Having tried to edit something on the wiki E-CAT page and having it
immediately deleted, I ended up writing this on the Topic Talk page.
It probably won't do any good but if enough people do this (anyone can)
They say there are 1000- 7000 hits per day on the E-CAT page.
This discussion
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:31 PM, a.ashfield a.ashfi...@verizon.net wrote:
Having tried to edit something on the wiki E-CAT page and having it
immediately deleted, I ended up writing this on the Topic Talk page. It
probably won't do any good but if enough people do this (anyone can)
They
Berke Durak,
My interest was to get Wiki to correct their entry. Not clear to me how
Reddit can help that.
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:57 PM, a.ashfield a.ashfi...@verizon.net wrote:
Berke Durak,
My interest was to get Wiki to correct their entry. Not clear to me how
Reddit can help that.
The idea is that pro-LENR people could collaboratively work on a wiki
where they have editorial control, whose
On Jun 3, 2013, at 11:31 PM, a.ashfield a.ashfi...@verizon.net wrote:
In fact an independent test has been carried out.
This is not true. The test was arranged in Rossi's facilities and by Giuseppe
Levi. And problem is that we do not know what is financial relationship between
Rossi and Levi,
Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
And since there is no radiation, I do not see that it is plausible have
claimed levels of excess heat.
So, you dismiss the entire body of cold fusion research? Is that what you
are saying? Do you think that all of the other researchers are also
Jouni Valkonen wrote:
This is not true. The test was arranged in Rossi's facilities and by
Giuseppe
Levi. And problem is that we do not know what is financial relationship
between Rossi and Levi, so Levi, who has been chief scientist in all
ecat tests, cannot be considered as independent
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.comwrote:
On Jun 3, 2013, at 11:31 PM, a.ashfield a.ashfi...@verizon.net wrote:
In fact an independent test has been carried out.
This is not true. The test was arranged in Rossi's facilities and by
Giuseppe Levi. And problem
I have opened a dispute notice on Wiki. As far as I know, anyone can
join the fray (at the bottom.)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard#Energy_Catalyzer_discussion
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Berke Durak berke.du...@gmail.com wrote:
I love the mailing list format as its dependence on third-party
infrastructure is minimal and replaceable but it's a bit too easy for
opponents to flood and derail discussions.
One thing that recently occurred to me is
On Jun 4, 2013, at 5:16 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
In my opinion, people should not bring up fraud unless they have specific
and compelling evidence. I do not know what the law (e.g., US law) says
about the permissible boundaries for discussing possible fraud in a public
Your hunch amounts to overwhelming evidence? Rossi is public figure? You
think you can accuse someone of fraud and not be subject to possible suit?
As a practicing lawyer, your comments make me shudder!
Ransom
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 3, 2013, at 9:37 PM, Jouni Valkonen
12 matches
Mail list logo
