basically it is plasma in electrolytic cell, with H2O split by
electrolysis, then H2 split by high current creating a plasma, and
recombinating befause of high temperature.
the question is whether the LENR reaction add some energy to the electric
energy provided...
it seems easy to make, but the
yes (my quick answer was dond on my address, not on the vortex reflecto),
it is an old news... just some recent void answer ...
what is fascinating is the double standard in pinpointing details, beside
not understanding the problem of magnitude.
it is typical pseudo-science, conspiracy theory,
From Eric:
The intensity of the emitted light sounds dangerous to me. Consider that
a fresnel lense can easily be used to start a fire with one sun (in contrast
to 10,000 suns). If the number is accurate, there may be military
applications.
See Blacklight’s June 25, 2014 Second
A new video of the SHT hydrogen generator in action.
Scroll Down
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Free_Energy_Blog:2014:07:28#SHT_provides_video_of_hydrogen_production_during_TRC_3rd-party_test
And to think all that from a BBQ grill...
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Steve High diamondweb...@gmail.com wrote:
A new video of the SHT hydrogen generator in action.
Scroll Down
From: Orionworks - Steven Vincent Johnson
a Fresnel lens can easily be used to start a fire with one sun (in contrast
to 10,000 suns). If the number is accurate, there may be military
applications. See Blacklight’s June 25, 2014 Second Public Demonstration -
http://vimeo.com/99500674
See:
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2014-07/31/nasa-validates-impossible-space-drive
Eric
The Ni/H reactor produces prodigious amounts of RF. This level of
production could even be increased by adding NMR active materials to the
structure of the reactor. This current disadvantage in Ni/H technology
might well be turned into an important feature. The Ni/H reaction could
provide a direct
Okay, so can we get them to test the emDrive now?
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
See:
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2014-07/31/nasa-validates-impossible-space-drive
Eric
Of course microwave RF energy is a form of electrical power.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Thu, Jul 31, 2014 3:46 pm
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Wired: Nasa validates 'impossible' space drive
The Ni/H reactor produces
I have a hangup about the conservation of momentum that makes me skeptical of
this device. My guess is that the thrust will be shown to be an error once
everything is taken into account. The power to generate the large amount of RF
must enter the device from somewhere and that is likely the
Dave, according to teh article they separated the power source and drive to
make sure that wasnt teh case.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 2:45 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
I have a hangup about the conservation of momentum that makes me skeptical
of this device. My guess is that
Axil,
Is there any data to backup your prodigious RF statement of fact?
Spectrum analyzer etc.
Ron
--On Thursday, July 31, 2014 3:45 PM -0400 Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com
wrote:
The Ni/H reactor produces prodigious amounts of RF. This level of
production could even be increased by adding
In reply to James Bowery's message of Tue, 29 Jul 2014 22:10:04 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Perhaps I should restate the 2 miracles along a slightly different axis:
1) If one adopts Storms's viewpoint, there is no scientific revolution --
merely a different interpretation of accepted theory. So the
this is the 3rd test, done with different metrology, and with many cross
checking documented on EmDrive (like changing turn...)
as Ed Storms says in his books, when a phenomenon survive to the change of
the measurement setup(shawyer, chinese, nasa), and is similar in different
setup(emdirve,
There is an intriguing cross-connection between two other controversial
lines of anti-gravity experiment: Eugene Podkletnov (mentioned in the Wired
article) and Claude Poher (not mentioned). Here is a review of Poher’s
superconductor.
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1101/1101.2419.pdf
NASA has
Jones
I suspect possess the same affliction that I suffer from: OAIS *
* OverActive Imagination Syndrome.
It has its advantages and disadvantages.
You have my sympathies. ;-)
Regards,
Steven Vincent Johnson
svjart.orionworks.com
zazzle.com/orionworks
At 01:16 PM 7/31/2014, you wrote:
Okay, so can we get them to test the emDrive now?
They tested the Cannae version (as reported by Wired) -- 40
micronewton at 28W , but ALSO a tapered version, which is an
emDrive -- 91 micronewton at 17W.
See page 1 of the Nasa paper
The Eugene Podkletnov anti gravity theory is based on rotating magnetic
fields. The connection might be that RF is produced by rotating electrons.
The microwave vibrations will induce spin rotation in the matter that fills
space and that might include the spins of virtual particles emerging from
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 5:25 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to James Bowery's message of Tue, 29 Jul 2014 22:10:04 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
Perhaps I should restate the 2 miracles along a slightly different axis:
1) If one adopts Storms's viewpoint, there is no scientific revolution --
Well, since we're talking about NASA impossible space drives...
Excerpt of heavily encrypted PDF file
Proposal by Quantum Potential Corporation in response to 2011 NASA
http://www.quantum-potential.com/ACT%20NASA.pdf
NASA, U.S. Navy and U.S. Air Force have commissioned a number of
interesting
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 6:05 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
I just wanted to help those uninformed posters to understand LENR, and I
was banned from the Quora forum.
***No good deed ever goes unpunished.
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
NASA has reportedly confirmed an effect of reactionless acceleration with
Poher’s device ...
I have to hand it to groups at NASA for being relatively independent of the
opinion of the physics mainstream. Apparently there
Whithout any technical knowledge I agree with you Eric. I wonder how they
could keep the good spirit in this big organization
once Lwerner Brown and Na8sa was the same, was that how much he colored the
culture as he was certaily a contrarian.
On Jul 31, 2014 8:31 PM, Eric Walker
In reply to James Bowery's message of Thu, 31 Jul 2014 20:07:18 -0500:
Hi,
[snip]
No of course a Newton, Maxwell, etc comes along once a century or so.
That's not what I'm talking about. Its more like someone accidentally
discovers steam power but can't really reproduce it because Newton's laws
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 7:32 AM, Steve High diamondweb...@gmail.com wrote:
http://peswiki.com/index.php/Free_Energy_Blog:2014:07:28#SHT_provides_video_of_hydrogen_production_during_TRC_3rd-party_test
Note that the nuclear binding energy of oxygen is ~ 7.7 MeV (the amount you
would need to
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 11:22 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
It's actually the other way around. Mills came up with the theory first,
then
started looking for ways to realize practical benefits from it.
Ah! Then that is a start on an answer to my request for a chronology
stated in my prior
27 matches
Mail list logo
