Rossi no-comments :
Andrea Rossi
October 29th, 2011 at 12:14 PM
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=516cpage=5#comment-105875
Dear Max:
The Customer is of a category that usually maintains secret all they do. I do
not know if and when they will want to make public statements and I am
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 1:35 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Rossi no-comments :
Andrea Rossi
October 29th, 2011 at 12:14 PM
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=516cpage=5#comment-105875
Dear Max:
The Customer is of a category that usually maintains secret all they do. I
Area 51?
2011/10/29 Alan Fletcher a...@well.com
Rossi no-comments :
Andrea Rossi
October 29th, 2011 at 12:14 PM
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=516cpage=5#comment-105875
Dear Max:
The Customer is of a category that usually maintains secret all they do. I
do not know if
Am 29.10.2011 19:55, schrieb Daniel Rocha:
Area 51?
Cosa Nostra?
Mafia!
;-)
2011/10/29 Alan Fletcher a...@well.com mailto:a...@well.com
Rossi no-comments :
Andrea Rossi
October 29th, 2011 at 12:14 PM
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=516cpage=5#comment-105875
Exxon
I don't think the Mafia has written non-disclosure agreements.
But when things go wrong, they are known for putting out contracts
Peter Heckert peter.heck...@arcor.de wrote:
Am 29.10.2011 19:55, schrieb Daniel Rocha:
Area 51?
Cosa Nostra?
Mafia!
;-)
2011/10/29 Alan Fletcher a...@well.com
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
The Customer is of a category that usually maintains secret all they do.
. . .
A skeptic forum member elsewhere predicted those words almost verbatim.
Not hard to predict. Rossi said that before the test. It may not be true,
but that is what he
I am of the contrarian opinion; for an American, this is the very best of
news. If the customer is a military organization (the US Navy), the
security apparatus of the associated country (the US) is now available in
all its varied and potent forms both known and clandestine to protect the
Rossi
Stirling Allan reports:
*QA just finished; reading of results; 470 kW maintained continuously
during *
*self-sustain; customer satisfied; sale made; more later.*
I definitely like this client!
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
That's ~3KW for every core... So, that's much less than the other test on
6th october, or at lest at the low end. And the client was promised 1 to 6
amplification! Wow, happened?
2011/10/28 Peter Gluck peter.gl...@gmail.com
Stirling Allan reports:
*QA just finished; reading of results; 470 kW
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
That's ~3KW for every core... So, that's much less than the other test on
6th october, or at lest at the low end. And the client was promised 1 to 6
amplification! Wow, happened?
If there was no input power, the
There certainly was input, as it always happen to achieve
a threshold temperature to begin the reaction. But, anyway, this was not the
promised test...
2011/10/28 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com
wrote:
That's ~3KW for every
Stirling Allan reported:
*QA just finished; reading of results; 470 kW maintained continuously
during . . .*
I believe Terry Blanton's prediction was the closest to this. He wins the
prize here, if these results are confirmed.
The difference between 470 kW and 1 MW is unimportant.
- Jed
I am so sorry that I don't know who is the Customer.
I want to offer him a Trabant 1963 and ask the price of a Rolls Royce 2009.
So I lose a great opportunity.
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
There certainly was input, as it always happen to achieve
a
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
And the client was promised 1 to 6 amplification! Wow, happened?
The amplification was reportedly infinite, but anyway, how do you know what
the customer was promised? Were you there during the negotiations?
There certainly was input, as it always
If Rossi's Reactor output 470,000 watts using a sustained
Nickel/Hydrogen reaction and an industrial client from the US just
bought it, the world has changed more dramatically than when the
Trinity site as alit.
Vishnu also creates worlds.
T
.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Date: 2011/10/28
Subject: Re: [Vo]:ideal client
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
And the client was promised 1 to 6 amplification! Wow, happened?
The amplification was reportedly infinite
know that from what he says that self
sustaining is not stable for long. Now, he does a test that is very within
the energy density of 1L or 2L of propane in every core.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Date: 2011/10/28
Subject: Re: [Vo]:ideal
does a test that is very within
the energy density of 1L or 2L of propane in every core.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
Date: 2011/10/28
Subject: Re: [Vo]:ideal client
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote
The first priority is to win the sale. Getting outbid while kicking
the tires would be devastating to the customer. The contract will
specify that the sale is void if Rossi is using chemical shenanigans.
The sooner the customer can start working on the technology, the
faster they can establish
Subject: Re: [Vo]:ideal client
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
And the client was promised 1 to 6 amplification! Wow, happened?
The amplification was reportedly infinite, but anyway, how do you know
what the customer was promised? Were you there during
Subject: Re: [Vo]:ideal client
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
That's ~3KW for every core... So, that's much less than the other test on
6th october, or at lest at the low end. And the client was promised 1 to 6
amplification! Wow, happened
@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, Oct 28, 2011 2:48 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:ideal client
There certainly was input, as it always happen to achieve a threshold
temperature to begin the reaction. But, anyway, this was not the promised
test...
2011/10/28 Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011
On 2011-10-28 20:26, Peter Gluck wrote:
Stirling Allan reports:
*QA just finished; reading of results; 470 kW maintained continuously
during *
*self-sustain; customer satisfied; sale made; more later.*
I definitely like this client!
Interesting comment on 22passi blog by an unidentified user
On 2011-10-28 21:52, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Interesting comment on 22passi blog by an unidentified user (who appears
to be truthful), translated in English by me. I think he mistook kW and
MW with kWh and MWh:
More interestingly, the same user is also reporting that during the
press
If they only have heated water by about 50° then he would not need any
permission. This would be 2 liters of hot water per second (estimated,
not calculated). this are 7.2 m^3 per hour. This should be possible.
However, how did they cool down the water (or condense the steam) to
recycle it?
Peter Heckert wrote:
If they only have heated water by about 50° then he would not need any
permission.
In the U.S. you are not allowed to operate a boiler as large as this
without a permit. It makes no difference whether it produces steam or
hot water. You must have a permit; the machine
Am 28.10.2011 22:59, schrieb Jed Rothwell:
Peter Heckert wrote:
If they only have heated water by about 50° then he would not need
any permission.
In the U.S. you are not allowed to operate a boiler as large as this
without a permit. It makes no difference whether it produces steam or
hot
Am 28.10.2011 23:15, schrieb Peter Heckert:
The problem is, the heat must be dissipated or stored somewhere. Even
at 470kW this cannot been done easily.
How was this done? Has nobody seen something. Where there big
ventilators running?
This must give more than 7 m^3 of hot water per hour or
On 2011-10-28 23:15, Peter Heckert wrote:
The problem is, the heat must be dissipated or stored somewhere. Even at
470kW this cannot been done easily.
How was this done? Has nobody seen something. Where there big
ventilators running?
Another 22passi user who was there mentions there were six
Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
Another 22passi user who was there mentions there were six large (1.5x1.5
meters) heat exchangers with approximately 1 meter wide cooling fans.
Ah! Finally some technical details. That sounds good. Six large heat
exchangers sounds like what
On 2011-10-28 23:56, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Ah! Finally some technical details. That sounds good. Six large heat
exchangers sounds like what you would need.
Where did you read that? URL please!
I read it in one of the latest comments of 22passi Blog user nemo here:
Am 28.10.2011 23:38, schrieb Akira Shirakawa:
On 2011-10-28 23:15, Peter Heckert wrote:
The problem is, the heat must be dissipated or stored somewhere. Even at
470kW this cannot been done easily.
How was this done? Has nobody seen something. Where there big
ventilators running?
Another
33 matches
Mail list logo
