--
From: "Jonathan Berry"
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; evg...@groups.io; aethericscien...@groups.io
Sent: Friday, 10 Nov, 23 At 02:20
Subject: [Vo]:Re: Polished: Re: Special Relativity (SR) .vs Aether
A few updates...
First because the Michelson Morley claim seemed plausible but
It's always interesting to question what is considered our standard point
of view even when it works so well. Special Relativity is common sense in
my opinion and is why I would never give it up. However, what always
bugged me was time and using it as a 4th dimension. One of the concepts of
A few updates...
First because the Michelson Morley claim seemed plausible but not totally
conclusive, I wasn't doing the math myself and math isn't my thing so I
farmed that out to AI's that kept on having different ideas so to be sure I
had to really drill down and figure out the best most pure
The ARV story is chaff; misdirection to fill the void with something
semi-plausible, at least to some degree of consistency, yet whilst only
providing bumsteer. The UFO equivalent of red mercury. Visitors' craft
are obviously surrounded by some kind of glowing orb phenomenon, commonly
assumed to
As I was eating some soup (on day 5 of the fasting mimicking diet) I
wondered why I didn't try putting a pyramid in a box?!
I took a Pyramid I made from A4 Paper where I printed a Template for a
Pyramid of my own design, this design uses an effect I discovered and then
found another researcher
BTW, just curious about things with a high dielectric constant as these
have been correlated with both Free Energy (a researcher with a coil around
a Barium Titanate coil inputting a special frequency got a blue glow and
free energy out, yes, Barium again pops up).
But also I recall reading about
It's part of the blog, computers tab, I see guile scheme as an art and have
a few suggestions of great improvements for it. But you have to demand
those features if you like it. And if you do not see we have some serious
issues in the world, just ignore it as much as you like. Enjoy your
sleep...
The strong force is not a constant. It is proportional to the parallel
EM flux. The increase from proton --> 4-He is a complex quaternion
Logarithmic factor. It can be exactly given by the SO(4) physics model.
The standard model simply is garbage invented by people that miss the
understanding
:35 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:‘Alien Calculus’ Could Save Particle Physics From
Infinities | Quanta Magazine--tunneling and other entangled system phenonma--
Jurg apply points out that tunneling is a common event that happens within
entan
From: Jürg Wyttenbach<mailto:ju...@datamart.ch>
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2023 2:01 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: [Vo]:Re: [Vo]:‘Alien Calculus’ Could Save Particle Physics From
Infinities | Quanta Magazine
Tunnelling is a fancy effect that occurs when
Tunnelling is a fancy effect that occurs when you neglect the magnetic
interaction.
Obviously and even worse Dirac and similar equations neglect the main
acting part of particle physics - EM resonance. So they will go on for
ever publishing fringe/fancy ideas (“Resurgence is very
Wrong, but interesting, URL
https://www.vice.com/en/article/epvdme/developers-are-connecting-multiple-ai-agents-to-make-more-autonomous-ai
On Sat, Apr 8, 2023 at 11:03 AM Terry Blanton wrote:
> https://www.miamiherald.com/news/state/florida/article274029875.html
>
An interesting take on AI for $1 at Amazon:
"Smart Until It's Dumb: Why artificial intelligence keeps making
epic mistakes (and why, the AI bubble is about to burst)"
Author: Emmanuel Maggiori, PhD, is a 10-year AI industry insider,
specialized in machine learning and scientific computing. He
Physics has no clue of the photon. So you are free to speculate in any
direction.
Currently we use the envelope function to describe a traveling photon.
Of course this function contradicts basic Maxwell equations as E/B are
never symmetric.
Solar photon emission produces a pressure that
The original tired light hypothesis was rejected as an explanation of the
hubble red shift relation because it predicted more distant galaxies would
appear fuzzier then we observe. The predicted the fuzziness was a
consequence of scattering causing the red shift. However, perhaps a new
version of
Cosmology is the gossip kitchen table for sidelined physicists
Enjoy the nice pictures of galaxies but do not believe any version
II,III etc. of bibles genesis like big bang.
Most fake facts about black holes have been debunked as nonsense simply
because real physics cannot work with
Eric Lerner argues the "unexpected" data from the JWST is expected in an
non-expanding universe. Of course if the universe is not expanding he also
says explaining the hubble redshift relation would require some new physics.
