Thanks Jed!
This was indeed an automated spamfilter change causing the problem.
I'll keep an eye on the spambox more often now.
Good you sent me a response to my private mail address too, otherwise it
would have taken me longer to find out.
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Jed Rothwell
Just when it looked like things were becoming clearer in LENR theory, they
seem to have become more complicated. Ockham fails again – no surprise
really, since “parsimony” always fails miserably when QM enters the picture.
SPP was the “catch-phrase” of the day for understanding LENR, due to the
Just to add 2 more cents to the thread:
- The high relative permeability of mu-metal only exists for low
frequencies. By the time you get to 1MHz, the permeability of mu-metal has
fallen an order of magnitude and it keeps declining at that rate. Don't
think that mu-metal has extraordinary
Dear Jones,
thank you for this very interesting paper. Howeve, can you please
explain/justify this assertion: it looked like things were becoming
clearer in LENR theory I think exactly the contrary is true, cold fusion
needs more theories combined, not one.
Peter
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 6:00
From: Bob Higgins
- The high relative permeability of mu-metal only exists for low frequencies.
By the time you get to 1MHz, the permeability of mu-metal has fallen an order
of magnitude and it keeps declining at that rate. Don't think that mu-metal
has extraordinary magnetic properties
From: Peter Gluck
…thank you for this very interesting paper. However, can you please
explain/justify this assertion: it looked like things were becoming clearer in
LENR theory I think exactly the contrary is true, cold fusion needs more
theories combined, not one.
Peter
Well yes, an
Much of the science that underlies the Ni/H reactor is just at the
publication stage. For example, I was just reading this newly released
paper:
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1404/1404.3764.pdf
*Magneto-photonic phenomena at terahertz frequencies*
This paper has some tidbits of
Jones Beene wrote:
| Here is a mainstream paper that touches on the SP
| phenomenon but does not mention LENR.
|
http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/jap/112/10/10.1063/1.4765028
[...]
| When photon upconversion was first discovered by François Auzel, he
Some of the ol' time Vorts will remember how I've been ranting for years
on how the vacuum is a near fricionless fluid under extreme pressure...
well, the theorists are finally coming around... they got the nearly
frictionless part in, now all that's left is to add some 'pressure', and
Mark,
This is essentially why Don Hotson calls the Dirac “sea” the “BEC” instead of
the epo field these days.
… as in the “original BEC” which is of course a dense superfluid…
From: MarkI-Zeropoint
Some of the ol' time Vorts will remember how I've been ranting for years on how
Jones--
What's an epo field? The same as the Dirac sea? What do the letter stand for?
Bob
- Original Message -
From: Jones Beene
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 4:05 PM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:They're finally catching up!
Mark,
This is
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Bob Cook frobertc...@hotmail.com wrote:
Jones--
What's an epo field? The same as the Dirac sea? What do the letter stand
for?
http://archive.today/SGMFP
Hotson’s essays move around. Most of my old links are dead.
Here is one site (which misspelled his name)
http://issuu.com/scottjenson/docs/d._l._hoston_-_dirac_s_equation_and/1
From: Bob Cook
What's an epo field? The same as the Dirac sea? What do the letter stand for?
Mark--
I am about 2/3 through the paper you identified on the transmission of a
teraherz electric
field wave form through Ni and Co particles in a static magnetic field. It
is well written and even I can understand it.
One question that kept going through my mind. Does the oscillating
14 matches
Mail list logo
