Re: [Vo]:Sleeper from ICCF20

2017-03-19 Thread H LV
Hi Robin and Eric, If the evidence about transmutation at the Indian refinery is reliable then one way to explain it is to imagine nuclear forces as being fundamentally non-conservative and viewing their apparent conservative nature as an accurate approximation in the high energy domain. Another

Re: [Vo]:Sleeper from ICCF20

2017-03-19 Thread Eric Walker
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 11:46 AM, H LV wrote: ​CoE would still be true, but there would be no mass into energy > conversion. Instead the iron would be slightly more massive than iron > produced by stellar fusion.​ > This suggestion has the benefit of being falsifiable. If

Re: [Vo]:Sleeper from ICCF20

2017-03-19 Thread H LV
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 12:35 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > Hi Harry, > > On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 11:09 AM, H LV wrote: > > If the evidence about transmutation at the Indian refinery is reliable >> then one way to explain it is to imagine nuclear forces

Re: [Vo]:Sleeper from ICCF20

2017-03-19 Thread Eric Walker
Hi Harry, On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 11:09 AM, H LV wrote: If the evidence about transmutation at the Indian refinery is reliable then > one way to explain it is to imagine nuclear forces as being fundamentally > non-conservative and viewing their apparent conservative nature

Re: [Vo]:Sleeper from ICCF20

2017-03-19 Thread H LV
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 9:11 AM, H LV wrote: > > ​What is the "bond" energy of a nut and bolt? Does the amount of energy >> that is required to literally slam together a bolt and a nut correspond

Re: [Vo]:Sleeper from ICCF20

2017-03-19 Thread Frank Znidarsic
Magnetic fields are not conservative. This includes the gravitomagnetic, electro-magnetic, and nuclear spin orbit magnetic. You are on the right track. Another type of non-conservative force is a time dependent force which is exhibited by visco-elastic materials. This another and perhaps

[Vo]:Book about scientific misconduct

2017-03-19 Thread Jed Rothwell
https://www.amazon.com/Hidden-Data-Blind-Eye-Science-ebook/dp/B01JKM1DWW/ref=sr_1_1 Hidden Data: The Blind Eye of Science BLURB: "A story of scientific misconduct told by a Professor of Radiology at the New Jersey Medical School in Newark, NJ, who witnessed it and then tried to get the

[Vo]:LENR- idealization of "independent"

2017-03-19 Thread Peter Gluck
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/03/mar-19-2017-lenr-intentional-idalistic.html peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com

Re: [Vo]:Sleeper from ICCF20

2017-03-19 Thread mixent
In reply to H LV's message of Sun, 19 Mar 2017 12:35:21 -0400: Hi Harry, In a fission reactor, the neutrons are normally slowed down to thermal temperatures before they react. This increases the reaction cross section, and allows the reactor to work. AFAIK the energy produced is as expected from

Re: [Vo]:Sleeper from ICCF20

2017-03-19 Thread H LV
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 5:13 PM, wrote: > In reply to H LV's message of Sun, 19 Mar 2017 12:35:21 -0400: > Hi Harry, > > In a fission reactor, the neutrons are normally slowed down to thermal > temperatures before they react. This increases the reaction cross section, > and

[Vo]:unsubscribe

2017-03-19 Thread Robert Lynn

Re: [Vo]:Sleeper from ICCF20

2017-03-19 Thread mixent
In reply to Frank Znidarsic's message of Sun, 19 Mar 2017 14:00:30 -0400: Hi Frank, [snip] >Magnetic fields are not conservative. This includes the gravitomagnetic, >electro-magnetic, and nuclear spin orbit magnetic. You are on the right track. If magnetic fields are not conservative, then

[Vo]:Fw: [teslafy] Reconstitution of Relativity

2017-03-19 Thread Harvey Norris
 Pioneering the Applications of Interphasal Resonances http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/teslafy/ On Sunday, March 19, 2017 7:29 PM, "Harvey Norris harv...@yahoo.com [teslafy]" wrote:    Relativity Reconsidered; Summaries of past submissions and engaging

[Vo]:Re: [usa-tesla] Fw: [teslafy] Reconstitution of Relativity

2017-03-19 Thread ROGER ANDERTON
relativity believers are making numerous mistakes such as math mistake highlighted at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXLtoJ0DKoQ While big conceptual mistake by mainstream physicists is to mostly forget that unified field theory published in 1758 by Boscovich; as used by Tesla et al

Re: [Vo]:Sleeper from ICCF20

2017-03-19 Thread Eric Walker
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 8:56 PM, H LV wrote: You mentioned "not-iron" before but can you clarify what you mean by this > term? Thanks. > This is just a placeholder for whatever is converted to iron, e.g., 28Si + 28Si, since Narayanaswamy reports there being something

Re: [Vo]:12 years from now

2017-03-19 Thread Terry Blanton
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 5:07 PM, Jones Beene wrote: But I would love to have an intelligent personal assistant so long as it was more like Samantha and less like HAL. Personally, I agree but it's because I find it very difficult to separate Sam's voice from Scarlett's

Re: [Vo]:unsubscribe

2017-03-19 Thread Terry Blanton
send it to vortex-l-requ...@eskimo.com Virus-free. www.avast.com

Re: [Vo]:12 years from now

2017-03-19 Thread Jones Beene
Terry Blanton wrote: Jones Beenewrote: But I would love to have an intelligent personal assistant so long as it was more like Samantha and less like HAL. Personally, I agree but it's because I find it very difficult to separate Sam's voice from Scarlett's body. Besides, HAL (like IBM)

Re: [Vo]:Sleeper from ICCF20

2017-03-19 Thread H LV
On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 1:27 PM, Eric Walker wrote: > On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 11:46 AM, H LV wrote: > > ​CoE would still be true, but there would be no mass into energy >> conversion. Instead the iron would be slightly more massive than iron >>