bother with an expensive patent office and all those millions
(billions?) of patents?
--
Daniel Rocha - RJ
U.S. Constitution Article I, Section 8
Ripple~Effects New York 212~924~5996
.-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-. .-.
\ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \
`-' `-' `-' `-' `-' `-' `-'
From: Mary
experience of small companies owning patents, or small inventors owning
patents,
is that big corps usually find a way to get around, especially when
collaborating with the inventor before.
(It is why the inventor of smartcard get out of France, feeling abused by
his big partner)
I'm sure that
Hank Mills
November 28th, 2011 at 1:15 AM
Hello Andrea,
I apologize if Im not controlling my passion about this topic quite as
well as I should. I think the lies of the cynics and competitors (which I
read everyday), are making me a bit more angry than usual. Out of
jealousy and envy, they
On 11-11-28 12:28 PM, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
[ ... ]
Andrea Rossi
November 28th, 2011 at 1:15 AM
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510cpage=35#comment-133038
Dear Hank Mills (regarding the answer to RH):
I am very sorry, but I must say I do not agree on the fact that
further
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:28 AM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Hank Mills
November 28th, 2011 at 1:15
AMhttp://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=510cpage=35#comment-133037
Hello Andrea,
I apologize if I’m not controlling my passion about this topic quite as
well as I should.
Yes, I will sign up too.
Alan we miss the bandwagon.
I guess Mary is taking all the money.
G
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.comwrote:
**
On 11-11-28 12:28 PM, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
[ ... ]
Andrea Rossi
November 28th, 2011 at 1:15
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:36 AM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I think I recall him suggesting that if it is in fact 470 kW, then that
is due to LENR energy release. I would assume that he will come back and
respond to your
statement in that manner.
You recall incorrectly.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Giovanni Santostasi
gsantost...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes, I will sign up too.
Alan we miss the bandwagon.
I guess Mary is taking all the money.
G
You can have the Rossi business. I'm concentrating on debunking Hugh
Deasy's antigravity machine. Boeing is paying
Frank,
If LENR is mostly beta decay, I'm not sure why its not work like a
betavoltaic. It would be the killer app of the century. Please get
to work. :)
Who is spinning a turbine with LENR?
MY, You are comments are snide, cantankerous and counter-productive.
Its no wonder you're hiding behind a
But does it fit the possibility of 470 kW also?
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Nov 28, 2011 12:50 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Large Temperature Increase of Core Not Required for 6 to 1
Output Delta
On Mon, Nov 28,
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 10:01 AM, ecat builder ecatbuil...@gmail.comwrote:
MY, You are comments are snide, cantankerous and counter-productive.
Its no wonder you're hiding behind a pseudonym. He didn't say people
are spinning a turbine, he said they are generating heat _to_ spin a
turbine.
They do not pay us enough :-) The hours are long and the pay is short.
-Original Message-
From: Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Nov 28, 2011 12:38 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi blog -- Hank Mills proposes a side-by-side blank test
On
From the Defkalion forum:
Dear all,
We will release the expected info pre-announced on November 14th 2011, on
Wednesday, November 30th 2011.
Thank you for your attention
Defkalion GT
to search for Defkalion statements in their forum, use:
Now it seems you can see it without signing up.
- Jed
This should be an interesting announcement.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Robert Leguillon robert.leguil...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Nov 28, 2011 1:30 pm
Subject: [Vo]:Defkalion Announcement on Wednesday
From the Defkalion forum:
Dear all,
We will
Hold on here . . . This link seems to work:
http://bostonglobe.com/business/2011/11/28/hope-skepticism-for-cold-fusion/w7FgGyI9Zx432chxuD5BEL/story.html
It looks the same but there must be some difference.
I got this link from Google alerts. If the Googlebot can read it so can we.
- Jed
On Nov 28, 2011, at 8:53 AM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Giovanni Santostasi
gsantost...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I will sign up too.
Alan we miss the bandwagon.
I guess Mary is taking all the money.
G
You can have the Rossi business. I'm concentrating on debunking
peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
I think, this says all.
This guy is a professional electrochemist and without doubt he has 1000fold
more possibilities than I.
If he gave up, he has doubts himself.
He gave up because he could not get funding. That is what he told me.
This approach is
On Nov 28, 2011, at 9:44 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Hold on here . . . This link seems to work:
http://bostonglobe.com/business/2011/11/28/hope-skepticism-for-cold-
fusion/w7FgGyI9Zx432chxuD5BEL/story.html
It looks the same but there must be some difference.
