I just found that paper cited on a facebook group...
http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/79979
I've made a tiny article on that...
http://www.lenr-forum.com/forum/news/index.php/News/7-Papre-Energy-in-Germany-A-critical-review-of-current-issues-and-analysis-of-futu/
I don't expect high
http://blogs.nature.com/news/2014/09/stap-co-author-offers-yet-another-recipe-for-stem-cells.html?WT.mc_id=TWT_NatureNews
the usual story of vexed replicator who insult the discoverer because they
cannot imagine they are unlucky, incompetent or ignored some key details...
I am surprised they did not mention Purratio AG - which is the one of the few
German companies to be pushing forward with LENR
http://www.purratio.ag/PurratioAG%20eng/html/news.html
Does anyone have information on them?
From: alain.coetm...@gmail.com
I just found that paper
Jed, I think it hangs together with money or perhaps better greed.
Many people in this group can see the big light in the end of the tunnel
and I think it looks like $ Billion $.
Then envy and greed makes for salty and sometimes downright insulting
comments.
I think it is a pity. As a group we
Dear Friends,
My blog publication for today is;
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/09/what-if-lenr-gets-big-money-internet-is.html
Please take it very seriously.
Peter
--
Dr. Peter Gluck
Cluj, Romania
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
Thanks Jones,
You are indeed correct they meant it only produces the hydrogen 30x faster,
not using less energy.
But after some further research, I have come to believe this breakthrough
does have implications which will change the world eventually.
1. The increased yield is nice but it isn't
Research (published in the peer reviewed journals Physical Review E and
Foundations of Physics) mentioned on the MFMP site argues that the second
law of thermodynamics is not a law but only a rule of thumb.
The authors have set up an open source organisation to develop the
_epicatalysis_ phenomena which they believe is producing the heat.
http://jointheparadigm.com/what-is-epicatalysis/
Harry
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 2:47 PM, H Veeder hveeder...@gmail.com wrote:
Research (published in the peer
Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com wrote:
Then envy and greed makes for salty and sometimes downright insulting
comments.
I think it is a pity. As a group we could accomplish a lot.
Share and you will receive.
That is what patents are for. With a patent you share and yet your greed is
YES!
Thanks for posting this, Harry. Epicatalysis is a good name for a more general
phenomenon which can replace the idea that LENR must involve fusion.
This does not mean that there cannot be some forms of LENR which do involve
fusion, but it opens the door for another branch of LENR
This result seems reasonable since a hot black body can emit IR radiation from
its surface. This process is in effect changing internal thermal heat energy
into radiation energy which can be harnessed to perform work.
I have long pondered this apparent loophole.
Dave
-Original
In reply to Axil Axil's message of Sat, 13 Sep 2014 01:29:48 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
Fusion is a two step process. The first step is the tunneling of the one or
more He2 nuclei into the as yet to be realized resultant nucleus. This
process may occur as a superposition of many separate nuclear
events
Yes, you are correct Jed. Although, it is still a silly attitude as the
ability to reach the goal is diminished - 25 years and counting.
The other side of it is that it is my experience that patents are worth
very little if you do not have deep pockets to defend it with.
Best Regards ,
Lennart
In the earlier Sheehan paper abstract, I was struck by the fact that this
would be possible to achieve perpetual motion, if one could find an almost
perfect mirror reflector of IR (gold works well to 1.5 microns). Does anyone
have the full paper?
Funny thing - they mention a Crookes radiometer
The COP measure by itself is inadequate for evaluating the productivity of
such systems. Carnot efficiency (which will exceed 100%) should be included
in the measure somehow.
harry
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
YES!
Thanks for posting this, Harry.
I do not have a problem with low apparent COP at this early stage.
BTW – we should step back and relook at the Cravens NI-Week demo in the context
of Epicatalysis, and as an example of something similar but more robust than
Sheehan. Cravens was getting much higher COP, at modest temps. There
While we are on the subject of Second Law violators - Ken Rauen published an
interesting article in Infinite Energy magazine which discusses the history of
the Second Law and some known exceptions and comes to the final conclusion that
what has been known about the behavior of heat and entropy,
My son (doing a theoretical physics PhD) tends to quote Pirates of the
Caribbean on this and say that it is not so much a rule as more what
you'd call guidelines
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6kgS_AwuH0
Nigel
On 13/09/2014 19:47, H Veeder wrote:
Research (published in the peer reviewed
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com
wrote:
*Thinking Big Is The Easy Part: My Weekend Dreaming Up The Next XPrize*
http://www.fastcoexist.com/3030775/thinking-big-is-the-easy-part-my-weekend-dreaming-up-the-next-
xprize
On E-Cat World there is a post about
Interesting how similar the description is to the Casimir effect.
20 matches
Mail list logo
