Re: [Vo]:Spin amplification and nucleon disintegration

More... [image: Inline image 1] [image: Inline image 2] On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 9:48 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 9:11 PM, wrote: > >> I >> This implies >> lots of neutrons, and lots of T neither of which are seen to any great >>

Re: [Vo]:Spin amplification and nucleon disintegration

more... http://arxiv.org/pdf/1410.1374.pdf Monopole catalysis of proton decay The possibility that a GUT monopole could catalyse a baryon number violating process was suggested as early as 1980 [117]. The central core of a GUT monopole retains the original symmetry and contains the fields of

Re: [Vo]:Spin amplification and nucleon disintegration

In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 30 Nov 2015 11:59:11 -0800: Hi, [snip] >As you may surmise, all of this comes back to an emerging premise for >understanding LENR based on Holmlid’s work. That premise is that at the very >heart of the reaction we find nucleon disintegration, first and

Re: [Vo]:Spin amplification and nucleon disintegration

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 9:11 PM, wrote: > I > This implies > lots of neutrons, and lots of T neither of which are seen to any great > extent. > > As you know, quarks are monopoles, Quarks make up protons. When a proton is exposed to a monopole magnetic field, it will decay.

Re: [Vo]:Spin amplification and nucleon disintegration

http://arxiv.org/pdf/1410.1374.pdf Non-collider searches for stable massive particles *Abstract* The theoretical motivation for exotic stable massive particles (SMPs) and the results of SMP searches at non-collider facilities are reviewed. SMPs are defined such that they would be sufficiently

Re: [Vo]:Spin amplification and nucleon disintegration

In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 14 Dec 2015 21:48:30 -0500: Hi Axil, [snip] I wasn't arguing against the general idea, just pointing out that if muons are being produced, then they are not catalyzing many fusion reactions. >On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 9:11 PM, wrote: >

Re: [Vo]:Spin amplification and nucleon disintegration

It is uncertain to how large a magnetic effect that SPPs can produce. The DGT reports from Dr. Kim indicate that the effect can be large, *Magnetic monopole beam * One of the amazing revelations that has come out of nanoplasmonic research and experimentation is the explanation of how the “dark

RE: [Vo]:Spin amplification and nucleon disintegration

From: Axil Axil http://physik.uni-graz.at/~dk-user/talks/Chernodub_25112013.pdf * This article shows how a strong magnetic field destroys color in matter to produce mesons. Although this paper is about the extreme magnetic fields (10^15 T) of heavy ions in a very hot plasma, there

Re: [Vo]:Spin amplification and nucleon disintegration

http://physik.uni-graz.at/~dk-user/talks/Chernodub_25112013.pdf THis article shows how a strong magnetic field destroys color in matter to produce mesons. On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 7:19 PM, Bob Cook wrote: > The same EM circular polarization Jones has described can also

Re: [Vo]:Spin amplification and nucleon disintegration

Spin amplification and nucleon disintegrationThe same EM circular polarization Jones has described can also interact with orbital spin states of electrons in metal lattices and/or mere atoms. At resonant frequencies, disintegration of the lattice can occur and the excess angular momentum must

RE: [Vo]:Spin amplification and nucleon disintegration

Bob, It would be interesting to get info on that Michigan company. Side Note: There is a little known “Law of Conservation of Nuclear Number”. This law states that the sum of protons and neutrons before and after a radioactive decay reaction will be the same. It has been stretched to include

Re: [Vo]:Spin amplification and nucleon disintegration

http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0801/0801.2752.pdf Here is the math support for the “Mössbauer Effect”. It shows that a monopole magnetic field is the most sensitive element to the Mössbauer effect. >From the Urutskoiev exploding titanium foil experiment experiment 4) Various difficulties of