I got this link from Google
Here is an extreme example of what I discussed in chapter 7 of my book: one
technology imitating another. In this case Toyota is making cars that look
like smart phones. See (in Japanese):
http://www.yomiuri.co.jp/atmoney/news/2028-OYT1T01025.htm
You can program your smart phone to display
There are two forces at work in the nucleus. The strong and the
electromagnetic. In ordinary hot fusion only the static electrostatic
repulsion and the static strong nuclear attraction are considered.
There are other induced forces the electromagnetic and the dynamic strong
nuclear spin
Bite me Brad!
MY, You are comments are snide, cantankerous and counter-productive.
-Original Message-
From: ecat builder ecatbuil...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Nov 28, 2011 8:01 am
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Brian Ahern's 2011 USPTO patent application
Frank,
If
fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
Bite me Brad!
MY, You are comments are snide, cantankerous and counter-productive.
He meant Mary Yugo, not you.
- Jed
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:43 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
Bite me Brad!
MY, You are comments are snide, cantankerous and counter-productive.
He meant Mary Yugo, not you.
Well, he can't bite me. He might have a disease.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 3:00 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, he can't bite me. He might have a disease.
You were going to let an alien bite you and you were going to BITE IT BACK!
Talk about diseases . . . outta this world!
T
I agree Horace. This is pathetic.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Nov 28, 2011 1:45 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Rossi blog -- Hank Mills proposes a side-by-side blank test
On Nov 28, 2011, at 8:53 AM, Mary
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:54 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I agree Horace. This is pathetic.
Dave
Deasy, IIRC, has a PhD in a physical science or engineering and is a flight
dynamics specialist by profession. He supported Steorn and for all I know,
still believes that have
Brad please accept my apology. I have worked hard and get slammed a lot. I
have, through this, become a bit quick to react.
Yes they want to make steam, however, with the positive thermal coefficient it
is going to be difficult to control.
Frank Znidarsic
Am 28.11.2011 22:01, schrieb Mary Yugo:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 12:54 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com
mailto:dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I agree Horace. This is pathetic.
Dave
Deasy, IIRC, has a PhD in a physical science or engineering and is a
flight dynamics specialist by
Interesting NASA materials (I've posted a couple of these before):
Contract Statement of Work for LENR Support:
R12.1 Material investigations:
The Contractor shall investigate properties of electromagnetic materials (EM)
in support of the R4LENR
(Low Energy Nuclear Reactions) project.R4
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.dewrote:
Am 28.11.2011 22:01, schrieb Mary Yugo: Aah now I see, it this is this
guy:
I suggest Rossi is more skilled in the art of understanding and
controlling his reactors than anyone on the planet. He was there so his
health was also at risk. It is a cheap shot to suggest to suggest he
intentionally risked the others health. You were not were, so how can
you judge? I do
@Peter
As an aside, please let me know how do you interpret Focardi's declaration
that he does not know what Rossi's catayst is.
I think the obvious interpretation is that Rossi invented it, and didn't
tell Focardi. I think that's the official story anyway and I don't see
anthing wrong with that?
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.comwrote:
I suggest Rossi is more skilled in the art of understanding and
controlling his reactors than anyone on the planet. He was there so his
health was also at risk. It is a cheap shot to suggest to suggest he
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Rossi has written on his blog about having had many explosions. I want to
see one (somewhere isolated where nobody can get hurt). That would be
interesting ... and fun.
I searched his responses on JoNP and never found
Patents in themselves give the inventor no real commercial protection
unless they have the funds and time to defend it in court. Investors
like to see patents, so maybe they do have a use.
AG
On 11/29/2011 3:46 AM, Alain dit le Cycliste wrote:
experience of small companies owning patents, or
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Rossi has written on his blog about having had many explosions. I want
to
see one (somewhere isolated where nobody can get hurt). That would be
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.comwrote:
Patents in themselves give the inventor no real commercial protection
unless they have the funds and time to defend it in court. Investors like
to see patents, so maybe they do have a use.
Rossi could patent the
Hi all,
I have set up a long bet on a well respected website where the money from
both sides go to charity.
If you have a strong opinion on either side of this debate, you can
challenge this prediction and turn it into a bet. (Minimum $200).
The prediction is: By November 30th 02013, Andrea
http://www.e-catworld.com/2011/04/rossi-says-that-over-the-years-has-blown-up-37-e-cats/
One of the questioner asked, “Another fun question: How many reactors have you
blown up? (You have experimented to determine the safest
size/pressures/temperatures. Stress testing is important!)”