Harry
On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 7:32 PM Jones Beene wrote:
> As Lerner
Jurg,
You state "In SOP we show that the electron is a resonance of the proton."
Since I believe that the proton is composed of relativistic leptons and
leptons of EM fields (expressed as photons?), you have presented something
that will take me time to examine. I hope to do so - eventually.
Andrew
Just one thing:
I assume that you mean the atom (including the bound electron) is
neutral. If you mean that the bound electron (in its interaction with
the nuclear Coulomb field) is uncharged EM field only, then this would
be one of our incompatible assumptions. However, I am
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 3:15 PM Jürg Wyttenbach wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> I started to dig deeper the last few months and it became clear that most
> of the classic physics approaches are Kindergarten level physics based on
> wrong understanding of basic physics rules.
> On 25.04.2022 17:53, Andrew
Jones,
I looked quickly at the patent by Haisch and Moddel but could not find
anything about cooling. However, the authors of this paper,
ttps://arxiv.org/abs/0910.5893
experimentally investigated the claims of Haisch and Moddel in section
2.3.2. They tried to find alternative explanations for the
Photons are the universal = most basic form of energy. With photons you
can transport energy over any distance. So here the equivalence relation
E = mc^2 is obvious. Same for the Pointing power vector for a radiation
field.
But if you write E = mc^2 and e.g. m is 4-He then the equation simply
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Mon, 25 Apr 2022 22:17:01 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>Classic misunderstanding ... the bomb energy comes from E=dmc^2 .
>
>
>J.W.
That was assumed anyway. I.e. the change in mass is where the energy comes
from. Are you saying that E=mc^2 is not the
total energy of
I think I have posted this before, but Einstein was also able to derive E=mc^2
without recourse to his theory of special relativity. Max Born presented
this alternate derivation in his book Einstein's Theory of Relativity. Here
is the proof:
I was thinking about LASERS (Light amplification by Stimulated Emission of
Radiation) and it occurred to me that the notion of cooling radiation is
already present in quantum theory, but it is disguised as "stimulated
emission" in order to respect the mid 19th century doctrine that cooling
Classic misunderstanding ... the bomb energy comes from E=dmc^2 .
J.W.
On 25.04.2022 21:23, Robin wrote:
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Mon, 25 Apr 2022 16:25:49 +0200:
Hi Jürg,
If E=mc^2 is wrong, then perhaps you should write the major nuclear powers, and
explain to them why
Andrew,
I started to dig deeper the last few months and it became clear that
most of the classic physics approaches are Kindergarten level physics
based on wrong understanding of basic physics rules.
On 25.04.2022 17:53, Andrew Meulenberg wrote:
Jurg,
Thank you for the comments. It helps
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Mon, 25 Apr 2022 16:25:49 +0200:
Hi Jürg,
If E=mc^2 is wrong, then perhaps you should write the major nuclear powers, and
explain to them why their bombs don't
work. ;)
>Andrew,
>
>
>I could give you a very long list. First problem: The Dirac equation
Jurg,
Thank you for the comments. It helps us to understand the reasons behind
rejection of the concept of deep-orbit electrons.
Comments below
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 9:25 AM Jürg Wyttenbach wrote:
> Andrew,
>
> I could give you a very long list. First problem: *The Dirac equation
> itself
Andrew,
I could give you a very long list. First problem: The Dirac equation
itself is only working for fields and never for mass. The inclusion of
the relativistic mass simply is an error made by a mathematician with no
clue of physics.
The Einstein equation (E=mc^2) has been guessed
Jurg,
I would be interested in what physical laws you think are violated by the
deep-orbit electrons. Without the Dirac equation's "anomalous orbit"
results, I don't think that we would have looked for the relativistic
effects that make the deep orbits (and nuclear forces?) possible.
