On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 12:35 PM, Eric Walker <eric.wal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Harry, > > On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 11:09 AM, H LV <hveeder...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If the evidence about transmutation at the Indian refinery is reliable >> then one way to explain it is to imagine nuclear forces as being >> fundamentally non-conservative and viewing their apparent conservative >> nature as an accurate approximation in the high energy domain. >> >> Another type of non-conservative force is a time dependent force which is >> exhibited by visco-elastic materials. This another and perhaps easier way >> to conceptually introduce non-conservative forces into the nuclear domain. >> > > I gather with this suggestion that you are arguing against CoE in the case > of the Coimbatore smelting facility, i.e., that many nuclear bombs' worth > of energy disappeared into thin air every 24 hours. Please correct me if I > have misunderstood. > > Eric > > CoE would still be true, but there would be no mass into energy conversion. Instead the iron would be slightly more massive than iron produced by stellar fusion. Harry