Rossi’s
Good idea but you need tighter and way more specific criteria for how the
bet can be won or lost. Widely accepted is sort of vague and loose. How
about:
- said to have been properly tested and said to work by fusion or LENR as
advertised and with the net energy quotient quoted by Rossi (6:1 or
And how do you know that is the case? I would suggest he has. Even
better to do it as a provisional. Rossi then gets another 12 months to
keep it secret yet establishes a worldwide priority date.
AG
On 11/29/2011 9:51 AM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
BTW, the most random two-digit number is 37.
When groups of people are polled to pick a “random number between 1 and 100”,
the most commonly chosen number is 37.
I'm not saying that he just pulled the number out of thin air.
I'm saying that, if he were to pull a number out of thin air, odds
Mary Yugo is correct. The term widely accepted to produce a COP of 6
could mean anything depending on the observer and testing methodology. By
many accounts in this forum, many of whom are textually prolific, it is
already widely accepted.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 6:30 PM, Patrick Ellul
An interesting conversation:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/RossiECat/A-Conversation-With-Thomas-Blakeslee.shtml
Is Krivit backing down a bit?
AG
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.comwrote:
And how do you know that is the case? I would suggest he has. Even better
to do it as a provisional. Rossi then gets another 12 months to keep it
secret yet establishes a worldwide priority date.
How do I know
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 3:50 PM, Robert Leguillon
robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote:
BTW, the most random two-digit number is 37.
Hilarious!
AG, Krivit has staked his reputation upon Rossi being a scammer and I have seen
nothing to suggest that he believes otherwise. It all began with that June
demonstration where Rossi made an attempt to snow Krivit. Krivit detected
the games that Rossi was playing and tried to trap him and his
Widely recognized could mean that Fleishman and Pons and/or Rossi will get
the nobel prize in 2013. High temperature conductivity, which is a much
lesse expressive discovery, got within 1 year. If a couple customers
confirm that e-cat works, which, if not a scam, is certainly going to
happen
Andrea Rossi
November 28th, 2011 at 6:48 PM
November 28th, 2011 at 6:48 PM
Dear Herb Gills:
Today we sold in the USA a 1 MW plant which will go to a normal Customer.
This installation will be visitable by the qualified public.
We wait to have completed the contractual procedure through the
Mary Yugo,
Would you take up the challenge if I state the terms to be:
More than 5 companies with at least 50 employees each publicly acknowledge
the satisfactory use of E-Cat for at least 3 months
Let me know,
Patrick
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi
Can anyone help me to find it?
David
David Jonsson, Sweden, phone callto:+46703000370
It appears there is debate here similar to the historic philosophical
debate about how many angels can sit on the head of pin, when it is
not determined the size or nature of the pin and whether angels exist.
I am responding to this only to bring some clarity to what it is I am
doing
http://tmx.quotemedia.com/article.php?newsid=4783244qm_symbol=ZNN:CA
Market Regulation Services - Trading Halt - Feel Good Cars Corp. - ZNN
VANCOUVER, Jan. 18 /CNW/ - The following issues have been halted by
Market Regulation Services (RS):
Issuer Name: Feel Good Cars Corp.
TSX-V Ticker
Let me think about. They'd have to be verifiable as unrelated to Rossi and
unconnected in any way other than as a client.
Rossi probably has 5 companies and he can make any claims through them as
he wants to -- for example Leonardo and Ampenergo so I don't think so. If
this thing is real, it
Provisionals do not have high visibility. I know. I use them.
On 11/29/2011 10:46 AM, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.com mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
And how do you know that is the case? I would suggest he has. Even
At 04:51 PM 11/28/2011, Terry Blanton wrote:
EEStor related? I wouldn't get my hopes up.
http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=ZNN.V
Peaked at 25% up from 10am -- coulda made a killing! (If I had any stock).
Volume: 148,044
Way to go Rossi. Congratulations. Bit sad they beat us but then we need
Ac kWs.
AG
On 11/29/2011 11:03 AM, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
Andrea Rossi
November 28th, 2011 at 6:48 PM
Thanks, Robert
And, here is some forgotten LENR evidence from 1951 --
Lattice Energy LLC-LENRs ca 1950s-Sternglass Expts-Einstein Bethe-Nov 25
2011
http://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llclenrs-ca-1950ssternglass-exptseinstein-bethenov-25-2011
Maybe established theory has
Ok, so let's change it to:
More than 10 companies with at least 50 employees and that Rossi has no
ownership of, each publicly acknowledge the satisfactory use of E-Cat for
at least 3 months
So?
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Let me think about.
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
