I wrote:
What is interesting for this particular model (photon transmission through
1cm of nickel) is that reaction channels (0)-(3), which are the deuteron
capture reactions, are either not detected or barely detected (keep in mind
there was a layer of lead shielding the E-Cat at one point).
Why are the ash products all different between systems? What could explain
these differences? DGT has no copper but lots of boron, beryllium, and
lithium. Rossi has iron and copper, Piantelli has a mix. Mizuno has helium
and copper.
It is safe to say that no two LENR systems have the same ash
that happen depend upon their final lower energy
states in any given coherent LENReaction. That is IMHO.
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2014 1:24 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:transmitted radiation for potential reactions in an NiH
In the past, following the many statements compiled by Gary Wright of Rossi
saying that they were seeing significant amounts of copper, I have argued
in favor of a proton capture reaction in the NiH system. I argued this not
out of a strong conviction that this was the case, but out of a desire
I've had a chance to revisit the earlier model of photon transmission from
the E-Cat through various media and incorporate some new features. Now
decay half-lives and detector efficiency are factored in. Here is what I'm
seeing for 1cm of nickel:
Photons from a total of 7e+14 transitions per
radiation for potential reactions in an NiH system
I was curious what the numbers would look like for a range of possible
reactions in an NiH system if the only two assumptions that were made were that
nuclear reactions are the main show in NiH LENR and that somehow there is a way
to overcome
Hi Eric,
Nice spreadsheet. I like how it captures a lot of considerations in one
place.
Have you considered adding the reactions that would include a delta in
atomic number of 2N? Seems like there were trends in experiment reports
showing transmutations by integer multiples of 2 in atomic
Hi Bob,
Good comments. Replies inline.
Just to mention it again, the model is no more than a back-of-the-envelope
estimate. I'm guessing a rigorous treatment would do a lot of things
differently.
Eric
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 2:23 AM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
The first
I was curious what the numbers would look like for a range of possible
reactions in an NiH system if the only two assumptions that were made were
that nuclear reactions are the main show in NiH LENR and that somehow there
is a way to overcome Coulomb repulsion. Although I suspect this is not the
9 matches
Mail list logo
