Thomas malloy wrote ( about junkscience.com):-
Steve is offering $100,000 to
anyone who can prove that anthropogenic global warming is real, and that
it's deleterious consequences outweigh the benefits. Since it's
impossible to prove either one, the prize is of no consequence.
What just about
Nick Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What just about everybody seems to miss on both sides
of the argument, both global warming deniers and climate
change scientists alike ...
Hi All,
Whatever the merits of the above arguments, the
real problem is national security. Do you want your
Covered on a number of sites and the national news;
http://www.technologyreview.com/Infotech/19142/?a=f
A flashlight that appears to work through the visual cortex and causes a
disruption in the brain. Not to surprising when I look back many years when
experiments were done using LF created by
The damage appears to be less than initially expected. See:
http://www.iaea.org/NewsCenter/PressReleases/2007/prn200716.html
- Jed
Nick Palmer wrote:
[If] . . . the analysis of the situation suggests that there is a
possibility of disrupting a stable climate with enormous long term
consequences for humans and all the other life on Earth, then that
chance MUST NOT be taken. It is up to the deniers to PROVE that
there is
On 15/8/2007 10:14 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Cold fusion might lead to very cheap, easily made weapons of mass
destruction. I think this danger is real, and at present it is
impossible to prove there is no danger, but I do not think it would
be wise to ban research on cold fusion because of
If humans are causing the current apparent warming trend, maybe we've done
it before? Fossils, cores, and other evidence (legends, ancient records well
known to some Vortexians) shows that the earth has warmed and cooled
substantially and perhaps rather suddenly quite a few times over the last
few
Harry Veeder wrote:
Cold fusion might lead to very cheap, easily made weapons of mass
destruction. I think this danger is real, and at present it is
impossible to prove there is no danger, but I do not think it would
be wise to ban research on cold fusion because of this.
What would
Moray King spoke on O U electrolyzers and how they may be cohering the ZPE at the Tesla conference. I called him yesterday and he said that he would be posting this. Sterling Allen just sent me the URL.
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Water_Disassociation_Using_Zero_Point_Energy
---
While it's certainly not proof, for many years after nuke came on the scene
at the end of the 19th century, even top scientists were certain that we
would never be able to extract usable energy from it. How times have
changed. I guess the danger is in the pattern.
- Rick
-Original
Terry Blanton wrote:
On 8/13/07, Horace Heffner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 13, 2007, at 3:51 PM, Terry Blanton wrote:
Interesting exchanges.
If a pair of wires are 3 x 10^10 cm long; and, a potential is applied
to the ends of the wires with a load resistor on the other end, I
I completely forgot about this question. I'm getting buried in
private email and mundane chores. Check out:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Velocity_of_propagation
Horace Heffner
On Aug 15, 2007, at 12:00 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence wrote:
Terry Blanton wrote:
On 8/13/07, Horace Heffner
Thanks to Stephen and Horace for explanations. There is, of course,
another: epo polarization . . . aether waves.
Dr. (?) Bearden likes to harp on that one.
I only bring it up because of another thread regarding potential
differential. In a luminiferous aether, an absolute potential can
On 15/8/2007 1:34 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Harry Veeder wrote:
Cold fusion might lead to very cheap, easily made weapons of mass
destruction. I think this danger is real, and at present it is
impossible to prove there is no danger, but I do not think it would
be wise to ban research on cold
Last week there was a bank run in Second Life...
http://www.technologyreview.com/Biztech/19242/
We're not talking the 10 k charity event either
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_run
Harry Veeder wrote:
How about the appearance of uranium and plutonium.
Yup. That too.
- Jed
This is quite interesting. I wonder what's the detailed mechanism by which the
free electron density wave described by Stephen propagates at the speed of
light *outside* the wire (in the surrounding dielectric), in spite of the
electrons moving *inside* the wire and coulombically repelling each
On 15/8/2007 6:50 AM, Nick Palmer wrote:
Thomas malloy wrote ( about junkscience.com):-
Steve is offering $100,000 to
anyone who can prove that anthropogenic global warming is real, and that
it's deleterious consequences outweigh the benefits. Since it's
impossible to prove either one,
I have always found it interesting that electricity propagates by the
skin effect. I have never found a good intuitive explanation for
this before I met Frank Grimer. Once you are able to get over the
cognitive dissonance of what he is saying, it all makes perfect sense.
Is it worth the effort?
Horace Heffner wrote:
On Aug 14, 2007, at 11:05 AM, OrionWorks wrote:
There is a chance some change may occur:
http://www.hillaryclinton.com/issues/energy/
Did you look through Moray King's presentation? I'm referring to the MIB
harassment. I've always believed that the only way to have
isnt it interesting that he sheds not even one sentence for Walter Russell
and his method of producing hydrogen out of watervapour?
also that there seems to be no networking between Moray King and his Under
certain conditions self-organization may occur. Ilya Prigogine lot and
Self Organizing
21 matches
Mail list logo
