Hi all
More Scientists putting their head above the parapet. A paper positively
reviewing the work of Prof. Arata, by Florentin Smarandache and Vic
Christianto has appeared on vixra under the mathematics section:
Unleashing the Quark Within: Lenr, Klein-Gordon Equation, and Elementary
Well, I wouldn't call Smarandache a very mainstream scientist...
perhaps I'd say he is less mainstream than CF researchers...
2014-04-18 5:15 GMT-03:00 Ian Glen Walker walker...@gmail.com:
Hi all
More Scientists putting their head above the parapet. A paper positively
reviewing the work of
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 3:15 AM, Ian Glen Walker walker...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi all
More Scientists putting their head above the parapet. A paper positively
reviewing the work of Prof. Arata, by Florentin Smarandache and Vic
Christianto has appeared on vixra under the mathematics section:
Hi all,
Being without understanding of QM and not sharp enough to see the
theoretical explanations I think this is positive enough. I would focus on
the following:
You may try to think of any possibilities of constructing fundamental
scalar fields
(complex fields, of course) in some way or the
Here is a good writeup of the Cravens experiment/demo at NI week - which may
go down as one of the most underappreciated experiments of the past decade
in Physics - due to its simplicity, far-reaching implications and lack of a
credible alternative explanation. If only it had been replicated by
The Cravens experiment shows two important optimizations applied to LENR:
direct application of magnetism and sizing particles based on dipole based
black body temperature resonance.
A powdered magnet is used to provide magnetic stimulation of LENR reactions
on the surface of carbon micro
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/views/Group1/Letts.shtml
Mr. Letts is experimenting with Nanoplasmonics and getting a COP of up to
30 with it.
He is shining a low powered laser onto the cracked surface of palladium
which has been roughened through deuterium loading.
Here too, the level of
Dennis Cravens mentioned here on vortex that he has had success in LENR
when he adds rare earth metals to his experiments.
The method by which this addition of rare earths might succeed in LENR is
that rare earths have an electron orbital structure like iron where the 4F
electron obit is the
That is fun to read! Good experiment. Good write up.
- Jed
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LettsDstimulatio.pdf
*Laser Polarization Angle*
“In 2003 Letts and Cravens reported that single laser beam polarization
seemed to be an important factor in stimulating deuterated palladium
cathodes [9]. When the laser beam polarization was at a 90 degree angle
From: Jed Rothwell
That is fun to read! Good experiment. Good write up.
Yes it is a fabulous, simple experiment that is ripe for both replication
and improvement.
And it is somewhat poignant for those who have followed the field for a
while, to mention Les Case
That was a 2003 interview.
If as reliable as he claimed it should be in just about every science fair
in the world by now.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/views/Group1/Letts.shtml
Mr. Letts is experimenting with
A recent news item:
http://time.com/66459/portland-reservoir-pee/
Portland Dumps 38 Million Gallons of Water After Man Pees in Reservoir
April 17, 2014
The city plans to dump 38 million gallons of water after authorities say a
19-year-old urinated in a large, uncovered reservoir during an
Was it in what part of the process cleaning of the reservoir? In my
city's it seems the last stage is covered.
2014-04-18 19:33 GMT-03:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
A recent news item:
http://time.com/66459/portland-reservoir-pee/
Portland Dumps 38 Million Gallons of Water After Man
It seem like no one is interested. Everyone has their own priorities and
it usually revolves around making money.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 6:12 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
That was a 2003 interview.
If as reliable as he claimed it should be in just about every science fair
in
Axil, this is a good path.
2014-04-18 20:48 GMT-03:00 Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com:
It seem like no one is interested. Everyone has their own priorities and it
usually revolves around making money.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 6:12 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
That was a 2003
I mean, your 1st post
2014-04-18 20:50 GMT-03:00 Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com:
Axil, this is a good path.
2014-04-18 20:48 GMT-03:00 Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com:
It seem like no one is interested. Everyone has their own priorities and it
usually revolves around making money.
On
The item below is an idem of interest in the IE article regarding magnetism.
an empirical model by Dennis Letts was used...“A Method to Calculate
Excess Power”... predicts that the heat production is linearly proportional
to the mass of the hydrogen-containing material and the magnetic field
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
Was it in what part of the process cleaning of the reservoir?
I do not think so. If they were scheduled to clean the reservoir soon, I
guess it would be okay.
They do have to dump out the water and dredge reservoirs from time to time.
- Jed
What is Mr. Letts' explanation for the lack of replication of his results?
Seriously, the protocol that is reliably reproducible has been the Holy
Grain of cold fusion research from day one. I find it stretches credulity
to the breaking point that after this statement in 2003:
*Has anyone
Jones--
What happened to Case? Does anyone know?
Sending the samples to Oak Ridge was questionable.
My first question is whether they spiked the sample before testing. I
would think the He may leak out of a porous sample pretty quickly. The
Mizuno test seemed to have a more reliable
So, it was in the part that is just a reservoir, that is before
processing and distribuition? Heh? That kind of concern is so odd.
2014-04-18 21:12 GMT-03:00 Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com:
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
Was it in what part of the process cleaning of the
Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Jones--
What happened to Case? Does anyone know?
He died of old age. Do you mean what happened to his experiment? McKubre
replicated with Case's help. Ed Storms tried to replicate but he saw no
excess heat. I do not know of anyone else who tried.
-
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
… and given the recent Mizuno results – where a former
proponent of helium is now (effectively) recanting - we may be seeing a
major change in outlook.
I did not read that into Mizuno's recent slides. I doubt he is
-Original Message-
From: Bob Cook
What happened to Case?
NEWFIELDS N.H. - Leslie C. Case, 79, died Thursday, July 15, 2010, at his home
in Newfields. He was born Sept. 11, 1930, in Tulsa, Ok, Mr. Case received his
doctorate of science degree from the Massachusetts Institute of
Axil--
Which IE article regarding magnetism are you referring to?
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Axil Axil
To: vortex-l
Sent: Friday, April 18, 2014 5:00 PM
Subject: Re: [Vo]:RE: Co-Netic AA and the Dirac sea
The item below is an idem of interest in the IE article
Jed
I assume you are talking about the Craven/Gimpel experiment at the Cold Fusion
at National Instruments Week event in August 2013?
I read it last Fall and was impressed. Those two seem to want to get the
information out and provide their theory in an understandable manner.
Their
Daniel Rocha danieldi...@gmail.com wrote:
So, it was in the part that is just a reservoir, that is before
processing and distribuition? Heh?
Yes. A large outdoor pond.
That kind of concern is so odd.
It is symptomatic of modern ignorance. People nowadays in the U.S. seem to
know nothing
The referenced article at the top of this thread as follows:
http://www.infinite-energy.com/images/pdfs/NIWeekCravens.pdf
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Axil--
Which IE article regarding magnetism are you referring to?
Bob
- Original
People will not attempt to understand LENR until it is heating the water
for their baths.
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 8:13 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
What is Mr. Letts' explanation for the lack of replication of his results?
Seriously, the protocol that is reliably reproducible
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 10:02 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
It is symptomatic of modern ignorance. People nowadays in the U.S. seem to
know nothing about nature, or bacteria, or the concept of risk factor, or
(in this case) the proportional difference between a ~50 ml of urine
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
The bulk of the material inside the active sphere is activated charcoal
(carbon). The charcoal has a mesh of between 1350 and 2000 (micro mesh
screening of 6 to 10 microns)…. That was selected to match the 8.2 micron
peak
32 matches
Mail list logo