Andrew
_ _
I just want to remind some folks here that H*-H*, the only existing from
of dense hydrogen (besides D*-D*) has been measured by multiple methods
by Randal Mills, now some 3 years ago. Also Holmlid tried to measure the
H*H* bond energy but he did work with clusters of H* that suffer from
If the 2.8328 fermi mentioned in the paper is multiplied by the inverse
of alpha, the fine structure constant (alpha =1/137.035999), then you
get the radius of Randell Mills' TSO (Transition State Orbitsphere)
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269319303624
the radius of
On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 11:26 AM Jones Beene wrote:
> HLV wrote:
>
> A simple argument that small hydrogen may exist
>
> Physics Letters B Volume 794, 10 July 2019, Pages 130-134
>
> https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0370269319303624
>
>
> Thanks for posting this. One curious
https://nypost.com/2021/04/12/us-navy-ships-capture-video-of-pyramid-shaped-ufos-overhead/
Frank
t;
>
>
>
> ___
>
>
>
> *From: *Robin
> *Sent: *Tuesday, March 9, 2021 3:17 PM
> *To: *vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject: *Re: [Vo]:Re: Unexplained Magnetic Phenomenon EXPLAINED
>
>
>
> In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Tue, 9 Mar 202
___
From: Robin<mailto:mixent...@aussiebroadband.com.au>
Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 3:17 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com<mailto:vortex-l@eskimo.com>
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Unexplained Magnetic Phenomenon EXPLAINED
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Tue, 9 Mar 2021 16:43:23 -0500:
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Tue, 9 Mar 2021 16:43:23 -0500:
Hi,
It just occurred to me that this sounds like it may the mechanism behind the
John Searle flying saucer, since that also
depends on rotating magnets? (See e.g. https://manmade-ufos.com/john-searl).
>Hamdi's article has
Hamdi's article has been published:
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-8994/13/3/442
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 10:52 AM Terry Blanton wrote:
> Five years ago, a Hamdi Ucar showed Vortex a magnetic phenomenon he
> stumbled across. It was something similar to Levitron except that it
> involved the ability
Coming along. I now use synthetic reads and they don't squeak so much.I need a
gear driven guitar type apparatus to hold the viola and violin in tune.
Sprinkling rosin powder on the pegs does not do it for me.Perhaps I will design
one.
First song: Do you really want to tell me that you
There is no getting through to people like the editors at Physics Today. I
expect that even if everyone here were to write to them, they would reject
every message.
They think of themselves as fair, objective and open minded. Perhaps they
are open minded about some subjects, but not cold fusion.
More:
http://www.quantumheat.org/
http://remoteview.substack.com/
They have quite a lot of compelling content of Cold Fusion and Engineering
the Vacuum (EVO's, Exotic Vacuum Objects, Ken Shoulders etc).
Really pulled it all together.
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 at 23:52, Jonathan Berry
wrote:
>
I wrote:
> The ingredients are listed here. I think they are liquid at room
> temperature, not powder:
>
The lipid nanoparticles are similar to butter, according to one expert. I
think butter is considered a solid at room temperature. See:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eK0C5tFHze8=emb_logo
JonesBeene wrote:
> It is not clear if this category (~3 percent) is anything more than a
> passing phenomenon
>
Other sources say the problems went away in one day or less. There have
been no reports of longer-term problems.
Other vaccines have stronger, more common effects, yet they are
Jürg Wyttenbach wrote:
> Look at CDC presentation slide 6** column explained below:
>
>
> https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2020-12/slides-12-19/05-COVID-CLARK.pdf
>
> 3% were no longer able to work afterwards...
>
Only for one day. Such reactions are common with many
Jürg
“no longer able to work” could be misleading - since it implies a long term
problem.
It is not clear if this category (~3 percent) is anything more than a passing
phenomenon – except for the few cases with extreme allergic reaction, of
course. Recipients should be screened for history
Not so happy Christmas for some...
Pfizer vaccine seems to be high risk!
Look at CDC presentation slide 6** column explained below:
https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/meetings/downloads/slides-2020-12/slides-12-19/05-COVID-CLARK.pdf
3% were no longer able to work afterwards...
Effectively
opps wrong URL correct below
https://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/temp/ViolinXmass.mp4
If you like to follow a serious talk/discussion about general relativity
I do recommend
:::
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_the_non-locality_of_the_gravitational_energy_a_serious_problem_for_General_Relativity
Needs some deep math knowledge
And of course GR is incomplete as the
Here is the show.
https://www.theothersideofmidnight.com/guest/frank-znidarsic/
I am not doing shows and lectures anymore. I sort of gave up.
Frank Z
Thank you Terry. I was on the Dark Side of the Moon a few years ago. The show
went well.
