[Vo]:AlumiFuel Power Inc.

2010-03-11 Thread OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson
Vorts, I got spammed this morning with an eMail from a startup company called AlumiFuel Power Inc. Don't know how I got on their preferred customer list. http://www.alumifuelpowerinc.com/ They claim to deliver five times the energy density (runtime) of lithium batteries. I'll be curious to

[Vo]:Focardi and Rossi paper

2010-03-11 Thread Jed Rothwell
Several people have called this to my attention in the last week: http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/files/Rossi-Focardi_paper.pdfhttp://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/files/Rossi-Focardi_paper.pdf Jones Beene pointed out the patent for this here:

Re: [Vo]:Focardi and Rossi paper

2010-03-11 Thread Jed Rothwell
I got that exactly backwards! I meant: Output ENERGY is 1006.5 kWh, which is average POWER of 3.0 kW. For crying out loud. I wrote: I have had some doubts about previous reports from Focardi, because they have not been independently replicated as far as I know. This paper says these

RE: [Vo]:Focardi and Rossi paper

2010-03-11 Thread Jones Beene
There are a number of reasons to be extremely skeptical of this but I have not followed the CMNS discussion, so there could be more to it than meets the eye. The patent is among the poorest written and drafted that I have ever seen. It is essentially worthless in the USA but as for Europe, who

RE: [Vo]:Focardi and Rossi paper

2010-03-11 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jones Beene wrote: There are a number of reasons to be extremely skeptical of this but I have not followed the CMNS discussion, so there could be more to it than meets the eye. I have not followed CMNS either. But what I meant was that despite the fact that the patent is poorly written and

RE: [Vo]:Focardi and Rossi paper

2010-03-11 Thread Jones Beene
-Original Message- From: Jed Rothwell [ Quoting the immortal Fats Waller: One never knows, do one? ... as long as they Ain't Misbehavin'

[Vo]:OT (sort of): Unique Patent for trolling

2010-03-11 Thread OrionWorks - Steven V Johnson
Patent Acquisition and Assertion by a (Non-Inventor) First Party Against a Second Party See: http://ow.ly/1ghNr Actually, I got the above link from another interesting article: Good Artists Copy, Great Artists Steal, which describes how corporate entities both regularly and repeatedly sue each

RE: [Vo]:Focardi and Rossi paper

2010-03-11 Thread Jones Beene
Apparently there is an online blog to which Andrea Rossi, or someone from Leonardo Technologies, or else it is from a PR firm, responds: http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=58 BTW - I have been told that 'Andrea' is a name for both male and female in Italy so it is not clear the gender

[Vo]:FRACTAL-Geometry/TCW-Tachyon(speed)CarrierWave/TESLA-Tulku-Team

2010-03-11 Thread Jack Harbach-O'Sullivan
subtitle: The Nantucket Sleigh Ride-2010' aka 'Harpooning the Great ZEN-Whale:-) aside: Methinks that Carl Jung may have more to do with Fractal Geometry Encoded Data-enscription than he might have thought were possible(if he had ever known of 'computer-software data-code enscription').

Re: [Vo]:Focardi and Rossi paper

2010-03-11 Thread Jed Rothwell
I wrote: However, it is difficult to imagine that such large ratios could be an error in calorimetry. Let me amend that. It is impossible to imagine that such large ratios and such high absolute power can be an error. As Chris Tinsley said regarding the Fleischmann Pons boil-off results,

RE: [Vo]:Focardi and Rossi paper

2010-03-11 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jones Beene quoted Daniele Princiotto: We are making a very hard work in Leonardo Corporation about this issue. We are manufacturing a 1 MW reactor in the USA . . . I do not conclude that these people are crackpot inventors, BUT . . . it is typical of such people that they try to make a 1 MW

RE: [Vo]:Focardi and Rossi paper

2010-03-11 Thread Jones Beene
FWIW: One more comment on Leonardo Technologies, Inc. and the past history of Dr Andrea Rossi. This is important only in that it may affect the credibility of the fusion report. Obviously, if the fusion RD were true in the apparent COP, it would be an earth-shaking discovery. It is far better

Re: [Vo]:AlumiFuel Power Inc.

2010-03-11 Thread Horace Heffner
On Mar 11, 2010, at 4:54 AM, OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson wrote: Vorts, I got spammed this morning with an eMail from a startup company called AlumiFuel Power Inc. Don't know how I got on their preferred customer list. http://www.alumifuelpowerinc.com/ They claim to deliver five

Re: [Vo]:Focardi and Rossi paper

2010-03-11 Thread Horace Heffner
On Mar 11, 2010, at 6:19 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote: Several people have called this to my attention in the last week: http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/files/Rossi- Focardi_paper.pdf Jones Beene pointed out the patent for this here: http://www.wipo.int/pctdb/en/wo.jsp?

Re: [Vo]:Focardi and Rossi paper

2010-03-11 Thread Terry Blanton
One breakthrough like this will alter the world economy and render so many fears moot. G-d bless them all. T

Re: [Vo]: Reply to Rich Murray on the Electric Field error, and Earthtech results: Abd uh-Rahman Lomax: Rich Murray 2010.03.11

2010-03-11 Thread Rich Murray
Re: [Vo]: Reply to Rich Murray on the Electric Field error, and Earthtech results: Abd uh-Rahman Lomax: Rich Murray 2010.03.11 http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2010_03_01_archive.htm Thursday, March 11, 2010 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/astrodeep/message/44