Re: [Vo]:The Papp engine and cavitation

It seems to be rather easy to test the noble gas cavitation posit. With the advent of barbell type acoustic horns, a quantity of pressurized noble gas mix might be treated with ultrasonic stimulation from the acoustic horn and then excited with a spark. If the noble gas mix explodes then the

RE: [Vo]:Borghi, Missfeldt and Gray

DOE’s response to Gray’s inquiry about making helium by a fusion process is short and dismissive The information on Gray’s web site is mostly nonsense IMHO. Gray did not have much standing and got little fanfare about his cold fusion process, unlike MF and MP. I wonder if IH sponsored

Re: [Vo]:The Papp engine and cavitation

- One of the big mysteries of the Papp engine is understanding the Papp engine fuel preparation device. What does that device do and why is it important to the function of the Papp engine? All the Papp engine replicators have discounted the need to use this fuel prep device and try

Re: [Vo]:Borghi, Missfeldt and Gray

What Jones is getting at is duality in physics. This is a hard idea to understand. Bul let is try to understand this proven idea. Meaning of Duality in Physics Posted on November 1, 2012 by Suresh Emre The literal meaning of the word “dual” implies two but in philosophy “dual” usually means

Re: [Vo]:Borghi, Missfeldt and Gray

The Higgs boson with spin 0 is now proved, at least to most physicists. It is the only spin 0 massive particle known to exist in nature, if it is not a funding vehicle for CERN ;-) A hypothetical particle of interest (wrt UDH) is known as the chameleon particle. It has zero spin and other

Re: [Vo]:Fission may be the best fit for future LENR

As the smoke cleared Brian Ahern mounted the barricade and roared out: I use outlook for e-mails.How do you block certain senders? From: Che . . . Best to filter all vortex mail to its own folder

Re: [Vo]:Fwd: Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project just uploaded a video

Over at EcatWorld Bob Greenyer • 9 hours ago I am now within a whisker of stating that LENR as in "Low Energy Nuclear Reactions" (however they are caused) are real and testable based on specific data. With reference to ECCO, without knowing for certain that it is producing excess heat