An anatomy of an ancient headphone linked below.
http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/temp/Inside.mov
Frank Z
That is a pretty good price but modules have fallen in popularity. In fact,
music keyboards in general have fallen off.
Thanks Terry. I know everything is going to a computer or phone now.
Camcorder, GPS, cammera are now all on a phone.
Now its hit musical keyboards. You just purchase a
When I was in elementary school in the late 1950 there was this girl Elaine who
played a Hammond organ. It was an impressive thing with two key boards, tone
peddles, and two sound volume peddles. It had mechanical sound clog wheels and
made a wising sound as it was turned on. A friend of
A bit of history with the product review. The Wurtlizer is the oldest device
CIRCA 1970. It is electromechanical and has reeds that vibrate. Coils pick up
the vibrations and send them to an amplifier. I added a Stomp Box to extends
the range of sounds. There were also more expensive
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Wed, 19 Aug 2020 20:04:34 + (UTC):
Hi Jones,
[snip]
> Is the correct Rydberg value 27.2 instead of 22.7 ?
>...or was that a typo ?
Not a typo, just a "senior moment" on my part. (Same numbers, wrong order.) It
should of course be 27.2 and Erbium is
not a
Is the correct Rydberg value 27.2 instead of 22.7 ?
...or was that a typo ?
Robin wrote:
>The elements is rare, costly and does not appear in the list of Mills’
>catalysts (but almost any element can be contorted to be catalytic,, as Mills
>has repeatedly shown).
The 3rd ionization
In reply to JonesBeene's message of Wed, 19 Aug 2020 11:49:32 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
>The elements is rare, costly and does not appear in the list of Mills
>catalysts (but almost any element can be contorted to be catalytic,, as Mills
>has repeatedly shown).
The 3rd ionization energy of Er is
From: CB Sites
Any ideas as to why they chose Erbium for the host metal?
I wondered about this too.
The elements is rare, costly and does not appear in the list of Mills’
catalysts (but almost any element can be contorted to be catalytic,, as Mills
has repeatedly shown).
The one
On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 12:39 PM CB Sites wrote:
> Any ideas as to why they chose Erbium for the host metal?
>
I can think of one reason:
Palladium 2,197.00 USD per Troy Ounce
Platinum962.50 USD per Troy Ounce
Erbium $650 per kilogram!
Any ideas as to why they chose Erbium for the host metal? Seems like a
pretty straight forward idea. I do wonder how quickly the host metal gets
consumed.
On Sun, Aug 16, 2020, 11:06 PM Terry Blanton wrote:
> Direct link to quote:
>
>
Direct link to quote:
https://www1.grc.nasa.gov/space/science/lattice-confinement-fusion/
On Sun, Aug 16, 2020 at 11:04 PM Terry Blanton wrote:
> "NASA Detects Lattice Confinement Fusion
>
> A team of NASA researchers seeking a new energy source for deep-space
> exploration missions, recently
Here it is.
https://csnews.com/three-square-market-sets-out-create-chain-100-self-pay-convenience-stores
-Original Message-
From: Frank Znidarsic
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Wed, Jul 1, 2020 11:50 am
Subject: Jed's predictions
I believe that Jed missed the mark with his optimistic
Self pay is up and running here in Switzerland since years.
If you like to do free work without getting any payback then you are
welcome!
Looks like the USA has lost contact with the rest of the world.
Especially after Trump today bought all Remsdesivir - a crappy untested
medicament that
On 28.06.2020 01:50, Che wrote:
Is it your claim that mass is a function of the inertia of spinning
energy -- here, in some toroidal form..?
Yes exactly that is what SO(4) physics shows with the highest possible
precision.
I was referring to the mathematical analysis of bulk matter rather
Engineers and applied physicists never stopped using the concept of an
infinitesimal so they should be happy to know that it isn't bad mathematics
after all.
Harry
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 6:18 PM Jürg Wyttenbach wrote:
> Particle physics has originally been based on the rigid mass operator.
I was referring to the mathematical analysis of bulk matter rather than any
sort of underlying particle theory of matter.
If matter is composed of point particles separated by some distance, then
each point particle could have a finite mass connected to it.
Harry
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 7:00
On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 6:18 PM Jürg Wyttenbach wrote:
> Particle physics has originally been based on the rigid mass operator.
