If you had bothered to read he references provided you would know
your statement is nonsense.
There is another type of battery that does not appear in the table
above, since it is limited in the relative amount of current it can
deliver. However, it has even higher energy storage per
At 10:39 PM 12/26/2011, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote:
As I read Dr Bushnell, he is saying 5 things: 1) Excess heat is real
and has been replicated in 100s of labs around the world.
Yes. It has. By a couple of years ago, there were 153 reports of
excess heat in peer-reviewed journals, there is a
From Abd:
...
I'll comment on it: he [Bushnell] went on to say, but it isn't
fusion.
That's apparently because he's swallowed, lock, stock, and sinker,
Widom-Larsen theory, and isolated, idiosyncratic attempt to explain
LENR by coming up with even more preposterous hypotheses,
On Dec 26, 2011, at 6:32 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Put it this way, if this isn't a nuclear reaction, it is some kind
of super-battery, probably worth billions just for that.
Unfortunately for this battery idea, ... helium.
A Lithium Thionyl Chloride battery works out OK. See post
Horace, lithium batteries will explode in a high temperatures of ecat,
especially if batterypack is thermally isolated. Only chemically plausible
idea is to hide a bucketful of thermite or some other oxygen containing
mixture of chemical compounds and an apparatus for controlled or catalyzed
... not to mention a few hints (re: supra-chemistry) coming direct from
National Labs ... years before nano-thermite made an impact, so to speak.
http://www.osti.gov/bridge/servlets/purl/437696-qcD7AM/webviewable/437696.pd
f
-Original Message-
From: mix...@bigpond.com
Put it this
At 11:39 PM 12/26/2011, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Mon, 26 Dec 2011 22:32:07 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Put it this way, if this isn't a nuclear reaction, it is some kind of
super-battery, probably worth billions just for that. Unfortunately
for this battery
Am 27.12.2011 00:19, schrieb Aussie Guy E-Cat:
What no comment on this:
My change of mind was a direct result of talking with Dr. Dennis
Bushnell, the Chief Scientist for NASA Langley who has assured me that
over 100 experiments worldwide indicate that LENR is real, capable of
producing
At 01:43 AM 12/27/2011, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
I'll comment on it: he went on to say, but it isn't fusion.
That's apparently because he's swallowed, lock, stock, and sinker,
Widom-Larsen theory, and isolated, idiosyncratic attempt to explain
LENR by
Do we really know Obdenaker actually wrote the email attributed to him?
Has anyone checked with NASA's PR office or anyone else there? I think it
was just from a post by an anonymous poster in a fan/enthusiast web site
run by a guy only known as Ben.
On Dec 27, 2011, at 8:31 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 01:43 AM 12/27/2011, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
I'll comment on it: he went on to say, but it isn't fusion.
That's apparently because he's swallowed, lock, stock, and sinker,
Widom-Larsen theory,
Abd,
If you reject W-L theory, what would you regard as the most reasonable
explanation for all of the transmutations reported? Is there a
particular paper that you could recommend. I'm too overwhelmed by the
complexity
of solid state reactions to take any side in the controversy.
Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Do we really know Obdenaker actually wrote the email attributed to him?
I expect he would complain if he did not write it. In the modern wired
world, he would soon find out someone is circulating a forged memo
attributed to him.
- Jed
At 01:01 PM 12/27/2011, Horace Heffner wrote:
On Dec 27, 2011, at 8:31 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Transmutations are not observed with any clean correlation with
excess heat. Some experiments produce more, some less. Levels of
transmuted products other than helium are produced at far
In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Tue, 27 Dec 2011 12:03:10 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
At 11:39 PM 12/26/2011, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Mon, 26 Dec 2011 22:32:07 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Put it this way, if this isn't a nuclear reaction, it is some kind
On Dec 27, 2011, at 5:40 PM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 01:01 PM 12/27/2011, Horace Heffner wrote:
On Dec 27, 2011, at 8:31 AM, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
Transmutations are not observed with any clean correlation with
excess heat. Some experiments produce more, some less. Levels of
I forgot to mention Table 2 of:
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/MileyGHreviewoftr.pdf
Note that the results are reported in percent of isotopic abundance.
In terms of atoms this is *huge*. It is *huge* compared to helium
results.
If you find related reactions in my tables (all
http://ecatnews.com/?p=1717
Better link:
http://e-catsite.com/2011/12/26/more-helpful-e-mails-from-the-doe/
AG
On 12/27/2011 9:19 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote:
http://ecatnews.com/?p=1717
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.comwrote:
Better link:
http://e-catsite.com/2011/12/26/more-helpful-e-mails-from-the-doe/
An email to Mr. X? Hah! Now we know who Rossi's anonymous buyer is. It's
none other than Mr. X!!
What no comment on this:
My change of mind was a direct result of talking with Dr. Dennis
Bushnell, the Chief Scientist for NASA Langley who has assured me that
over 100 experiments worldwide indicate that LENR is real, capable of
producing energy much greater that chemical reactions, with
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.comwrote:
What no comment on this:
My change of mind was a direct result of talking with Dr. Dennis
Bushnell, the Chief Scientist for NASA Langley who has assured me that over
100 experiments worldwide indicate that LENR
Why not call Mr. Opdenaker to confirm? His phone number and email are
listed. I find it amazing how easily you put down Dr. Bushnell, casting
aside his statement as if it has no value? MY if you were really after
the truth, you could have seen a working FPE device by now.
AG
On 12/27/2011
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.comwrote:
Why not call Mr. Opdenaker to confirm? His phone number and email are
listed.
I don't want to pester him by telephone but I am thinking of sending an
email. I'd rather someone from the press do it -- perhaps
And here I thought I was the only person to get those. Damn I'm not so
special alter all. Oh well time to play with my FPE cell. Did I tell you
I have learned how to make it levitate and act like a room temperature
superconducting ring magnet? Amazing technology. Now if I can just get
the
to have more people that are willing to go the extra mile.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Aussie Guy E-Cat aussieguy.e...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, Dec 26, 2011 6:55 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:US DOE alters it's stance on LENR and Rossi?
And here I thought I
At 06:19 PM 12/26/2011, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote:
What no comment on this:
My change of mind was a direct result of talking with Dr. Dennis
Bushnell, the Chief Scientist for NASA Langley who has assured me
that over 100 experiments worldwide indicate that LENR is real,
capable of producing
At 06:27 PM 12/26/2011, Mary Yugo wrote:
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
mailto:aussieguy.e...@gmail.comaussieguy.e...@gmail.com wrote:
What no comment on this:
My change of mind was a direct result of talking with Dr. Dennis
Bushnell, the Chief Scientist for NASA Langley
As I read Dr Bushnell, he is saying 5 things: 1) Excess heat is real and
has been replicated in 100s of labs around the world. 2) The scale of
the heat generated is beyond current chemistry. 3) What is being
observed to occur is not Fusion (Hot or Cold) as it is currently
understood. 4) WL
In reply to Abd ul-Rahman Lomax's message of Mon, 26 Dec 2011 22:32:07 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Put it this way, if this isn't a nuclear reaction, it is some kind of
super-battery, probably worth billions just for that. Unfortunately
for this battery idea, ... helium.
You appear to have ignored the
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
I'll comment on it: he went on to say, but it isn't fusion.
That's apparently because he's swallowed, lock, stock, and sinker,
Widom-Larsen theory, and isolated, idiosyncratic attempt to explain
LENR by coming up with even more preposterous hypotheses, none of
31 matches
Mail list logo
