Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com wrote:
In Rossi's case, he hasn't delivered a product that could be evaluated for
patent violation yet. So, Piantelli would not be able to build a case
against Rossi until he releases a publicly available product that could be
tested for violation.
By
Forget about patents.
They are as obsolete as the pony-express.
I have been involved on both sides. The winner is always the one with
better financial support. In a few cases persistence has paid off.
As an example a company has requested a patent for push button making two
separate events start
When I worked for a large corporation, I spent a lot of time with their
internal patent system. A core criteria for deciding which invention
disclosures to pursue as a patent had to do with the detect-ability of an
infringement. Basically, if you couldn't detect that a competitor was
using your
Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com wrote:
Forget about patents.
They are as obsolete as the pony-express.
I do not see how cold fusion can succeed without patent protection.
- Jed
I guess a patent in Italy would be a little better than nothing. Although
with something as big as cold fusion I doubt it would be enforceable.
- Jed
? ( Thinking about it, I guess a court could
subpoena anything it wants. ).
Hoyt Stearns
Scottsdale, Arizona US
From: Lennart Thornros [mailto:lenn...@thornros.com]
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2015 10:28 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:OT: Patent question
Forget about patents
From: Jed Rothwell
The Italian Patent Office granted a patent for the E-Cat in 2011, valid until
2028 but only in Italy.
Ø Of what POSSIBLE use is a patent valid only in Italy?!?
Ø It sounds like a patent valid on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays in months
with R in them.
Well –
Hoyt - Has a LENR patent actually been granted to him in the USA? Piantelli
has a recent PATENT APPLICATION and many older ones, but not a granted LENR
patent in the USA, as far as I know.
http://www.google.com/patents/US20140098917
He will not likely ever get one either, given the stance
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
The Italian Patent Office granted a patent for the E-Cat in 2011, valid
until 2028 but only in Italy.
Of what POSSIBLE use is a patent valid only in Italy?!?
It sounds like a patent valid on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays in months
with R in them.
-
Jed, you think I do not see how cold fusion can succeed without patent
protection.
I might not fully understand the theoretical discussions. However, it
sounds to me that there are many ways LENT might work.
To participate in a lawsuit about who has what patented will just resources
away from
I wrote:
Someone who knows a great deal about patents and the U.S. military told me
the USPO would not allow that. You cannot use a patent to suppress a
technology or prevent it from reaching the market. There are regulations
forbidding that.
Not just regulations; it would be a clear
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
wrote:
When I worked for a large corporation, I spent a lot of time with their
internal patent system. A core criteria for deciding which invention
disclosures to pursue as a patent had to do with the detect-ability of an
Terry and Bob I agree.
That is reality and you need capital and soup is ready.
Your reasoning is perfect for deep pockets, which is what you say.
It is not a protection for a sol inventor.
Best Regards ,
Lennart Thornros
www.StrategicLeadershipSac.com
lenn...@thornros.com
+1 916 436 1899
202
Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com wrote:
To me the real catastrophe as I see it is if there is a patent and a
strong financial arm holding off the development and implementation of a
new energy source.
Someone who knows a great deal about patents and the U.S. military told me
the USPO
14 matches
Mail list logo