> Unkluckily only a few physicists understand master level rotating mass
> mechanics as this is a field used/covered by mechanical engineering.
>
> Why physics did use
point-particle theory is Boscovich's theory and educators don't teach it any
more to physics students; only a few physicists know about it because now an
obscure subject
On Saturday, 27 June 2020, 23:18:35 BST, Jürg Wyttenbach
wrote:
Particle physics has originally been based on
Particle physics has originally been based on the rigid mass operator.
Unkluckily only a few physicists understand master level rotating mass
mechanics as this is a field used/covered by mechanical engineering.
Why physics did use the fringe Virial approach (square integrable
functions..) is
I am not sure if this is related but I always had a problem with the
concept of a point mass or a point charge, since mathematically that would
imply infinite mass density or charge density or alternatively zero mass
and zero charge. However these conundrums are resolved mathematically by
moving
The fantasy of the old SM guard always seemed to be limitless...
SO(4) physics exactly explains how the claimed force "gravity" is
generated and mediated between hadronic masses.
Since about 1 year there is game over for SM. No more cheating with
point particles that do not behave as points
To end this lengthy discourse with a second reply; I shall shorten this
considerably, although many investigations have now been done to formulate a
more comprehensive solution for certain effects being noted in the loosely
coupled resonant transfer of amperage above the resistive ratio. Brian
Twin Versions of RealityBeing somewhat ahead of the "common joe" in making
these observations, I should first say that this is not my first rodeo. And
comparisons to the former version of reality to the present one now present
itself. Now if two measurements of reality differ in results, we
Making no assumptions as to the existence or nature of time and space, we
can reduce their defining properties to more fundamental propositions:
• there are information processors (us)
• thus there is, implicitly, 'information', the actual substance and
format of which is determined by our
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Tue, 14 Apr 2020 13:12:28 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>Our live is covered/maintained by faint fluctuations on top of highly
>stable matter that does not feel time at all.
I think supernovas would imply otherwise. I think what you are trying to say is
that
Our live is covered/maintained by faint fluctuations on top of highly
stable matter that does not feel time at all.
Of course these small fluctations are highly dependent on time but this
does not imply that time exist for the universe! It's just us that want
to believe that there is time for
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Tue, 14 Apr 2020 01:18:59 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>Te best atomic clocks are sensitive to 10cm difference in altitude.
>
>But there is one open point: Is only the Rb/Cs crystal oscillating a bit
>slower/faster or is the electronics measuring slower/faster - or
vortex-l@eskimo.com>
*Subject: *Re: [Vo]:Re: CONCEPTS OF TIME--
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 5:14 PM mailto:mix...@bigpond.com>> wrote:
Note that our perception of the flow of time and even our
measurement of it is based on processes which may vary in
speed. IOW
-----
>
> *From: *H LV
> *Sent: *Sunday, April 12, 2020 6:32 PM
> *To: *vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject: *Re: [Vo]:Re: CONCEPTS OF TIME--
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 5:14 PM wrote:
>
>
>
> Note that o
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: CONCEPTS OF TIME--
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 5:14 PM mailto:mix...@bigpond.com>>
wrote:
Note that our perception of the flow of time and even our measurement of it is
based on processes which may vary in
speed. IOW if the fabric of space time changes, e.g. in a g
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 5:14 PM wrote:
>
>
> Note that our perception of the flow of time and even our measurement of
> it is based on processes which may vary in
> speed. IOW if the fabric of space time changes, e.g. in a gravitational
> field, then the processes upon which our clocks
> are
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sat, 11 Apr 2020 10:59:14 +0200:
Hi,
[snip]
>Your logic is one way correct.
>
>If you take the path length L given by c covered by one second, then
>this is just one out of infinite many possible gauges.
>A frequency is just the breakdown of L in units of
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 11:04 AM Jürg Wyttenbach wrote:
> You verb it right "suggests" !!
>
> This kind of "communication" is outside the domain of standard
> communication theory
>
> Its also far outside GER with the real existing communication at >>c . (
> Measured here in Switzerland! long
You verb it right "suggests" !!
This kind of "communication" is outside the domain of standard
communication theory
Its also far outside GER with the real existing communication at >>c . (
Measured here in Switzerland! long time ago..)
But this communication does not affect an exchange of
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 6:27 PM Jürg Wyttenbach wrote:
> Good to know some more physicists start to think about time. One of them
> cited I did know personally.
