Recent positive responses to Mizuno's work present recently at MIT
by Yoshino made me look at his work presented at ICCF
18http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MizunoTmethodofco.pdflast year.
In section 1.1 of this presentation Mizuno hints in my view at Rydberg
matter but does not actually mention
Keep in mind that Rydberg matter does not normally describe shrunken
hydrogen. Shrunken hydrogen has its electron in a reduced orbital at an
energy state below the normally accepted ground state. This has been
variously described as inverse Rydberg and fractional Rydberg or
hydrino (Mills)
-
From: Bob Higgins
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 5:56 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Is Mizuno poining at Ryberg matter or not?
Keep in mind that Rydberg matter does not normally describe shrunken
hydrogen. Shrunken hydrogen has its electron in a reduced orbital
Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Sent:* Tuesday, April 08, 2014 5:56 AM
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Is Mizuno poining at Ryberg matter or not?
Keep in mind that Rydberg matter does not normally describe shrunken
hydrogen. Shrunken hydrogen has its electron in a reduced orbital
field and
its interaction with the magnetic fields of nearby particles outside the BEC.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Bob Higgins
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Cc: Bob Higgins
Sent: Tuesday, April 08, 2014 9:35 AM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Is Mizuno poining at Ryberg matter
Bob, you are probably right, this likely is pointing at inverse Rydberg
matter.
Rob.
Op dinsdag 8 april 2014 heeft Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com het
volgende geschreven:
Keep in mind that Rydberg matter does not normally describe shrunken
hydrogen. Shrunken hydrogen has its electron
In my opinion, an inverse Rydberg atom can not exist in isolation. Such
inversion may only happen in an excited and/or ionized crystal formation of
hydrogen. How the group motion of the elections and protons in such an
arrogation in and among each other is not clear; that is, how the details
of
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 8:03 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
What is your understanding of the energy transfer mechanism involved in
the evanescent coupling (non-radiative) phenomena?
I have heard that Mills's claim is that it is Forster resonance energy
transfer (FRET) [1].
Eric
On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 5:56 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.comwrote:
One way to successively remove the energy in such a hydroton configuration
may be the progressive conversion to an ever more fractional state, and
when Mills' minimum size of 1/137 is reached, fusion occurs.
I think
Mills may not ever see fusion in his devices - even if his theory is
correct, and even if he is creating hydrinos. His means of extracting the
energy to get hydrinos probably never takes them to the lowest level
(1/137). Even though he calculates such a level is possible, he never gets
that
10 matches
Mail list logo
