On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 4:49 PM, a.ashfield wrote:
To me it looks like the hand waving is largely from the skeptics. I have
> yet to see a specific item that is wrong in Mills theories highlighted by
> them.
>
Did you take a look at the link I sent? Can you help us to
To me it looks like the hand waving is largely from the skeptics. I
have yet to see a specific item that is wrong in Mills theories
highlighted by them.
Rossi had it right years ago when he stated the skeptics will never
believe an experiment but only the sale of working commercial units.
In Italian, their report
https://gsvit.wordpress.com/2017/01/03/enea-rapporto-41-analisi-e-critica-tecnica-del-contenuto/
I imagine a translation, and some answers will be interesting.
It turns out that universal chemistry has produced some entirely unexpected
dusty trails to explaining the answer to the question of life, the universe,
and everything… http://atom-ecology.russgeorge.net/2017/03/25/3788/
Is it well known based on real data that the charge of the electron remains
constant at short distances from another charge-- positive or negative?
An interesting recent paper addresses this question.
“ Understanding the discrete nature of angular momentum of electron in hydrogen
atom with
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-25-2017-lenr-shorter-weekend-edition.html
peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Eric Walker wrote:
The thing that trips me up with BrLP is that the Grand Unified Theory
of Classical Physics (GUT-CP) book is hand-wavy I guess I'm open
to BrLP having some experimental phenomenon that keeps them going.
But in that case I wonder why they would publish the several volumes
The thing that trips me up with BrLP is that the Grand Unified Theory of
Classical Physics (GUT-CP) book is hand-wavy, and I have a hard time not
concluding that this is other than intentional. I had my suspicions from
the start, but they were more than borne out when we actually looked at one
of
Bob Higgins wrote: I just can't imagine a hydrino being able to share
an electronic state with another atom because the hydrino's electron is
so tightly bound to the hydrino nucleus - not an ordinary valence bond
for sure.
... a premise for this is extreme magnetic binding
In a high
There is also the possibility of one or more of the S orbital electrons of
the larger parent atom being taken into a sub-ground hydrino state. In
which case, each of the electrons in such a state would screen a proton and
make those protons appear like neutrons. For example, say one of the S
Bob Higgins wrote:
The predicted properties of the hydrino or any sub-ground-state
hydrogen suggest that it will be really hard to detect... It must be
detected by proxy. Like detecting the neutrino, detection of the
hydrino will require new, inventive techniques
Bob, I generally agree
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1703.05249.pdf
In the new Rossi theory paper, a tunneling current is seen to flow between
the nickel electrodes.
The tunneling current flow of R = 1 Ohm , U = 0.105 Volt may be caused by
nanoscale superconductivity were the plasma is an imperfect superconductor
and the
The predicted properties of the hydrino or any sub-ground-state hydrogen
suggest that it will be really hard to detect. According to Meulenberg,
these states lack sufficient angular momentum to have a photon
transaction. Thus, the hydrino hydrogen would not have telltale absorption
spectra of
One of the better articles to appear on the subject of LENR in the
context of a valid commercial effort appeared recently in C (which is
becoming a top flight science journal) and was picked up by SciAm.
14 matches
Mail list logo