>
> The real problem is the missing education in computation theory. I did
> spend 2 net years working on the theme, which the article
Your logic is one way correct.
If you take the path length L given by c covered by one second, then
this is just one out of infinite many possible gauges.
A frequency is just the breakdown of L in units of wavelength. This is
also what today is used to define time!! - just the other way round
I like it. Makes sense to me.
On Fri, 10 Apr 2020 at 23:27, Jürg Wyttenbach wrote:
> Good to know some more physicists start to think about time. One of them
> cited I did know personally.
>
> The real problem is the missing education in computation theory. I did
> spend 2 net years working
In reply to Jürg Wyttenbach's message of Sat, 11 Apr 2020 00:26:55 +0200:
Hi Jürg,
[snip]
>Time is just the measurement interval or the
>frequency what ever you like more.
How can you speak of interval or frequency without time? Once time itself
exists, you can have an interval of time. You
Good to know some more physicists start to think about time. One of them
cited I did know personally.
The real problem is the missing education in computation theory. I did
spend 2 net years working on the theme, which the article tries to
illuminate. I developed a new computer architecture
I cant believe that they are willing to do this at $2 a mask. Just like the
girls who grew long hair for gun sites in WW2 todays women want to help but
dont know how.
-Original Message-
From: Frank Znidarsic
To: vortex-l
Sent: Wed, Mar 25, 2020 12:46 pm
Subject: Masks
I have
here is the review. In this field any news is good news.
http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/temp/063_FT389.pdf
-Original Message-
From: Frank Znidarsic
To: vortex-l
Sent: Sat, Mar 7, 2020 11:32 am
Subject: some good news
Your book on Energy, Cold Fusion and Antigravity had a short
Here is what happened last year. A coal truck hit a large power pole. The
high voltage line fell onto the low voltage system. 200 meters blew off of
many houses. The houses had to be reinspected before the power was returned.
http://www.angelfire.com/scifi2/zpt/temp/meter.jpg
That the
I put the heater on the wall in the basement near the stair well. It stinks
while heating.
-Original Message-
From: Frank Znidarsic
To: vortex-l
Sent: Wed, Mar 4, 2020 12:22 pm
Subject: Re: A good model makes accurate predictions
Thanks Robin
It burns natural gas. I have never
Thanks Robin
It burns natural gas. I have never lost gas. The gas company has there own
back up power for delivery. I was worried about CO with a ventless heater.
The newer models have low oxygen sensors to prevent CO emissions.
I bought the Dinaglow becuse it can be scaled back. That way
In reply to Frank Znidarsic's message of Sun, 1 Mar 2020 17:25:15 + (UTC):
Hi Frank,
[snip]
>I put in a ventless heater that does not require electric power.
What does it burn?
Regards,
Robin van Spaandonk
local asymmetry = temporary success
Thanks for that again Robin van Spaandonk. Unfortunately nothing ever came out
of it.
I am getting ready. I put in all LED light bulbs. I have a self designed TV
antenna that picks up 28 channels in the valley. I am tapping in to a higher
spring to supply back up and flush water. Maybe
In reply to Terry Blanton's message of Sun, 9 Feb 2020 11:59:17 -0500:
Hi,
The COP however still leaves a little to be desired. I don't think they can use
this for electricity generation just
yet. As an efficient heat source, yes.
>On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 11:54 AM Terry Blanton wrote:
>>
>>
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 11:54 AM Terry Blanton wrote:
>
> ...one more time!
>
>
https://revolution-green.com/blp-4-24x-gain-yielding-295-71-kw-net-excess-power-validated-unc-phd-randy-booker/
The poorly focused images remind me of UFO piccys!
I know that I have been off topic a bit. But rest assured I am working on
things. Nothing happed as of yet, that's why I don't say anything about this
effort.
Two years ago I played a Christmas song on my piano for you. Last year a
played a Christmas song on my 100 year old restored Radiola
bobcook39...@hotmail.com wrote:
> The essay you provide highlights the effect of the “hard wired” instinct
> to be part of the HERD of people making up a society of economically driven
> humans and a FEELING it is good to be the most aggressive pecker in the
> flock, the top dog, the biggest
1 - 100 of 6957 matches
Mail list logo
