Sorry, you may be correct. However, I downloaded the paper and found this:
In the central region of this slab, part of
the electron population was initialized as a beamlike bunch
with an average energy of 1 MeV at an intensity of 5
1018 W=cm2. All other electrons were thermal electrons
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Tue, 2 Apr 2013 01:59:38 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Sorry, you may be correct. However, I downloaded the paper and found this:
In the central region of this slab, part of
the electron population was initialized as a beamlike bunch
with an average energy of 1 MeV at
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Tue, 2 Apr 2013 01:14:51 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
I disagree. The words was corroborated by the rear-side hot electron
spectra. would not be used to determine the power of a laser beam.
They don't need to determine the power of the laser beam. They already know how
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Thu, 28 Mar 2013 17:38:11 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Can I change my mind?
Tin Sn126 looks good. It has a 0 nuclear spin like the isotopes of nickel
that work for LENR.
It also has 76 neutrons. That means we have 26 neutrons over the neutron
magic number.
And the
Sn126 is in the middle of the mass range for fission products. Thermal
reactors, which make up almost all current nuclear power plants, produce it
at a very low yield (0.056% for U235), since slow neutrons almost always
fission U235 or Pu239 into unequal halves. Fast fission in a fast reactor,
or
WL now includes a reference to spasers in the following on page 26:
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 1 Apr 2013 19:06:00 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
WL now includes a reference to spasers in the following on page 26:
I disagree. The words “was corroborated by the rear-side hot electron
spectra.” would not be used to determine the power of a laser beam.
I believe you misread the sentence.
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 9:28 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Mon, 1 Apr 2013
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 22:21:44 -0400
From: janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: [Vo]:thoughts on LENR energy
In LENR, the delicate balance within the nucleus between nuclear attraction and
the electrical repulsion between protons is disturbed in the opposite
fashion.In the
Physics has seven magic numbers. An atom with a magic number of protons or
neutrons is super stable.
When both the protons and neutrons are magic, that's a double magic atom.
There are only seven of them.
The seven magic numbers are 2, 8, 20, 28, 50, 82, and 126. They are the
number of nucleons
can you use your insight to tell what fuels would work best, instead of what
products are produced.You have to get the reaction working before you can start
looking for products. d2
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:11:03 -0400
Subject: Re: [Vo]:thoughts on LENR energy
From: janap...@gmail.com
Axil,
How can you say that Nickel-48 is stable?
Arnaud
_
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: jeudi 28 mars 2013 20:11
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:thoughts on LENR energy
Physics has seven magic numbers. An atom with a magic number of protons
to get the reaction working before you can start looking for
products.
d2
--
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:11:03 -0400
Subject: Re: [Vo]:thoughts on LENR energy
From: janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Physics has seven magic numbers. An atom with a magic
...@lakoco.bewrote:
**
Axil,
How can you say that Nickel-48 is stable?
Arnaud
--
*From:* Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* jeudi 28 mars 2013 20:11
*To:* **vortex-l@eskimo.com**
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:thoughts on LENR energy
, Arnaud Kodeck arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be wrote:
Axil,
How can you say that Nickel-48 is stable?
Arnaud
_
From: Axil Axil [mailto:janap...@gmail.com]
Sent: jeudi 28 mars 2013 20:11
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:thoughts on LENR energy
Physics has seven magic numbers
--
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 15:11:03 -0400
Subject: Re: [Vo]:thoughts on LENR energy
From: janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Physics has seven magic numbers. An atom with a magic number of protons or
neutrons is super stable.
When both the protons and neutrons are magic, that's
Replace
In explanation, the binding energy of the nucleus is when there are pairs
of protons and neutrons.
with
In explanation, the binding energy of the nucleus is *greater* when there
are pairs of protons and neutrons.
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
17 matches
Mail list logo
